与「IBelieve」相关的搜索结果

Britney's response is very interesting. She completely dodges the fact that she was hunting the boss, and dresses it up as "helping young pros grow." What a joke. She always twists facts by taking people’s words out of context, exactly like what she did to C. Ye and she only shared snippets of the conversation to make herself look good. Ask herself: with Britney's actual poker skill, how does someone survive in the poker world for over a decade? (Yes she was already setting up these hunting games in Shanghai ten years ago, yet in the US she claims she had never played poker before. She is extremely good at lying and inventing facts. She burned her bridge in Shanghai but she built her rich Chinese image here thanks to Ryan Feldman) Be careful to play with her. @RyanGarcia @neymarjr I want to say sorry to Alan, because he didn't want his name brought up. But for the sake of the truth of this story, I had no choice but to name several people , including @lsghank1 , @yuchao and Jimmy. Alan's video and Hank's statement together prove the following: 1. On Day 1, Britney staked 40%+ of every player at the table. So counting Britney herself, Day 1 was effectively 7v1 against Peter. That's a textbook pig-butchering setup not "supporting young pros." On Day 2, she cut Hank's and Jimmy's pieces, so it became 5v1v1v1. LMAO. I believe those pros wouldn't collude at the table, but I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions. 2. Hank did take chips off the table, but he did NOT steal them. The only reason I used the word "steal" in my original post is that Britney herself has been telling everyone ever since that Hank is a chip thief, her good friend Jeff can confirm this too. After Britney and Hank fell out over other matters, she started smearing and defaming him nonstop, which is why so many people in the high-stakes community have misunderstood him. 3. I never said Britney owed Alan money. I said she paid in the end. From Alan's perspective, he did get the money within a day (24h) of finishing the CCTV review , so from where he sat, Britney paid quickly. What he doesn't know is how hard that process actually was. According to L, Alan's limited Chinese and his Western mindset meant he wasn't involved in the final step of collecting the money, so he never saw how difficult it was. In the end, Britney owed the pros on L's side roughly $200K, and she initially planned to walk away from it. The host at the time, and another Chinese pro (the one who investigated together with Alan), can both confirm this. She only paid because the other host threatened to call the police and to tell Peter everything. In fact, she had already booked a flight for the next day and was ready to run , Hank's statement confirms this too. #poker# #hustlercasinolive#

There are 217 @WNBA players in the league and now I’m speaking directly to all of you. I’m astonished. You play in a league and have a commissioner who cannot and will not define your gender and is embarrassing you in front of the entire world. Yet none of you have the BALLS to stand up for yourselves and say, “Enough is enough.” And that’s the whole point. None of you have balls, and it needs to stay that way. I guess biology is still pending committee approval. They’re trying to figure out how to define a woman in a way that fits their nonsense agenda. Deep down, I believe you don’t want a biological male entering your league and taking your minutes, your money, your endorsements, and your dignity. Are you all really that afraid of cancel culture that you would rather sacrifice your morals, values, and principles for money? If the #NBA# commissioner came out tomorrow and said, “We cannot define what a man is,” there would be outrage and a protest among the players the next day. Open your eyes. #WNBA# I’m not the enemy here. The real threat to women’s sports is not the one asking the question. It’s the silence of the women who refuse to answer it.

Many have asked me to give my 2 cents on the (newest) HCL controversy. Probably a bad idea, so I’ll do it anyway: I don’t know C Ye or Britney or any of the “newer” HCL regs. And I have no insider info on this dispute. But I do know a lil’ somethin’ somethin’ about Nik Airball and Ryan Feldman. In my opinion, this is all par for the course for them: I believe they will do and say whatever they need to protect their financial interests. If you haven’t read Beneath the Cards, I break it all down there. As I see it, Airball has long been committed to doing whatever it took to become a mainstay on HCL. Give him credit: mission accomplished. And I think Ryan did and said numerous things in an attempt to destroy my reputation the moment I publicly stated that something shady went down on his show. Four years and a bestselling book later, mission definitely not accomplished. Here’s the takeaway, as is sadly too often the case in the pokersphere: Follow the money. It will so often explain the why behind the actions of the less-savory characters in our industry. In short, if Britney is good for the game, I suspect Ryan and Airball will go to great lengths to protect her.

Folks less familiar with Aave often ask me how I think about Aave’s potential markets. I like to measure them through addressable collateral. The bigger the universe of assets that can be used as collateral, the bigger the lending opportunity. We started with crypto, expanded into securities through Coinbase Tokenized Stocks and Horizon RWAs, and will eventually help accelerate the world’s transition toward abundance: solar, batteries, GPUs, robotics, and space infrastructure. I believe this transformation will continue through 2050. Aave’s goal is to accelerate it by a decade by funding the assets that power abundance. Stay ambitious.

patterns in the ai startups that blow up if you advise enough companies, take enough founder calls, watch enough launches, you start to see repeating structures here’s the blueprint all of them share: 1. a relentless launch cadence they never shut up one of my clients launched every wednesday higgsfield launches 2-3x/wk always manufacturing something to talk about 2. one channel = unfair advantage they’re active everywhere but one channel carries them 3. a founder who’s the face the founder is the loudest account in the company weekly podcasts. vlogs. clip & ugc farms people know the product bc they know the founder 4. volume over perfection they never post and chill out they tell the same story 100 times for every post that does 10k views, another does 10m 5. no fear of price the loudest ai companies don’t negotiate they spray higgsfield is a perfect example of crazy budgets 6. a second motion once plg breaks elevenlabs is around $500m arr i believe the first $300m came from plg the rest came from enterprise, now 50/50 ish 7. omnipresence over roi on most channels they stop asking about direct roi they ask how the whole entire planet hears abt them scroll anywhere & they’re there they think blended CAC growth at the highest level isn’t random it’s a pattern repeated by everyone with skin in the game once you see it. you can’t unsee it.

JUST IN: 🇨🇳 China political advisory body CPPCC member announces he "believes Bitcoin" can attract lots of wealth and innovators to Hong Kong 👀 "I believe that Bitcoin is one of the really good synergies...to attract more funds in our domains."

My investigation on the GTA 6 Leaker is done and I have emailed all the evidence to TAKE2 and Rockstar Games legal team As much as I wanted and loved to actually reveal who we are dealing with here, full identity and all, I believe that would be doxxing. Since the way I got to this guy was through a mix of OSINT and some people familiar with the matter via TG, I don’t want anyone to get into trouble, so for now I’ll leave out personal details and how I obtained the information One of the stronger findings links to what appears to be this guy’s personal bank account, the bank is located in Europe. It’s obviously not out of the question that the bank account in question might be stolen, but given the circumstances and some other correlations I saw, I believe we have him Going forward, I’ll refer to him as Leeker With the data I have provided to T2, I believe it will make their job easier when cooperating with law enforcement and help pin down the people involved (it’s not just one). Given the nature of the data I found, revealing it publicly could give the guys time to cover their tracks or alter evidence But I don’t want to leave people hanging so I’ll share some stuff below and answer as much as I can in the comments without it being damaging Stuff I have learned that can be shared: -> The leeker is actually a threat actor who has previous malicious activity under a different alias It also seems that there is genuine hatred toward this guy from the people around him. Much of my current information comes from his peers snitching after my first post -> This leak was apparently due to a breach or an insider. Nature of how is still unknown to me, But I’ve received two different stories about this so I'll share them anyway: 1. One story I got is that leeker bought a backdoor access or some sort from someone 2. Another person told me this is somewhat related to some incident inside Rockstar a while ago Keep in mind it’s pretty common for these crypto bros to boast and lie about their “gains” to each other, so I honestly don’t know which to believe here -> Not related at all to the ‘Mafia 808’ group -> I haven’t heard anything about Rockstar India being hacked unlike some other people are claiming -> This build we are seeing here is apparently from a year ago (as confirmed in ResetEra forums), but the theft I believe happened in April 2026 and the leeker has been preparing since then -> From what I can tell, and as I explained in one of the earlier posts, I don’t think they possess a live build. Most likely pre-recorded footage, but this is just my assumption The voting thing they did initially was to make people want to get the coin so the market cap can grow I highly recommend staying away from the coin. This is a literal pump and dump, don't buy into their "Fighting for gamers" bullshit. I won’t be surprised if they at some point start threatening to leak the story unless people donate to them in the poll. Even if that happens, don’t do it That’s all I can responsibly share right now. Questions that don’t risk the investigation or the people involved are welcome in the replies

At midnight on February 6th, earlier this year, the doorbell to our apartment rang. The doorbell was followed by a pounding on the door. I answered the door and a security person in our building handed me his phone. It was my oldest daughter Eloise. She had found my 26-year-old daughter unconscious on the floor of her apartment and had called 911. The EMT team was already there, but they did not know what was wrong with Lucy or to which hospital they would take her. I threw on some clothes and jumped in an Uber heading east toward Brooklyn. (Lucy lived alone in Williamsburg.) On the way, I learned that they were taking her to Elmhurst, a City trauma hospital in Queens. I arrived about five minutes after the ambulance to join Eloise, Lucy’s mom, and a friend, and waited to learn what was wrong. After about 15 minutes, I asked a nurse where she was. I looked over his shoulder to his computer. Next to her name, it said “non-responsive.” I walked into the emergency room and wandered around looking for her until I found her unconscious on a gurney surrounded by several doctors and nurses. By about 2:30am with the results from a CAT scan, Lucy’s doctors had determined that she had a massive brain hemorrhage and would need an emergency hemicraniectomy to release the pressure on her brain and remove the blood from the hemorrhage. I called our wonderful friend and family doctor Eddie Fisher and explained what was going on. He woke up Josh Bederson, Chairman of Neurosurgery at Mount Sinai, to find out more about Zach Hickman, the neurosurgeon on call that night. Dr. Bederson said Hickman was an excellent surgeon, which was comforting as we had no choice. The surgery to save Lucy’s life began around 3:15am and finished around 5:30am. It was successful. The following day, I joined Lucy in an ambulance while she was being transferred to Mount Sinai on Madison Avenue. Later that day, we determined from Lucy’s Oura ring that her hemorrhage had occurred around 9am, which meant that more than 19 hours had passed from the time of the hemorrhage to the completion of the surgery to release the pressure on her brain (I only wish @ouraring had an alert for this kind of a medical event. Imagine it could call a family member if the wearer doesn’t cancel the alert). I later learned that the standard of care is not to do surgery to save a patient with a large brain bleed if more than five hours have passed since the hemorrhage. Even when the surgery is done, I was told that the likely outcome for the patient is a few months in a nursing home and death from pneumonia. When I met Lucy’s doctors, I did my best to inspire them: “Let’s see what can be accomplished if we give her the best care possible and we invest unlimited resources to restore her to life.” And I promised that whatever we learned we would make available to everyone. Dr. Chris Kellner, her neurosurgeon, and Dr. David Putrino, Director of Rehabilitation Innovation for the Mount Sinai Health System have led Lucy’s care team since that day. Words cannot describe the remarkable and compassionate care that she has received beginning with the EMT team and then from nurses, doctors, therapists, and the army of people who have worked to save her and return her to life. To this day, we have a daily Zoom where we discuss her progress and make adjustments to her care. While her care and oversight have been incredible, the learnings for the Mount Sinai team have also been elucidating and will assist in the care of many others. Lucy began in a bad place. She was in a coma for several weeks and then awoke not being able to breathe on her own, unable to walk, see or speak. Over the last six months, she has recovered her cognition – she understands everything including her circumstance – is able to walk a hundred or more steps at a time with assistance, is making progress with sounds, vowels and consonants and the beginnings of speech, but she remains unable to see. Each day, she makes a little progress, and daily progress compounds. Every day I tell her that she just needs to make a little progress and it won’t be long before she is back. We remain optimistic that Lucy will return to normal function. It will likely take years, but I believe it is only a matter of time, hard work, and technological progress, along with some, and perhaps a lot, of divine intervention. Many people have been praying for Lucy and we are incredibly grateful for the prayers and remarkable support she has received. Lucy’s friends have been with her every day since the beginning, and their presence and friendship have saved her life and helped to rebuild and maintain her spirit. And on a very positive note, Lucy’s challenge has brought together our entire modern family who have all been incredibly devoted to her care and recovery. Lucy's vision and other faculties may require some form of brain computer interface, work that is underway at Neuralink, Precision Neuroscience, Science, Synchron, Nudge, and other companies in the space. If you are going to have a devastating brain injury, now is the best time in history for that to happen. We are living in a world when you can be confident that the blind will soon see again. We are going to do everything we can to help make that happen, including by assisting existing companies in the space. With respect to our promise to make Lucy’s care available to others, we have made good progress. In May, a real estate colleague made me aware of a 93% vacant, brand new, 400,000 square foot Class A+ purpose-built biotech facility on West End Avenue between 65th and 66th Streets that missed the market and was available for sale. The Pershing Square Foundation acquired the building 60 days later. We also put under contract an adjoining 130,000 square foot building at 320 West 66th Street that is currently being used by Saturday Night Live for studio space. The building has 35-foot ceilings with massive column-free spaces that can be converted into superb rehabilitation facilities. We will close on the SNL building in December. We are also acquiring an adjoining vacant lot with additional air rights. With just the existing zoning rights, we can add a 150,000 square feet for a total of 680,000 square feet, a lab footprint larger than Rockefeller University, and that’s without including the potential for an upzoning that would allow for substantially more buildable area on the site’s 3.4 acres with spectacular views of the Hudson. Our goal is to build the world’s greatest brain research, rehabilitation, recovery, human optimization, and longevity institute. We have named it The Ackman Oxman Institute or the AOI for lack of a better name, but also to reinforce the point that Neri and I and our family are all-in on the mission. The AOI will be patient-centric. It will not be an academic research institute that produces lots of papers, a Nobel Prize winner or two, but little if any results for patients. We will be laser-focused on cures, treatments, devices, rehabilitation and exercise equipment, and targeted and basic research with a goal of massively accelerating the time from idea to innovation to production to helping a patient. While the AOI will be a non-profit, it will have highly commercial instincts. The AOI will have its own venture funding and will work to develop innovations to create companies that we will seed, assist, and spinout to ensure technologies, treatments, techniques, and drugs get to patients as promptly as possible. On one 3.4 acre campus in what is still the greatest city in the world, we will do neurosurgery, neuroscience, rehabilitation, nutrition, BCI and device development, human trials, hyperbaric oxygen treatments, and life extension programs, and we will mandate and incentivize collaboration among the teams with no silos, politics, bureaucracy, or any other constraint that is inconsistent with the mission. Mount Sinai will be an important partner and deservedly so, but it won’t be our only hospital or medical school partner as we don’t believe any institution has a monopoly on the best ideas or the best talent. We don’t believe in exclusive relationships because that is not in the best interest of patients. Five years ago, we considered launching a brain institute inspired by Neri’s mom who sadly died from Alzheimer’s. We couldn’t make the math work as the real estate was too expensive and we believed it would be too difficult to recruit the best talent from universities to our effort. Since then, the real estate became available at a 70% discount, universities became a much less attractive place to work due to politics outweighing meritocracy, protests that disrupt learning, the curse of antisemitism, and a decline in funding. Fortunately, during the same time, I made sufficient personal economic progress to make the AOI possible. The advance of AI in the last few years will also enable us to greatly accelerate our mission. AI still has a lot to learn about human intelligence and the brain, and the AOI should be at the forefront of the interplay between the brain and AI. Today, I am making a public filing disclosing a gift from Neri and me of ~$400 million or 10,000,000 shares of Pershing Square Inc. (PS) to the AOI. It is very early days for Pershing Square so these shares are intended to anchor the long-term work of the AOI as the shares compound over time while generating what we expect will be a growing stream of quarterly dividends to fund the Institute. We will also be announcing an additional gift of similar and potentially greater size which won’t be in the form of Pershing Square stock to provide the AOI with the short- and intermediate-term runway necessary to enable it to achieve its goal of becoming a self-sustaining institute, which reinvests all of its revenues, royalties, and the economic rewards of company formation to advance the fields of brain health and human longevity. Neri and I have chosen to anchor the funding of the AOI to maintain vision alignment and limit the need for the organization to focus on fundraising. We expect the AOI to be the best-resourced brain, rehab, recovery, and longevity institute in the world. We are grateful to have been able to form a board which includes Dean Kamen (our generation’s Thomas Edison), George Yancopoulus (CEO of Regeneron), James Rothman (Nobel Laureate), Bernardo Sabatini (neuroscientist), Chris Kellner (neurosurgeon), Olivia Flatto (CEO Pershing Square Foundation), Neri Oxman, and myself. We have recently identified a CEO who we expect to announce by October along with other key hires, and are beginning searches for a Chief Scientific Officer, a Chief AI/Technology Officer, a Chief Operating Officer, a Chief Financial Officer, and other key leadership roles. If you find what we are building compelling and want to be part of the leadership team that creates and builds the AOI from a standing start, please send an email to: search@aoiinst.org with a short note as to why you believe you can help. Please include your best three ideas for the AOI along with a summary of your background and your most important accomplishments. We promise strict confidentiality to those expressing interest in working with us. We have learned from Lucy that the brain can recover from even catastrophic injury. There is so much more work to be done as the mind is a terrible thing to waste. For details from my Pershing Square SEC filing see:

Sholto, thank you for setting the record straight. Larger issue is that multiple very serious people in Silicon Valley have heard some variation of this and believe it to be true. And the reason it is believable to so many is that it is consistent with Dario’s public messaging and what he outlined in the essay you shared: this technology *might* be dangerous for humans in multiple ways, could lead to extreme concentration of economic power (as outlined in the essay) and therefore needs to be regulated thoughtfully. I agree with the potential risks and I believe Dario makes all of these arguments in good faith. 
As discussed on the pod, if one agrees that AI *might* be dangerous, there are two ways to address this potential risk. Either concentrate it in the hands of a chosen few companies and politicians via regulation or distribute it widely. Essentially boils down to whether one believes AI is too dangerous to concentrate or too dangerous to distribute. There are reasonable arguments on both sides, but I profoundly agree with Zuckerberg’s statement that: “The notion that AI is so dangerous that the only safe path is an extreme concentration of power seems inherently problematic. Historically, hoping that an absolute power will benevolently provide for humanity if sufficiently enlightened has not led to safe or positive outcomes.” And as Dario says in the aforementioned essay, “some may object that we can simply keep AIs in check with a balance of power between many AI systems, as we do with humans.” I believe this is the best path forward: I want as many AIs as possible to maximize the odds that one shares my own particular values. And as Dario notes, no human has ever been able to take over the world. At this point, I think safe to say that Dario has lost the argument. His messaging has failed to result in his preferred regulatory path. The fact that the only solution to the recent incident where an unreleased advanced OpenAI model hacked Hugging Face was an open-source model likely ended any chance of strict near-term regulation. Essentially every major company other than Anthropic has signed Jensen’s letter. However, Dario’s messaging has been massively helpful to efforts to ban datacenters here in America. I suspect we will see anti-datacenter advocacy groups runnings ads using clips of Dario warning about how dangerous AI could be for humans. His good faith efforts in favor of regulation are now increasing the odds that AI will not be beneficial for Americans and humans everywhere. I believe that there is a reasonable chance AI might help us cure most forms of disease such that we have extended lifespans and can enjoy these long lives in an abundant Star Trek like future. That is the future that I want and I think Dario is decreasing the odds of that future at this point. He is about to be the CEO of one of the most important public companies in the world and given that the pro-regulatory effort has failed (at least for now), I respectfully think he should make an effort to be a more positive advocate for his own industry. And if I am wrong and we do need to regulate this technology, he will be a more effective advocate for this in the future having been open-minded to the alternative. And for the sake of clarity and as I outlined on the pod, I think Anthropic has deep competitive advantages and is an amazing company. Ironically, the main risk I saw to Anthropic a few months ago was nationalization as a result of Dario’s own rhetoric and behavior.