注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「INVOID」相关的搜索结果

INVOID 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 INVOID 的内容
I directed a full AI-assisted series using Invideo Agent One. Here are the 8 things that experience taught me about what actually matters in AI filmmaking.
0
25
132
28
转发到社区
Agencies selling services, not hours, need more than invoices. Wayfront gives you the client portal, order forms, onboarding, billing, and delivery workflows in one place. Free until your first client.
显示更多
0
168
1.3K
145
转发到社区
Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?
显示更多
0
1.8K
22.4K
9.1K
转发到社区
The latest news keeps vindicating my points. While the U.S. is losing ground to China in an expanding range of critical domains, it has built a much more lucrative business model. It now turns to leverage allies' psychological inertia and geopolitical path-dependency to squeeze and extract them like "blood bags". Keeping allies scared and dependent means cornering them into buying overpriced US weapons, US energy, and US technology. Unfortunately for countries like India, they have gone from being courted to being invoiced. What turns out can be very absurd--the U.S. acts like a developing country that demands help from "a developed India". Instead of helping Make in India exports, America is extorting India to buy from it and to invest in it.
显示更多
0
59
1.1K
323
转发到社区
PlayStation Network has a critical security vulnerability that remains unpatched six months after it was first disclosed in December 2025. The flaw allows attackers to take over user accounts using nothing more than a purchase transaction number from any old receipt, invoice, or screenshot. Security journalist Nicolas Lellouche had his own PSN account compromised twice, even though he had 2FA and passkeys enabled. Sony support can transfer account ownership after verifying the transaction ID. A temporary protection flag was applied but has since expired, and no permanent fix has been implemented.
显示更多
0
54
1.2K
152
转发到社区
Now listed on @BNBCHAIN's payments page alongside Binance Pay, Alchemy Pay, AEON and others. AllScale is the only self-custody stablecoin neobank on the list. One stack: checkout, payroll, invoicing, payout, cards with more to come. Funds land in your own wallet.
显示更多
0
456
547
378
转发到社区
@iiVoidzz I thought you weren't complaining o.o
クリスマス衣装⑤※無料あり [クリスマスデート月間] - なな茶畑♡の投稿|ファンティア[Fantia]
0
0
334
11
转发到社区