与「Ledger」相关的搜索结果

Why Tokenization Could Be the Most Important Economic Innovation of Our Lifetime | Bruce Fenton @BruceFenton is a longtime Bitcoin advocate since 2012, securities professional, and one of the early pioneers of tokenized securities. He is the founder and CEO of Chainstone Labs and founder of Atlantic Financial. Alongside Overstock founder @PatrickByrne, Bruce was involved in some of the earliest efforts to bring securities and financial-market infrastructure onto blockchain rails. In 2018, he tokenized equity in his own company, Chainstone Labs, on the Ravencoin blockchain—years before tokenization became one of Wall Street’s biggest narratives. In this episode, Bruce breaks down naked short selling, the plumbing behind traditional securities markets, and why he believes much of the problem is ultimately a ledger problem. We dive into questions such as: Who actually owns the stocks sitting in your brokerage account? How can shares be lent and rehypothecated? What role do brokers, clearing firms, DTCC, and Cede & Co. play in determining who owns what? And could blockchain replace an opaque system of claims and intermediaries with a transparent ledger showing exactly where an asset is and who owns it? We unpack what “tokenized stocks” actually means—and the important distinction between a token that simply gives you exposure to a stock’s price and a security issued natively onchain, where the token itself represents the actual share and the ownership rights that come with it. Bruce discusses how tokenization could allow smaller businesses to tokenize ownership and have their stock traded globally without needing to be listed on a traditional exchange like the NYSE, as well as what a future without KYC could look like. Finally, we get into Wall Street’s embrace of tokenization, the SEC’s evolving approach to tokenized securities, and one of the biggest questions surrounding the future of this technology: who ultimately controls these new financial rails? Remember to subscribe and hit the bell “🔔” icon to get notifications 0:00 Bruce Fenton & Patrick Byrne: Pioneers of Tokenized Securities 3:36 Naked Short Selling Explained 6:28 Who Actually Owns the Stocks in Your Brokerage Account? 12:00 Tokenization Solves Wall Street’s “Ledger Problem” 15:48 What Are You Actually Buying With Robinhood’s Tokenized Stocks? 16:48 Real Tokenized Stocks: When the Token IS the Share 21:46 Tokenization Could Open U.S. Markets to the Entire World 22:52 Why Companies May No Longer Need the NYSE 26:29 Could Tokenized Markets Exist Without KYC? 29:31 Bruce Tokenized Equity on Ravencoin in 2018 30:53 Will Blockchain Make Clearing Houses & DTCC Obsolete? 33:17 Could Tokenization Have Prevented the GameStop Crisis? 38:19 Wall Street Is Embracing Tokenization — Who Gets the Power? 40:20 The SEC’s New Tokenized Securities “Innovation Exemption” 42:57 Why Robinhood’s Tokenized Stocks Don’t Qualify 47:01 Could Everything Eventually Be Tokenized? 51:02 The Dystopian Side of Tokenization: Surveillance & Asset Seizure

重要进展：提现时间将不晚于9月26日04:00（UTC）对外公布，感谢各位用户的耐心等待。 根据最新的链上追踪及交易分类结果，约合3.875亿美元的资产已被转移至多个网络上攻击者控制的地址。 此次数据调整反映的是对事件期间转账情况更完整的核算，新增纳入了此前未计入初步估算范围的 Zcash 及 TRON 链上受影响资产，并不代表出现了新的未经授权转账。该事件持续处于受控状态，不会再发生新的未经授权转账。 此次事件涉及以太坊（Ethereum）及多个 EVM 网络、XRP Ledger、Zcash 及 TRON 上的资产。 截至目前已识别的主要攻击者控制的收款地址如下： →EVM：0x770b10b273fc44fe9197d6bf20f145c2e98463ee →XRP：rwNhefsz1UQEusxhCvHip3RANinWi4CTck →ZEC：t1WgMdtND8NF7NDUuYmq8MpMj1NTCXkMDVG →TRON：TBWNguTTgezw9dVorX441C6nDrZpRxYwKD 已确认受影响的资产包括 XRP、ETH、USDT、ZEC、USDC、USDT0、XAUt、BNB、AVAX 及 TRX。 我们的调查与追踪工作仍在持续进行。上述数据反映的是本文发布时已确认的信息，随着更多交易被分类和追踪，相关数据可能会更新。 该事件持续处于受控状态，自事件得到控制以来未再发生新的未经授权转账，与 Mandiant 及慢雾（SlowMist）的联合调查仍在持续进行。 提现功能仍处于暂时暂停状态，我们正在进行进一步的安全核查与修复工作。 Bitget 将持续通过官方渠道，就调查进展、资产追回、提现恢复以及用户保护基金相关事宜发布经核实的最新信息。 以上内容仅供参考。

𝗜𝗠𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗧 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦: The withdrawal plan will be announced by September 26th, 4:00 AM UTC. We appreciate your patience on this matter. Based on the latest onchain tracing and classification of transactions, assets equivalent to approximately $387.5 million were transferred to attacker-controlled addresses across multiple networks. The revised figure reflects a more complete accounting of transfers that occurred during the incident, adding affected assets on Zcash and TRON that were not included in the initial estimate. It does not reflect further unauthorized transfers. The incident remains contained and no further unauthorized transfers are possible. The incident involved assets across Ethereum and several EVM networks, XRP Ledger, Zcash and TRON. The primary attacker-controlled receiving addresses identified to date are: → EVM: 0x770b10b273fc44fe9197d6bf20f145c2e98463ee → XRP: rwNhefsz1UQEusxhCvHip3RANinWi4CTck → ZEC: t1WgMdtND8NF7NDUuYmq8MpMj1NTCXkMDVG → TRON: TBWNguTTgezw9dVorX441C6nDrZpRxYwKD The confirmed affected assets include XRP, ETH, USDT, ZEC, USDC, USDT0, XAUt, BNB, AVAX and TRX. Our investigation and tracing efforts remain ongoing. The figures above reflect information confirmed at the time of publication and may be updated as additional transactions are classified and traced. The incident remains contained, with no further unauthorized transfers since the incident was contained, and the investigation with Mandiant and SlowMist remains ongoing Withdrawals remain temporarily paused while additional security checks and remediation are underway. Bitget will continue to provide verified updates on the investigation, asset recovery, withdrawal restoration and the User Protection Fund through its official channels. 𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺.

吴说获悉，Ledger 披露 LSB 023 安全漏洞：部分基于 Ledger Secure SDK 构建的应用在用户进行屏幕确认期间仍可能接收新的 APDU 指令，导致屏幕显示的参数与最终签名参数不一致。在攻击者控制设备与主机间 APDU 通信的情况下，用户确认屏幕所示操作后，设备可能对不同参数生成签名。该漏洞源于 Ledger Secure SDK 的输入输出事件处理机制，不涉及设备操作系统或固件，是否受影响取决于应用使用的 SDK 版本及自身状态校验。Ledger 已通过应用级校验和 SDK 层修复该问题，并于 8 月 21 日发布 Ledger Secure SDK v26.6.1，相关应用已重新构建并发布。用户需通过 Ledger Live 更新应用，仅更新设备固件不足以完成修复。Ledger 表示目前没有证据显示该漏洞已被实际利用。

we hacked ledger. the @OneKey_Anzen team has successfully reproduced a transaction replacement attack against ledger ethereum app 1.22.1 in our lab. the bug is a race condition between the transaction display logic and the underlying transaction buffer. an attacker can overwrite the transaction waiting to be signed while the user is still reviewing a legitimate one. in simple terms: - you see transaction a on your ledger. - you approve transaction a. - your ledger can end up signing transaction b. - and you never see transaction b. to reproduce this, we built the 1.22.1 ELF ourselves, fixed the speculos reset 502 issue, and got the full attack flow working end to end. ledger fixed this in ethereum app 1.22.3. if you’re still on an older version, update it.

📂 Useful Crypto Apps (2026 edition) ┃ ┣ 📂 DeFi ┃ ┣ 📁 @aave ┃ ┣ 📁 @MorphoLabs ┃ ┣ 📁 @compoundfinance ┃ ┣ 📁 @LidoFinance ┃ ┣ 📁 @kamino ┃ ┗ 📁 @jito ┃ ┣ 📂 Wallets ┃ ┣ 📁 @MetaMask ┃ ┣ 📁 @phantom ┃ ┣ 📁 @Rabby_io ┃ ┣ 📁 @rainbowdotme ┃ ┣ 📁 @DinhtienSol ┃ ┣ 📁 @TrustWallet ┃ ┗ 📁 @safe (multisig) ┃ ┣ 📂 Hardware Wallets ┃ ┣ 📁 @Ledger ┃ ┗ 📁 @Trezor ┃ ┣ 📂 Stablecoin Yield ┃ ┣ 📁 @pendle_fi ┃ ┣ 📁 @ethena ┃ ┗ 📁 @sparkfinance ┃ ┣ 📂 Onchain Perps ┃ ┣ 📁 @HyperliquidX ┃ ┣ 📁 @Lighter_xyz ┃ ┣ 📁 @Aster_DEX ┃ ┗ 📁 @GMX_IO ┃ ┣ 📂 Swaps & Aggregators ┃ ┣ 📁 @Uniswap ┃ ┣ 📁 @JupiterExchange ┃ ┣ 📁 @1inch ┃ ┗ 📁 @CoWSwap ┃ ┣ 📂 Bridges ┃ ┣ 📁 @AcrossProtocol ┃ ┣ 📁 @StargateFinance ┃ ┣ 📁 @lifiprotocol ┃ ┣ 📁 @RelayProtocol ┃ ┗ 📁 @deBridgeFinance ┃ ┣ 📂 Crypto Cards ┃ ┣ 📁 @ether_fi ┃ ┣ 📁 @MetaMask ┃ ┣ 📁 @gnosispay ┃ ┣ 📁 @RedotPay ┃ ┣ 📁 @cryptocom ┃ ┣ 📁 @Plasma ┃ ┣ 📁 @KASTxyz ┃ ┗ 📁 @holyheld ┃ ┣ 📂 Tokenized Stocks ┃ ┣ 📁 @RobinhoodApp ┃ ┣ 📁 @xStocksFi ┃ ┣ 📁 @Ondo ┃ ┗ 📁 @Gemini ┃ ┗ 📂 Prediction Markets ┣ 📁 @Polymarket ┣ 📁 @Kalshi ┗ 📁 @trylimitless Part 2 👇

又一起，法国一对夫妇家中被暴力袭击并绑架，目标指向其加密资产 法国西南部Landes地区（朗德省）的一对夫妇在家中遭遇暴力袭击。约凌晨4点，一伙犯罪分子闯入他们的住宅，以威胁和施压的方式试图勒索他们持有的大量比特币及其他加密货币资产。 随后，两人被绑架并转移。男受害者最终在约30公里外的Solférino镇被发现，当时全身赤裸，身上有多处割伤。女受害者则在数公里外、另一个省份的一辆汽车内被找到（有报道提到他们曾被关在汽车后备箱中）。 案发后，法国宪兵迅速封锁了相关道路，展开大规模排查。刑事技术人员对现场进行取证后不久，两名男性嫌疑人被逮捕。案件目前由波尔多地区的专门司法机构负责调查，属于法国国家打击有组织犯罪检察院管辖范围。 法国官方指出，自2026年初以来，针对持有大额加密资产人群的线下暴力抢劫、绑架（俗称“crypto-rapts”或“扳手攻击”）案件显著增加，已有数十起类似事件。犯罪分子通常通过数据泄露获取受害者家庭住址，再雇佣执行人员实施犯罪，主谋本身往往不直接参与行动。 这起事件并非孤立，近年来法国已发生多起针对加密货币持有者的绑架和勒索案，包括知名硬件钱包公司Ledger联合创始人及其妻子被绑架等案件。这类犯罪的核心目的是通过暴力直接逼迫受害者转移加密资产，因为加密货币的匿名性和不可逆转性使其成为高价值目标。

LATEST: 🚨 Cybersecurity firm Rapid7 says a crypto phishing campaign dubbed "Operation Asterix" targeted roughly 885,000 phone numbers to steal seed phrases via fake Ledger, Trezor, and Exodus apps.

$BTC 的一波爆拉，确实是出乎很多人意料。 本周，@milkroaddaily 播客请到 @NewsAsset 的嘉宾 Rob 来讨论当前的加密市场行情。 Rob 认为“熊市十月才见底，可能跌到 4 万 5”，但这两天比特币暴涨 10% 冲破 7 万美元，创下 2021 年以来最大规模的空头清算。 虽然短期拉升出乎意料，但节目里这位嘉宾的投资逻辑值得一看： 重点不在预测点位，在于一套越跌越买的纪律和投资风格： 1.用 Into The Crypto Verse 网站上的“风险位”来确定自己的买入倍数 风险位在 0.5 到 0.6 开始买；跌破 0.49，下周买入翻倍；到 0.39，四倍；跌破 0.29，八倍。现在风险位约 0.3，所以这周一买入是上周的四倍。 2.200 周均线附近他历来当作买入区，但不是精确底 2015 年跌破一下，2018 年跌破后所有人喊归零，2020 年疫情跌破，2022 年连 200 周、250 周、300 周均线全破。每次都有人喊“完了”，回头看全是买点。他 2018 年买 3000 美元的比特币，2022 年买 1.5 万到 1.7 万的比特币，现在看都不亏。 3.对 CLARITY Act 和白宫加密会议，他的判断是“摆姿态” 法案被推迟到九月，中期选举年，民主党不会让特朗普拿下一局去胜利巡演。 WFLI 拿到银行牌照，USD1已经是第5大稳定币，但总统力推它是因为对自己公司有利，这条路不会顺。国会靠不住，SEC 和 CFTC 会补缺口，但对整个加密帮助有限。 4.行情牛回，不要忘了分散保管自己的加密资产 Coldcard、Trezor、SafePal 连环暴雷，他连自托管都开始分散。Rob 现在把币分在五处：Ledger、Tangem、iTrust 托管、Coinbase Prime 以及相关ETF里。 5.山寨他只认四条链：BNB、以太坊、Solana、Tron 他管这叫 BEST。依据是 Visa 的链上数据，稳定币流量最大的就是这四条。Tether 超过 60% 的量在 Tron 上。Polygon、XRP、Canton、Hyperliquid 他都看过，但钱有限，不调仓。 整个播客里小编有一句话感同身受： 「我希望它还没见底。」这样我还能在更便宜的位置，多买一点。

THE BNPL VISIBILITY GAP ────────────────── Open four "0% interest" plans across four different apps and none of those four lenders can see the other three. Unlike a credit card, most BNPL installments still don't hit a credit bureau by default - the debt exists, but no single ledger sees the full stack. ────────────────── Aug 13: Klarna rolls out a European membership tier with rewards - the free "pay in 4" app is repositioning itself as something closer to a credit card Nov 20: France starts requiring a full credit check (the same file used for loan defaults) before approving any 0%-interest "4x" plan - regulators writing in the underwriting step BNPL apps never had ────────────────── "0% interest" was never the same promise as "0% risk." It was the one form of consumer debt built to clear the one question a credit card is legally required to ask you first.