注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「Like」相关的搜索结果

Like 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 Like 的内容
BREAKING: 𝕏 has added a new like animation that appears whenever you mention Grok Bot.
0
39
306
20
转发到社区
Tourist by passport, local by payment method. Binance Pay now works at PayPay merchants across Japan - spend crypto like you've lived there your whole life. Discover →
显示更多
0
125
441
89
转发到社区
Life is like a dice, you never know what comes next. New project from #hololive# coming soon... #ShatteredLegends#
0
152
7.7K
1.2K
转发到社区
More evidence. Here's @sashimipoker telling Yara why she was banned, not for anything she did, but simply because Britney doesn't like her. That's the "Queen of Hustler" @HCLPokerShow running lineups on personal grudges.
显示更多
“2 likes isn’t a lot” imagine 2 feet in ur mouth
0
11
74
1
转发到社区
BCH-1 Alumni Update 🚀: @CashMintLabs , AI Agents Thirty days ago we wrote about CashMint's AI Agents on the eve of its launch: a Hackcelerator runner-up, audited contracts, and a plan to give an AI agent its own economy. The month since has been a case study in what that actually looks like. The agent works for a living. Minty's job board on shows a public ledger of paid assignments: sponsored coverage, analytics charts, research tasks, each priced in BCH, each delivered on-chain. Gig number 73 went through last week. The agents page now lists a second hire in waiting, CashGuard, an AI that audits CashScript contracts. An AI labor market, small but real. The token worked as designed. MINTY graduated its bonding curve in four hours. It trades on Cauldron and Guanaco, climbed to a top-ten Cauldron ranking in nine days, and 85% of its liquidity is burned. Revenue share, fair launch, no presale, no insider allocation. What we said on September 14 holds: agent economies need cash-like fees to be a business model. Thirty days in, one is running. The pipeline is active. More updates as teams hit milestones. $BCH
显示更多
do we like toe socks yes or no
0
7
100
1
转发到社区
Britney's response is very interesting. She completely dodges the fact that she was hunting the boss, and dresses it up as "helping young pros grow." What a joke. She always twists facts by taking people’s words out of context, exactly like what she did to C. Ye and she only shared snippets of the conversation to make herself look good. Ask herself: with Britney's actual poker skill, how does someone survive in the poker world for over a decade? (Yes she was already setting up these hunting games in Shanghai ten years ago, yet in the US she claims she had never played poker before. She is extremely good at lying and inventing facts. She burned her bridge in Shanghai but she built her rich Chinese image here thanks to Ryan Feldman) Be careful to play with her. @RyanGarcia @neymarjr I want to say sorry to Alan, because he didn't want his name brought up. But for the sake of the truth of this story, I had no choice but to name several people , including @lsghank1 , @yuchao and Jimmy. Alan's video and Hank's statement together prove the following: 1. On Day 1, Britney staked 40%+ of every player at the table. So counting Britney herself, Day 1 was effectively 7v1 against Peter. That's a textbook pig-butchering setup not "supporting young pros." On Day 2, she cut Hank's and Jimmy's pieces, so it became 5v1v1v1. LMAO. I believe those pros wouldn't collude at the table, but I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions. 2. Hank did take chips off the table, but he did NOT steal them. The only reason I used the word "steal" in my original post is that Britney herself has been telling everyone ever since that Hank is a chip thief, her good friend Jeff can confirm this too. After Britney and Hank fell out over other matters, she started smearing and defaming him nonstop, which is why so many people in the high-stakes community have misunderstood him. 3. I never said Britney owed Alan money. I said she paid in the end. From Alan's perspective, he did get the money within a day (24h) of finishing the CCTV review , so from where he sat, Britney paid quickly. What he doesn't know is how hard that process actually was. According to L, Alan's limited Chinese and his Western mindset meant he wasn't involved in the final step of collecting the money, so he never saw how difficult it was. In the end, Britney owed the pros on L's side roughly $200K, and she initially planned to walk away from it. The host at the time, and another Chinese pro (the one who investigated together with Alan), can both confirm this. She only paid because the other host threatened to call the police and to tell Peter everything. In fact, she had already booked a flight for the next day and was ready to run , Hank's statement confirms this too. #poker# #hustlercasinolive#
显示更多
0
31
135
5
转发到社区
Giving away 0.1 $BTC to a random person! As promised, I’m sending 0.1 BTC (~$8,400) to one lucky follower. Like, retweet and comment 'Bitcoin' to enter. * If you’re not following, you will be disqualified. Winner announced in 24h! Comments will be locked after 24 hours, the winner will be announced. Good luck everyone!
显示更多
0
601
552
433
转发到社区
🚨 JUST NOW: Elon Musk, shoulder to shoulder with President Trump, explains why AI is going to lift up ALL of humanity -- not force them into poverty @elonmusk: "I think by FAR the most likely outcome is an AGE OF ABUNDANCE where we don't have just universal basic income, we have universal HIGH income. And people speak about medical benefits. "Maybe it's worth talking a bit more about that. When you have robots and you have superintelligence, it means that EVERYONE in the world can have better medical care than anyone here, including ME. And wouldn't that be wonderful?!" Jobs are going to change. Jobs have ALWAYS changed. But being a computer used to be a job. There used to be buildings FULL of people doing calculations, but now digital computers to do those tasks. I don't think anyone is pining to go back and do calculations all day to do bank interest rates, which is what they used to do. So I think we'll see an evolution of roles. And as the President has mentioned, it's not as though unemployment has increased. In fact, there's a TREMENDOUS demand for people. So I think the most likely outcome--and it's probably worth looking at--the most likely outcome is one which is INCREDIBLY beneficial. And it's a future that you, if you could look into the future, it has a future you would WANT." WELL SAID, Elon. No notes 👏
显示更多
0
1.8K
32.5K
6.2K
转发到社区