注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「My_Universe」相关的搜索结果

My_Universe 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 My_Universe 的内容
[#대성# 📸] 260201 𝗗𝗔𝗘𝗦𝗨𝗡𝗚 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱 𝗔𝗦𝗜𝗔 𝗧𝗢𝗨𝗥: 𝗗’𝘀 𝗪𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗘 -𝗝𝗔𝗣𝗔𝗡 #Day2# D's my Universe✨💫🪐 D's WAVE 앨범부터 D's WAVE 아시아투어 그리고 D's WAVE ENCORE까지 함께해 주신 모든 분들 진심으로 감사합니다😍 #대성# #DAESUNG# #DLITE# #DsWAVE# #ENCORE# #Asia_tour# #JAPAN#
显示更多
0
36
3.1K
755
转发到社区
[📢] 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗦𝗢𝗢𝗡 ⠀ D's my Universe ⠀ #대성# #DAESUNG# #DLITE#
0
41
4.4K
1.1K
转发到社区
𝗗𝗔𝗘𝗦𝗨𝗡𝗚 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱 𝗔𝗦𝗜𝗔 𝗧𝗢𝗨𝗥: 𝗗'𝘀 𝗪𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗜𝗡 𝗦𝗘𝗢𝗨𝗟 Thank you for coming to my Universe #대성# #DAESUNG# #DLITE# #DsWAVE# #Asia_tour# #SEOUL#
显示更多
0
50
9.8K
2.8K
转发到社区
[#대성# 📸] 250426 𝗗𝗔𝗘𝗦𝗨𝗡𝗚 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱 𝗔𝗦𝗜𝗔 𝗧𝗢𝗨𝗥: 𝗗'𝘀 𝗪𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗜𝗡 𝗦𝗘𝗢𝗨𝗟 #Day1# Welcome to my Universe🪐💫 생일에 함께한 우리 Beautiful Life✨ 내일도! Are you reaDy to riDe? #대성# #DAESUNG# #DLITE# #DsWAVE# #Asia_tour# #SEOUL#
显示更多
0
41
4.6K
1.4K
转发到社区
the My Universe Crew 😄 @coldplay
0
49.7K
2.4M
673.6K
转发到社区
혀니허니스가 기다리던~역대급 뮤비 리액션! (feat. #손성득#) 이것이 MV인가 영화인가!🎬 #Coldplay# X #BTS# 'My Universe'의 뮤직비디오 리액션이 궁금하다면?!👀 👉 #이현# #LeeHyun# #혀니콤보TV# #많관부# #하이브# #Coldplay# #방탄소년단# #My_Universe# #빅히트_정도전의_시선#
显示更多
0
58
9.7K
2.8K
转发到社区
My Universe Crew ! (+개량hanbok) @coldplay
0
63.7K
2.2M
631.2K
转发到社区
[#대성# 📸] 260412 Coachella 2026 Welcome to my Coachella Universe🪐✨💫 Are you reaDy to riDe again?🔥 #대성# #DAESUNG# #DLITE# #Coachella# #BIGBANG#
0
391
33K
7.4K
转发到社区
But here we get to the thing that will confound looking at human and machine as separate units: the possibility of deeper and deeper integration between human and machine. This is the strand of technology that includes: computers being able to work much more symbiotically with us, picking up on all kinds of conscious and sub-conscious signals we release as an interface, brain-computer interfaces, computer-assisted telepathy that helps multiple people better understand each other and work together. The ultimate end is erasing the binary divide between human and machine and opening up any position on that spectrum. On one end, you sitting at a laptop terminal; on the other end, mind uploading, and also everything in between. The hope is that deeply integrated human + machine will outperform separated human + machine, and that this will remain the case all the way up to the technological ceiling. This is the best "far-future AI outcome that I actually like" that I can come up with: * We preserve global political and economic pluralism (no single company or government dominates) all the way up to the technological ceiling. * We humans each get the ability to either take technological upgrades to ourselves, and explore the universe at a level competitive with "pure" machines, or stay as we are, and get some ability to act in the world through having a bot listen to our instructions. * Most of Earth will probably become a highly-regulated nature preserve where anyone can continue living the kind of life they have now (without the pains and annoyances; most challenge will be healthy "good challenge"), and if you want to do more crazy things, you go to space. Make no mistake - this is a ride through a narrow corridor. Things could go off the rails in one of several different ways: AI-on-its-own could get too powerful relative to the alternatives; one country or one company could gain decisive advantage and decide to lock it in permanently, powerful technological ways of destroying each other could cause incalculable harm, or the human + machine integration approach itself ends up preserving not enough of our humanity, and so it ends up being "just another way to make powerful bots". For these reasons, I wish that we can ride through the narrow corridor at 60 kph and not 200 kph, which is why I feel warmly toward "slowdown" / "pause" proposals (including "give us a chance to hit the brakes" ideas like mutually assured compute destruction (as in AI 2040, also previously Dan Hendrycks, and others)). My ideal world is actually one where (i) open weights wins, and (ii) Dean Ball turns out to be completely right that open weights is decelerationist because it deters capex in frontier models [though it will enable more capex in peripherals and applications], because then we get slowdown without any of the downsides of doing it through heavier-handed political means. But also I don't think we should count on the world to naturally give us "convenient" laws of economics and physics. We do have some degree of agency over the laws of politics, plenty of ways to change incentives without putting a king in charge, and we should exercise that.
显示更多