与「NEWERA」相关的搜索结果

💥可怕！纽约市长马姆达尼在乞求搬不回亿万富翁（逃离纽约）后，开始向中产小富户下手了：呼吁“驱逐”房主，并将房产“移交”给租户和非营利组织！ 今天5月26日周二，马姆达尼在布鲁克林Gowanus举行的“Block by Block”住房计划发布会上发表了下面这段讲话，他正式公布了名为《Block by Block: The Housing Plan for a New Era》的全面住房蓝图，其中就包括“Fix the City”运动的相关内容。 该计划旨在未来10年新建20万套可负担住房，并稳定另外20万套，同时加强对恶劣房东的执法，包括将长期疏忽的建筑所有权转移给租户、非营利组织或社区土地信托。 “通过我们新的全市运动‘修复城市（Fix the City）’，我们将重点针对纽约市最糟糕（恶劣）的房东。必要时，我们将采取激进的法律行动，移除疏忽大意的业主和物业经理。对于那些长期遭受忽视的建筑，我们将努力将所有权转移给负责任的托管者 - 这些托管者包括社区土地信托、非营利组织，甚至租户自己。” 让我们来看看他们定义的“恶劣的房东”：把租户住房当成摇钱树、长期不管死活、造成真实危害的“slumlord”（贫民窟房东）；以及被租户向HPD投诉过的房东…… 大白话就是：你靠出租房子赚钱赚多了，而那些交不起的房租的人变得越发穷了，你的房子要被没收充公！ 当然刁钻的租户（动不动去投诉你），你的房子在不知不觉中也危险了！ 当然你长期收不到租金，缺钱没有办法及时去修好水电煤气等等，你的房子就会变成不是你的房子了！ 50、60年代过来的华人应该熟悉这种玩法吧！

NVIDIA has officially retired the GeForce Control Panel after 20 years, ending one of the longest-running software tools in PC gaming. The company is moving users to the newer NVIDIA App, which combines driver updates, game optimization, DLSS and RTX settings, performance tools, overlays, and display settings into one application. The old Control Panel will still work for now but is now considered a legacy app and will no longer receive major updates for GeForce users. For many gamers it has been a familiar part of the Windows experience since the early 2000s.

JUST’s GasFree Carnival Shows How Blockchain Payments Are Becoming Simpler For years, one of the biggest challenges in crypto payments was complexity. Even users sending stablecoins like USDT still need to manage gas fees, hold separate network tokens, and understand transaction mechanics before completing a transfer. That process slowed adoption and made blockchain payments feel more technical than necessary. The latest initiative from JUST reflects how that experience is beginning to change. As part of its sixth anniversary celebration, the JUST ecosystem launched the GasFree Super Carnival across the TRON DAO network, combining real transaction utility with rewards designed around everyday stablecoin usage. Running from May 25 to May 31, the campaign allows users to participate in a 10,000 USDT reward pool while using GasFree-powered transfers that remove traditional gas token requirements. The campaign includes: • 100% transfer fee reimbursement • Up to 66 USDT refund per wallet • Easter Egg rewards for qualifying new users • “Most 6 Lucky Koi” bonus events • Additional social participation rewards What makes the campaign important is that participation is tied directly to real on-chain activity. Users interact with the GasFree infrastructure itself while completing stablecoin transfers. How It Works Users can create or access a GasFree wallet through supported platforms such as: • TronLink • Klever Wallet • Guarda Wallet • NOW Wallet After funding the wallet with USDT, including direct transfers from centralized exchanges, users can begin making GasFree transfers immediately. Each transfer automatically contributes toward reimbursement eligibility and leaderboard participation. The system removes several traditional friction points: • no separate gas token management • fewer failed transactions from insufficient fees • smoother onboarding for newer users • simpler stablecoin transfers overall Why This Matters Stablecoins continue becoming one of blockchain’s most practical financial tools for: • payments • cross-border transfers • savings • business settlement • digital commerce As adoption grows, usability becomes increasingly important. Most users simply want transfers to work efficiently without dealing with unnecessary network complexity. GasFree moves blockchain payments closer to that experience by simplifying how transactions are executed underneath the surface. The Bigger Picture The “Most 6 Lucky Koi” event also adds transaction-based rewards for users landing specific transfer sequence positions: 6 / 66 / 166 / 666 / 1666 / 2666 / 3666 / 4666 / 5666 / 6666 Eligible users can receive instant 20 USDT rewards during the campaign period. More importantly, the initiative reflects a larger direction across blockchain infrastructure: making digital payments simpler, faster, and more accessible for ordinary users. The technology becomes far more practical when users can focus on transferring assets instead of managing network mechanics. And that is exactly the direction GasFree infrastructure is helping move toward within the TRON ecosystem. 🔗 [GasFree Official Website]( 🔗 [JUST Official Website]( 🔗 [TronLink Wallet]( @justinsuntron @DeFi_JUST #TRONEcoStar#

At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions. Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place. The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin. Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not. Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese) On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days. One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads. I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard. Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general. When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it. I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this. I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity. I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc. But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.

"This really does feel like a silent IPO." James Seyffart (@JSeyff) is the ETF analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. Spent his career inside the machine that tracks every dollar flowing through US ETFs. Predicted the spot Bitcoin ETF approval timing months before Wall Street consensus. Now tracking what advisors are actually doing, not what they're saying. "Q1 2026 was the most successful quarter Bitwise ever had. Selling Bitcoin ETFs to wealth advisors. Despite the price not doing well at all." We cover: — Why advisors loaded up on Bitcoin while retail was selling — The "silent IPO" frame: ETFs in, MicroStrategy in, retail out, and what happens when that flips — Why the Iran weekend was the real Bitcoin turning point nobody talked about — The Facebook moment thesis: why ETF growth keeps compounding even as crypto-native traders lose interest — Six years ago people asked if Bitcoin would be banned, what changed in DC — Why gold ETFs went from $130B to $300B+ and what that means for the next BTC leg — The basket ETF and prediction market ETF wave coming through SEC pipeline right now — Why James can't be more bullish than he is on ETF structure and the inflow numbers backing it up — Which wealth advisors are now writing Bitcoin into 60/40 portfolios as a structural allocation — The Clarity Act window and why his colleague has never put odds below 60% Thanks to James for joining us again on @new_era_finance. Highlights: 00:00 - Intro 02:13 - The Iran Moment Shock 02:33 - Bitwise's Best Quarter Ever 03:34 - Crypto's Inverse Adoption Curve 12:08 - Tokenization & The Stablecoin Cliff 20:00 - Gold ETFs vs Bitcoin ETFs 21:00 - Six Years Ago vs Now 24:48 - The Gold Bull Run Explained 30:15 - Basket ETFs Coming 32:50 - Clarity Act Odds 33:40 - Why ETF Inflows Hit New ATHs 36:08 - The Silent IPO Frame

President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin jointly attended the opening ceremony of the China-Russia Years of Education. President Xi pointed out that over the years, China-Russia cooperation in education has continued to deepen and yielded notable outcomes, enriching the China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for the new era. Taking the China-Russia Years of Education as an opportunity, the two sides should continue to build consensus on cooperation, expand areas of cooperation, and enhance the level of cooperation.

President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin jointly met the press after their talks. President Xi stressed that this year marks the 30th anniversary of the China‑Russia strategic partnership of coordination. Over the past three decades, the China‑Russia relationship has been growing in stature and now stands at the highest level in history as a comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for the new era, setting a prime example of a new type of major‑country relationship. This year also marks the 25th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Good‑Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation Between China and Russia. Over the years, the two countries have always adhered to the treaty’s established principle of non‑alliance, non‑confrontation and not targeting any third party, and stayed committed to equality, mutual respect, good faith and win‑win cooperation, serving as a vital constant amid century‑defining changes sweeping across the world. China‑Russia relations have reached a new starting point. The two sides should follow the trend of the times toward peace, development, cooperation and mutual benefit, and strive for higher‑quality development of bilateral ties. First, we should build higher‑quality political mutual trust and give each other firm strategic support. The two sides should further strengthen mutual support on issues concerning each other’s core interests and major concerns. Second, we should empower higher‑quality mutually beneficial cooperation and jointly advance our two countries’ development and revitalization. The two sides should deepen the synergy between China’s 15th Five‑Year Plan for economic and social development and Russia’s development strategy through 2030. Third, we should promote higher‑quality people‑to‑people connectivity and strengthen the foundation of lasting friendship between the two nations. President Putin and I have decided to hold the tenth national theme year, namely the China‑Russia Years of Education, this year and next. Fourth, we should pursue higher‑quality international coordination to reform and improve global governance. As permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, China and Russia must work steadfastly as responsible major countries, safeguard the authority of the U.N. and international fairness and justice, oppose all unilateral acts of bullying and attempts to reverse the course of history, and especially oppose all provocative acts that deny the outcomes of the victory of World War II and attempt to justify and revive fascism and militarism.