注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「Notice」相关的搜索结果

Notice 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 Notice 的内容
I'm seeing a lot of fake information about a potential deal to reopen the Strait and end Iran's nuclear weapons program. First, the Iranians are not receiving any cash, and no funds are being released for simply signing a deal or attending a meeting. The deal is structured to ensure that the US and its allies concerns are prioritized, and that if the Islamic Republic of Iran meets its obligations, then economic benefits will flow to them and to the entire region. This deal has the potential to remake the region and lead to lasting peace. I've noticed a couple of bizarre things in the reporting over the last few hours. First, people who (rightly) said Donald Trump was a historic president a month ago now criticizing a deal based on unconfirmed media reports. Second, people who say you can't trust a word said by the IRGC who apparently believe anonymously sourced social media posts. The president is going to get us a good outcome, one way or the other.
显示更多
0
8.1K
58.1K
9.8K
转发到社区
AI coding didn’t just help me build MacMater faster. It helped me notice the small frictions people live with every day. On macOS, there still isn’t a simple native way to right-click in Finder and instantly open a file or folder with the app you actually want. There also isn’t a clean built-in way to right-click and create a new file from your own templates. So people install one app for Finder tweaks. Another for clipboard history. Another for mouse gestures. Another for input switching. But ordinary people shouldn’t need a folder full of tiny utilities just to make their computer feel right. That became the idea behind MacMater: an all-in-one native Mac utility that brings these daily improvements together. Open with your favorite apps. Create new files from templates. Switch input methods automatically. Make your mouse feel better. Bring back anything you copied. AI wasn’t a magic button. It was more like a patient teammate. It helped me unfold ideas, question tradeoffs, rewrite messy thoughts, and keep asking: “Is this actually useful to a real person?” The biggest lesson: AI coding does not remove human judgment. It demands more of it. You still have to know what matters. You still have to say no. You still have to choose simplicity over cleverness. In the end, the best technology disappears. What remains is a small moment: someone opens their Mac, does their work, and feels like the machine finally understands them a little better.
显示更多
I love having moles. I have like 7 on my face with 3 of them being on the bigger side. And then other noticeable ones on my shoulder, ankle, underarm and back. Noticing more mole appreciation lately with characters like Mi fu, Evie, 2B, Mint… etc Give me all the moles
显示更多
A few years from now, nobody is going to remember how many likes you got on a random post. They’ll remember how you made them feel. I learned that the hard way. Some of the posts I’m most proud of barely got noticed. Meanwhile, some of the ones that performed best were forgotten within days. The numbers looked great, but they didn’t leave a mark on anyone, including me. That’s when I realized attention and impact are not the same thing. Attention is easy to measure. Impact isn’t. One disappears with the next scroll. The other stays with someone long after they’ve closed the app. That’s why I’ve started caring less about reach and more about whether something I share is actually worth reading. Not because it’s the best strategy. Because life is too short to spend it saying things you don’t believe. Part of why @RallyOnChain stands out to me is that it pushes people to contribute ideas, not just collect impressions. So here’s something I’ve been thinking about: If every post you’ve ever made disappeared tomorrow, which one would you still be proud of?
显示更多
0
66
101
5
转发到社区
This happened in Monroe, Louisiana. A man rolls up on his E- bike at Lowe’s store in outside garden. He grabs something (I don’t know what it is) and he’s getting ready to take off. Just another day in Monroe. This gentleman walks up and says something to him, probably to the tune of like why are you stealing? The guy on the bike seems to get upset. The man turns and walks away. I like how the other guy passes by, looks over and just keeps on walking. 🙄 Many people said they don’t understand why people would put themselves in harms way over a Fortune 500 company, they aren’t struggling they said and they have insurance. And others said they understood because of this economy and the times we are in. 😳 But a lot of others said this is one of the reasons our prices keep going up and it is not okay to justify stealing because of the economy. A Lowe’s employee said there is so much theft that it affects their livelihood, it affects their bonuses. What do you think? Is it worth confronting someone if you notice they are stealing from a store? Or should you just mind your own business and keep on walking?
显示更多
0
385
2.4K
619
转发到社区
An elderly person pushing a wheelchair fellaccidentally while crossing the road. A busdriver noticed the incident and immediatelygot off the bus to offer help.#Heartwarming##Rescue##GreatDriver#
显示更多
America built a house on a broken foundation. When folks noticed the cracks, leaders painted the walls instead of fixing the concrete. First, laws allowed white men to own Black humans. When that stopped, the state wrote the Black Codes. Mississippi made it a crime for a Black man to lack a job, forcing men into unpaid convict labor. When those rules failed, the state wrote quiet rules. In 1933, the Home Owners Loan Corporation drew red lines across federal maps. Banks labeled Black neighborhoods hazardous, ensuring lenders would not approve home loans for Black residents. Next, towns used local real estate taxes to fund public schools. Rich white suburbs kept cash inside their own borders, while redlined Black neighborhoods had zero wealth to tax. The hate never left. It just learned to hide in plain sight.
显示更多
Be honest… what did you notice first 🌠
0
36
3.6K
100
转发到社区
It is with a heavy heart that we announce we are winding down the Botanix network. This decision is the hardest one we have made in four years, and we want to share the reasoning openly because the people who backed us, built with us, and used what we shipped deserve more than a quiet shutdown notice. First off, an immediate practical consideration for the Botanix community: please withdraw your Bitcoin and other assets before July 9th, 2026. When we started in 2022, the pitch was simple enough to say in a sentence: bring real utility to Bitcoin. What that actually meant in practice, and what we have spent nearly four years building toward, was more ambitious than that sentence made it sound. We were trying to build a Bitcoin-based blockchain that could find genuine product-market fit as a platform for Bitcoin applications, without using token incentives to drive growth, manufacture users, or simulate utility. Almost every chain that has launched in the last cycle has reached for the same playbook (issue a token without PMF, engineer the incentive surface, point at the resulting metrics), and we did not believe this route is a viable strategy in the long term. We wanted to know whether a Bitcoin chain could earn its users on the strength of what was built on top of it, the value it brings in the market with Bitcoin itself as the only meaningful economic primitive in the system. And we built it. The Spiderchain went live and stayed live, a year of mainnet operation with one hundred percent uptime and zero security incidents on a genuinely novel cryptographic architecture. We built Dynafed, a dynamic federation that turned the Spiderchain from a static multisig set into a rotating, decentralized one, the technical milestone that most people in this space said could not be built on Bitcoin without compromising trust assumptions. Twenty-five million transactions, two hundred thousand wallets, and tens of millions of dollars in assets moved across the chain, every single number of that earned organically without a token, without airdrops, without points programs, or any of the manufactured-demand machinery. Chainlink, Morpho, GMX, Dolomite, Fireblocks, Alchemy, Galaxy, OKX Wallet, all integrated. We shipped a Bitcoin neobank with BINK on iOS and Android, with self-custodial email login for Bitcoin (something that had never existed before), native Bitcoin yield, and the lowest borrowing rates against Bitcoin anywhere in the world, all of it downstream of owning the infrastructure. The point of saying this is not to argue with our own conclusion. The protocol works, the product works, and our team and ecosystem worked in concert to do exceptional work. We have run this experiment in earnest, with a working protocol, real applications, and a serious team, for over a year on mainnet and nearly four years in total. The honest answer we have arrived at, after living inside it every day, is that it did not work, at least not in this market and not on this timeline. We want to share what we think we learned, with the caveat that some of this is conviction and some of this is still suspicion, and we would rather be transparent about the difference than pretend to have clarity we do not have. The first thing I've had to sit with is timing. Bitcoin utility, making Bitcoin programmable, productive, and integrated into real financial activity, isn't where the real world users sit right now. The conversation is still on Bitcoin as a reserve asset, on its monetary and political positioning, on base-layer conservatism. Those questions are upstream of the ones a Bitcoin L2 needs people to be asking. I still believe Bitcoin gets there, but belief in the destination is not the same as being able to predict when, and nobody can. It's also possible the destination never materialises at all, and that Bitcoin's role as a reserve asset is simply where it settles. If that's true, there will never be a market for what we were building, and no amount of time or capital would change that. The second is the token question. We intended to eventually launch a token. We saw it, and still see it, as a genuinely new form of equity, something closer to an IPO than an airdrop, to be done when you reach product market fit and the moment is right. That moment never came. What became clear over the last year is that the market largely stopped rewarding even the more considered versions of that playbook. Token launches across the board have broadly underperformed, and those that did go to market with tokens haven't seen the outcomes or PMF that the model is supposed to produce. The third lesson is about where DeFi demand on Bitcoin actually lives. For most use cases that exist today, lending, yield, leveraged exposure, WBTC on a mature general-purpose L2 is genuinely sufficient. Users have voted with their behaviour, and the verdict is that the trust assumptions of a wrapped representation on Ethereum are acceptable to almost everyone who wants Bitcoin-denominated DeFi. Decentralisation matters to people in principle and in conversation; in practice, when something cheaper and easier is in front of them, they use it. The security case for a dedicated Bitcoin L2 is real, but it only matters for a narrower band of applications than our thesis required, one of the clearer lessons this market has taught us. The fourth lesson is structural. The on-chain economy is consolidating around venues that own the user relationship: Hyperliquid, Robinhood, the major CEXes, and now TradFi participants absorbing an ever-larger share of attention, flow, and revenue. Convenience and institutional credibility win, every time, as soon as they're available. As retail participation thins, that concentration only deepens. We were, and still are, believers in decentralisation, but the current direction of on-chain growth is running through distribution, and any team building base-layer infrastructure today is rowing upstream against that current. We were no exception. The fifth lesson is the most concrete. Both of the above played out directly in our economics. The users we attracted were primarily using Bitcoin as a store of value for yield, a legitimate use case, but not the high-frequency transaction volume that drives fee revenue on a network like ours. BINK was our answer to that: a Bitcoin neobank designed to bring daily usage of BTC and stablecoins on-chain, driving the transaction volume the network needed. It was the right strategic instinct, and one we never got the chance to fully test. BINK only landed on both app stores in the last few weeks, a product that by its nature could only be built once the underlying infrastructure was proven and live. When users choose the convenient option and economic gravity pulls toward distribution, what's left on a decentralised infrastructure layer is a user base that costs more to serve than it generates. Infrastructure costs are what they are, and the fee income never came close to covering them. If you would like to see how we were imagining a Bitcoin future and what we have been working on since September, feel free to download BINK and give it a spin: it’s a full-fledged self-custodial Bitcoin Neobank with email login, one click borrowing, a Lightning integration and more. App store: Play store: This UX is where we think Bitcoin is ultimately heading towards although it feels too early. You can use invite code 1SD31R, but remember to remove your funds by July 9th. We could keep going. We have chosen not to, however, because continuing past the point where additional time stops producing additional learning is not conviction, it is something that looks like conviction from the outside while corroding into something else on the inside. We would rather stop now, with integrity intact and resources available to take care of the people who took a chance on us, than push the experiment past the point where it still has something to teach us. Reminder: Please withdraw all your assets by July 9th. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. To our investors, who backed a thesis that was harder to defend than it should have been, to our partners who built alongside us and bet pieces of their own roadmaps on ours, to the developers who deployed on Spiderchain, to our users and the BINK community who showed up for something experimental and stayed, and most of all to the Botanix team who shipped a genuinely novel system with rigour and care and who made every hard day worth the difficulty: Thank you, more than the words available here can carry.
显示更多
0
54
220
19
转发到社区