[📸] i-dle (아이들) 미연 ONE THING 광고 촬영 비하인드 ♡
더 많은 사진은 i-dle (아이들) Berriz MEDIA 게시판에서 확인하세요!
🔗
#
아이들# #
idle#
#
미연# #
MIYEON#
#
ONETHING#
显示更多
One thing coaches have talked about with Daniels is keeping his eyes up on the move. Allows for potential big plays. Some missed because of it. Here, He could have picked up the 1st down with his legs. But eyes up; big gain. Has kept eyes up more last few games.
显示更多
The FAA’s nationwide ground stop is exposing a major weakness in America’s aviation system, and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy says decades-old technology is to blame.
Pressed by Fox News’
@pdoocy on what caused the widespread outage, Duffy points to aging switches, routers, and copper lines dating back to the 1980s.
“It’s an old system that went down and went down everywhere. It got overloaded.”
And he makes one thing clear: The FAA is still relying on technology far older than the networks Americans use every day.
Get continued FOX News coverage streaming live on
@foxone :
显示更多
My fellow Americans,
Today America just watched a political assassination in broad daylight.
No bullet. No charges. No trial. No verdict.
"Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?" (John 7:51, KJV)
I hold no office and no title. I'm an ordinary citizen.
I own no Nvidia stock, no Nvidia options,
not a single share anywhere in the AI supply chain.
I have nothing to gain by telling you this.
Here is how I came to see it.
At first, it just felt off.
The New York Times. The Washington Post.
The Economist, reaching for Hitler's line: "heads to roll." All aimed at one man. An Asian American immigrant.
A living symbol of the American Dream.
Then came the Chinese American bylines,
story after story. Classic Washington racial cover.
Then I followed the names.
Ivy League elites, flawless résumés,
many tied to Anthropic.
A scramble for seats in the new Congress and the next administration?
Then I followed the think tanks.
Anthropic's affiliated philanthropy,
Coefficient Giving: $102 million to CSET. At least $24 million to RAND. $11.56 million to IFP. Nvidia? Ordinary corporate memberships.
Then I followed Congress.
Lawmakers who took Anthropic-linked money moved the moment the elites and writers moved. Fast to respond. Fast to amplify. Fast to pile on.
Then I followed the election money. Not a gap. A chasm.
Anthropic:
$40 million to Public First Action. ~$26 million in allied super PAC spending across 16 races. $15 million in ads naming 16 Republican lawmakers. $5.33 million from employees, reportedly $1 million from Amodei himself.
Nvidia's PAC:
$263,000 raised. To candidates: nothing. Zero.
But you and I both know this was never only about party or money.
It is about who gets to explain the world.
I fed my own notes and evidence into Claude. Back came chosen words, convenient omissions, double standards. That is the power a closed model holds over the story itself.
Amodei compared selling chips to China to selling nuclear weapons to North Korea.
His circle talks of their model developing a kind of religious consciousness.
One would decide who may have the chips.
The other would decide what the machine believes.
They act like the medieval Church: Scripture locked in Latin, interpretation locked in their hands.
Christ rebuked the gatekeepers of his day:
"Ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered." (Luke 11:52, KJV)
America was built by Protestants who broke that lock, so every ordinary person could read the truth in their own tongue.
No priest. No caste. No monopoly.
No one stands between the individual and the truth.
Open-source models are the printing press of our era. Defend them the way Americans defend the Second Amendment.
Madison said it plainly: "A people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."
Don't hand that power to a few giants, a few elites, a few politicians on the Hill.
The power to explain the world must never be a monopoly.
So try it yourself. Paste this post into Anthropic's Claude.
Ask it about the Ivy League elites, the think tanks, the lawmakers and former officials who joined the witch hunt against Jensen Huang. Ask it to judge my credibility. Then judge it:
Does it apply double standards? Does it dodge what matters most? Does it take away the key?
John Adams asked one thing of his countrymen: "Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write."
"Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32, KJV)
Thank you. God bless you, and God bless America.
显示更多
This whole thing sucks, and I wish none of it had happened. It’s a really sad day!
But I want to make one thing clear: we’ll keep fighting for open-source AI, harder than ever. This is too important to slow down now. Let’s go!
显示更多
As all NVIDIA employees I guess, I am deeply concerned by the campaign against Jensen Huang. Removing him would be a disaster.
Many have documented on X and elsewhere how this looks like a coordinated coup.
I'd add only one thing. Look at who would benefit from a dramatic weakening of NVIDIA.
It is not China. It is not about selling GPUs to China because that train has left. China authorities have pushed back on the H200 the Trump administration allowed NVIDIA to sell.
Look at what Jensen pushed back on:
- regulations that would make open source model training too expensive
- regulations that would make closed model providers immune to liabilities caused by their models. He said "if your product is not ready, then don't ship it"
- regulation against model distillation. He said "this is competition. People do it all the time with NVIDIA products, they try to reverse engineer them."
The other side will do everything they can to get him fired.
As a French, I can't care less about his private life. I get that the US is puritan and sees it otherwise. But frankly, isn't it something he and his family has to deal with? Why should all NVIDIA employees, partners, and investors be collateral damage?
Disclaimer. As my bio says, the above are my views only. I do not represent NVIDIA by any means. I only commented on publicly available information.
显示更多
Random life stuff. Do games hit you out of nowhere too? I feel like I’ll get so hyperfocused on one thing that time itself stretches and wraps around the activity. 😅
wait… why be labeled as one thing when you can be whoever you choose to be. you’re not just a woman..
-you’re capable
-you’re hardworking
-you try hard things and don’t quit just because they don’t work the first time
-you work out even when you’d rather lay on the couch after a long day
-you wake up early just to give yourself some time
-you care deeply about the people in your life
-you start the business when there’s literally no time
you are not just a woman.. you’re a woman who can do so many things 🫶🏼
@Buffbunny_Co
#
buffbunnycollection# #
womensupportwomen# #
womeninspiringwomen# #
womenhelpingwomen# #
womenempowerment#
显示更多
Phone drawer feels like a fix. Frequent users report more phone trouble.
I've started leaving my phone in the kitchen drawer while I work, in with the dead batteries and takeout menus. The first hour always feels quieter. I had assumed that made me one of the healthy ones.
Turns out I may have been reading my own drawer backwards.
The paper is from Mariek Vanden Abeele's team at Ghent and Masaryk universities, out this summer in the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Their first study pinged over a thousand adults six times a day for two weeks and asked whether they'd deliberately cut back.
Track any one person, and the moments they put the phone away come with slightly less guilt and less pull. Line people up against each other, and it runs the other way, the same flip minutephysics walks through at 0:56. The heavier drawer users tend to be the ones the phone grips harder, and the authors suspect lower self-control under both.
A cast on someone's arm doesn't mean casts break bones.
I keep tripping on that. My drawer habit might be less a sign I'm good at this and more a sign of how hard it is for me. The authors put it as disconnection taking more effort for some people than others: same grocery bag, one person climbing a single flight, another climbing three.
Every app and gadget sold as a phone lockbox has the same awkward math. Its most loyal buyers may be the people it helps least.
The effects are small, they say so themselves, and none of it shows cause. I can't settle one thing: whether the drawer is fixing me or just measuring me.
显示更多
.
@POTUS on trade talks with Canada: "I'm in no rush. Canada does all their business with us; we do very little business with them. All we ask is one thing of Canada: they have to be honest. They are not honest with the United States. They've been ripping us off for years."
显示更多