与「ONE_THE_STORY」相关的搜索结果

[#OMYIZ#] 여러분이 보내주신 예쁘고 소중한 마음 덕분에 아름다운 이야기를 써내려갈 수 있었답니다💝 아이즈원과 위즈원이 함께한 시간은 늘 기적같았던 순간으로 영원히 남을 거예요. 아름다운 기억만 가득한 꿈 꾸시기를 바라요🌙 #IZONE# #아이즈원# #アイズワン# #ONE_THE_STORY#

[#OMYIZ#] 위즈원의 소망 가득 담은 유닛 무대❣ 오늘 앚둥유닛의 컨셉은 청순뽀짝큐티러블리🍬 다들 사랑 가득 담은 눈으로 시청해 주셨겠죠? 아이즈원을 보는 위즈원 눈은 항상 꿀이 뚝뚝 떨어진다구요👀🍯 #IZONE# #아이즈원# #アイズワン# #ONE_THE_STORY#

[💡] 2021 IZ*ONE ONLINE CONCERT [ONE, THE STORY] D-DAY 2 어제 공연은 즐거우셨나요? 오늘도 멋진 무대가 기다리고 있으니, 5시에 'ONE, THE STORY'에서 만나요! DAY2 ▶ #IZONE# #아이즈원# #アイズワン# #ONE_THE_STORY#

[💡] 2021 IZ*ONE ONLINE CONCERT [ONE, THE STORY] D-DAY 1 위즈원! 우리 잠시 후 8시에 시작될 'ONE, THE STORY' 에서 곧 만나요! DAY1 ▶ DAY2 ▶ #IZONE# #아이즈원# #アイズワン# #ONE_THE_STORY#

[💡] 2021 IZ*ONE ONLINE CONCERT [ONE, THE STORY] D-1 드디어 D-1! 위즈원 여러분, 내일 만나요! DAY1 ▶ DAY2 ▶ #IZONE# #아이즈원# #アイズワン# #ONE_THE_STORY#

[💡] 2021 IZ*ONE ONLINE CONCERT [ONE, THE STORY] D-2 공연 2일 전, 위즈원을 위해 준비한 다양한 무대에 많은 기대 부탁드립니다! DAY1 ▶ DAY2 ▶ #IZONE# #아이즈원# #アイズワン# #ONE_THE_STORY#

[💡] 2021 IZ*ONE ONLINE CONCERT [ONE, THE STORY] D-3 위즈원! 온라인 콘서트가 이제 3일 앞으로 다가왔어요❣ 아이즈원이 열심히 준비한 무대, 많이 기대해주시고 곧 만나요🙌 DAY1 ▶️ DAY2 ▶️ #IZONE# #아이즈원# #アイズワン# #ONE_THE_STORY#

Lore behind the name 🎬 EPISODE 88. @merheb • What’s the story behind your name? - Quick history: when I joined the space in 2021, I used to go by “MysticMac.” Then my X account got suspended in 2022, so I rebranded to “Merheb.” The story behind Merheb is simple. It’s my family name. It has different meanings in Arabic, but one of the main ones is “scary.” I chose it with pride. I wanted to be the first one in my bloodline to put the name onchain and make money from magic internet money. • What would you highlight right now among the things you’re building and consider truly important? - Coming from a tech background, and after working across community, social media, partnerships, business development, and sales, my focus right now is pretty simple: Helping brands grow through attention, personality, and content people actually enjoy watching. That’s what I’m building through UGC, streaming, and podcasting with FUNonchain, which I started in late 2024. It’s a media-first approach focused on real conversations, entertaining content, and making complex ideas easier for people to connect with. I’m also expanding beyond X, especially through daily prediction markets videos on TikTok. I think the upside there is insane. Prediction markets feel like one of the easiest and closest ways for everyday consumer to make money online. On the other hand, I’m also using my network to help Hamieverse grow as an IP, while continuing to develop my sales and closing skills, which I believe are becoming a real need in this space.

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, poses a question to physicist David Deutsch about what it would actually take to believe an AI is thinking: The setup is a discussion of Einstein and general relativity which Altman calls one of the most beautiful things humanity has ever figured out, maybe even number one. But his point isn't about the physics. It's about the story. As Altman puts it: "Einstein had a story. We knew what he was working on." We knew the problems Einstein wrestled with, the questions he chose to chase, and the path he took to get there. That narrative is part of how we recognise genuine understanding. So @sama builds a hypothetical to test the line between imitation and real reasoning: "If in a few years GPT-8 figured out quantum gravity and could tell you its story of how it did it and the problems it was thinking about and why it decided to work on that, but it still just looked like a language model output but it really did solve it… would that be enough to convince you?" In other words: not just the right answer, but the reasoning, the choices, the why this problem. The same things we'd want from any human physicist. Deutsch's response is short: "I think it would. Yeah." And Altman accepts it as the bar: "I agree to that as the test." The real test for AI might not be whether it can pass as human, but whether it can produce something genuinely new: solving a problem that's eluded us for a century and account for how and why it got there. Output alone isn't enough. The story is what makes it convincing.

Today a crazy quantum story just got wilder. On March 31, the Google Quantum AI team published a landmark result on Shor's algorithm for elliptic curve cryptography. Technically, the paper was a bombshell: a dramatic 10x improvement over the state-of-the-art. As a stunt and wakeup call to the blockchain space, those optimisations were illustrated on secp256k1, the elliptic curve underlying Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. But perhaps the most striking part of the paper was sociological, not technical. Instead of following standard academic process, the optimisations were kept secret, hidden behind a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof. Google's accompanying blog post mentions they "engaged with the U.S. government". The ZK proof demonstrates the existence of algorithmic improvements without leaking details. Academic censorship with ZK, a historic first! As a co-author of the Google paper I witnessed some of the context surrounding this censorship. To be honest, multiple aspects of that context don't sit well with me. As much as I believe the general public ought to know more, I am limited in my ability to whistleblow. Though let me be clear about one thing: the Google team's professionalism has been absolutely exemplary, and they deserve nothing but praise. Censorship has a way of backfiring. The Streisand effect, where an attempt to bury something only draws more attention to it, is exactly what's unfolding today. First, Google's key optimisation has been rediscovered by the French. And in a thrilling turn of events, a collaborative Shor-at-home challenge just launched. The initiative, available at ecdsa[.]fail, breached a new Shor world record in a matter of hours. Let's start with the rediscovery. Just two months after Google's paper, French quantum expert André Schrottenloher cracks the main secret optimisation. His paper, titled "Optimized Point Addition Circuits for Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithms", landed on the arXiv today. Big congrats to André, who beat several other nerdsnipped experts to it. In a blog post also published today, Craig Gidney, the world expert on Shor optimisations, revealed that he'd been sitting on this very optimisation for a whole year under censorship pressure. Interestingly, André missed a handful of minor optimisations, both from Google's original publication and from improvements found since. It's plausible there's still plenty of juice left to squeeze out of Shor, and this is exactly what the ecdsa[.]fail challenge is about. The verifier program developed for the ZK proof does double duty, automatically filtering for valid submissions. Dozens of compounding small and micro improvements are rolling in. As of the time of writing there's an 8.4% improvement to Google's circuit, as measured by the product of logical qubit count and Toffoli gate count. Nice! The nerdsnipping ran deeper than anyone expected. Over the last few weeks it became clear it extended well beyond André and other quantum experts. Behind the scenes, a small army of amateurs quietly got to work. Inspired by Karpathy-style autoresearch, they turned AI on Shor. Ironically, the verifier program for the ZK proof makes an ideal reward function for AIs. The barrier to entry for this modern style of research is refreshingly low, with several non-experts, even a teenager, finding nice optimisations. Get in touch if you'd like to join a Telegram group with fellow autoresearchers :) Part 2: neutral atoms and qday The story doesn't end with Google. On the same day Google went public, a stealthy startup called Oratomic published its own Shor paper in a coordinated release. It made a splash, ultimately becoming the most upvoted paper on scirate[.]com, a website ranking arXiv papers. Oratomic's claim was wild. By building on Google's logical optimisations and applying custom physical optimisations for neutral atoms, they claimed just 10K physical qubits were sufficient to run Shor's algorithm on secp256k1. That number is mind-bogglingly low. Knowing essentially nothing about neutral atoms when Oratomic's paper landed, I was intrigued and decided to learn more about the tech. I fell straight down the rabbit hole and spent a couple hundred hours on the topic. I got a little obsessed and watched every YouTube video I could find and spoke to a bunch of experts. My conclusion? The tech is real, very real. Even Google recently decided to start a neutral atom lab, a notable pivot from their sole focus on superconducting qubits. If you care about qday, i.e. the day a quantum computer will break the first piece of cryptography in production, neutral atoms demand your attention. I shared some of my learnings on Shor and neutral atoms in a 30min talk at the ZKProof cryptography conference. You can find it on YouTube by searching "zkproof neutral atom". Here's an interesting observation about this duo of breakthrough papers: neither Google nor Oratomic say a word about what their results mean for qday. No timelines. Zero. Nada. That is especially baffling given that the whole point of whitehat quantum cryptanalysis is to inform qday estimations and help the general public make good decisions. So let me attempt to partially fill the silence, similarly to what Scott Aaronson did in his April 29 post. Given everything I know, including scary non-public information, I now put the odds of qday by 2032 at 50%. 10% by 2030. Anecdotally, the US government has its own date: 2035. Originating at the NSA and later adopted by NIST, it's when branches of the US government will be disallowed from using quantum-vulnerable cryptography. In plain language: with hindsight, that date is a joke and should be discounted entirely. I don't see how NIST avoids being forced to pull it forward by years. Part 3: post-quantum cryptography There are good reasons to sound the alarm today, but please do not panic. Rushing carelessly towards immature post-quantum cryptography is a recipe for disaster. IMO a good target date for migration is 2029, roughly 3.5 years out. 2029 happens to be the date selected by Google, Cloudflare, and the Ethereum Foundation. These days most of my time goes to safely migrating Ethereum towards post-quantum cryptography as part of the broader lean Ethereum effort. There's a lot to do. We need to rip out and replace BLS signatures at the consensus layer, KZG commitments at the data layer, and ECDSA signatures at the execution layer. The plan to get there is compelling, and is based on hash-based cryptography. Within the Ethereum Foundation we've developed a Swiss army knife called leanVM (github[.]com/leanEthereum/leanVM) powered by the magic of hash-based SNARKs. Thanks to truly exceptional work by Emile, Thomas, and others, its performance is derisked. Regarding security, leanVM is a jewel, a minimal zkVM crafted for end-to-end formal verification and maximum security. Want to help? There are two $1M initiatives. First, the Proximity Prize (proximityprize[.]org). Solve a long-standing mathematical conjecture in coding theory, improve hash-based SNARKs, and go home a millionaire. Second, the Poseidon Initiative (poseidon-initiative[.]info), offers $1M for breaking Poseidon, the SNARK-friendly hash function.