与「OPEN」相关的搜索结果

X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE (BIG ONE) 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the biggest number in it is gone: copy link went from 20 to 0 points. Small accounts should focus on: posts people like, reply to and stay on (so stop counting on link copies) tl;dr: - on Nov 13 X's open source code set the score for copying a post's link to 0 - copy link: 20 → 0 - it was the top score in the whole system, 4x a reply - the code also names a "copy link bait" spam check - likes (0.708), replies (5) and DM shares (5) didn't move full details: - The number that's gone Since I started reading X's open source code in August, one number sat at the top: 20, for someone tapping share and copying your post's link. Nothing else came close. As of the Nov 13 release, it's 0. X still guesses who'll copy your link. It just multiplies that guess by 0 now. X didn't explain it. It's just what the code says. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Cross it off your list My own checklist called copy link the biggest number. Last week's post said it too. It was true then. It isn't now. If you saved that list, cross that line out. - The "copy link bait" check X's code now mentions a spam check called "copy link bait". In the code it adds a spam label to the post, and that label already keeps a post out of strangers' feeds. It only shows up in a test, so I can't see if it's running or how strict it is. My read: X saw people baiting link copies, so it turned the score off and built something to catch the bait. That's a read, the code doesn't say why. - Why that matters if you're small If your plan was posts people copy the link to, that plan now earns 0 in X's ranking. A copied link can still bring people in from outside X. It just doesn't push your post up anymore. What still pays: likes at 0.708 (the highest ever), people staying on your post, replies at 5 and back and forth with mutuals at 20. - Also new: photo and video tags If a post has a spam label, people you tag in its photo or video who don't follow you won't get notified. Same idea as last week's rule for replies. - What didn't change Every other score. Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and early likes still pick which one gets it. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - aim for likes, replies and time spent, the copy link score is gone - a DM share still earns 5, same as a reply or a quote - likes sit at 0.708, never higher - time on your post keeps counting at its best rate yet - 10+ seconds after someone taps in adds 0.385 - write your replies yourself, under big accounts most of all - give people a reason to hang around your profile - in videos the opening seconds carry it, an open alone scores 0 - posts read to the end help X find you strangers - smaller accounts (below 50K) get a shot at a spot near 16 for a fresh original - early likes decide which new post gets that spot - post when your followers are awake, the push lasts 2 hours and 200 views - mutuals going back and forth earn 20, so follow back the regulars - only your originals ever get shown to strangers - like 1 and like 32 each unlock another way to reach strangers - one strong post per feed, your second only counts 62% - clips longer than 10 seconds for the video lists - a post likely to win you a follow gets +4 - give your pinned post a look, it can affect the whole account What you should NOT be doing: - counting on copy link shares, they score 0 now - baiting link copies, the code names a spam check for exactly that - a spam label also stops your photo tags reaching non-followers - AI-written replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a flag X uses - copy-paste replies, labeled ones skip non-followers' notifications - chasing taps, 0.274 and dropping - drifting off your topic, each probable "not interested" takes 53.07 away - videos people open and leave, the open itself earns 0 - posting at 3am, it wastes the 2 hour push - expecting replies and reposts to reach strangers - an insult label, it hides that post from non-followers - earning a misinfo or low quality label, which adds a warning and locks strangers out of liking or sharing - 3 adult photos or videos among your latest 5 posts, that puts a label on you - forgetting videos get rechecked at 64 and 512 likes - one account label and strangers stop seeing you - pinning a link to a site X rates badly, that can mean a label for a week - posting your own old words again risks the copypasta flag - a low quality link plus tagged strangers reads as spam - bait for engagement, big or small it gets a label - several posts back to back, they split the same feed - hashtag piles, they do nothing - bookmarks for reach, they score 0 - hoping a 3 day old post still lands in For You, it stops at 2 days

I LAUNCHED A GROK BOT TERMINAL OVERNIGHT, GAVE IT $44.82 AND STOPPED ASKING AI WHAT IT WOULD DO. BY MORNING IT HAD $11,643.21 AND SIX AGENTS LOGGING EVERY TRADE I spent a year asking agents what they'd trade and watching the chat scroll. Last weekend I built the thing that actually trades, in Grok Bot, with no code I touched by hand. The six agents share one screen, each one job: > scanner reads new token pairs and volume spikes > rug check filters suspicious tokens before anything executes > sizer sets position from account equity, not a fixed ticket > executor opens and closes with slippage tracking > logger writes the reason behind every trade > equity curve updates on every close I went to bed on $44.82 and left the laptop open on the dashboard. By morning the balance read $11,643.21. Every trade on the activity feed had a reason next to it and a line in the log. That's the shift I didn't see coming. Not that an agent made money overnight. That I stopped being the one asking "would you long this?" and started being the one reading the log of what already happened. Starting balance: $44.82 Current balance: $11,643.21 Grok Bot built the terminal, the agent architecture and the dashboard. I described what I wanted and the thing went live. The full build is in the article below ↓ The whole build is in the post below ↓ Comment " Grok_Bot " 2️⃣ Like and Repost 3️⃣ Follow me @Nexa_Tech_Ai I'll DM you the complete setup.

2016 年英伟达第一个 AI 电脑发布当天 0 客户，都是批评声 后来只有一家非盈利机构感兴趣，老黄自己开车送过去，这家公司就是现在如日中天的 OpenAI

让 Claude Code 跑一会儿额度就见底，翻回去一看，大头根本不是你说的话，是它自己 grep 出来的几百行结果、一整坨日志、重复的 JSON，每一轮都原样塞回给模型。 Headroom 管的就是这块。它在本地把工具输出、日志、文件、RAG 片段先压一遍，再发给模型。 现在 7.9 万多星，今天在 GitHub Python 日榜上，10 号刚发 v0.44.0。 README 里我觉得比较有用的： 1. 不用改代码，headroom wrap claude 一条命令就把 Claude Code 套上，Codex、Aider、OpenCode、Kimi CLI 也能这么接，不想用了 headroom unwrap 撤掉 2. 官方实测四个 agent 场景省了 21% 到 57% 的输入 token，重复的 JSON 和日志能压掉九成以上 3. 压掉的原文都缓存在本机，模型需要细节时自己调 headroom_retrieve 取回来 4. 还能压输出：开 HEADROOM_OUTPUT_SHAPER=1，让模型少说"好的，我来……"这类开场白，默认是关的 压缩在本机跑，内容不会发出去。uv tool install --python 3.13 "headroom-ai[all]" 就能装，Apache-2.0，Cursor 得手动配。 大段正文、本来就很密的输出基本压不动，省多少看你的流量有多啰嗦，跑一下 headroom savings 就知道了。

🏫 想把 AI agent 真正做上线的看这里，Agentic System Course 用 22 章讲透生产级 agent 怎么设计、搭建和运维。 Agentic System Course 的 fork 已经接近一百个，而且整套课是写给你和你的 AI 一起读的，仓库里同时放了 AGENTS.md 和 CLAUDE.md。 以前学 agent 开发，要么跟着某个框架的教程一步步敲，换个技术栈就全废；要么零散看博客，记忆、多 agent 协作、成本控制各讲各的。 这门课只给骨架：把记忆与状态、多 agent 协调、外部接口、可观测性、成本与延迟、安全运维这些承重的主题和取舍讲清楚，具体代码交给你的 AI 按你的技术栈去补。最后一章是一张设计画布，直接拿来设计你自己的 agent。 还有个顺手的：仓库自带一个评审 skill，把你的 PRD、设计文档或 agent 代码丢给它，它先判断你做的是个人项目、团队工具还是面向客户的产品，再挑相关章节出报告，每条问题都带严重程度、证据、章节出处和修复建议。课程拿 OpenCode、Hermes Agent、OpenClaw、Paperclip 四个开源项目当参考实现。 用 agent 学 agent，这个思路挺对味。 GitHub：

Dario looks just like Cesare Borgia. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---

Dario looks just like Cardinal Richelieu. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---