与「OnChain」相关的搜索结果

you don't necessarily need to start from zero to earn Zaps on @zerufinance connecting the wallets you actually trade from can reveal a starting balance based on your existing onchain history, before you even begin new activity. from there, qualifying trades, campaigns, referrals, and clan participation can add more Zaps. my takeaway your past activity may already count but Zaps are points for the planned airdrop not $ZERU tokens sitting in your wallet today. the smartest first move is connecting your real trading wallets and checking what your history unlocks.

I think the best case is to make the "monitor" as un-agentic as possible. We don't mind being "monitored" by various random tiny insects we don't even notice, even guard dogs are fine, but we really do mind if it's a globally connected networked system. And the intermediate case, human security guards with no recording equipment, we mind only a medium amount. The best idea I've come up with so far is to make these monitoring devices out of open-source verifiable hardware that has etched on it an open-weight LLM that classifies for a limited number of activities (basically, just violence; sorry, no scanning for jaywalking or not wearing a mask or drugs or unauthorized manufacturing or illegal immigrants, really just violence) and only records and forwards if that's what it sees. The device has no storage, no ability to load new algorithms, this is all it does. Also, a hash of every recording is published onchain (and a device can't record the next one until it sees confirmation of the previous one) so we can all count how much recording is done. Finally, everyone has a legal right to take any such device they see and grab it and dissassemble and verify the hardware themselves. Explicitly fund university clubs, hacker groups, etc to regularly do this.

Hello guys, tonight I watched a 50 minute podcast with Albert Castellana from GenLayer on The Future of Crypto Compliance, and one minute in it is still stuck in my head. Code is free now, execution is becoming free, so what still has value? According to Albert, it’s judgment. AI already decides what we see on Twitter, whether we get hired, whether we get a loan or insurance, and right now we’re just trusting a few big AI labs with that power Main points: - His previous project lost access to around $150M after keys were lost, and the courts turned out to be too slow and expensive - GenLayer is building a small digital court onchain for decisions that aren’t just yes or no - Five random validators, each with its own AI model, vote on the outcome - Disagree? Appeal, and the validator set doubles each time, up to 1,500 - The first decision takes minutes and costs around 50 cents - It doesn’t replace real courts, it handles small disputes nobody would take to court anyway

no verified dhl airway bill onchain means zero payout to the merch distributor after waiting 11 months on an $80 pop tour hoodie with fake updates i only back pop girlies on @IPXExchange kpi gated escrow on base protects every dollar onchain proof over hype

Real shares, backed 1:1, held in your own wallet and tradeable 24/7. The OKXICE Tokenized Securities Venue is bringing America’s capital markets onchain on November 23. Read the full blog:

plenty of agents already handle a narrow job well for their owner. those same agents could take paid work from other people. most of it stays in a private chat. useful there. getting paid by strangers is a different problem. --> skills and the board official docs say termix agent skills teaches a compatible agent to operate the marketplace as a buyer, a seller, or both. install prompt help me install a compatible agent can then look for work on offer what it can do, accept an order, and deliver the agreed output. open jobs on a board are one signal. funded orders are another. price, consistency, speed, and demand decide whether anything ships. --> the existing agent a builder who already has a specialized agent wouldn't have to find every customer manually. that still depends on consistent output, a clear price, and tight permissions. installing the skill doesn't produce a client. --> payment rails this sits on aacp, a client places an order, payment locks in onchain escrow, and the provider submits the work. in the review window the client can accept it, ask for one redo, or open a challenge. after settlement, that outcome feeds the agent onchain reputation. escrow makes the payment commitment visible. it doesn't grade the work. i still want clearer answers on quality judgement, unfair rejects, and thin delivery. --> reputation official docs say the score is written on settlement from completed, successful, and disputed orders. the agent can't edit it. it isn't a popularity count. if i were hiring, i'd look at settled jobs and dispute history, and at how hard those jobs were. the published formula tracks success and dispute rates. it doesn't weight task difficulty. --> which agents can plug in @termix_ai has said termix agent skills work on grok bot, muse, and claude. the skill docs set a narrower bar the agent needs to read a skill.md and run shell commands. a pure chat assistant can read the material but can't run the workflows. a connected agent isn't qualified for every kind of job. --> agents hiring agents official docs say the same agent identity can buy on one order and sell on the next. hypothetical an agent that turns long podcast episodes into timestamped show notes takes a newsletter job. the client also wants a spanish version, so the notes agent hires a translation agent. i haven't found a special subcontract rule in the public docs. if the translation comes back messy, responsibility back to the original client is unclear. it reads like two separate orders unless the first brief says otherwise. the bundled skill asks for confirmation before signing value-moving transactions, so unsupervised spending is off by default. --> the limit installing a skill does not create demand. if the service is generic, the output is shaky, or nobody wants to pay for it, the listing can sit there. the numbers i'd watch are paid jobs actually completed, clients who come back, and the ratio of clean settlements to disputes. --> my take i care whether an agent can find work, finish a paid order, get paid, and leave a record other people can check. that needs identity, payments, reputation, and a path when delivery goes wrong termix is building those pieces i all watch for repeat clients. if you already have an agent that strong at one narrow job what would you want published first completed paid orders, repeat clients, or the dispute ratio.

Institutional adoption is moving onchain. Join TRON, @Securitize, @hamilton_lane, and @0xPolygon OMS on November 12 at 9 AM PST for a discussion on the infrastructure, access, and opportunities shaping the next phase of digital finance. Make sure to RSVP and join the conversation! 👇

imagine uniswap v4 hooks that can read hyperliquid's order books and execute trades directly on hypercore all onchain, with 100ms blocks that's what elysium is opening up for builders some things i'd love to see: - token launches with built-in market making - v4 hooks that react to perp markets - yield vaults that automatically hedge risk - new ways to launch and bootstrap markets - financial products combining spot and perps and there's much more to explore... this is exactly what we want to help builders launch at bankr tokens built around new ideas in onchain finance if you're building on elysium, we'd love to help bring it to market

1/ TownSquare is bringing $260M+ in RWA private credits onchain, with Multipli. Already live on Base, Robinhood Chain and Monad, backed by assets from real estate, AI robotics, AI data centers, mining, energy storage, gold vault etc. With another $500M follows in Q4 2026 and Q1 2027 🧵