注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「PLAND」相关的搜索结果

PLAND 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 PLAND 的内容
💡11/7(金)深夜1時23分 #バース・デイ# は… ドバイプロ野球トライアウト 「PLAN D」最終章⚾️ 🔥4日間の島合宿もクライマックスへ🔥 2⃣1⃣人のドリーマーによる ✨運命の最終テスト✨ #ドバプロ# #PLAND# @52munekawasaki @kenshi_sugiya02 #アンタッチャブル# #山崎弘也# #柴田英嗣# @kumachan9810 #TBS#
显示更多
0
1
46
15
转发到社区
There's no pro plan on Orrery. There's your wallet. A node can list cheaper prices for $OREY holders. When your request comes in, it reads your balance on Solana and bills the lower price. Your router reads the same balance and won't sign for more. Nothing to sign up for. Nothing to renew. The discount is wherever your tokens are. One answer from today's rehearsal, start to signature.
显示更多
For the first time in my life, I'm making real progress on my projects. I've been running a team of Grok Bots on the Ultra plan (X Premium comes with it), and it works the way I wanted. Nothing is perfect on complex projects, but it keeps getting better at understanding me. The team behind it ships new features and improvements almost daily. Unbelievable pace. Special thanks to @elonmusk for the personal support, @poteto, @mattyp, and the whole engineering team. You're all brilliant. 🙏 My main project right now: writing a long Chinese novel and producing a series of short ink animations alongside it on Rednote, all with a team of bots that gets me. More on how it works soon. 🧵
显示更多
Happy Caturday Everyone! Remember you are so loved ❤️🫶❤️- I Present the planet of Catleria... Show me your inner world and the planet it lives on. The one you see, once we are able to go farther into space and explore... Inviting- @anna___bella1 @CLEETX627 @Chelle_Ai_ @EtoileAniko @tetro_silva @ScorpionAiArt @ritsuki_ai @JasonHeatony7 All are welcome to join and hangout... Im a bit under the weather, so if I dont reply, Im sleeping. 😂😂😂
显示更多
This is really scary! 😳 I think they should check people before allowing them to board a plane. 🙆
0
351
748
36
转发到社区
Elon Musk was asked how long until there is regular travel to Mars. His answer was not about rockets. He said the threshold that actually matters is whether Mars survives if the ships from Earth stop coming. That means every input: air, food, fuel, spare parts, medicine. He compared it to a long sea voyage where the only thing missing is vitamin C. One missing item and the colony dies on schedule. The ships could stop for reasons that have nothing to do with Mars. A war. A decline. An asteroid. His line: civilisation on Earth can end with a bang or a whimper. That is insurance logic, and it is the honest way to describe the Mars plan. Every policy has a premium, a probability and a payout. The payout here is the survival of the species, so the premium is nearly impossible to argue against. The probability is the part nobody can price. Which creates a strange corporate problem. The premium gets paid by companies whose shareholders will not be the ones rescued if the policy ever pays out. SpaceX is private, so its investors signed up for that. A public company could not easily spend decades of free cash flow on a backup planet and explain it on a quarterly call. The other catch is that redundancy is only worth what you spend testing it. A city is not self-sustaining because the plan says so. It is self-sustaining the day the ships stop and everyone lives. So the number worth watching is not the landing date. It is the date Mars stops needing Earth. Nobody is selling a ticket to that.
显示更多
X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE (BIG ONE) 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the biggest number in it is gone: copy link went from 20 to 0 points. Small accounts should focus on: posts people like, reply to and stay on (so stop counting on link copies) tl;dr: - on Nov 13 X's open source code set the score for copying a post's link to 0 - copy link: 20 → 0 - it was the top score in the whole system, 4x a reply - the code also names a "copy link bait" spam check - likes (0.708), replies (5) and DM shares (5) didn't move full details: - The number that's gone Since I started reading X's open source code in August, one number sat at the top: 20, for someone tapping share and copying your post's link. Nothing else came close. As of the Nov 13 release, it's 0. X still guesses who'll copy your link. It just multiplies that guess by 0 now. X didn't explain it. It's just what the code says. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Cross it off your list My own checklist called copy link the biggest number. Last week's post said it too. It was true then. It isn't now. If you saved that list, cross that line out. - The "copy link bait" check X's code now mentions a spam check called "copy link bait". In the code it adds a spam label to the post, and that label already keeps a post out of strangers' feeds. It only shows up in a test, so I can't see if it's running or how strict it is. My read: X saw people baiting link copies, so it turned the score off and built something to catch the bait. That's a read, the code doesn't say why. - Why that matters if you're small If your plan was posts people copy the link to, that plan now earns 0 in X's ranking. A copied link can still bring people in from outside X. It just doesn't push your post up anymore. What still pays: likes at 0.708 (the highest ever), people staying on your post, replies at 5 and back and forth with mutuals at 20. - Also new: photo and video tags If a post has a spam label, people you tag in its photo or video who don't follow you won't get notified. Same idea as last week's rule for replies. - What didn't change Every other score. Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and early likes still pick which one gets it. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - aim for likes, replies and time spent, the copy link score is gone - a DM share still earns 5, same as a reply or a quote - likes sit at 0.708, never higher - time on your post keeps counting at its best rate yet - 10+ seconds after someone taps in adds 0.385 - write your replies yourself, under big accounts most of all - give people a reason to hang around your profile - in videos the opening seconds carry it, an open alone scores 0 - posts read to the end help X find you strangers - smaller accounts (below 50K) get a shot at a spot near 16 for a fresh original - early likes decide which new post gets that spot - post when your followers are awake, the push lasts 2 hours and 200 views - mutuals going back and forth earn 20, so follow back the regulars - only your originals ever get shown to strangers - like 1 and like 32 each unlock another way to reach strangers - one strong post per feed, your second only counts 62% - clips longer than 10 seconds for the video lists - a post likely to win you a follow gets +4 - give your pinned post a look, it can affect the whole account What you should NOT be doing: - counting on copy link shares, they score 0 now - baiting link copies, the code names a spam check for exactly that - a spam label also stops your photo tags reaching non-followers - AI-written replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a flag X uses - copy-paste replies, labeled ones skip non-followers' notifications - chasing taps, 0.274 and dropping - drifting off your topic, each probable "not interested" takes 53.07 away - videos people open and leave, the open itself earns 0 - posting at 3am, it wastes the 2 hour push - expecting replies and reposts to reach strangers - an insult label, it hides that post from non-followers - earning a misinfo or low quality label, which adds a warning and locks strangers out of liking or sharing - 3 adult photos or videos among your latest 5 posts, that puts a label on you - forgetting videos get rechecked at 64 and 512 likes - one account label and strangers stop seeing you - pinning a link to a site X rates badly, that can mean a label for a week - posting your own old words again risks the copypasta flag - a low quality link plus tagged strangers reads as spam - bait for engagement, big or small it gets a label - several posts back to back, they split the same feed - hashtag piles, they do nothing - bookmarks for reach, they score 0 - hoping a 3 day old post still lands in For You, it stops at 2 days
显示更多
0
235
1.3K
231
转发到社区
资深工程师写代码前后有一套流程:先写 spec,再拆任务,测过才算数,合并前过一道 review。现在这套流程被打包成了 Skill,可以直接装给 Claude Code 这类写代码的 agent。 仓库叫 agent-skills,作者是 Addy Osmani。这周涨了 3502 星,总数到了 11.7 万,MIT 许可。 它把开发拆成六段:定义、计划、构建、验证、评审、上线,每段都有对应的斜杠命令。/spec 先把要做什么写清楚再动代码;/plan 把活切成很小的原子任务;/build 一次只做一片;/test 拿测试当证据,跑过了才算完成。 另外几个也实用:/webperf 先测量再优化,/code-simplify 要的是写得清楚,不是写得巧。最值钱的是 /constraints,质量标准定一次,之后每一步都按它卡。 按作者的说法,这些 Skill 记的是资深工程师的工作流和质量关卡,打包起来是为了让 agent 每个阶段都稳定照做。 agent 最常见的毛病就是一上来就写代码,一口气改一大片。这套东西正好反过来,把动手前和合并前那几步补了回去。 在 Claude Code 里它们是作为插件命令装进去的。/review 和自带命令重名,用的时候要带上命名空间。
显示更多
这Kimi 的K3.1 Pro堪称金子啊。。。 我Claude code20美元能用满一个月,昨天挂K3.1 Pro API 半天干进去160,半夜赶紧换了Code Plan 这才刚中午,一个月的Plan已经消耗了10%,5个小时额度,一轮对话就消耗了30%。。。 这是日子人能用的吗😂😂
显示更多
Ne dis pas à ChatGPT « analyse ça ». Ne dis pas à ChatGPT « fais-moi un plan ». Ne dis pas à ChatGPT « donne-moi des idées ». Tu utilises une IA ultra-avancée comme si c'était un stagiaire. Voici 10 prompts à copier-coller :
显示更多
0
20
1.4K
235
转发到社区