与「PROMISEเพื่อชีวิตเด็กนับล้าน」相关的搜索结果

เรามาสัญญาเพื่อเด็ก ๆ ด้วยกันนะครับ 🤍💍 For every child, a PROMISE. @unicef_thailand ร่วม PROMISE ไปพร้อมกับผม บริจาครายเดือนวันนี้ รับแหวนแทนคำสัญญา เพื่อปกป้องเด็ก ๆ ให้ปลอดภัย และมีอนาคตที่สดใสไปด้วยกันนะครับ For every child, a PROMISE. #PROMISEเพื่อชีวิตเด็กนับล้าน# #ForEveryChildAPromise# #UNICEFThailand#

สวัสดีครับ แบมแบมนะครับ แหวนวงนี้นะครับ คือสัญลักษณ์แทนคําสัญญาของของผมเพื่อเด็ก ๆ และผมขอส่งต่อคำสัญญานี้ให้กับทุกคน 💍 มาPromise ไปด้วยกันนะครับ @unicef_thailand บริจาครายเดือนวันนี้ รับแหวนแทนคำสัญญา พร้อมช่วยเหลือ เด็ก ๆ อย่างต่อเนื่องไปด้วยกันนะครับ #PROMISEเพื่อชีวิตเด็กนับล้าน# #ForEveryChildAPromise# #UNICEFThailand#

Happy weekend friends, good morning and have a great Saturday fam ☀️ Two weeks into exploring @meetmotes, I think I can finally describe the project with a clearer mental model. At the beginning, I mostly saw Motes as an NFT project entering the AI conversation. Now, after spending more time with the docs and the architecture, I think that framing is too shallow. The more accurate way to understand it, at least for me, is this: Motes is not just about AI agents. It is about how ownership, control, and execution are supposed to fit together. If I had to summarize the whole design in four layers, I would explain it like this: 1. NFT Identity The Mote NFT is the ownership reference and collectible identity. This is where the story starts. 2. Smart Account The account is where assets and permissions live. It is separate from the artwork and gives the system functional structure. 3. Agent Proposal The AI layer suggests or prepares actions. It is the intelligence layer, but not the final authority. 4. Owner Policy This is the part that matters most to me now. The owner defines the limits. What assets are allowed, how much can be used, for how long, and under which rules the agent can act. That is the mental model I have after two weeks. And honestly, my thinking has changed a bit. At first, I was most interested in the AI angle. That is what naturally gets attention. But the deeper I looked, the more I felt the real substance might be in the control framework around the AI. So if you ask me where my view changed, it is here: I started by thinking the most important layer was the agent. Now I think the most important layer may be the policy model that keeps the agent useful, bounded, and accountable. That shift matters. Because a lot of products can promise intelligence. What feels harder, and more valuable, is building intelligence that operates inside a structure the owner can actually understand and trust. That is why Motes has become more interesting to me over time. Not because it says AI louder than other projects. But because it tries to connect four things that are often treated separately: Identity Assets Intelligence Control And if those four layers really stay aligned, then the NFT becomes more than a PFP, and the agent becomes more than a black box. For me, that is the best short summary of the first two weeks. A Mote is not just art, and not just automation. It is an attempt to turn ownership into a structured relationship between identity, account, agent, and policy. Curious how others would summarize it. If you had to explain Motes in one sentence after two weeks of research, what would your sentence be?

My mom fed a homeless man behind our house for 20 years. Three meals a day, even when we couldn’t afford electricity. I hated her for it. The day after her funeral, that same man took my hands, looked me straight in the eyes, and said: “Before she died, she begged me to stay silent.” I honestly had no idea what he was talking about. For 20 years, this man had lived in a makeshift shelter behind our rental house. My mom brought him breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Every single day. And the crazy thing was, we were poor too. My sneakers had tape covering the holes. Sometimes we struggled to pay our bills, and there were days when we couldn’t even afford electricity. But somehow, my mother always found enough food to feed him. I never understood it. I remember coming home two days before Christmas and finding a yellow eviction notice taped to our front door. We were struggling to keep a roof over our heads, yet my mother was still preparing three meals a day for a stranger. That night, I finally lost my temper. Me: “Maybe if you stopped feeding strangers, we wouldn’t live like this!” My mom turned around so quickly that I knew I had crossed a line. Mom: “Don’t you ever DARE say that again.” I had never seen her that furious before. I didn’t understand why she was defending him so strongly when her own child was going without things. I moved out when I turned 18. We fought less after that, mostly because I stopped asking questions. But the man stayed. Year after year, his little shelter remained behind our house, and my mother continued feeding him. Then my mom got sick. Cancer made her small. She became quiet, and it was the kind of quiet that scares you because you know something terrible is happening. Two weeks before she died, she reached out and grabbed my wrist. Her grip was so weak that it broke my heart. Mom: “Promise me you’ll keep feeding him.” I looked at her. Honestly, I wanted to say no. I wanted to ask why she was still worrying about that man when she was the one who needed help. But you don’t lie to a dying mother. So I promised. My mom eventually passed away. The day after her funeral, I prepared the best meal I could, put it on a plate, covered it with foil, and drove to her house. I had promised her I would keep feeding him. But when I got there, the man was gone. His shelter had been completely cleared out. Everything was gone. The ground had even been swept clean, as if those 20 years had never happened. I stood there holding the warm plate, wondering where he could have gone. Then I noticed something. A black SUV was parked at the curb. Standing beside it was a man wearing an expensive wool coat. He was clean-shaven, well-dressed, and looked nothing like the homeless man I had known for 20 years. But the thing that caught my attention was what he was holding. My mother’s old silver locket. The same locket she had told me she lost when I was eight years old. He looked at me and said: Man: “I thought you wouldn’t come.” I stared at him. Me: “Wait… is that you? What’s going on?” He smiled, but his expression was unsteady. His eyes were already filling with tears. Man: “Your mom hid something from you.” I felt my stomach tighten. Me: “What did she hide?” He looked at the plate in my hands before responding. Man: “Before she died, she begged me to stay silent.” My blood went cold. Me: “Silent about what?” He gently shook his head. Man: “Sit down. You shouldn’t hear this standing in the cold.” We sat on the front steps. The plate was still warm between us. He turned my mother’s silver locket over in his palm as though it might break. Then he began telling me something I never could have imagined. Man: “My real name is Vernon Hale. Before all this, I owned a company. I had a big house in Connecticut, a wife, and a little girl. My daughter was six years old.” I just stared at him.

Jensen Huang is effectively OUT of NVIDIA🚨 Man His wife is 65 years 🇺🇸 They have been married for 41 years. As early microchip designers, she reportedly earned more money She totally left engineering work to raise their two children while Jensen Huang built Nvidia She was one of only three women in a class of 250 electrical-engineering students at Oregon State University when she and Jensen met. Jensen was 17 years when he walked up to the 19 year old Lori (his wife) and asked "Do you want to see my homework?" He promised that if they studied together every Sunday she would get straight A's, turning homework sessions into weekly dates. He also told her he would be a CEO by age 30. A promise he kept when he co-founded Nvidia in 1993. Jensen has repeatedly called meeting her "the most important, single event of Oregon university, and of my life" They married in 1985, the same year she graduated with her electrical-engineering degree. In 2022 the couple gave $50 million to Oregon State University (the campus where they met) to create a major innovation complex named after both of them. Jensen has said he does "zero percent" of his own shopping and that Lori (with their daughter) chooses his clothes, including the signature black leather jacket. He has publicly credited her with being "part of Nvidia every step of the way" and with handling the personal and financial details of their life. It's quite sad what is happening currently and how shattered Lori Huang must be.

Her name is Kimberly Powell. She is 48 this year and joined Nvidia in 2008. > November 8, 2026. Jensen Huang sends a letter to every Nvidia employee. > “I was unfaithful to my wife. My actions hurt her and our children. There is no excuse for what I did. I am deeply sorry.” > The affair was with Alice Huang, a Chinese businesswoman suspected by US intelligence of being a spy. > The board opens an investigation. > The FBI is involved. > Nvidia’s stock falls. > Then, three days later, the story gets worse. > November 11, 2026. The New York Times publishes a second report. > Jensen Huang had another affair. > A second woman. > A subordinate. > Someone who reports directly to him. > Her name is Kimberly Powell. > Vice president of healthcare at Nvidia. > Joined the company in 2008. > Promoted to senior director in 2016. > Vice president by the end of 2017. > Eighteen years at Nvidia. > One of Huang’s roughly sixty direct reports. > She is 48. He is 63. > Both are married. > March 2026. Nvidia’s GTC conference in San Jose. > Powell presents on AI and healthcare. > Her slides use animated images of Huang. > Then executives gather at a nearby hotel. > Huang and Powell are seen together. > Affectionate. Intimate. > A witness records it on their phone. > Huang’s security team spots the witness. > Escorts them away. > Asks them to sign a confidentiality agreement. > The video still exists. > Five former Nvidia employees confirm the relationship was discussed inside the company. > Nvidia’s code of conduct has a rule. > Personal relationships can create conflicts of interest. > The company says it promptly investigates reports of misconduct. > The CEO wrote the letter that begins the code. > He is now the subject of the investigation. > November 12, 2026. The board prepares to meet. > The Wall Street Journal reports the board could determine his future as soon as that day. > The board is preparing to oust the CEO who built the most valuable chip company on Earth. > Nvidia’s stock sinks more than 7% after hours. > Huang, Powell, and Nvidia have all declined to comment. > None of the allegations have been confirmed by any of them. > The first affair cost him his reputation. > The second affair may cost him his company. > He admitted one. He has said nothing about the other. > The board is meeting. > The investigation is expanding. > The man who kept his promise to Lori Mills is running out of promises to keep. He built the most powerful company in the history of computing. He admitted to one affair. Then a second woman’s name surfaced. The board is deciding whether he still runs the company he founded. His name is Jensen Huang. He is 63 years old. And for the first time in his life, the next move is not his to make.

Today, we’re taking another major step towards making that promise of energy dominance a reality. I’m excited to announce the Alaska Railbelt Transmission Project, which is going to devote $400 million dollars to building out Alaska's power grid. With this project, the Trump Administration will help develop more than two hundred miles of new transmission line, lowering costs and strengthening grid reliability for 75% of the population of the state.

Atomic synchronous composability is no longer a promise. History made on mainnet: the first atomic cross-chain L1->L2 transaction ever 🔥 And this is only the beginning for EEZ ... 🚀 @etheconomiczone