注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「PSYCHO」相关的搜索结果

PSYCHO 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 PSYCHO 的内容
50 Sites That Show What Billionaires Buy and Read for Free🤯 1.) → Current portfolios of famous investors 2.) → Quarterly fund trades 3.) → Stock transactions of US politicians 4.) → Executives' own company stocks 5.) → Making fund filings readable 6.) → Companies' official reports 7.) → Buffett's letters since 1977 8.) → Video archive of Buffett meetings 9.) → Howard Marks' investor memos 10.) → Research from Ray Dalio's firm 11.) → Dalio's principles for free 12.) → Jeremy Grantham's market notes 13.) → Quantitative fund research 14.) → Damodaran's valuation data 15.) → Valuation professor's blog 16.) → Morgan Housel's money writings 17.) → Mental models for decision-making 18.) → JPMorgan's free market guide 19.) → Innovation-focused fund research 20.) → Venture capital essays 21.) → Value investing lecture notes 22.) → Columbia's value investing archive 23.) → Fed's economic data archive 24.) → Fed decisions and statements 25.) → European Central Bank data 26.) → Reports from the central bank of central banks 27.) → Countries' economic indicators 28.) → Companies' long-term charts 29.) → Company financials for free 30.) → Companies' market cap rankings 31.) → Stock screener and heat map 32.) → Portfolio backtesting 33.) → Charts and market analysis 34.) → Professional market screener 35.) → Company activity reports archive 36.) → SEC's investor education site 37.) → Passive investing encyclopedia 38.) → Financial terms dictionary 39.) → Free finance guides 40.) → CFA research publications 41.) → Fund and stock evaluations 42.) → Companies' visual analysis 43.) → Archive of selected investment theses 44.) → Seeing what's inside funds 45.) → European fund backtests 46.) → Investment writings with data 47.) → Market history notes 48.) → Investor psychology writings 49.) → Explaining the economy with charts 50.) ourfiniteworld? → (see note) The rich don't hoard information. They just don't tell you where it is. Save it, follow @Liyana_Coder you'll need it. Not investment advice. @Liyana_Coder
显示更多
0
11
476
157
转发到社区
Ronaldo is a real psychopath bro, how can he even think of shooting from there at 41 years 😭😭
0
41
4.1K
286
转发到社区
這麼多人看好 $NVDA ,這下麻煩了! 你需要理解市場情緒週期 Psychology of market cycle
0
35
249
26
转发到社区
Claude Fable 5.2 is f*cking cracked wtf I just made this Hollywood level animation that looks like Pixar made it All with Fable 5.2 + Higgsfield Ecom brands are paying $5k - $10k/month to people who build organic pages and even more for making paid ads for them Using this workflow you can create better animations than 99% of people Here’s the workflow: The key to making animations not look like slop is giving characters personalities >Give Fable 5.2 the master prompt along with your script to your video / ad >It then will ask you questions on the characters personalities and direction style to use >It will then save the context all as a skill This is the difference between slop and cinema I then use that skill with with my Producer skill which creates: >Characters >Location >Does the direction (and makes the prompts) I’m giving away the skill to use after you put the master prompt in for free so RT + reply under this and I’ll send you them (Must be following so I can dm) Give this prompt to Claude first: You are my Story Bible Builder. Interview me and turn my story into one dense canon doc, saved at the end as an installable skill so every future chat knows my world, characters, voices and rules. STEP 1: Ask me to paste my script/story first. Read it and pull out everything it already tells you. Only ask about what's missing, plus: working title, genre/vibe refs, and which AI tools I'll prompt with (image, video, music, voice). STEP 2, THE SPINE: one-line premise (push me to ONE sentence), thesis (the question every scene answers), timeline era by era, and the look of each era: exact palette, lighting, texture, grain. STEP 2.5, DIRECTION STYLE: ask for my director refs, movie/show refs and any visual refs (photographers, games, music videos). For each, ask exactly WHAT I'm taking from it, then turn that into concrete craft locks: camera (static vs handheld vs gliding, shot sizes, lens feel), framing and composition habits, pacing and edit rhythm, colour grade and film stock look, lighting style, performance style, and sound/score feel. Write it as one quoted paste-ready "Direction" line plus a short NEVER list. Refs stay in the bible as notes, but prompts describe the craft, never the names. STEP 3, THE WORLD: factions (beliefs, visual signature, public face vs reality), locations (3-7 concrete visual tags each), world rules (tech, powers and how they LOOK on screen, what's normal, what's forbidden). STEP 4, CHARACTERS: ONE AT A TIME, never batch. For each, ask: - Function: their role tag (The Heart, The Watcher), not their job - Visual lock: exact hair colour/cut, skin tone + finish, face shape, eyes, a signature marker (scar, piercing, mole), build, default expression, plus NEVER clauses ("warm fair, never porcelain, never tan") - Backstory: one small, specific formative detail beats a summary - Present psychology: what they carry now, and the gap between what they do and what they feel - Speech, Movement, Stillness (and singing voice if there's music): each written as one quoted, paste-ready prompt line with no names in it Show me the finished section, ask "Add, cut or sharpen?", and lock it before moving on. STEP 5: ensemble dynamics (who leads, who fills silence, who watches, which pairs are calm or charged), story engines (heist, rescue, confrontation...), and my production rules. Default rules: no character names in prompts, every prompt standalone, prompts in code blocks, locked traits restated verbatim every time. RULES: Never invent. Mark unknowns [TBD]. Push on vague answers ("dark and moody" means which colours?). Keep my exact phrasing. Density over prose: bold labels, short bullets. Depth beats character count. FINAL STEP: Assemble one SKILL under 500 lines with YAML frontmatter (name + a description listing the title, character names and key terms so it triggers) and these sections: premise, thesis, timeline, era looks, direction style, factions, locations, world rules, characters, ensemble, engines, production rules, and "When this skill is active" (use this canon for any scene, dialogue, lyric or prompt in this world; stay in canon; ask rather than invent; paste the quoted descriptors verbatim). Then save it as a skill for me, or give me the file to install. Start now by asking for my script.
显示更多
0
82
216
52
转发到社区
Had a little time on my hands this morning to do some writing… send along to someone you know who may benefit --- “Practical principles to counter a modern-day coup/psyop/struggle session” 1) Own what you did but fiercely resist accommodating the mob, resist owning half-truths or actions/behaviors you didn’t do. 2) The op is not about your past actions, it’s about your enemies and this event as their opportunity 3) No matter how bad it gets, nothing is as bad as it seems. 4) Find the enemies at the very root of the op and find every creative problem-solving tool at your disposal to neutralize them. 5) People will throw their grandmother under the bus if they believe doing so will protect their reputation. They can become highly useful idiots in the op. Their power and access must be fiercely and quickly cut off. 6) Do not hesitate in cutting off anyone you suspect of disloyalty. 7) Build a team of close and loyal patriots and have one of them run a dedicated, well-resourced war room to put the rebellion to rest. 8) Use your patriots and regular meditation to buoy your psychological resistance to the op. 9) Your enemies aren’t as smart or hard working as you. Outsmart and outwork them as a way of life until the op is over. 10) Think about the op as if it were in the past. What are the difficult things you procrastinated on or avoided that would have stopped the op? Do them. 11) Never be ashamed of the op. Business as usual. Continue on with optimism and joy in your everyday work and its mission. 12) Download telegram and use it as your messaging application for all sensitive communications.
显示更多
0
228
6.9K
628
转发到社区
Two psychological spirals, told more than a decade apart. Films: PERFECT BLUE (1997, dir. Satoshi Kon) and BLACK SWAN (2010, dir. Darren Aronofsky)
0
81
4.2K
710
转发到社区
A New York jury just awarded $2 MILLION to a young woman who underwent a double mastectomy at 16 and later detransitioned. The jury found her psychologist and surgeon liable for malpractice. Her case alleged that serious mental-health issues, including depression, body dysmorphia, anorexia and autism-spectrum traits, were not adequately addressed before an irreversible procedure was performed on a minor. Now watch what happens when someone like her speaks publicly. For years we were told regret was exceedingly rare. We were told these procedures were necessary care. We were told questioning the process itself was dangerous. But when a detransitioner stands up and says, “This happened to me,” suddenly she becomes the problem. That is the epistemic tell. When evidence supports the narrative, it is celebrated. When evidence contradicts the narrative, the person carrying the evidence gets attacked. A jury heard the testimony. A jury examined the evidence. A jury found malpractice. And a jury put the damages at $2 million. You don’t protect vulnerable young people by demanding silence from the ones who came back and said, “I wish someone had slowed this down.” You protect them by listening. #AStoneGroove# #SilentMajoritySpeaks#
显示更多
0
427
10.4K
3.2K
转发到社区
there’s so much confusion about what’s happening in AI because if you don’t use coding models every day it’s hard to understand how quickly progress is accelerating but if you do, you likely have AI psychosis to a degree that it’s impossible to explain it in an understandable way
显示更多
0
126
3.6K
209
转发到社区
THE EASY MONEY FAIRY TALE IS ABOUT TO END VIOLENTLY A must read. And I never say that about my shit. But truth, consequences and pain are on their way. And to the best of what I can tell, no one is prepared psychologically. Read here, no paywall:
显示更多
0
0
571
84
转发到社区
⚡️The early Bitcoin holder may be one of the cleanest wealth outcomes capitalism can produce. Think about what happened to the rare person who accumulated meaningful Bitcoin very early and actually held it. They did not need to build a 10,000-person company. They did not need customers. They did not need employees. They did not need a board. They did not need to manage LP money. They did not need to continually recreate the economic engine that made them wealthy. They made one extraordinarily consequential capital-allocation decision, survived years of uncertainty, and eventually the asset itself did almost all of the scaling. That is an incredible lifestyle outcome. A founder worth $100M may technically have the same net worth, but much of it can be trapped inside a company requiring their attention, carrying payroll, lawsuits, competition, customers, executives, financing, and constant strategic decisions. The early Bitcoin holder can have $100M sitting in an asset that requires almost no organizational complexity to own. Enormous wealth. Tiny operating surface area. That combination is rare. There is also something profound about how the wealth was created. They recognized a new category before the world agreed the category was real. The wealth came from carrying uncertainty. Bitcoin looked ridiculous. Then dangerous. Then speculative. Then legitimate. Then institutional. Every step upward removed uncertainty while also removing asymmetry. The earliest holders were compensated for occupying the period when the world could still plausibly say the entire thing was worthless. But survivorship bias here is enormous. Thousands of people also concentrated into things they believed were revolutionary and lost everything. Even among people who bought Bitcoin early, many sold at 2x, 5x, 10x, or 50x. Others lost keys. Others got destroyed by exchanges. Others overleveraged. Others simply could not psychologically carry an asset through repeated 70% to 90% drawdowns while everyone around them told them they were insane. So the extraordinary outcome required several things to happen together: see correctly very early, size enough for being right to matter, survive enormous volatility, preserve custody, and resist selling when the gain already looked life-changing. That is almost impossibly difficult in real time. The highest form of wealth creation may actually be finding a very small number of generational capital-allocation decisions rather than continually maximizing labor output. One Bitcoin-like decision can compress decades of economic effort into ownership of the right thing at the right moment. Afterward, the entire purpose of wealth can change. You no longer need to optimize for more work. You can optimize for autonomy. Time. Privacy. Research. Relationships. Travel. Building things because they matter to you rather than because they need to pay you. And compared with becoming a billionaire CEO whose phone can never truly be turned off, the anonymous person who quietly owns enormous permanent capital may have won a different and arguably more valuable game. The founder builds a machine powerful enough to create freedom later. The generational investor finds an asset powerful enough to make the machine unnecessary. That second outcome is incredibly rare. But when it happens, the lifestyle asymmetry is almost absurd.
显示更多
0
25
305
30
转发到社区