与「P_sha」相关的搜索结果

So I spent some time studying the new Twitter/X algorithm today since the latest version was published about a week ago on Github ( My goal was to answer why so many people have seemingly seen such a dramatic drop in their posts' reach. The first answer, which is actually somewhat unrelated to the ranking algorithm on Github, is the auto-translate feature, rolled out worldwide on April 7, 2026 ( Before that date, if you wrote in English about, say, the Trump-Xi Beijing summit, you were competing for attention with maybe 5,000 other English-language accounts writing on geopolitics. After that date, your post is competing for attention with other posts on the same topic IN EVERY LANGUAGE ON EARTH. For some topics that do command global attention like geopolitics, that's a very brutal multiplier: you used to be one of 5,000, you're suddenly one of 50,000 (something of that order): MUCH more difficult to stand out. Secondly, the number of followers you have matters far less than it used to: each post now has to earn its audience reader by reader, on the predicted engagement of the post, and how its topic matches what each reader has recently been engaging with. Here is how the algorithm works, in simple terms: when you, as a reader, open your feed, the algorithm doesn't load "posts from accounts you follow." Instead it runs a 2-stage prediction of what posts you're likely to engage with in that very moment. The first stage is the retrieval stage. The system narrows billions of posts on X/Twitter that day down to roughly 1,500 candidates by matching the semantic content of each post - what it's about - against what you as a reader have recently engaged with. Some candidate posts come from accounts you follow; others are pulled from across the platform by pure topic similarity to your recent interests. You can test this retrieval stage easily: start disproportionally engaging with - say - Brad Pitt videos and you'll bit by bit see your timeline flooded with Brad Pitt content, most of it from accounts you've never followed and never heard of. Then there's the ranking stage. Each of these candidate posts for your feed is fed through a Grok-based model that tries to understand if you'll engage with the post. It looks at 15 engagement metrics: 1) P(favorite) — the reader likes the post 2) P(reply) — the reader replies to it 3) P(repost) — the reader reposts it 4) P(quote) — the reader quote-tweets it 5) P(click) — the reader clicks a link in it 6) P(profile_click) — the reader taps through to your profile 7) P(video_view) — the reader watches the video 8) P(photo_expand) — the reader expands an image 9) P(share) — the reader shares it (DM, off-platform, etc.) 10) P(dwell) — the reader stops scrolling and lingers on the post 11) P(follow_author) — the reader follows you after seeing it 12) P(not_interested) — the reader marks "not interested" 13) P(block_author) — the reader blocks you 14) P(mute_author) — the reader mutes you 15) P(report) — the reader reports the post Fifteen predicted actions, each multiplied by a weight, summed: that sum is the score that determines in which priority a post will be seen among other candidates. Please note that posting something with a video or an image can give your post an advantage as 2 actions are specifically for these: video_view and photo_expand. No video or photo and you don't get a score for these. Also, naturally, having a video maximizes the chance that a user will "dwell" on your post to watch it. Also note that 4 of these actions carry negative weights (not_interested, block_author, mute_author and report): meaning that if the model expects a post to generate a lot of negativity, it'll get de-boosted quite dramatically. But note, first and foremost, what's NOT in there: none of the things that, naively, one might think a serious information platform would weigh. There is no P(this post is true and well-sourced). No P(the author actually knows what they're talking about). No P(this person has spent a decade building a body of work that has held up). No P(this account has earned the right to be taken seriously on this topic). No P(the author has a large following from credible people). The model does not seem to care - at all - about any of that. Every post starts from zero. You could have ten years of rigorous, well-sourced analysis behind you - or you could be just an uneducated rando who registered yesterday. To this algorithm, you're both just a bag of engagement probabilities. Now, sure, to be fair, there is a "brand" effect that's not covered by the algorithm: someone who has in fact built a brand will naturally have better engagement metrics because people recognize their account. But that's an indirect, second-order effect. And crucially, it's legacy: those "brands" were built under earlier versions of the algorithm that gave followers and reputation more weight. Lastly, several other features of the new algorithm compound the dilution, none of them visible from outside but all consequential. The May 15 update added an "impression bloom filter," tightening the rule that once a reader has been served a post, the system won't serve it to them again. Before, a strong post could marinate in someone's feed across multiple refreshes and accumulate engagement on the second or third pass. Now it basically gets one shot. Also, your own posts compete with each other. An "Author Diversity Scorer" inside the ranking stage attenuates the score of every subsequent post of yours that ends up in a reader's candidate pool. In plain terms: if multiple of your posts land in a reader's candidate pool, the system shows one at full strength and dampens the others. So don't post several times consecutively on the same topic. And, last but not least, another huge impact on reach is that, in the old algorithm, when someone reposted or quote-tweeted you, your post was broadcast to their followers' timelines - a repost from an account with 100,000 followers was a huge boost. In the new algorithm, that mechanism is vastly demoted: reposts - like every post - need to go through the retrieval and ranking stage mentioned above, so a repost from a big account is a long way from the boost it used to be. This is especially brutal for low-effort quote tweets, which used to function as cheap amplification: now they often can't even clear the retrieval stage - they simply don't contain enough novel semantic content for the system to match them to anyone's interests. So, putting it all together, the reach collapse comes from many forces stacking at once: - Auto-translate makes your posts compete for attention against an order of magnitude more content - The retrieval stage matches posts by topic, not by who follows you - The ranking stage scores purely on predicted engagement with no weight for credibility, expertise, or track record - The bloom filter narrows every post's window to one strong shot - The diversity scorer penalizes prolific posting - Reposts no longer carry much distribution power Each of these alone would dent your reach. Combined, they amount to a complete reset: your audience that you built painstakingly over years basically doesn't matter much anymore, and it's much - much - harder to stand out even if you're a big account. People structurally rewarded by this algorithm are folks who: - Post visually (videos/images) - Post on globally popular topics because they clear the retrieval stage easily - Provoke strong emotional reactions - likes, replies, reposts - Don't care about accuracy or seriousness because the algorithm doesn't measure it - Don't care about their existing audience because every post is judged in isolation anyway In short this new algorithm, like so many on social media, is all about maximizing whether people will engage with something - not about whether they should.

＼柔軟剤 #P_sha# キャンペーン🫧／ 楽天市場、Amazon、店舗でP-shaをご購入いただいた方に、 抽選で賞品をプレゼント🎶 🎁賞品 A賞：Nissy直筆サイン入りP-shaボトル(12名様) B賞：P-shaオリジナルペーパーフレグランス(240名様) ⏰応募期間 2026/5/1(金)12:00～2026/5/8(金)23:59 🔻キャンペーンサイトはこちら 皆さまのご応募、お待ちしています！ @p_sha_CB #PR#

/／ 〈NEW〉 　柔軟剤 #P_sha# から新たな香りが登場🏝 \＼ ドン・キホーテ限定コラボ！ 爽やかで心地よい #シトラスサンライズ# の香り🍋 ドン・キホーテ限定特典 シトラスサンライズの香りをご購入で、Nissy新ビジュアルアテンションシールがもらえるのは“今回だけ”！ 対象店舗👇 華やかさと瑞々しさが重なる #ローズカシスシャワー# の香り🌹 WEB購入特典 ローズカシスシャワーの香り〈ボトル＋詰め替えセット〉をご購入で、Nissy新ビジュアルポストカード(全4種)をランダムで1枚プレゼント！ さらに限定アテンションシール付き✨ 楽天市場👇 Amazon👇 新しくP-shaに加わった限定の香りをぜひお楽しみください️🎶 @p_sha_CB #PR#

/／ 　📣柔軟剤 #P_sha# 　　待望の #ファブリックミスト# が新登場✨ \＼ P-shaのファブリックミストが、ついに誕生しました🫧 香りは「ホワイトフローラル」「ホワイトムスク」の2種類セット🎶 気分にあわせてお楽しみいただけます！ ファブリックミスト限定ビジュアルのNissyのアテンションシール付き！ ※アテンションシールはなくなり次第終了です。 🛒楽天市場 🛒Amazon ファブリックミストでも、 ぜひP-shaの香りをお楽しみください✨ @p_sha_CB #PR#

/／ 　📣柔軟剤 #P_sha# 　　#サクラ# の香りが数量限定で再登場🌸 \＼ 春らしいやわらかな香りが今季も登場🫧 この季節ならではの特別な香りをお楽しみください✨ 🎁特典 店舗・WEBで＜サクラの香りのボトル＞をご購入の方に Rujju🎀のアテンションシールが付きます！ ※特典はなくなり次第終了です。 🛒楽天市場 🛒Amazon 春をまとうような香りを、もう一度🎶 @p_sha_CB #PR#

/／ 　📣柔軟剤 #P_sha# から 　　 詰め替え大容量サイズが登場🫧 \＼ 待望の詰め替え大容量＜3倍サイズ＞の発売が決定いたしました🎶 人気のホワイトフローラルの香りとホワイトムスクの香りを、 日常使いに嬉しいサイズでお買い求めいただけます！ 楽天市場・Amazon・全国のお取り扱い店舗で販売中🛒 楽天市場👇 Amazon👇 ホワイトフローラルの香り ホワイトムスクの香り この機会にぜひ、大容量サイズをチェックしてみてください✨ @p_sha_CB #PR#

🎄最終日まであと1日‼️ 柔軟剤 #P_sha# クリスマスキャンペーン大好評開催中✨ 直筆サイン入りP-shaボトルが当たるのは今だけ！ ⏰応募期間 2025/12/18(木)23:59まで 🔻キャンペーンサイトはこちら 応募がまだの方はお早めに！ お見逃しなく💨

＼柔軟剤 #P_sha# クリスマスキャンペーン🎄／ 楽天市場、Amazon、店舗でP-shaをご購入いただいた方に、 抽選で賞品をプレゼント🎶 🎁賞品 A賞：Nissy直筆サイン入り P-shaボトル(12名様) B賞：P-shaオリジナルペーパーフレグランス(240名様) ⏰応募期間 2025/12/10(水)12:00～2025/12/18(木)23:59 🔻キャンペーンサイトはこちら この冬だけのスペシャル企画！ 皆さまのご応募、お待ちしています🎄

/／ 〈NEW〉 柔軟剤 #P_sha# から新たな香りが登場🌴 \＼ 新しい香りは、気分をリフレッシュしてくれる、爽やかな香り。 ドン・キホーテ限定コラボ！ 瑞々しく心まで晴れるような #トロピカルサンセット# の香り🌇 ドン・キホーテ限定特典 トロピカルサンセットご購入で、Nissy新ビジュアルアテンションシールがもらえるのは“今回だけ”！ 対象店舗👇 清潔感の中にやさしい甘さが広がる #ブルーフィグオーシャン# の香り🐬 WEB購入特典 ブルーフィグオーシャン〈ボトル＋詰め替えセット〉ご購入で、 Nissy新ビジュアルポストカード(全4種)をランダムで1枚プレゼント！ さらに限定アテンションシール付き✨ 楽天市場👇 Amazon👇 新しくP-shaに加わった限定の香りをぜひお楽しみください☀️ #PR#

/／ 📣柔軟剤 #P_sha# 　あの #キンモクセイ# の香りが数量限定で再登場🍂🧡 \＼ ご好評につき、ふわっと香る秋のやさしさをもう一度🫧 この季節だけの特別な香りをぜひお楽しみください✨ そして今回は…🎁 店舗・WEBで〈キンモクセイのボトル〉をご購入の方に Lippy💋アテンションシールが付きます！ ※特典はなくなり次第終了です🕊️ 🛒Amazon 🛍️楽天市場 秋の香りを、もう一度🍂🧡 #P_sha# #PR#