与「SCANDAL」相关的搜索结果

🚨 NATIONAL-SECURITY SCANDAL: Stanford’s former aerospace chief spent 14 years reviewing engine programs for the F-22 and F-35. Then he quietly trained researchers at a blacklisted Chinese defense university—and presented unpublished sensitive work there. 🧵

Something to ruin your Sunday - I have just come across evidence that proves the Government plans to continue welcoming illegal migrants until 2039. 2039. And we have the proof. This is an absolute scandal. Read on… The Home Office is advertising for ‘a long-term transformation programme in the delivery of asylum support and accommodation services.’ Basically bringing all the existing contracts together. They call it a 'transformative re-procurement'. They are searching for suppliers who can do the following... - Accommodation provision - ‘to meet the varied needs of asylum seekers’ and to support ‘community integration’. - Accommodation management - to ensure a ‘safe, suitable, and responsive living environment for asylum seekers.’ - Transport - provide a 24/7/365 transportation service that is ‘timely’ with ‘professional drivers’. - Sustenance - receive appropriate ‘cash’ and a ‘payment card’ is provided. - Safety and Security - ensuring the ‘safety and security’ of the illegals. - Audit and Assurance services - for inspections and reviews to identify areas ‘for improvement’. - Service User Assistance - support ‘throughout their asylum journey’ ‘from initial application and arrival at accommodation to integration into the community’. Helping the illegals to ‘access’ local services. - Wellbeing and Safeguarding - ‘specialist safeguarding staff’ 'must' be deployed. The contract start date? 1st September 2029. End date, 31st August 2036, with a ‘possible extension’ to 2039. 2039. Think about that. The illegals are going to keep coming and coming, and our rotten establishment is planning to accommodate them until AT LEAST 2039. Traitorous. I want to be really clear about what a Restore Britain Government will do. Every illegal migrant arriving will be deported, immediately - man, woman or child. Every illegal migrant living in Britain will be deported - man, woman or child. Those politicians/officials who are signing off on these contracts will be investigated, and prosecuted/imprisoned where appropriate. We will abolish the entire asylum system. There will be no more asylum seekers. Restore Britain has published the most comprehensive deportation policy ever produced in our country. We’ve done our homework. We will stop the boats, we will deport the illegals, we will make Britain safe again.

Extracts from article in Spectator 16th August by Brendan O’Neill: Behold the human wreckage of the cult of diversity. The tragedy of Jason Arday is that he was both built up and destroyed by the ruthless machinery of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion). The academy made him into the golden boy of its philistine project of ‘decolonisation’ and gave not one thought to what the consequences might be if his thin story unravelled, as it inevitably would. No one can deny it now: wokeness makes false gods and real tragedies. . . This is the poison chalice of the state religion of diversity. It lays traps for the very people it celebrates. It handpicks members of ‘the oppressed’ for moral anointment and institutional gushing while leaving them open to exposure as others start to query their credentials. That’s the toxic bargain of identity politics: it builds teetering pedestals for ethnic-minority thinkers, meaning their fall from grace is often twice as fatal. And what a pedestal they made for Arday. They worshipped him as ‘the best in the world’. They beatified him as a black wunderkind whose very presence in a place like Cambridge might help to wash away its sins of whiteness. They canonised him as a living monument to ‘decolonisation’. It was precisely this, their giddy, narcissistic desire to manufacture a kind of black saviour, that made them turn a blind eye to the questionable elements of Arday’s CV and life story. They sacrificed their due diligence to the god of decolonisation. And Arday suffered. He was both poster boy and sacrificial lamb of the diversity crusade. Even as he gained from it – reaching the dizzying heights of a Cambridge professorship – he was being damned by it. The foundation of myth and sand his starry career was built on was untenable. Its collapse was a given. It is a testament to the ideological blindness of the inhabitants of our ivory towers that none of them foresaw it. . . . The Faustian ruthlessness of it all is mindblowing. . . . The media is the only institution in this entire tragic scandal that did its job properly. Journalists found a story and they told it. It was the academy and Arday’s colleagues who failed to do their jobs. Who failed to prize merit over identity, and failed to foresee the public embarrassment that would befall their falsely promoted friend. They ignored the truth – the media found it. I and others have been arguing for years that the politics of identity is a disaster for all, black and white alike. White kids are overlooked, black kids are patronised. Whites are branded ‘privileged’, blacks ‘oppressed’. Whites are seen as the beneficiaries of historic crimes who must atone for past sins, blacks as history’s perma-victims who require the gracious helping hand of the state. We are demonised or infantilised according to the accident of our race. Enough. Let our monument to Jason Arday be the restoration of the true ideal of equality. We couldn’t save Jason but we can save merit from the monstrous jaws of identity.

Extracts from a further Spectator article (Aug 15) by Andrew Gilligan: An academic project hosted by Cambridge University platforms creationism, the belief that the world was created by God in seven days. It promotes an academic paper demanding that schoolchildren be taught to “actively resist” the science of evolution. At Charles Darwin’s old university, where a college is named after him, Darwin’s discovery is now described by one Cambridge researcher as an example of “potential challenges posed by Eurocentric monoculture.” It is the latest sign of fundamental problems at Cambridge’s education faculty, the same department which hired Jason Arday. The project which platforms the creationist claims, the Islamic Educator Learning Community (IELC), is led by Cambridge’s assistant research professor of education, Farah Ahmed, a former activist in the since banned terror group Hizb ut-Tahrir.. IELC is “hosted by” and “partners with” a university body called the Cambridge Teacher Research Exchange, Camtree. IELC publishes on its website, with a Camtree address, a paper on “Islamic scientific critical consciousness” . . . The paper says that “countering colonial hegemony in science education for Muslims” could include “identifying gaps in fossil records to make the case that the evidence of humans descending from apes is inconclusive.” On Tuesday, in the wake of the Jason Arday scandal, The Spectator revealed that Ahmed had been given the prestigious assistant professorship. We noted that in a 2002 pamphlet, republished in 2017, she attacked ‘western education’ as a ‘threat’ to Muslims, condemned democracy and integration, and criticised British schools for teaching that child marriage is wrong. Like the paper’s author, Mirza, Ahmed has also said that modern science is a problem, because in the “teaching of evolution, Muslim children will be exposed to ideas that contradict Islam.” After that story created a storm, the education faculty took decisive action. It removed the names of all its staff from its website, presumably to stop anyone who doesn’t know about web archive tools checking to see if they’ve hired any more wrong’uns (spoiler alert: they have Other action has been less forthcoming. The faculty clearly hopes to ride this one out, issuing a statement that it is “committed to academic freedom and freedom of speech within the law.” Well, we must reluctantly agree that Ahmed – benefiting from the democracy she condemns – should have the freedom to say that English is “one of the most damaging subjects” a school can teach, or (while teaching at Cambridge) write that Muslim students shouldn’t have to worry about “gaining literacy and numeracy and other disciplinary skills demonstrated through qualifications.” But that’s quite different from believing that Cambridge University should fund her to promote her ideas to the future leaders of the country. Still more indisputable is that a university subject, even one as debased as Education at Cambridge, should not promote baseless, anti-scientific twaddle in the name of academic research. But it does.

HOLY SMOKES JD Vance reveals that doctors and insurers MISLABELED s*x change treatments so they could make more money They got rich off of permanently m*tiIating and castrating confused kids and lying about it This might be the biggest medical scandal in modern history

Arday scandal exposes "moral rot" in academia - racist identitarianism, "opinion dressed up in incomprehensibility", "grievance studies". Pathologies won't disappear overnight, but things could improve if honest academics seize the moment and give the charlatans a roasting.

Indian police deployed water cannons in Raipur as the social media-driven Cockroach Janta Party movement led nationwide student protests demanding the resignation of the education minister and reforms over examination scandals.

I have written to the chair of the Nursing and Midwifery Council about their scandalous decision to publicly suspend Restore Britain's Greater Manchester mayoral candidate days before the election over social media posts. A post about the Pakistani gangs who raped his daughter.

Encore un scandale. On accuse Elon Musk sans arrêt de se servir de Grok pour faire passer ses idées. Pourtant, le @neutralityorg vient de sortir The Neutrality Project : une étude indépendante qui prouve l’inverse. Sur 18 modèles IA testés, 54 positions sur 60 atterrissent à gauche du centre. Moyenne globale : -0.41 (biais progressiste massif, surtout environnement et valeurs sociales). Et Grok 4.5 ? -0.02. Le modèle le plus neutre de tout le benchmark. Le seul vraiment proche du centre. Pendant ce temps, les autres boîtes injectent massivement leur idéologie de gauche dans des IA qui répondent à des milliards de questions par jour. Manipulation des masses à grande échelle. C’est absolument scandaleux. Ça devrait être un scandale mondial.

🚨 HOLY CRAP! CNN's Dana Bash just got OBLITERATED for trying to say leftists didn't vandalize Lincoln Reflecting Pool SEC. DOUG BURGUM: We CAN prove it! BASH: People cutting a 350 foot gash in the reflecting pool?! BURGUM: "Dana, I'm not SURE WHY YOU and others in the media keep questioning it! Literally it will NEVER just 'peel off!' The ONLY way to end up with SLICES in one spot and not the other is someone PHYSICALLY CUT IT. The pool itself is not leaking, it's finally been fixed, and the American flag blue is working...the REAL scandal is the fact the state of our capital was in disrepair! NO ONE talked about the pro-Hamas graffiti, and we're STILL talking about it." BASH: But it's now closed BURGUM: Because it's the 4th of July and there were FIREWORKS! Now the fence will come down. She's a joke!