与「Sh」相关的搜索结果

Yes, the green flame is caused by burning copper from depleting fuel in the regenerative cooling circuit and going oxygen-rich (closer to stoichiometric temperature) in the main combustion chamber. Slight underperformance of engines on this flight is the reason. The booster is meant to land with tiny residuals, so the solution is to improve engine performance and performance consistency (underway with Raptor V3.2), as well as adjust flight software to do MECO1 about one second earlier to ensure enough propellant for boostback and landing (tiny change). These early ships and boosters are already outdated by improved designs in production or on the test stand, so this booster loss does not change our timeline to reach high volume, fully reusable Starship flights.

Four months after we launched Manus, I was invited to a dinner with President Macron. I ended up seated directly across from Jensen Huang. He was half an hour late, and Macron asked him to give a toast. Jensen picked up his wine glass and turned it into a fully improvised speech — in front of a table of European politicians and founders. It was electric. The charisma of a top founder, on full display. I typed the whole thing into my Notes that night. Still one of the sharpest takes I’ve heard on software, AI and Europe. What a pity. What a loss.

恭喜自己又大一岁！🍻 早上一睁眼，推特真正意义上万粉了 非常认真拥抱AI的这一年 我的人生发生了非常多的变化 喜欢 @xmmxovo @gkxspace @Astronaut_1216 @ShengzheSeanxu 🥰🥰 00后的好朋友们，给了我非常大的力量 我的职业生涯，这8年，每次裸辞或者跳槽都没有休息超过一个星期 但！！！就在前天，已经谈了离职 💌 接下来，我要为我自己而活了！ AI时代，我们一定会创造更多精彩的👻

X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE (BIG ONE) 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the biggest number in it is gone: copy link went from 20 to 0 points. Small accounts should focus on: posts people like, reply to and stay on (so stop counting on link copies) tl;dr: - on Nov 13 X's open source code set the score for copying a post's link to 0 - copy link: 20 → 0 - it was the top score in the whole system, 4x a reply - the code also names a "copy link bait" spam check - likes (0.708), replies (5) and DM shares (5) didn't move full details: - The number that's gone Since I started reading X's open source code in August, one number sat at the top: 20, for someone tapping share and copying your post's link. Nothing else came close. As of the Nov 13 release, it's 0. X still guesses who'll copy your link. It just multiplies that guess by 0 now. X didn't explain it. It's just what the code says. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Cross it off your list My own checklist called copy link the biggest number. Last week's post said it too. It was true then. It isn't now. If you saved that list, cross that line out. - The "copy link bait" check X's code now mentions a spam check called "copy link bait". In the code it adds a spam label to the post, and that label already keeps a post out of strangers' feeds. It only shows up in a test, so I can't see if it's running or how strict it is. My read: X saw people baiting link copies, so it turned the score off and built something to catch the bait. That's a read, the code doesn't say why. - Why that matters if you're small If your plan was posts people copy the link to, that plan now earns 0 in X's ranking. A copied link can still bring people in from outside X. It just doesn't push your post up anymore. What still pays: likes at 0.708 (the highest ever), people staying on your post, replies at 5 and back and forth with mutuals at 20. - Also new: photo and video tags If a post has a spam label, people you tag in its photo or video who don't follow you won't get notified. Same idea as last week's rule for replies. - What didn't change Every other score. Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and early likes still pick which one gets it. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - aim for likes, replies and time spent, the copy link score is gone - a DM share still earns 5, same as a reply or a quote - likes sit at 0.708, never higher - time on your post keeps counting at its best rate yet - 10+ seconds after someone taps in adds 0.385 - write your replies yourself, under big accounts most of all - give people a reason to hang around your profile - in videos the opening seconds carry it, an open alone scores 0 - posts read to the end help X find you strangers - smaller accounts (below 50K) get a shot at a spot near 16 for a fresh original - early likes decide which new post gets that spot - post when your followers are awake, the push lasts 2 hours and 200 views - mutuals going back and forth earn 20, so follow back the regulars - only your originals ever get shown to strangers - like 1 and like 32 each unlock another way to reach strangers - one strong post per feed, your second only counts 62% - clips longer than 10 seconds for the video lists - a post likely to win you a follow gets +4 - give your pinned post a look, it can affect the whole account What you should NOT be doing: - counting on copy link shares, they score 0 now - baiting link copies, the code names a spam check for exactly that - a spam label also stops your photo tags reaching non-followers - AI-written replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a flag X uses - copy-paste replies, labeled ones skip non-followers' notifications - chasing taps, 0.274 and dropping - drifting off your topic, each probable "not interested" takes 53.07 away - videos people open and leave, the open itself earns 0 - posting at 3am, it wastes the 2 hour push - expecting replies and reposts to reach strangers - an insult label, it hides that post from non-followers - earning a misinfo or low quality label, which adds a warning and locks strangers out of liking or sharing - 3 adult photos or videos among your latest 5 posts, that puts a label on you - forgetting videos get rechecked at 64 and 512 likes - one account label and strangers stop seeing you - pinning a link to a site X rates badly, that can mean a label for a week - posting your own old words again risks the copypasta flag - a low quality link plus tagged strangers reads as spam - bait for engagement, big or small it gets a label - several posts back to back, they split the same feed - hashtag piles, they do nothing - bookmarks for reach, they score 0 - hoping a 3 day old post still lands in For You, it stops at 2 days

Thanks for taking part in our Guess What’s Next, The Fact-Check Desk, and Fly SAFU contests! 🎉 Congratulations to all our winners! We’ll share the winner lists in the replies below 👇 Stay tuned for more contests to come!

🚨 THIS IS WHY BITCOIN KEEPS CRASHING BELOW $67,000 If you still think Bitcoin trades like an asset whose price is determined purely by spot supply and demand, you need to read this carefully. Because that market no longer exists. What you’re watching right now is NOT normal price action. This isn’t just an AI stock sell-off. This isn’t just hotter inflation. And this definitely isn’t retail suddenly deciding to dump Bitcoin at the exact same time. Most people have no idea what is actually happening. And by the time it becomes obvious, the damage is usually already done. This didn’t start today. It has been building underneath Bitcoin for YEARS. And now it’s accelerating. Here’s the truth: Bitcoin still has a hard cap of 21 MILLION coins. But Wall Street can create almost unlimited financial EXPOSURE around those coins. That distinction changes everything. Because once derivatives dominate short-term price discovery... Bitcoin stops trading purely on who wants to own the actual coins. It starts trading on: 1) LEVERAGE. 2) HEDGING. 3) MARGIN. 4) LIQUIDATIONS. 5) FORCED SELLING. And that is exactly what is happening right now. It’s the same mechanism that repeatedly drives violent moves in: → Gold → Silver → Oil → Stocks Once derivatives become large enough, spot buyers are no longer the only force setting the price. And this is the part almost nobody understands: Bitcoin’s scarcity didn’t disappear. But scarcity alone no longer controls the SCREEN PRICE. Wall Street built an entire financial layer on top of Bitcoin: → Cash-settled futures → Perpetual contracts → Options → ETFs → Broker lending → Swaps → Wrapped BTC The 21 million cap controls the COINS. It does NOT cap the amount of leveraged exposure that can be created around them. And once that leverage starts unwinding... The market doesn’t care what the long-term thesis is. It SELLS. Look at what just happened: Over $1.9 BILLION in leveraged crypto positions wiped out in 24 hours. More than $1.1 BILLION liquidated in Bitcoin alone. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have already seen roughly $1.9 BILLION in outflows this month. Once leveraged selling overwhelms real buyers, price stops responding only to long-term demand. It starts responding to positions. Hedging. Margin calls. And cascading liquidations. Wall Street does not need to own millions of physical Bitcoin to push the market around. It only needs enough derivatives exposure and enough leverage sitting in the wrong place. The playbook is brutally simple: 1st: Build enormous leveraged exposur 2nd: Push price through obvious liquidity 3rd: Trigger stops and liquidations 4th: Forced selling pushes price even lower 5th: Buy back into the panic 6th: Repeat THIS is why Bitcoin can lose thousands of dollars while the number of coins on-chain barely changes. The coins didn’t suddenly disappear. The PRICE DISCOVERY mechanism changed. That’s what people are missing. Bitcoin is still scarce. But the financial claims built around Bitcoin are NOT. And when leverage controls the marginal trade... 21 million coins can behave like a market with FAR more supply than 21 million coins. That’s not the Bitcoin market retail thinks it is trading. That’s a WALL STREET PRICING SYSTEM built on top of Bitcoin. You can choose to ignore it. But don’t pretend nobody warned you. Bitcoin is now trading around $66,600, its lowest level since August and roughly 48% below the $126,200 high. If $65k breaks, the next level I’m watching is $62k. Reminder: I called the Bitcoin top at $126,000 and told you to start buying again around $60,000. The next call will matter even more. When I EXIT the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

黄仁勋被英伟达董事会逼下台后，硅谷和华尔街开始反扑了。 华尔街基金打响第一枪 先看资本这边的动作。两家重仓英伟达的知名科技基金 Altimeter 和 Atreides，手里一共管着超过 250 亿美元的资产。他们率先联名发表公开信，要求英伟达董事会恢复黄仁勋的 CEO 职务。 这两家基金在英伟达占的股份比例其实很低，加起来还不到 0.1%，但他们在华尔街和硅谷的号召力极强。2022 年扎克伯格死磕元宇宙，一年烧掉上百亿美金，导致 Meta 股价暴跌。当时就是 Altimeter 发了一封公开信，逼着扎克伯格大裁员，砍掉元宇宙开支，全面转向 AI。 当然，真正能一锤定音的，还是华尔街对英伟达持股最多的三家大股东：先锋领航（Vanguard）、贝莱德（BlackRock）和富达（Fidelity），这三家加起来握着英伟达大约 20% 的股份。这种金融巨鳄平时很少像硅谷投资基金那样公开发信骂街，但现在激进、有号召力的小弟已经打响了第一枪，这三大巨头后续会不会表态支持黄仁勋回来，非常值得关注。 马斯克带头，硅谷大佬集体站队 硅谷的一批创业大佬也开始集体站队。马斯克，还有 Uber、Shopify、Replit 和 Vercel 这些公司的创始人，全都公开发帖支持黄仁勋复职。硅谷知名投资人 Naval 直接说，黄仁勋就是英伟达的乔布斯，无人可以替代。 马斯克昨天一天之内更是连续表态了 5 次。早上他还只是回一句 Hmm 围观，中午回 Indeed 表示认同，到了下午就直接宣布自己也要签复职请愿书，晚上又转发大股东公开信、赞同黄仁勋是乔布斯的说法。短短一天，他已经从最初的认同，变成带头向董事会施压的领头大哥了。 内部员工九成力挺黄老板回家 英伟达内部也一样。有老员工在公司内网发帖抗议，一下子涌进来 1600 多条评论，都在喊话让董事会把老大请回来。在硅谷匿名社区的英伟达员工投票里，接近 90% 的人力挺黄仁勋，支持董事会赶他走的只有 1%。员工跟着他干了这么多年，全靠英伟达的股票发家致富，大家心里只认这一个老板。 这件事才刚刚开始。接下来，英伟达董事会里那些反对黄仁勋的人，面对来自员工、股东、合作伙伴和客户的压力只会越来越大，直到他们妥协让步。 美国两党政治斗争产物，华尔街最后拍板 这两天 X 中文社区盛传一种种族歧视论，说黄仁勋是因为华人身份才被搞下去的，这其实是背后有外宣任务在推动带节奏的舆论。黄仁勋这件事，真正的原因根本不是什么种族问题，而是美国两党政治斗争的结果。 在这之前，黄仁勋一直在积极游说华盛顿，想让美国政府放宽对中国出口芯片的限制。他当时敢这么高调，底气主要来自两边：一边是更看重做生意赚钱、讲究实用的川普，对这事基本是睁一只眼闭一只眼；另一边则是华盛顿内部那些支持放松对华芯片限制的力量，比如商务部长霍华德。财长贝森特就公开抱怨过川普跟黄仁勋走得太近。 但中期选举之后，华盛顿的风向彻底变了。随着民主党重新掌控参众两院，那些在对华芯片禁运上态度强硬的鹰派开始占据话语权，而且民主党里本来就有很多人直接喊话要搞大科技公司。而在一众科技和华尔街大佬里，一直冲在最一线游说对华卖芯片的黄仁勋，理所当然就成了他们最先开刀的对象。 所以说白了，黄仁勋这次下台，根本上就是美国两党政治斗争的产物。但最终结果如何，还是要取决于华尔街最后怎么站队拍板。不管美国两党如何斗得你死我活，最终还是资本说了算。

I LAUNCHED A GROK BOT TERMINAL OVERNIGHT, GAVE IT $44.82 AND STOPPED ASKING AI WHAT IT WOULD DO. BY MORNING IT HAD $11,643.21 AND SIX AGENTS LOGGING EVERY TRADE I spent a year asking agents what they'd trade and watching the chat scroll. Last weekend I built the thing that actually trades, in Grok Bot, with no code I touched by hand. The six agents share one screen, each one job: > scanner reads new token pairs and volume spikes > rug check filters suspicious tokens before anything executes > sizer sets position from account equity, not a fixed ticket > executor opens and closes with slippage tracking > logger writes the reason behind every trade > equity curve updates on every close I went to bed on $44.82 and left the laptop open on the dashboard. By morning the balance read $11,643.21. Every trade on the activity feed had a reason next to it and a line in the log. That's the shift I didn't see coming. Not that an agent made money overnight. That I stopped being the one asking "would you long this?" and started being the one reading the log of what already happened. Starting balance: $44.82 Current balance: $11,643.21 Grok Bot built the terminal, the agent architecture and the dashboard. I described what I wanted and the thing went live. The full build is in the article below ↓ The whole build is in the post below ↓ Comment " Grok_Bot " 2️⃣ Like and Repost 3️⃣ Follow me @Nexa_Tech_Ai I'll DM you the complete setup.