与「SupportUs」相关的搜索结果

Justia’s heartfelt wishes… Will you turn her down? 🥺 Join the Discord, follow us on X, and subscribe to our YouTube channel—won’t you do it all for her? Show some love 💖 and give sweet Justia a warm cheer! 👇[BD2] Official Community Website: Discord: Facebook: Twitter: TikTok: Instagram: #BrownDust2# #SupportUs#

A profitable trade can still be a bad decision. And a losing trade can still be the result of a good process. That's something I think deserves more attention when discussing @Hypesium. In fast-moving on-chain markets, traders often judge their decisions by one simple metric: whether the price went up or down. But outcomes don't always tell the complete story. Imagine buying a token without checking liquidity, understanding the launch mechanism, or setting a reasonable risk limit. The price doubles. You make money. Does that mean the decision was good? I don't think so. A favorable outcome doesn't automatically justify the risks taken to achieve it. Now imagine another trader who carefully evaluates a launch, defines their position size, and follows a clear exit plan. The market moves against them, and they accept a controlled loss. That decision may have been more disciplined, even though the financial result was worse. Hypesium provides a Telegram-based trading workflow focused on the Elysium ecosystem, connecting traders with activity across multiple launchpads. What interests me is how tools like this fit into the broader challenge of improving decision quality. Faster execution can make a process more efficient, but it cannot determine whether the original reasoning was sound. For me, the real value of trading infrastructure should be measured alongside the quality of the decisions it supports. I believe traders improve when they evaluate their reasoning separately from short-term outcomes. Because luck can produce profits. But a repeatable process requires understanding why a decision made sense before the result was known. Would you rather celebrate a lucky win or learn from a well-managed loss?

50 Tbps per Starship is massive. Global international bandwidth is ~2,260 Tbps total. One flight adds over 2% of all cross-border capacity. It unlocks fiber-like speeds nearly everywhere, supports millions of concurrent high-res streams or AI transfers, and creates a resilient space mesh that reduces reliance on undersea cables while enabling high-bandwidth links for lunar and deep-space missions.

Dario looks just like Cesare Borgia. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---

Dario looks just like Cardinal Richelieu. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---

not all crypto rewards are created equal. when a platform advertises yield, i think the first thing to check is what holders actually receive and where that value comes from. @RebateLaunch has an interesting approach to this. instead of paying holder rewards in newly issued $rebate, eligible holders receive payouts in the pair asset. on robinhood chain, that's usdg. the platform reports: → $28.5k distributed to holders. → 120,403 individual payouts. → rewards sent several times throughout the day. → no staking or manual claiming required. but the reward distribution is only one part of the model. rebate pad also uses a declining launch tax to address early sniping. → 99% during the initial stage. → 66% in the next stage. → 33% in the following stage. these penalties go into a locked treasury that supports the buyer bonus mechanism. separately, the 0.7% platform fee is used to buy $rebate from the market and burn it. the reported cumulative burn has reached 35.3m tokens, representing 3.53% of the original 1 billion supply. what makes this model worth examining is how several mechanisms connect: ✦ early launch activity contributes to the treasury. ✦ the treasury supports buyer bonuses. ✦ trading fees fund holder payouts and the $rebate buyback-and-burn mechanism. my perspective is that paying rewards in the pair asset is an interesting distinction because holders aren't simply receiving more of the same token. however, attractive payout numbers alone don't prove sustainable yield. trading volume, fee generation, treasury health and long-term user activity still matter. i'd rather evaluate the source of rewards than focus only on the advertised percentage. also, round 3 of the creator campaign closes november 17 at 22:00 utc. the real question is whether rebate pad can maintain this economic cycle as adoption grows. $rebate

Google just launched Gemini 4 Hydrogen!. I had early access, and it's really fun to use inside Antigravity with the Swarm feature. It also supports four reasoning levels: Low, Medium, High, and Extra High, so you can balance speed and reasoning depending on the task. Here's something I built with Gemini 4 Hydrogen

I am a shareholder of Nvidia since 2015. It is the first stock I bought. I am also a gamer, a crypto investor, and a AI researcher. I own a 1080Ti, a 2080Ti, 3090, 4090, and multiple Pro 6000 GPUs. For me, Nvidia is not only the company giving me investment returns. It gave me so many joyful memories. And it is still making new memories for me every day. As shareholders and customers, we want Jensen to stay as Nvidia's CEO. We can't let 3 or 5 deep state board members decide the fate of the world's greatest company. We must let shareholders vote. LET SHAREHOLDERS VOTE! If you support us, please repost.

Day 22 of building GTA style Bengaluru game, 1. Now supports voice in 5 languages. 2. Source code audit by Fable 5.2. 3. Temple & Cultural rule sets, like no weapons or footwear inside sacred premises, NPCs of different faiths tagged appropriately 4. Cellphone system etc