注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「Two토리얼」相关的搜索结果

Two토리얼 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 Two토리얼 的内容
[📺 #Two토리얼#] #여자친구# #GFRIEND# 꿈의 케미😻 #은하# #EUNHA# ❌ 러블리즈 케이 I 꿈의 정원 편 ▶️
0
208
7K
1.8K
转发到社区
The give. The gooo 💨 CC swings the ball and cuts to the rack for two. The @IndianaFever are on a 19-4 run over the Aces as the time winds down in the 2Q! LVA-IND | Prime Video Tap to watch:
显示更多
Simon Mo and Matt Bornstein on why open-weight models matter: cost and control. "Open weight absolutely matters in the ecosystem. The world cannot just be controlled by proprietary APIs, where open weight, open development and research of these models are blocked or banned." "There's almost two pieces to this. There's the cost thing, where the closed models are too expensive, and then there's the control thing, where I want to be in control of my infrastructure and in control of the model. If I need to extend it or put on my own guardrails or anything." "Control matters a lot over the last few years, and then cost just started to matter over the last few months... It's about controlling the system performance against what they're paying for." "For a voice agent company, they want to control their own model so that it can make sure the model actually responds by the required time... This sometimes is only you can do with your controlled intelligence... versus signing up for relying on your critical infrastructure with a proprietary API where they might go down any time." @simon_mo_ @BornsteinMatt
显示更多
Sam Altman asked Elon Musk what he'd do if he were 22 again. Not "build Tesla." Not "start a rocket company." Two words: be useful That's the whole framework. It sits on two questions almost nobody asks themselves. How much better is your solution than what already exists? How many people can it actually help? Multiply the two. That's your real impact. Every company that has ever changed the planet started by solving a useful problem for a specific group. Nobody who set out to "change the world" ever did. The companies that transformed anything started by making one boring, useful thing 10x better. 22-year-olds looking for a moonshot miss the actual moonshot sitting in the boring problem next to them. Be useful. Ship it to a small group. See if they can't live without it. Repeat. What's the most important problem you think still doesn't have a real solution? Drop it in the replies.
显示更多
China successfully launched two hyperspectral satellites off its eastern coast — a mission that marks the first integrated “satellite–rocket–vessel–application” breakthrough.
显示更多
Colts, RB Jonathan Taylor reached agreement on a two-year, $44 million extension worth up to $47 million that includes $39 million guaranteed. (via @AdamSchefter, @RapSheet)
So here’s how America ended up with Ilhan Omar and Learing Centers. The rebels in Somalia overthrew the Marxist dictator in January 1991 and then they started killing each other over who got to rule next. General Mohamed Farah Aideed and Ali Mahdi Mohamed both claimed the presidency, and then from November 1991 to March 1992, the two sides slaughtered an estimated 14,000 people in Mogadishu (the capital) alone. The clans united to remove Barre, but they failed to replace him with anything functional. And so, Somalia has been a failed state for 35 years and Minnesota has welfare fraud.
显示更多
0
20
1.4K
348
转发到社区
Two weeks ago, I resigned from OpenAI to join Conduit as a founding researcher, where we're training models to non-invasively read the human mind. I've written some thoughts about what telepathy could look like by 2035 and how to get there:
显示更多
0
887
6.9K
702
转发到社区
Today we are releasing Cloudflare OS, a chatbot with connectors, just like every other tech company is doing. Except actually, it's different. This is a remake of Sandstorm[.]io, my startup from 10 years ago, except this time built on Cloudflare Workers (the platform I've spent the last 9 years building) and deeply leveraging AI. This is more or less the culmination of my secret 10-year master plan. This is a full-on personal app vibe coding platform, in which the sandbox is so secure that you can pretty much go wild -- the AI cannot introduce a significant security bug. We believe a company's security team can feel comfortable giving non-technical users permission to vibe code and then sleep soundly at night. How is that possible? It's the Sandstorm security model, revisited. A "Gadget" is the same thing as a Sandstorm "Grain": a fine-grained app instance. For example, if you have a document editor app, each document runs as a separate instance of the app, in a separate sandbox (one "Gadget"). This means two things, both of which I think are Big Deals: 1. The platform can manage all access control, by controlling who can access the Gadget at all. There is no way the Gadget can accidentally leak itself to an attacker -- even an attacker who has access to other Gadgets based on the same app. 2. Since everyone is running their own copy of the code, everyone can freely *modify* their copy of the code. Think about #2# a bit more. What if, when you wanted a new feature in the software you are using, you could just prompt your agent to add it? This doesn't work in the cloud Software-as-a-Service model, because you are not running your own copy of the app. Sandstorm tried to change that 10 years ago, but the world wasn't ready, because not enough people had the skills or patience to actually modify their software. AI has changed that. Now you just ask the agent -- the same agent that you are using to help you interact with the Gadget can also modify the code of the Gadget. And it is so fun.
显示更多
0
219
5.5K
656
转发到社区
my birthday is in two days i want 100 super sonico figures please
0
14
776
7
转发到社区