与「VideoEditing」相关的搜索结果

Kling 4.0 is coming this October. Kling 4.0 Flash is live now for Ultra Yearly subscribers. Kling 4.0 brings video creation to a new level of visual realism, creative control, and narrative completeness. 🎞️ Upgraded Audio & Visuals: Stable dynamic motion, high-quality stereo audio, more accurate lip sync, up to 4K resolution, and 10-bit HDR output. 🔮 Omni Reference: Richer reference options with up to 15 multi-modal references, more consistent results, and enhanced video editing. 🎥 Seamless Storytelling: Multi-keyframe control supporting up to 10 keyframes, native 30-second generation. 🌍 Diverse Possibilities: Video extension, support for multiple languages, accents, and dialects. The stage is set. You call the shots!

Introducing ChatCut Desktop! AI video editing is now LOCAL, FAST, and FREE. Connect Codex or Claude Code in one click - and tear through your editing backlog: - Edit talking heads and B-roll - Create stunning, fully editable motion graphics - Make and translate captions in any style - Generate video, music, sound effects, and images - including Seedance 2.5 at the lowest cost anywhere - Save and reuse skills, so you never repeat the same edit - Export XML directly to Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and CapCut - Agents work on real timelines. You stay in control Download now at

33 Days of Unlimited Seedance 2.5 The most capable video model is globally LIVE on Higgsfield. Up to 30 seconds of perfect continuity, physics realism, advanced CGI, and best-in-class video editing. Zero credit cost for 33 days. Limited-time offer.

Dreamina Seedance 2.5 Enterprise API is now live on BytePlus. Built for professional AI video creation, Seedance 2.5 brings new capabilities to creators: - Longer storytelling with consistent 30-second shots - Precise timestamp-level video editing - More realistic visuals with greater creative control Explore what’s possible with Seedance 2.5.

BREAKING: MiniMax H3 by @MiniMax_AI is 1st across 3 Video categories (Multi-Image to Video, Image to Video, and Video Editing) on Design Arena. MiniMax H3’s performance in Video Arena puts it ahead of other top performing models like Seedance 2.0 by @BytePlusGlobal, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Preview by @SpaceXAI, and Gemini Omni Flash by @GoogleDeepMind. This marks another category to be led by open-weight models, following Kimi K3’s first place in our coding categories. Congratulations to the @MiniMax_AI team for establishing a new SOTA in video generation!

7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.5 on Higgsfield. The most realistic and production-ready video model. Now we offer generations at ZERO credit cost for 7 DAYS. Up to 50 references, 30 seconds of perfect continuity, realism in physics,  advanced VFX/SFX, and SOTA video-to-video editing. 7-day unlimited access starts on August 7.

Dreamina Seedance 2.5 is now live! From creators to enterprises, a new era of AI video creation begins. Try Seedance 2.5 on Dreamina today. Enterprise API access via BytePlus is coming soon. Create longer videos with greater control: - Native 30-second generation - Precise video editing - Support for up to 50 multimodal references - Multilingual video generation More consistency. More control. More possibilities.

My view of: Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6-Sol. They are not easy models to compare, these are my vibes - take them as you will. My overall feel is that Fable is a 'wise owl' who is very thoughtful and very well spoken, GPT-5.6-Sol is like a rottweiler who will grab the problem by the throat and not let go until it is done. In other words, Fable, is a fundamentally smarter model - even at low reasoning it can be very insightful and writes in a clear compelling way. GPT-5.6-Sol on the other hand is extremely diligent, I can give it a list of 8 things to do and you will be sure that they will be done. Fable feels more arrogant to me, I was both to get it to build a new benchmark for me - 5.6 worked between 6 hours and 2 days (I tried several times) and it came up with very thoroughly tested, working benchmark. Fable came back within 40 minutes (twice) and the benchmark sounded smart, but was ultimately was 'vibe' based slop and since it was Fable's vibes that was doing the judging, it decided that it was good to go (it kept giving Fable 100% score btw). Some thoughts by category: UI & App building: Fable will still craft a better UI from scratch, the flow of the app would probably be a bit nicer. But I find that Fable often misses quite key things, which GPT-5.6-Sol doesn't. GPT's Frontend skills are big jump vs previous GPT models, but still not as great overall. Writing: Fable is better hands down, Sol feels quite difficult to align to what I want to say or explain things to me simply. Though I think the 'Pro' model writes clearer. Robustness & Reliability: This is where I think GPT-5.6-Sol wins for me hands down. Fable seems to do things of high quality, but I can never relax with it, it always misses something. With 5.6 this just almost never happens. Other things where I liked GPT-5.6-Sol, but can't compare to Fable directly. - Video editing is actually working now, it is not completely perfect, but with the right skill/guidance you can just give it 1h footage and it can give you a 5 min highlight clip no problem - Computer use - getting really rather good, very usable - Sub agents - it is very fluent at managing sub-agents and speaking to different threads, can help with some new workflows - Adhering to existing code patterns - I love this, even without asking it would implement something in a way that aligns with you app - major problem for slop generation - Research - I think it is getting quite a bit better, it still has some bad patterns (e.g being too tactical), but it feels like it is more steerable to be a good researcher - Multi-day runs - the /goal feature is pretty insane with 5.6-Sol, you can run it for days if you wanted to and it does work. Useful to have another thread or /side to check up on it, but I have some great results with it - Token efficiency - it is so much more token efficient and faster than 5.5, in reality it is now much faster than Fable too On the downside, you can feel that Fable is naturally smarter, and I did have some baffling moments with 5.6 when I was getting it to make a fairly simple change in 8 turns - it seemed to get stuck in a dumb stream that was hard to get out of. So it is not AGI, don't get too carried away by the hype. I have some phenomenal examples that I'm honestly blown away by that I'll share, but as a side anecdote, I have a kind of 'swear meter' which counts how often I'm rude to Codex. In GPT-5.5 era, the % was at around 4-5%, it dropped to 1-2% when I was testing GPT-5.6-Sol and it shot up to 7% when I went back to 5.5 - it was so shocking to go back to 5.5 and experience how much worse it was. So is GPT-5.6-Sol better than Fable? On pure intelligence - no. But man, I missed it when I just wanted to get sh*t done. It is insanely capable workhorse that you can give any task to and just expect it to be done. No lectures or 'you are absolutely rightisms', nothing is beneath it, if it takes 2 days to do some dirty work, it will do it. It feels like the first time in a while when we have quite different types of frontier intelligences that benchmark sort of similarly, but feel very different. If you can, you would be probably better off using both and iteratively finding what you'd use Fable or GPT-5.6-Sol for. Perhaps, something like - an architectural discussion with Fable, implementation with 5.6 and docs & comms with Fable.