与「WANTED佐久間」相关的搜索结果

🚨BREAKING: RED CROSS DELETES VIDEO AFTER MIGRANT MURDERS BRITISH WOMAN The Red Cross made a sympathetic cartoon video showing the journey of Sharif, an Afghan travelling to Europe When Sharif got there he MURDERED a British Woman and stuffed her body into a suitcase They wanted you to feel sorry for him but he killed a young woman like the savage that he is The Red Cross must be held to account for the blood they have on their hands

Today we are releasing Cloudflare OS, a chatbot with connectors, just like every other tech company is doing. Except actually, it's different. This is a remake of Sandstorm[.]io, my startup from 10 years ago, except this time built on Cloudflare Workers (the platform I've spent the last 9 years building) and deeply leveraging AI. This is more or less the culmination of my secret 10-year master plan. This is a full-on personal app vibe coding platform, in which the sandbox is so secure that you can pretty much go wild -- the AI cannot introduce a significant security bug. We believe a company's security team can feel comfortable giving non-technical users permission to vibe code and then sleep soundly at night. How is that possible? It's the Sandstorm security model, revisited. A "Gadget" is the same thing as a Sandstorm "Grain": a fine-grained app instance. For example, if you have a document editor app, each document runs as a separate instance of the app, in a separate sandbox (one "Gadget"). This means two things, both of which I think are Big Deals: 1. The platform can manage all access control, by controlling who can access the Gadget at all. There is no way the Gadget can accidentally leak itself to an attacker -- even an attacker who has access to other Gadgets based on the same app. 2. Since everyone is running their own copy of the code, everyone can freely *modify* their copy of the code. Think about #2# a bit more. What if, when you wanted a new feature in the software you are using, you could just prompt your agent to add it? This doesn't work in the cloud Software-as-a-Service model, because you are not running your own copy of the app. Sandstorm tried to change that 10 years ago, but the world wasn't ready, because not enough people had the skills or patience to actually modify their software. AI has changed that. Now you just ask the agent -- the same agent that you are using to help you interact with the Gadget can also modify the code of the Gadget. And it is so fun.

CITRUS WENT LOOKING FOR TROUBLE ON RAINBET → Wanted Dead or a Wild, the most brutal slot out there → Duel symbols landing and the reels turning ugly → Live on Rainbet, real play, no safety net

Today, I want to share something that happened to me on Kraken. I’m completely new to crypto, and this was my first time using Kraken. All I wanted to do was convert USDC into USD. Unfortunately, because USDT and USD differ by only one letter, I accidentally selected USDT instead of USD. I didn’t realize my mistake until the transaction had already been completed. In less than a minute, a single misclick resulted in a loss of approximately 810 USDT—more than $800. To be honest, I was shocked and devastated. Like many newcomers, I assumed that all major stablecoins were worth roughly the same, so converting between them would involve little or almost no loss. I never imagined that such a simple mistake could instantly cost me more than 1% of my funds. I immediately contacted Kraken Support, hoping they would understand that this was an honest human error and review my case, or at least consider making a one-time exception. What disappointed me even more was that almost every response came from AI. I was never able to speak with a real support agent. The only explanation I received was that the transaction had already been executed, the conversion details had been displayed before confirmation, and therefore nothing could be reversed or refunded. I understand that Kraken may not have violated its own rules, and I acknowledge that the final amount I would receive was displayed before I confirmed the transaction. But I believe that “the information was displayed” does not necessarily mean “a new user truly understands what it means.” As a beginner, I saw what I believed was a normal stablecoin conversion. I had no idea that the number shown on the confirmation screen meant I was about to lose more than $800. If a platform expects users to recognize an $800+ pricing difference on their own, instead of proactively warning them that the conversion is unusually unfavorable, I don’t believe that’s a user-friendly experience—especially for beginners. I believe that a platform responsible for customers’ assets should do more than simply display numbers. It should also be designed to help users avoid obvious mistakes that can lead to significant financial losses. Crypto is already complicated enough. The risks users take should come from the market—not from a product design that makes such costly mistakes so easy to make. This experience has left me deeply disappointed and has almost completely destroyed my trust in Kraken. I’m not trying to deny Kraken’s rules, and I’m not asking for special treatment. I’m simply asking @kraken and @krakensupport to review my case, seriously consider improving the user experience, provide real human support when genuine mistakes happen, and consider a one-time resolution for customers who make an honest human error. If this could happen to me, it could happen to any newcomer entering the world of crypto. I hope my experience helps others avoid making the same mistake. Please double-check every click. @krakenfx @krakenpro @krakensupport

Most people seriously underestimate what Grok Build can do They assume an AI coding agent is only useful for building apps or writing complex software But some of its most valuable work is handling the boring, obvious tasks that quietly consume 10 minutes here, 20 minutes there, every single day For example, I gave Grok Build a SpaceX video posted on 𝕏 and asked it to extract the clearest frames and turn them into a clean collage It pulled the video, selected the strongest images, cropped them, arranged the layout and produced the final collage shown in the post below I simply described the result I wanted, then let it handle the entire process while I worked on something else And that is only one small example You can use Grok Build to: • Organize and intelligently search files across your computer • Diagnose and fix audio, display and system-setting problems • Download, install and configure apps or tools • Extract images or audio from videos • Add music, trim, compress and convert media • Resize, crop and enhance images • Batch rename and organize hundreds of files • Clean spreadsheets, merge datasets and build dashboards • Write scripts and automate repetitive tasks • Fix broken configurations and connect tools together Even something as annoying as an audio setting not working becomes much easier Instead of hunting through menus, searching forums and trying random fixes, you can explain the problem to Grok Build It can inspect the setup, identify the likely cause, change the relevant configuration and test whether the fix worked It is basically an agentic operator living inside your computer, working within the permissions you give it I also keep a simple instruction file telling Grok how I prefer tasks to be completed, including automatically opening the finished result after a successful run so I do not forget about it Configure the workflow once, and Grok keeps working the way you prefer That is what makes Grok Build so useful It is not only building software It turns all the small computer tasks between an idea and the finished result into work you can simply describe and delegate