与「WANTED_SPECIAL」相关的搜索结果

[📢] ATEEZ <WANTED SPECIAL> 쇼케이스 with 한국관광공사 해적왕의 모자를 찾아 떠난 3주년 여행! 멤버들이 대구, 경주, 담양, 강릉에서 즐긴 맛과 멋은? 12/23 오후 3시(KST) 쇼케이스에서 하이라이트를 미리 확인해 보세요! #ATEEZ# #에이티즈# #WANTED_SPECIAL#

#STEPN# & #STEPNGO# May Townhall Recap 📝 🔹 Last two months retrospective 🔹 Challenge Capsules 🔹 STEPNathon 2 Missed it? We got you covered 👇 🔄 Last two months retrospective The Townhall opened with a look back at some of the main updates from the last two months: 🔸 Rabbids 🔸 Marathon Season 2 🔸 LSD for Legendary holders 🔸 Android Marketplace removal On the Android side, the team acknowledged that the Marketplace had to be removed due to Google Play restrictions. 🐰 Rabbids The Rabbids event leaned fully into community participation, with users posting April Fools content, memes, fake breaking news, and all kinds of chaotic entries to earn Rabbids GGBoxes. Those GGBoxes included chances to win 100 Rabbids co-branded Solana Genesis Sneakers, along with rewards like 100k GMT, 1k USDT, and $50 worth of XAUT. And importantly, there are still some Rabbids Genesis Sneakers left to be found in GGBoxes. 🏁 Marathon Season 2 The Townhall also looked back at Marathon Season 2, with a strong focus on how Teams have changed the tone of the challenge. A few highlights: 🔹 Players are not only competing for themselves, but also for their team 🔹 Teams have made the Marathon more collaborative, more competitive, and more social 🔹 Team Takeover was introduced during Round 4 🔹 The top 3 teams and 4 random active teams could earn additional rewards The team also confirmed that work on Season 3 is already in progress, and community feedback is welcome through Discord and the ambassador team. 🐈‍⬛ LSD Legendary Schadenfreude Day was another highlight of the last two months. The event gave Legendary holders with unlucky or disappointing stats a chance to share why their Sneakers deserved better. Selected entries had a chance to receive improved stats, although usually with a trade-off involved. The result was a playful event with a strong identity, while also creating a fun way to engage directly with Legendary holders. 🎟️ Challenge Capsules Challenge Capsules were the main product topic of this Townhall. The team clarified that while some users expected Charm in STEPN GO to eventually connect to avatar pieces or characters, that direction is no longer being pursued, even if that expectation came from how Charm was described in the STEPN GO whitepaper. The reason is simple: 🔸 It was not fun enough 🔸 It was also technically difficult to deliver at the level the team wanted So instead, Charm is being redirected into a new feature that adds more gamification to both apps. Challenge Capsule is a game mode built around movement, task completion, reward opportunities, and discovery. The core loop is simple: 🔹 Open a Capsule 🔹 Reveal the challenge 🔹 Complete it 🔹 Earn a Ticket 🔹 Join the draw for a prize A few key points: 🔸 Challenge Capsules will work with both STEPN and STEPN GO through FSL ID 🔸 Users enter a Capsule by paying an entry fee 🔸 Each Capsule has its own challenge, conditions, and reward pool 🔸 Users need to complete the required challenge within the given time limit 🔸 Completing the challenge successfully gives the user a Ticket for the reward draw And importantly, this is not passive participation. Users need to move, complete the challenge, and earn their chance. For STEPN GO: 🔹 Charm will now have a clearer role in the system 🔹 Charm runs can help users earn more Tickets and improve their chances at winning the Capsule’s draw For STEPN: 🔹 Resilience becomes the key attribute in the system 🔹 Resilience now gets more utility through Challenge Capsules 🔹 STEPN players will also have a chance to obtain a new type of Mystery Box containing Challenge Capsule Tickets 🔹 Those Tickets give users more chances to win the Capsule reward The feature will go live in limited access beta within the upcoming weeks, with more details to be shared soon. 🏃 STEPNathon 2 The Townhall also included an exclusive first announcement for STEPNathon 2. From June 22 to June 29, players will be able to take on the challenge by completing either 21 km or 42 km in a single session using STEPN and or STEPN GO. To participate: 🔹 A Season Pass is required 🔹 Every finisher automatically enters a Genesis Sneaker raffle 🔹 There will be one raffle for STEPN and one for STEPN GO Event rewards will depend on both the app and the distance completed. In STEPN: 🔸 Players can earn exclusive badges, backgrounds, and GGBoxes In STEPN GO: 🔸 Players can unlock exclusive backgrounds and GGBoxes A few more infos: 🔹 Completing 42 km also unlocks the 21 km reward tier 🔹 Each badge and background is unique to the app and to the distance 🔹 Teams also matter this time The Marathon team with the highest total Energy spent during the event week will receive additional exclusive rewards: 🔸 A unique badge 🔸 A special background 🔸 5 GGBoxes plus 1 Key for each member So STEPNathon 2 keeps the spirit of the original challenge, while connecting more directly to the team dynamics introduced in Marathon Season 2. That’s the May Townhall recap. Challenge Capsules are introducing a new gamified movement layer across STEPN and STEPN GO, STEPNathon 2 is coming back, and the last two months have continued to push both products toward a more social and more interactive direction.

Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going. First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want. The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?" Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain. As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain. One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan. My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it. Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism. This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate. Now how does this all get to the role of the EF? EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter. This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward. And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally. This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself) EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects). At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting. To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose. I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like: * Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this. * Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash. * Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future. Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%. Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations. The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support. EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.

I wanted to set aside some special time tonight to properly pamper you… the way you deserve 💗 🗓️ 27 April 2026 9:00 PM BST 【ASMR】 🌸 Twitch Stream 🌸 YouTube Waiting Room

I wanted to do something special too for those who wanted to join and help me with this sponsorship, so if you live in the USA and end up using my promo code to try out HelloFresh, I will mail you a 3" waterproof vinyl sticker of Hana eating corn! Because Hana loves corn :3