与「Warning」相关的搜索结果

🚨 THE REAL DANGER ISN’T THAT JENSEN HUANG WAS PUSHED OUT. THE REAL DANGER IS THIS: Nvidia’s core engineers are already saying it out loud: “If the board doesn’t bring Jensen back, we’re going straight to SpaceX and Terafab.” And they’re claiming Elon has already reserved seats for them. This isn’t normal employee frustration. This is a public warning that Nvidia’s soul could walk out the door. On one side, the board is fighting its own founder. On the other, Elon is standing there with open arms saying “you’re welcome anytime.” If this letter is real, the next few days could rewrite the entire AI chip landscape. History rarely gives second chances. This time, it might be happening in real time.

X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE (BIG ONE) 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the biggest number in it is gone: copy link went from 20 to 0 points. Small accounts should focus on: posts people like, reply to and stay on (so stop counting on link copies) tl;dr: - on Nov 13 X's open source code set the score for copying a post's link to 0 - copy link: 20 → 0 - it was the top score in the whole system, 4x a reply - the code also names a "copy link bait" spam check - likes (0.708), replies (5) and DM shares (5) didn't move full details: - The number that's gone Since I started reading X's open source code in August, one number sat at the top: 20, for someone tapping share and copying your post's link. Nothing else came close. As of the Nov 13 release, it's 0. X still guesses who'll copy your link. It just multiplies that guess by 0 now. X didn't explain it. It's just what the code says. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Cross it off your list My own checklist called copy link the biggest number. Last week's post said it too. It was true then. It isn't now. If you saved that list, cross that line out. - The "copy link bait" check X's code now mentions a spam check called "copy link bait". In the code it adds a spam label to the post, and that label already keeps a post out of strangers' feeds. It only shows up in a test, so I can't see if it's running or how strict it is. My read: X saw people baiting link copies, so it turned the score off and built something to catch the bait. That's a read, the code doesn't say why. - Why that matters if you're small If your plan was posts people copy the link to, that plan now earns 0 in X's ranking. A copied link can still bring people in from outside X. It just doesn't push your post up anymore. What still pays: likes at 0.708 (the highest ever), people staying on your post, replies at 5 and back and forth with mutuals at 20. - Also new: photo and video tags If a post has a spam label, people you tag in its photo or video who don't follow you won't get notified. Same idea as last week's rule for replies. - What didn't change Every other score. Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and early likes still pick which one gets it. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - aim for likes, replies and time spent, the copy link score is gone - a DM share still earns 5, same as a reply or a quote - likes sit at 0.708, never higher - time on your post keeps counting at its best rate yet - 10+ seconds after someone taps in adds 0.385 - write your replies yourself, under big accounts most of all - give people a reason to hang around your profile - in videos the opening seconds carry it, an open alone scores 0 - posts read to the end help X find you strangers - smaller accounts (below 50K) get a shot at a spot near 16 for a fresh original - early likes decide which new post gets that spot - post when your followers are awake, the push lasts 2 hours and 200 views - mutuals going back and forth earn 20, so follow back the regulars - only your originals ever get shown to strangers - like 1 and like 32 each unlock another way to reach strangers - one strong post per feed, your second only counts 62% - clips longer than 10 seconds for the video lists - a post likely to win you a follow gets +4 - give your pinned post a look, it can affect the whole account What you should NOT be doing: - counting on copy link shares, they score 0 now - baiting link copies, the code names a spam check for exactly that - a spam label also stops your photo tags reaching non-followers - AI-written replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a flag X uses - copy-paste replies, labeled ones skip non-followers' notifications - chasing taps, 0.274 and dropping - drifting off your topic, each probable "not interested" takes 53.07 away - videos people open and leave, the open itself earns 0 - posting at 3am, it wastes the 2 hour push - expecting replies and reposts to reach strangers - an insult label, it hides that post from non-followers - earning a misinfo or low quality label, which adds a warning and locks strangers out of liking or sharing - 3 adult photos or videos among your latest 5 posts, that puts a label on you - forgetting videos get rechecked at 64 and 512 likes - one account label and strangers stop seeing you - pinning a link to a site X rates badly, that can mean a label for a week - posting your own old words again risks the copypasta flag - a low quality link plus tagged strangers reads as spam - bait for engagement, big or small it gets a label - several posts back to back, they split the same feed - hashtag piles, they do nothing - bookmarks for reach, they score 0 - hoping a 3 day old post still lands in For You, it stops at 2 days

In 2014, Elon Musk stood in front of an audience at MIT and told the whole world exactly where AI was going. Everyone missed it. Because he used one word, and that's the only thing the internet remembered: "demon." The headlines called him scared of killer robots. Tech blogs called it hyperbole. People moved on. I went back and watched that moment. It's barely 2 minutes long. You'll never hear the word "AI" the same way again. Here's what I took away. 1. He called it before almost anyone. Someone in the audience asks about AI. His face goes serious. "If I were to guess like what our biggest existential threat is, it's probably that. So we need to be very careful with the artificial intelligence." This was 2014. No ChatGPT. Most people had never heard the word "chatbot." 2. He asked for rules 12 years ago. "I'm increasingly inclined to think that there should be some regulatory oversight, maybe at the national and international level, just to make sure that we don't do something very foolish." National AND international. In 2014. Governments are still arguing about it today. 3. The demon line wasn't a joke. "With artificial intelligence we are summoning the demon." And then the part almost nobody quotes: "In all those stories where there's the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, it's like, yeah, he's sure he can control the demon. Doesn't work out." Read that again. His warning wasn't about the demon. It was about the guy who thinks he can control it. 4. Now here's what got me. In 2014 he said: summoning the demon. In 2018 he told Joe Rogan: "Nobody listened." In 2023 he signed a letter asking AI labs to pause. In 2026 he told The Economist he can't see any way to stop it anymore. His new philosophy? "Let's enjoy the ride." And: "If you can't beat them, join them." Today he's building one of the most powerful AIs on Earth. 12 years later, the man who warned us about the guy with the pentagram is holding one. My takeaway: He wasn't wrong in 2014. He just realized nobody was going to stop it. So he decided to build it himself. Whether that's genius or the exact ending of his own story, I honestly don't know. So now I'm asking you: Was Musk right in 2014? Or did he become the guy in his own warning? Tell me below. I genuinely want to know where people land on this.

A father was handcuffed by police as his car continued moving with his children still inside. He tried warning the officer that his kids were in the vehicle, but the officer ignored him.

‼️ CISA Confirms Active Exploitation of Outlook User Interaction 0-Day Vulnerability Details: The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has confirmed active exploitation of a Microsoft Outlook zero-day vulnerability, CVE-2026-124194, that can expose user authentication data. According to Microsoft’s security advisory, an attacker can send a specially crafted message file and persuade a victim to open it in Outlook. The application may then connect to an attacker-controlled network location without showing its usual warning about external content. Microsoft released security updates for an actively exploited Outlook network-spoofing flaw (CVSS 6.5) that allows unauthenticated attackers to spoof networks. #CybersecurityNews#

We're still so small but I'm loving the team we've got at Superlogical. They're so talented and kind and love their craft. It's a different era of software development and our expectations and practices reflect that. I want to share a bit about how we work. First, everyone is trusted to push to main. We do machine-aided code review pre-push and human plus more machine-aided code review post-push. Limited to no PRs. Culturally, we've all agreed that if we ever hire someone who we DON'T trust to push directly to main, then they probably aren't the right fit for the team (so far, not an issue). Some common sense here: if someone is stepping outside their lane or comfort zone, we'll open PRs. For example, I'm pretty trash at macOS/iOS UI, so I'll open PRs for UI-affecting functionality and ask for eyeballs/help. But for business logic and internals, I push to main. Second, everyone can cut a release. Our release process is fully automated and when you start a release (for any platform) it triggers a Slack notification and a 15 minute countdown. The 15 minute warning is a final gate that allows people to review plus collaborate on a changelog. During that 15 minutes, anyone in the company can pause the release rollout. After 15 minutes, the train leaves the station. You can't override the 15 minutes (except to pause). It gives everyone a chance to step in. Third, we avoid synchronization through fast remediation rather than through planning. The server and clients on various platforms ship features as fast as they can. We use post-hoc human review and AI-assistance to identify feature mismatches across products ("Windows has support for X and Mac doesn't." or "Mac and Windows differ in their behaviors for Y in this way."). This avoids expensive "sync" meetings and coordination. We trust that producers of features are mindful of what they're producing and we trust that adjacent product lines will self-synchronize quickly. In practice, we see feature parity across platforms within 24 to 48 hours. All of this works on mutual trust. It ONLY works with mutual trust. Everyone at all times has to trust that they've got each others back: 1. Push to main only works if you fix your mess, or if you don't, that someone else will quickly but that you'd do the same (and generally in equal amounts). 2. Anyone can deploy only works if you trust everyone to cut at the right time, with the right changelog, and that people will respect the 15 minute timer. 3. Sync through fast remediation only works if you trust other teams will pick up and integrate your work quickly, which only works if you would too. It also only works if you are fairly producing mismatches (e.g. not constantly). We've got a great team. I know we're still small and that these practices will change in many ways as we scale. But this is already a markedly different practice than what I would've done 15 years ago. In general, we are building from day 1 on a foundation of mutual respect, excellence, and trust. And it's been awesome.

2015, Colbert: “You’re a billionaire trying to do good things. Superhero or supervillain? You have to choose one.” Elon: shows him a robot snake that plugs itself into your car Colbert: “Is that thing going to attack me in my sleep?” Elon, completely deadpan: “For the prototype, at least, I would recommend not dropping anything when you’re near it.” Ten years later he’s built reusable rockets, humanoid robots and the best-selling EV on the planet, and he’s still the only CEO who can deliver a product safety warning and a punchline in the same sentence. Superhero, obviously. Just one with a very dry sense of humor. @elonmusk

Elon nailed the double standard. If we shipped 100,000 Americans to Greenland, elected an American prime minister, and voted the place into the U.S., the left would lose their minds. Do that to Europe through mass immigration and they call it progress. Same playbook here. Import the votes. Change the country. Then act shocked when the natives notice. Europe is the warning. November is the off-ramp. Vote Republican. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

70 to zero. Tesla's automatic braking in FSD saved us... Rush hour on I-75 N in Atlanta, a driver pulled out ahead of us, clipped the Lexus in front of him, and locks 'em up in HOV lane. I never touched the brake — the car saw him a hundred-plus yards out, flashed the red steering wheel warning, and was already slowing from 70 before I could react. Ended up with about a foot to the concrete barrier on the left, four or five inches to the Lexus on the right, no scratches anywhere. Seatbelts on, everyone fine. Automatic emergency braking doing exactly what it's built for. Thanks Tesla! @SawyerMerritt