与「Who_am_I」相关的搜索结果

this is my personal singularity moment this post may sound like a paid ad. I only wish. I'm concerned, more so than happy. the world is changing, and, among the scenarios where AI goes terribly wrong, inequality is the most realistic, yet, the one Anthropic seems to be the least concerned about. I'm glad OpenAI is taking the opposite stance: *personal AGI for everyone*. I think this is a commendable position in the times we live. but who am I in the queue of the bread? anyway, Fable is here, so I'll just report my first-hour experience first of all, all my pet prompts are solved. → λ-calculus puzzles → bug questions → one-shot apps all are trivial to it. I don't have anything harder other than my ongoing work so, in the last several days, I've been toying with HVM5, a new interaction net evaluator with a faster loop. after writing the first version, I left 32 GPT-5 agents working for ~20 hours each. this resulted in up to 2x speedups, but the file size increased by 2-fold and quality decreased significantly. I then simplified the whole thing into an even simpler core, and left Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 optimizing it for 8 hours. Opus got a legit 6% - 34% speedup in most benches. GPT got better results, but, sadly, an unusable file. I then asked Fable to optimize it. 2 hours later, it landed a 1770% speedup in one case, 100%+ in other 4, and 22% in average. yes, in 2 hours it outperformed me, opus 4.8 and a swarm of gpt 5.5 agents, by one order of magnitude. that could not possibly be legit. "it must be hardcoding the benchmarks" (GPT trauma). so I read its explanation and what it did was, indeed, the most high impact optimization one could try first. seems like HVM5 was wasting a lot of time garbage-collecting unused branches of pattern-match nodes. I had optimized that for static mats, but not for dynamic mats. skill issue. Fable figured how to do it for these, resulting in a massive speedup in some benches but wait, is that *correct*? I'm not sure yet, it is credible, but this is the kind of thing that is very easy to get wrong on interaction nets. the problem is, when I was ready to start auditing Fable's solution so I could tell whether it was buggy or legit, it interrupted me to tell me it had found a massive bug on the code *I* had written. ... wait, what? so... for garbage collection purposes, I stored a bit on lambda term pointers that meant "the variable bound by this lambda has been freed, so, its lambda must free whatever argument it is applied to". that's fine. yet, on duplicator nodes, I also used the same bit to mean "one of the duplicated variables was freed, so, treat this dup as a passthrough no-op". so, if a lambda entered a duplicator, it would mistake the lambda's collection bit for its own, resulting in corrupted interaction! that's a mouthful, why I'm writing this? just so you can appreciate the sheer absurdity of what just happened. I didn't ask it to find bugs. I asked it for an optimization. and even if I did ask it to find bugs, this bug is so astonishingly subtle and specific, identifying it takes mastering the domain to an extent that it beyond even me. I'd easily need hours or days to fix it, *if* I ever came across it. chances are it would just go unnoticed. and Fable found it and fixed it like it was nothing, while it was busy adding a 17x speedup to a file that neither I, nor Opus 4.8, nor a fleet of GPT 5.5 managed to barely make 2x faster. oh and there is also another tab where it is also ripping through Bend's codebase and finishing everything I had to do I don't know what to say anymore this isn't about Anthropic or OpenAI, this is about our collective future as a species. the world is changing, and we need to be aware of it, and discuss how to handle this change. receipt below . . .

Trying to improve my X feed and learn from folks on the frontier + make it higher signal to noise. any recs? a few i've liked: AI gtm — @Carles_Reina, @Chris_Orlob, @austinh___ AI infra — @akshat_b AI research - @karpathy, @AndrewYNg, @DrJimFan, @lilianweng AI coding — @bcherny, @ScottWu46, @ErikSchluntz, @_catwu AI legal — @scottastevenson, @WinstonWeinberg, @willchen500 AI cx — @mjwoo94 (biased) AI customer success — @marty_kausas AI pricing — @poyark AI branding/design — ? ... Storytelling - @lulumeservey AI biz/thought pieces - @sama, @DarioAmodei, @JayaGup10 who am I missing? side note - who are some fun accounts? @craigzLiszt is one

Stop doom-scrolling. Follow these 15 instead. The smartest AI minds on X right now: 1.@karpathy: ex-Tesla AI, now at OpenAI 2.@fchollet: creator of Keras 3.@ylecun: Meta's Chief AI Scientist 4.@AndrewYNg: built Google Brain 5.@rasbt: ML educator 6.@dair_ai: AI research digest 7.@lilianweng: OpenAI safety lead 8.@jeremyphoward: fastai founder 9.@simonw: AI tools builder 10.@_akhaliq: AI paper tracker 11.@ID_AA_Carmack: gaming legend gone AI 12.@gwern: deep AI thinker 13.@goodside: prompt engineering OG 14.@drfeifei: Stanford AI pioneer 15.@demishassabis: Google DeepMind CEO Repost to help someone level up!! Who am I missing? ⬇️

This is a powerful post because it’s highly accurate! Jung nailed the mechanism: the Persona as survival mask that eventually becomes a prison, starving the authentic Self until the Shadow erupts. But the real tragedy (and the real opportunity) is that most people stop at personal integration and never ask what the unmasked Self actually is in the larger architecture of reality. This cuts right to the heart of what the newly released book, Nous Solis, explores on a deeper, cosmic level. In Nous Solis, the Persona isn’t just a social adaptation—it’s a symptom of humanity’s unfinished evolutionary state. We’re not merely individuals wearing masks; we’re a species with a noetic soul (the divine spark seeded within) buried under layers of fragmentation. The mask earns approval from a world still run by lower powers (call them archons, cultural programming, or collective unconscious contracts). But beneath it lies something far more radical: the potential to reconcile matter and spirit from within creation, not by escaping it. The Shadow Jung described? Those suppressed desires, wildness, grief, and ambition aren’t just personal repressed material. They are echoes of the greater alchemical work: transmuting the opposites—light and dark, animal and divine—into the unified Christ Monad. Individuation isn’t the end goal. It’s the doorway to species-level metamorphosis. That’s why so many achieve the “successful” Persona life and still feel empty. The soul isn’t starving for more external validation. It’s starving for its prime directive: to finish what was started in Eden, take the fruit of knowledge fully, and evolve the material realm itself into something immortal. The question “Who am I without the mask?” is essential. However, Nous Solis pushes further: What are we becoming when the noetic soul awakens and the mask dissolves? This isn’t just therapy. It’s gnosis as evolutionary technology. If the post resonates, the book goes much deeper into exactly this territory—connecting Jung, Gnostic insight, NDEs, quantum observation, and the current planetary crisis of consciousness.