注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「bidol」相关的搜索结果

bidol 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 bidol 的内容
シートマスクしてる、なう。 なうって 使ってもいい?w #bidol# #シートマスク# #高橋愛# #お風呂上がり#
0
11
531
33
转发到社区
🇺🇸🇯🇵🇰🇷⚔️🇨🇳🇰🇵🧵 HOW THE UNITED STATES TURNED JAPAN AND SOUTH KOREA INTO IMPERIAL COLONIES AS PART OF ITS COLD WAR AGAINST CHINA AND THE DPRK American policy in the Asia-Pacific has always been centered in building up Japan’s industry and leveraging Tokyo’s power at the expense of the economic independence of other country’s in the region. This doctrine goes all the way back to the early 20th century as Theodore Roosevelt committed the United States to the establishment of a global empire and JP Morgan created a monopoly over large sectors of the American economy in the aftermath of the Panic of 1907. The Meiji Restoration, which established the Empire of Japan, brought industrialization and modernization to the Japanese economy. However, this was mostly done on the backs of foreign loans and had been a continuation of work already theorized in China under Sun Yat Sen, whose Three Principles (Nationalism, Democracy, People’s Livelihood) inspire Chinese socialism today and were based on the state-led economic frameworks of Alexander Hamilton and Abraham Lincoln. Sun himself was educated in Hawaii by protégés of Lincoln. And it ultimately led to this notion among leaders in Tokyo that Japan is now becoming a partner of the Anglo-American Empire. A major reason why this was is because Theodore Roosevelt agreed in the Taft-Katsura Agreement that the United States would give Japan control over the Korean Peninsula if they did not interfere with Washington’s violent seizure of the Philippines. However, what Tokyo didn’t notice at first is that they were not becoming a regional empire but a proxy of American imperialism. From there, the groundwork was set for Japan’s wars of mass genocide against the people of China, Korea, Russia and across the Asian continent. After its war with Russia in 1905, Tokyo fully annexed Korea in 1910, which would then be used as a launching pad for their wars against China. The Japanese previously launched a failed war against China in 1894, after which European colonial empires set up spheres of influence as part of the Century of Humiliation. And then in 1931 and 1937, as a result of false flag incidents staged by the Japanese Kwantung Army along the South Manchuria Railway in Mukden and the Marco Polo Bridge near Beijing, Japan launched the Asia-Pacific Theatre of World War II waging mass genocide and engaging in sexual exploitation against the people of China, Korea and across Asia. Unit 731 was established in Manchuria under the command of Dr. Shiro Ishii and with the approval of the puppet dictatorship in Japanese-occupied Manchuria led by former Emperor of the Qing Dynasty Puyi. 731 carried out some of the most cruel and tortuous human experimentations against civilian victims, including infecting prisoners with deadly diseases and amputating their limbs, conducting vivisection and organ harvesting, suffocating victims and hypobaric chambers and exposing prisoners to chemical, explosive and biological weapons. Even more outrageous is the fact that Ishii escaped prosecution after the US granted him immunity in exchange for research from Unit 731. And some of that research was used by the CIA for Project MKUltra.
显示更多
are people aware bpd doesnt mean bipolar
0
190
23.3K
1.3K
转发到社区
Elon Musk just proved that the body is optional. A quadriplegic sat motionless in a chair and played a video game using nothing but thought. No hands. No voice. No movement whatsoever. Just a decision firing across a chip the size of a coin. Musk: “You just lie there and think, and you can move the mouse cursor around the screen and click things.” Download software. Browse the web. Navigate a screen with the same effort you use to remember your mother’s name. Without lifting a finger. Because he can’t. And now he doesn’t have to. That isn’t a product demo. That is a quadriplegic man doing with silence what you do with your entire body. And this is the version with a thousand electrodes. Musk: “I think ultimately you need something which has probably a hundred thousand or a million electrodes.” A thousand gave us telepathy. A million gives us something that doesn’t have a name yet. Musk is honest about how far this still has to go. He’s not overselling it. He’s underselling it. Because the part that should keep you up tonight isn’t what Neuralink still has to build. It’s that the line between human thought and machine action already disappeared. And the world just kept scrolling. Musk: “Our human brain has a lot of constraints. We only have about maybe 10 watts of higher brain function.” Ten watts. That’s less than the light inside your refrigerator. Every empire ever built. Every symphony ever written. Every theory that bent the arc of history. Ten watts of wet biological circuitry. Musk: “It’s not bad for a bunch of monkeys.” He’s not joking. He’s framing the question nobody wants to sit with. If ten watts of constrained primate hardware produced Shakespeare and general relativity and nuclear fission, what happens when the constraint disappears? Not when the brain gets faster. When the wall between thinking something and doing something no longer exists. The entire history of human tools has been one long negotiation with the same problem. You think something. Then you spend hours, years, lifetimes turning that thought into reality. Your hands. Your voice. Your body. Fire shortened the distance. Language shortened it more. Writing. The printing press. Electricity. Code. Every invention ever built was a cruder, slower translation layer between the mind and the world. Neuralink isn’t another layer. It’s the elimination of translation itself. Diamandis: “It’s a matter of when, not if.” Musk didn’t push back. He just kept discussing electrode counts like an engineer reviewing specs on a vehicle that already left the ground. That calm is the tell. The philosophical event already happened. A thought left a human skull, entered a machine, and executed a command in the physical world. No hand touched anything. No mouth spoke. A man thought the word “move” and the screen obeyed. Every tool before this was a prosthetic for intention. This is intention, naked, arriving without a body. The oldest question in philosophy was never about what we can build. It was about where the mind ends and the world begins. Neuralink just made that question obsolete.
显示更多
0
24
187
48
转发到社区
Neuralink just showed the future in motion Participants are now controlling advanced robotic arms using nothing but pure thought - restoring movement that spinal cord injuries and neurological diseases once took away - No surgery on the arm - No wires running through the body ➝ Just the brain communicating directly with machines This is one of the first real bridges across one of humanity’s greatest limitations: our own biology Imagine what happens as this technology scales: • thought becoming action instantly • independence returning to millions • people regaining mobility, freedom, and dignity The age of abundance is not just about AI, robots, or energy It’s also about restoring human capability itself Real progress is happening right now at Neuralink and this is only the beginning
显示更多
0
32
109
23
转发到社区
Why is it so hard to maintain long-term weight loss? Biology.
ELON MUSK: "Tesla full-self driving software, which is really just AI and cameras - we don't use radars or lidar or anything like that. It's really trying to drive the car in the same way that human drives the car, which is human drives the car primarily with vision and with a biological neural net, that we take the same approach with our vehicles, which is a digital neural net, and cameras, and we expect this approach to ultimately be at least an order of magnitude safer than humans driving. It is quite magical, because the car feels like it is sentient. It feels actually feels like it's alive. We already have some vehicles operating with no people inside and no safety monitors in three cities in Texas, and probably will be widespread in the US."
显示更多
0
95
767
186
转发到社区
JUST IN: Stanley Druckenmiller just updated his portfolio This is everything Duquesne Family and Stanley Druckenmiller owned as of the end of Q1 Natera $NTRA: $576.7M Taiwan Semiconductor $TSM: $201.2M STMicroelectronics $STM: $161.1M YPF Sociedad Anonima $YPF: $142.0M Insmed $INSM: $126.3M Brazil ETF $EWZ: $124.6M BBB Foods $TBBB: $113.6M NewAmsterdam Pharma $NAMS: $109.2M Sea Limited $SE: $96.8M Roku $ROKU: $93.2M Alcoa $AA: $92.9M Broadcom $AVGO: $83.7M Teva Pharmaceutical $TEVA: $82.1M Woodward $WWD: $73.6M Sandisk $SNDK: $54.1M Figure Technology $FIGR: $51.2M Revolution Medicines $RVMD: $46.0M Intel $INTC: $44.9M Coupang $CPNG: $43.5M Humana $HUM: $42.1M Seagate $STX: $40.6M CRH $CRH: $39.0M Lattice Semiconductor $LSCC: $39.0M Bloom Energy $BE: $38.6M Option Care Health $OPCH: $36.5M Twilio $TWLO: $36.0M Restaurant Brands $QSR: $34.6M Global X MSCI Argentina ETF $ARGT: $33.7M Jabil $JBL: $28.2M Caris Life Sciences $CAI: $28.1M Wabtec $WAB: $25.0M United Airlines $UAL: $24.6M Cleveland-Cliffs $CLF: $23.8M Arm Holdings $ARM: $22.5M iShares GSCI Commodity $GSG: $22.0M Southern Copper $SCCO: $21.7M Linde $LIN: $20.9M Unity Software $U: $20.4M Nuvation Bio $NUVB: $20.1M Qnity Electronics $Q: $19.8M Micron Technology $MU: $17.2M Protagonist Therapeutics $PTGX: $16.4M Coherent $COHR: $15.8M Belite Bio $BLTE: $15.2M Olema Pharmaceuticals $OLMA: $13.4M Xenon Pharmaceuticals $XENE: $13.0M ADMA Biologics $ADMA: $12.8M StubHub Holdings $STUB: $12.2M PureCycle Technologies $PCT: $12.1M Amazon $AMZN: $12.1M Celestica CLS: $12.0M Daktronics DAKT: $10.7M Cloudflare NET: $10.4M Twist Bioscience TWST: $10.1M LyondellBasell LYB: $9.9M Vista Energy VIST: $9.8M JBS JBS: $8.9M EchoStar SATS: $8.3M Almonty Industries ALM: $8.2M DBV Technologies DBVT: $7.5M Lumentum LITE: $6.8M Solstice Advanced Materials SOLS: $5.3M MercadoLibre MELI: $4.3M Westlake WLK: $1.9M Wave Life Sciences WVE: $1.2M
显示更多
0
35
765
119
转发到社区
Les vrais génies de l'histoire. 108 milliards d'humains ont vécu sur Terre. La liste ci-dessous en contient ~100. Soit environ 1 sur 1 milliard. C'est ça, le « autre chose » que les gens cherchent quand ils refusent d'admettre que Jobs ou Einstein étaient hors-norme. Une conjonction rarissime de cognition + obsession + timing + courage cognitif + santé mentale juste-assez-stable. Critère retenu : saut non-substituable. Sans cet individu précis, la chose n'arrive pas, ou arrive 30 ans plus tard sous une forme dégradée. J'exclus les agrégateurs (Edison), les opérateurs talentueux (Altman), les copieurs brillants et les figures dont la réputation vient surtout du PR. — PHYSIQUE — Newton — synthèse mécanique + optique + calcul, refonde la science occidentale seul Maxwell — unification électromagnétique, prédit les ondes EM avant qu'on les mesure Einstein — relativités restreinte et générale, photoélectrique, base de la quantique Dirac — équation relativiste de l'électron, prédit l'antimatière par pure beauté mathématique Heisenberg — mécanique matricielle, principe d'incertitude Schrödinger — mécanique ondulatoire Bohr — modèle atomique, interprétation de Copenhague Pauli — principe d'exclusion, postule le neutrino sans preuve Feynman — électrodynamique quantique, diagrammes, refonte pédagogique de la physique Boltzmann — fondations statistiques de la thermodynamique, seul contre tous Planck — quantum d'action, déclenche tout Galilée — méthode expérimentale + héliocentrisme défendu Kepler — lois du mouvement planétaire, abandonne les cercles parfaits par pure honnêteté empirique Faraday — induction, champs, sans formation mathématique Fermi — physique nucléaire théorique ET expérimentale, premier réacteur Landau — quasiment tous les sous-champs de la physique théorique — MATHÉMATIQUES — Euclide — axiomatisation de la géométrie, modèle de toute pensée déductive Archimède — calcul infinitésimal 1800 ans avant Newton Gauss — théorie des nombres, géométrie différentielle, statistiques, le plus polyvalent de l'histoire Euler — productivité et profondeur jamais égalées, fonde des champs entiers Riemann — géométrie qui rendra possible la relativité, hypothèse encore ouverte 170 ans après Galois — théorie des groupes à 19 ans, mort à 20 Cantor — théorie des ensembles, infinis actuels, seul contre l'establishment Gödel — théorèmes d'incomplétude, casse le programme de Hilbert Grothendieck — refonte de la géométrie algébrique, niveau d'abstraction inégalé Ramanujan — autodidacte indien, formules tombées « du ciel » qu'on prouve encore Poincaré — topologie, systèmes dynamiques, chaos avant l'heure Hilbert — formalisation, programme qui domine les maths du 20ème Leibniz — calcul (en parallèle de Newton), logique, monades — INFORMATIQUE / LOGIQUE — Turing — calculabilité, machine universelle, cryptanalyse d'Enigma, morphogenèse Von Neumann — architecture des ordinateurs, théorie des jeux, automates cellulaires Shannon — théorie de l'information, fondation de toute communication numérique Church — lambda-calcul Kolmogorov — fondations des probabilités modernes, complexité algorithmique Dijkstra — fondations de l'algorithmique structurée — BIOLOGIE / MÉDECINE / CHIMIE — Darwin — sélection naturelle, refonte de toute la biologie Mendel — génétique, ignoré 35 ans Pasteur — théorie microbienne, vaccins, refondation de la médecine Watson + Crick + Franklin — structure de l'ADN Mendeleïev — table périodique, prédit des éléments inconnus Lavoisier — refonte de la chimie moderne, méthode quantitative McClintock — éléments génétiques mobiles, ignorée 30 ans — PHILOSOPHIE — Platon — fonde l'idéalisme, tout l'Occident en discute encore 2400 ans après Aristote — fonde la logique, la biologie, la métaphysique, l'éthique, en parallèle Kant — refonte de la métaphysique post-Hume, synthèse critique Nietzsche — généalogie de la morale, mort de Dieu, transvaluation Wittgenstein — refonte deux fois de la philo du langage, seul Hegel — dialectique, philosophie de l'histoire Spinoza — Éthique géométrique, expulsé pour son courage cognitif Hume — empirisme radical, réveille Kant Descartes — cogito, géométrie analytique Heidegger — refonte de l'ontologie — ÉCONOMIE / SCIENCES SOCIALES — Adam Smith — fondation de l'économie moderne Hayek — connaissance dispersée, ordre spontané, prix comme signal Mises — calcul économique, action humaine Keynes — refonte macro (qu'on aime ou pas, le saut est réel) Schumpeter — destruction créatrice, entrepreneur comme moteur Girard — désir mimétique, bouc émissaire, refonte de l'anthropologie Weber — éthique protestante, sociologie de la rationalisation — MUSIQUE — Bach — architecture contrapuntique inégalée Mozart — synthèse mélodique et structurelle, mort à 35 ans avec 600 œuvres Beethoven — refonte de la forme symphonique, pont classique/romantique Wagner — refonte de l'opéra, harmonie qui ouvre la modernité Stravinsky — refonte du rythme, Sacre du Printemps comme rupture Schoenberg — atonalité, dodécaphonisme — PEINTURE / LITTÉRATURE — Léonard de Vinci — peinture + ingénierie + anatomie Michel-Ange — sculpture + peinture + architecture, au sommet de chaque Picasso — cubisme, refonte du regard pictural Cézanne — pont vers la modernité, structure géométrique du visible Dostoïevski — psychologie du sous-sol, profondeur métaphysique Tolstoï — synthèse romanesque inégalée Shakespeare — refonte de la langue anglaise et du théâtre Dante — Commedia, fonde l'italien littéraire Homère — fondation de toute la littérature occidentale Proust — refonte du temps romanesque Kafka — anticipe le 20ème siècle bureaucratique Borges — refonte du conte philosophique — INGÉNIERIE / TECH — Tesla — courant alternatif, moteur induction, fondations de l'électrotech moderne. Vrai génie, scammé par Edison Frères Wright — vol motorisé, contrefactuel solide Shockley + Bardeen + Brattain — transistor Noyce + Kilby — circuit intégré Engelbart — souris, hypertexte, visioconférence dans une seule démo en 1968 Berners-Lee — Web, donné gratuitement Linus Torvalds — Linux + Git, deux infrastructures civilisationnelles, seul au début John Carmack — moteurs 3D temps réel, refonte du jeu vidéo — ENTREPRENEURS (critère strict) — Jobs — synthèse design/produit/écosystème non-substituable Musk — SpaceX seul justifie l'inclusion : NASA avait abandonné le réutilisable. Tesla a forcé la transition EV mondiale Bezos — AWS spécifiquement, pas le e-commerce (qui arrivait quand même) Walt Disney — synthèse animation + parc + IP, modèle qu'on copie encore Henry Ford — chaîne de production Rockefeller — intégration verticale poussée à un niveau jamais vu — EXCLUSIONS VOLONTAIRES — Edison — agrégateur, marketeur, voleur de brevets Sam Altman — opérateur talentueux, pas inventeur. Le saut technique c'est Sutskever, Radford, l'équipe DeepMind avant Zuckerberg — exécution brillante mais Facebook arrivait quand même Gates — bon stratège, OS arrivait de toute façon Hewlett / Packard — grands constructeurs, pas génies au sens fort — LE PATTERN — ~100 noms. 2500 ans d'histoire. Un génie non-substituable tous les 25 ans en moyenne, tous domaines confondus. Sur 108 milliards d'humains ayant jamais vécu : ratio ≈ 1 pour 1 milliard. C'est l'empirique qui désarme définitivement le « biais du survivant ». Ce n'est pas que les génies sont rares. C'est qu'ils sont rarissimes — et que le monde avance malgré tout à coup de ces gens-là.
显示更多
0
43
182
40
转发到社区
Most documented psychological biases are not irrational, they are highly optimized, energy-efficient shortcuts meant for a biological substrate operating under strict real-time physical constraints and a limited caloric budget
显示更多
0
112
1.1K
92
转发到社区