与「chatgpt」相关的搜索结果

开了眼了，发现一个致富大道： ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini 聊天的空就能赚取广告费， 照这样下去还要啥创作者收益！ 安装插件：

还能这么玩？微软被曝约 70% 的 AI 收入来自 OpenAI。它们为运行 ChatGPT，要向微软持续购买云算力，还要把部分收入分给微软，而微软把这些算作是自己的 AI 收入。 不过市场也在猜疑，这笔收入里，有多少是 OpenAI 真金白银，还是之前投资协议里的服务，和收入分成形成的账面收入。

还在只用ChatGPT？那你真的out了 聊天→ChatGPT 画图表→Opal 写文章→Claude 做资料→Manus 搭LP→AntiGravity 剪视频→Kling 整理笔记→NotebookLM 作曲→Suno 生成图→Midjourney 写代码→Claude 不同场景用不同工具，效率能提升一倍。转发给还在低效率的朋友

The future of AI will be built by you. 🫵 Introducing #BuildWithYou# Chapter One: Finance Prompts Share the finance prompts you use to learn, research, invest, and trade. 20 standout prompts will split a 2,000 USDC prize pool. How to join: 👉 Follow @Binance and repost this 👉 Reply or quote repost with your prompt 👉 Complete the survey → Entries close: 15 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC. Join us, and let's build the future together. 🫡 P.S. Finally, a good reason to check your ChatGPT history. Disclaimer: This is not an offer or solicitation to trade any financial product. Not available to users in jurisdictions including: US, UK, EEA, Hong Kong, Singapore, and the jurisdictions on Binance's prohibited list (see for details)

如果chatgpt和claude被迫降价与DeepSeek竞争（$0.14/$0.28），他们的估值变化： OpenAI：从8520亿降到约3000–5000亿（跌40-65%） 
Anthropic：从9650亿降到约2500–4500亿（跌50-75%） 微软，亚马逊，英伟达，软银等重度或套娃投资者将被带崩导致美股崩盘。 这就是AI泡沫的根源

本机装了 ChatGPT、Claude、GLM、Kimi 等多个 AI 编程 Agent，各自的官方配额余量与 Token 消耗要分开去各 Agent 界面翻，Metrik 把这些集中到一个桌面常驻工具里统一查看。

Hot take… isn’t it kinda crazy that nobody is really using AI Agents? I don’t mean software engineers or AI early adopters. I mean “college friends talking about it in group chat,” the feeling you got when everyone started using Instagram or TikTok. These frontier AI models are *insane* (as are the harnesses & tool calls & the like). And every large tech co has an AI agents platform, not to mention all the YC startups doing vertical agents. Yet all of your friends and family outside of tech — who spend all day staring at their iPhones and get paid to work in browser tabs — don’t really care or find themselves using any AI agents yet. Yes ChatGPT, Claude, etc. are extremely popular… but if you look at the engagement data the vast majority of people are still using these aI chat tools like a glorified Google + Grammarly. That’s why the AGI labs are all pushing desktop apps for Codex, Cowork, etc. so hard to non-technical ppl. And yes exceptions for lawyers and customer service but even those have some asterisks and exceptions to rule. Look I’m not saying the ChatGPT moment for AI Agents is not coming… it most definitely is! Remember we pivoted from Arc to Dia precisely because we believe computing is going to be radically reimagined around these AI primitives. No doubt. But that’s my point: it’s just so surprising it hasn’t happened yet because all of the tech you’d need is there. Again if you stop for a second and think about it… for all the press and money and hype and models and crazy ARR numbers… this “AI Agent” moment does not *feel* like the other breakthrough tech moments we’ve lived through (e.g. think the shift to Stories via Snapchat & Instagram, or shift to on-demand via Uber/Airbnb/Doordash). Which is a long way of saying: if you can figure out the answer to “why” most people don’t care about AI agents yet (and have no enduring interest in using them) — especially since the models and harnesses are here and ready — the answer to that question will allow you to capture a lot of marketshare and make a lot of money in 2027. Theoretically, the tech is ready for AI Agents to totally transform how we work and live our lives… but alas the general public dgaf… that’s the generational puzzle to solve for the next 12 months for anyone not working on the models themselves.