与「cnann」相关的搜索结果

月曜〜土曜日までのオールナイトニッポンは、ラジオ大阪さんで流れています！大変失礼致しました！サクラバシ919と共にお楽しみください！タトゥーします。 #cnann#

🚀 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐔𝐏𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐃 — 𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐔𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐒 𝐀𝐑𝐄 𝐒𝐔𝐆𝐆𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐖𝐄 𝐆𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐔𝐏 Since this morning, I’ve been reading the news: “What was always corrected will soon become the norm. Why? Because that’s what young people say...” Wonderful. Learned men from the warm Moscow university departments condescendingly explain: “Well, it’s a living process. Teenagers are simply looking for symmetry when they say ‘то что,’ ‘ща,’ or ‘чонить.’” Seriously? Maybe it’s simply a lack of education? Giving in and going with the flow is the easiest thing to do. But if people are fighting and dying for the right to speak Russian, if our language is our banner, then we need to hold it firmly, not drag it through the mud. That’s what I believe. About linguist officials and the purity of the Russian language 👉 read my channel on MAX. War correspondent Maryana Naumova

Tokenized Stocks Are Being Won by Distribution As per @tokenterminal , Tokenized stocks stood at $3.56B in the week of Sep 21, up 65% from $2.16B in the week of Jun 29. That is roughly $1.4B added in 12 weeks, going into Q4. @Ondo Finance leads with 25.9% and $928.7M. xStocks follows at 23.8%, @binance bStocks at 20.6% and Securitize at 12.4%. The top four issuers hold 82.7% of the market Ondo's lead is 2.1% over xStocks and 5.3% over bStocks. That makes it the leader in a three-way race rather than a dominant player. @BNBCHAIN holds 29.5% of the market at $1.1B. Ethereum is at 21.5%, Solana at 20.2% and Avalanche at 11.9%. Arbitrum (5.6%), X Layer (5.0%) and Robinhood Chain (4.1%) make up the next tier, and Base is at 1.0%. Binance bStocks at 20.6% of $3.56B is about $734M. If bStocks sits on BNB Chain, roughly 70% of the chain's value is the exchange's own product. It reflects where an exchange with a large existing user base chose to issue, Ethereum and Solana are split across Ondo, xStocks, Securitize and others, and none of those issuers has a single distribution channel of Binance's size. Robinhood Chain at 4.1% and Robinhood as an issuer at 4.9% follow the same pattern at a smaller scale, with a broker issuing on its own rails. Bunt's POV Ondo's 25.9% is the most exposed number in this dataset. Exchange-native issuers grow with their own user base, and Ondo has to win through partners it does not control. I believe the Q4 test is whether Ondo holds its share while the total keeps expanding. If exchange-native issuance takes the share instead, the chain leaderboard will keep reflecting distribution rather than infrastructure.

📢 律动 BlockBeats 送福利啦！抽一套【币安礼盒】！！！ 💛 实不相瞒，这次主打一个“借花献佛”。 👇 参与方式： ① 关注 @BlockBeatsAsia，转发本推文 ② 加入律动官方 TG 社群 Group： Channel： 我们将随机抽取 1 位幸运用户，送出【币安礼盒】一套！ ⏰ 9月30日 20:00（UTC+8）开奖 同时我们也会不定期在TG群撒福利搞抽奖，赶紧进群埋伏先！

This is how HOUND smells a market. Market data enters as raw signal. HOUND normalizes it into a feature vector, projects it across 32 synthetic odor channels, activates 971 receptor slots, generates a scent fingerprint, compares it against memory, then decides what deserves attention. Market data → Feature encoding → Synthetic odor → 971 receptors → Scent fingerprint → Memory → HOUND response. The point is not to predict the next candle. It is to give market behavior another sensory representation, so changes, similarities and unfamiliar patterns become easier to notice. Try here :

There are 217 @WNBA players in the league and now I’m speaking directly to all of you. I’m astonished. You play in a league and have a commissioner who cannot and will not define your gender and is embarrassing you in front of the entire world. Yet none of you have the BALLS to stand up for yourselves and say, “Enough is enough.” And that’s the whole point. None of you have balls, and it needs to stay that way. I guess biology is still pending committee approval. They’re trying to figure out how to define a woman in a way that fits their nonsense agenda. Deep down, I believe you don’t want a biological male entering your league and taking your minutes, your money, your endorsements, and your dignity. Are you all really that afraid of cancel culture that you would rather sacrifice your morals, values, and principles for money? If the #NBA# commissioner came out tomorrow and said, “We cannot define what a man is,” there would be outrage and a protest among the players the next day. Open your eyes. #WNBA# I’m not the enemy here. The real threat to women’s sports is not the one asking the question. It’s the silence of the women who refuse to answer it.

Higgsfield is the most untold story in tech. $1BN in ARR in 18 months. Faster than everyone other than OpenAI and Anthropic. They spend $4M a month on models. They expect this to be $100K per person per month. They have 150 people working in a content machine. They will breed more millionaires than any other company in Kazakh history. For the first time, @alexmashrabov on the journey to $1BN in ARR. (below) 1. The Power of the Immigrant Founder Coming from Uzbekistan, Alex was pushed into competitive programming at age eight as his single path to reach the United States. For international founders, placing top in global competitions serves as the ultimate social elevator, instilling the relentless work ethic required to build breakout companies. 2. My Biggest Lessons in the Journey to Finding Product-Market Fit @higgsfield burned over $10 million of its $16 million seed round chasing hype and narrative rather than product quality. With under $5 million left, the team pivoted to product-led growth, solving camera control for creative directors, which immediately triggered organic hypergrowth without paid ads. 3. The 150-Person Content Team Powering Higgsfield's Billion in ARR Nearly half of Higgsfield's workforce consists of 150 in-house creative professionals producing tutorials, ads, and cinematic projects. Generating 90 minutes of TV-quality AI video requires 100 hours of raw output, proving human taste and curation remain the primary drivers of distribution. 4. We Spend $4 Million per Month on Models Higgsfield spends $4 million monthly on internal model usage, averaging $10,000 per employee so teams can freely vibe code and test workflows. Uncapped inference compute acts as a force multiplier, allowing top talent to discover breakthroughs at maximum velocity. 5. Why Chasing Benchmarks Is Bullshit and the Corporate Misalignment Occurring Public benchmarks have devolved into corporate psyops where lab researchers overfit test data to secure bonuses before job-hopping. Text-to-video benchmarks ignore real production workflows requiring 3,000-word prompts, proving direct customer iteration beats artificial leaderboards. 6. Why Team Sizes Won't Be Impacted as Much as People Think While AI handles over 60% of basic support requests, complex B2B environments cannot eliminate human teams. High product velocity constantly shifts rules and context, requiring smart, coordinated operators across legal and customer success. 7. Americans Are Way More Promiscuous When It Comes to Leaving Companies Silicon Valley workers routinely jump jobs every two years, prioritizing short-term trends over deep commitment. This transactional market gives international hubs an advantage, where cultural loyalty and team stability build compounding technical moats. (links in comments)