与「intelligence」相关的搜索结果

This slide from the Anthropic IPO roadshow was a big factor in my decision to leave. It’s an insane plot and I’m surprised they made it public. It shows the compute efficiency of pretraining over time. The y-axis is a **log scale**: they are seeing continued superexponential algorithmic progress. Mythos was not a one-time deviation, but a point on a superexponential. They could already retrain Mythos with a fraction of the compute originally needed. It doesn’t strictly imply a software-only intelligence explosion- they have been spending more on R+D. But algorithmic improvements do not require ridiculous creative genius and are on the verge of being automated. You do the math.

Personal Intelligence in Gemini securely connects information from apps you already use to make your experience more personalized and helpful. Today, we’re adding Google Wallet to the list of connected apps so you can get more tailored responses in the @GeminiApp around personal finance questions, based on your spending habits, including: 📈 Generate dynamic charts tracking cash flow, asset allocation, and budgets directly in your chat to help you visualize your spending. 📅 Find forgotten subscriptions and recurring charges across your linked accounts, and Gemini will also flag any price increases. 🎁 Set a budget for the holidays by asking “How much did I spend on gifts and travel last year? Use that to help me set a holiday budget” and Gemini will look at your transactions from the last year to suggest a budget tailored for you. You’ll also have the option to securely link your financial accounts from your credit cards and banks to Wallet via @Plaid to unlock deeper insights.

GCSA Insight: Critical Security Vulnerability Discovered in a Leading Robotics Manufacturer’s Product, with System-Level Privilege Compromise Verified on Physical Hardware As artificial intelligence and embodied AI technologies continue to advance, robots are evolving from conventional automated machines into intelligent systems capable of perception, decision-making, and autonomous operation. At the same time, cybersecurity risks are extending beyond software and data into the physical world. The security of robotic systems is no longer solely a matter of protecting data and devices; it can also directly affect operational safety, physical environments, and user safety. Recently, the security research team of the Global Cybersecurity Alliance (GCSA) discovered and verified a critical security vulnerability in a product developed by a leading robotics manufacturer. Through in-depth analysis and multiple rounds of testing on physical hardware, the team successfully breached the device’s system security boundaries and obtained the highest level of operating system privileges in a real-world device environment, demonstrating the vulnerability’s actual impact under specific testing conditions. This research encompassed the entire process, from identifying the security flaw and assessing its risks to validating its impact on physical hardware. The findings also highlight significant challenges facing the underlying security mechanisms of embodied AI systems. The research findings and supporting evidence have been formally submitted to the manufacturer. On November 13, 2026, the manufacturer responded by email, preliminarily confirming the existence of the vulnerability and stating that it had initiated internal remediation efforts and an assessment of the scope of affected products. It is important to emphasize that confirmation of a vulnerability does not mean the associated security risks have been eliminated. GCSA will continue to monitor the manufacturer’s assessment of the affected scope, remediation plans, and subsequent security validation, and will update its research findings as new information becomes available. For intelligent systems capable of physical interaction and movement, timely, effective, and verifiable security remediation is particularly important. In accordance with responsible vulnerability disclosure principles, GCSA is currently withholding sensitive information, including the manufacturer’s identity, specific product details, the vulnerability’s underlying mechanisms, and exploitation methods. GCSA is currently seeking guidance from relevant authorities and regulatory bodies regarding the associated security risks. Taking into account the manufacturer’s remediation progress and a comprehensive assessment of potential security implications, GCSA will carefully determine the appropriate arrangements for further disclosure. Subject to appropriate conditions and upon obtaining the consent of the relevant authorities and regulatory bodies, GCSA will publicly release a detailed security insight report, providing the industry with ongoing updates on the research findings and associated risk assessments. The findings of this research are based on specific testing environments and the evidence obtained to date. They do not imply that other product models or similar robotic systems are affected by the same security issue. This security research and validation on physical hardware represent one of GCSA’s initiatives in the field of embodied AI security. GCSA will continue to advance security research, coordinated vulnerability disclosure, and industry collaboration to promote stronger security response mechanisms across the artificial intelligence sector, enhance product security, and strengthen industry trust. 🔗 Read the full report: · Stay Connected with GCSA Follow GCSA's official social media channels for the latest news, product launches, research developments, and ecosystem updates. GCSA Official Telegram Channel: GCSA Official WeChat Account: #GCSAInsight# #GCSACybersecurity# #GCSASecVibe#

Over the past few months, we have restructured MEGA to move in a new direction. We’ve brought together new capabilities and reorganized our teams, a process that has resulted in a 20% reduction in our staff. These are people who helped build MEGA from its earliest days ( building out the chain / wallet, supporting our ecosystem, and telling our wild stories). To everyone who is leaving: I appreciate you. Your work is foundational in what we’re doing next. If you are hiring, please reach out. These are some of the best people we have worked with, and we will gladly make introductions. Our founders, early employees and core engineering team remain committed to MEGA and to the work we started three years ago with MegaETH. We believe cryptography and distributed systems will change how the world produces and accesses purified intelligence. We have a lot to prove, and a lot of work ahead.

Dylan Patel says Alice Huang was telling everyone on WeChat she could get them Nvidia chips in China, and Jensen probably knew "I actually don't think she's a spy in the colloquial sense. And I don't think she's a honeypot in the colloquial sense. She is a well-connected individual in the Chinese, you know, business world and family." "And if you're well connected in China, if you're well connected in America, you will talk to intelligence agencies when they tell you to." [ The CIA was asking me for your personal phone number and I had to tell him to take a hike. ] "She was clearly like showing everyone on WeChat she is close to Jensen and can get them chips in China. Jensen, did he know? Probably." "But like Super Micro didn't have to honeypot Jensen to ship billions of dollars of servers to China, right?"

Here’s why Jensen Huang did NOT fall for a “Chinese honeypot.” 1. China doesn’t actually want Nvdia chips. They ordered their biggest tech companies to CANCEL orders. 2. Almost 1 MILLION Nvidia chips are stranded in Hong Kong as China won’t let them in the mainland. 3. Nvidia itself said China tells customers to purchase and use “China-based competitors” 4. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick admitted it’s because using Nvidia gets China "addicted to the American technology stack” 5. Alice was DISOBEYING China by smuggling chips. Chinese authorities were INVESTIGATING her. 6. The ONLY source of her being a honey pot is “U.S. intelligence”. NO ONE knows what the intelligence actually is.. 7. The US Attorney General admitted the DOJ has NOT determined she was a spy… Fake news took down one of the most powerful CEOs in the world from the company he founded. Thats what happens to non-pedo billionaires.

Microsoft ont licencié 60000 personnes pour les remplacer par de l’intelligence artificielle. Le service d’email Microsoft 365 est en panne aux USA et ils sont incapables de le ramener en ligne… ils n’ont plus personne de compétent pour regarder dedans.

Kraken co-founder Jesse Powell defended Jensen Huang, reminding that Special Agent James Bond did nothing but sleep with foreign spies 🤪 1. Jensen had sex with a Chinese spy under false pretenses (he was raped), and for this he is being forced to leave his own company? 2. People constantly fuck spies. Look at James Bond. What intelligence did he get from her? 3. When will we acknowledge that legendary performance requires non-orthodox fuel? #Nvidia# #JensenHuang#

I analyzed eleven New York Times reports on the Jensen Huang story. Most notably, NYT makes the "spy" claim 30 times in these 11 reports. The original report cites unnamed officials who had been "briefed" on the intelligence. Not who had seen it themselves -- but who had been "briefed". This is a game of telephone with plausible deniability. Nobody named. No specific details of the intelligence used to draw the conclusion that the woman was a spy. Anonymous "officials" "briefed". This was used to try to take Jensen Huang down. When that didn't work, journalists resorted to viciously digging up and scandal mongering about Jensen Huang's other alleged affairs. Then he was removed as CEO. Without an investigation. Without due process. And now officials and intelligence agencies are contesting the New York Times characterization. This is unethical. It is unjust. It is an absolute disgrace. If anyone should resign now, it is Nvidia's board who aggressively removed Jensen Huang without an investigation, after he gave decades of his life to make the company what it is. And any investigation that proceeds from here should involved not just the "spy" claim, but the New York Times -- who has engaged in potentially unethical behavior. Jensen Huang deserves due process -- not mob justice. He deserves respect for everything he has done for technology and America -- not a disgraceful removal after anonymous, unsubstantiated allegations, several parties removed from the source.

What?! So journalists with sketchy motives portrayed rumors from god-knows-who (lobbyists?) as facts sourced from intelligence officials and gaslit the NVIDIA board to push out the founder, CEO, and once-in-generation visionary? This raises serious corporate governance issues.