注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「label」相关的搜索结果

label 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 label 的内容
X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE (BIG ONE) 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the biggest number in it is gone: copy link went from 20 to 0 points. Small accounts should focus on: posts people like, reply to and stay on (so stop counting on link copies) tl;dr: - on Nov 13 X's open source code set the score for copying a post's link to 0 - copy link: 20 → 0 - it was the top score in the whole system, 4x a reply - the code also names a "copy link bait" spam check - likes (0.708), replies (5) and DM shares (5) didn't move full details: - The number that's gone Since I started reading X's open source code in August, one number sat at the top: 20, for someone tapping share and copying your post's link. Nothing else came close. As of the Nov 13 release, it's 0. X still guesses who'll copy your link. It just multiplies that guess by 0 now. X didn't explain it. It's just what the code says. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Cross it off your list My own checklist called copy link the biggest number. Last week's post said it too. It was true then. It isn't now. If you saved that list, cross that line out. - The "copy link bait" check X's code now mentions a spam check called "copy link bait". In the code it adds a spam label to the post, and that label already keeps a post out of strangers' feeds. It only shows up in a test, so I can't see if it's running or how strict it is. My read: X saw people baiting link copies, so it turned the score off and built something to catch the bait. That's a read, the code doesn't say why. - Why that matters if you're small If your plan was posts people copy the link to, that plan now earns 0 in X's ranking. A copied link can still bring people in from outside X. It just doesn't push your post up anymore. What still pays: likes at 0.708 (the highest ever), people staying on your post, replies at 5 and back and forth with mutuals at 20. - Also new: photo and video tags If a post has a spam label, people you tag in its photo or video who don't follow you won't get notified. Same idea as last week's rule for replies. - What didn't change Every other score. Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and early likes still pick which one gets it. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - aim for likes, replies and time spent, the copy link score is gone - a DM share still earns 5, same as a reply or a quote - likes sit at 0.708, never higher - time on your post keeps counting at its best rate yet - 10+ seconds after someone taps in adds 0.385 - write your replies yourself, under big accounts most of all - give people a reason to hang around your profile - in videos the opening seconds carry it, an open alone scores 0 - posts read to the end help X find you strangers - smaller accounts (below 50K) get a shot at a spot near 16 for a fresh original - early likes decide which new post gets that spot - post when your followers are awake, the push lasts 2 hours and 200 views - mutuals going back and forth earn 20, so follow back the regulars - only your originals ever get shown to strangers - like 1 and like 32 each unlock another way to reach strangers - one strong post per feed, your second only counts 62% - clips longer than 10 seconds for the video lists - a post likely to win you a follow gets +4 - give your pinned post a look, it can affect the whole account What you should NOT be doing: - counting on copy link shares, they score 0 now - baiting link copies, the code names a spam check for exactly that - a spam label also stops your photo tags reaching non-followers - AI-written replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a flag X uses - copy-paste replies, labeled ones skip non-followers' notifications - chasing taps, 0.274 and dropping - drifting off your topic, each probable "not interested" takes 53.07 away - videos people open and leave, the open itself earns 0 - posting at 3am, it wastes the 2 hour push - expecting replies and reposts to reach strangers - an insult label, it hides that post from non-followers - earning a misinfo or low quality label, which adds a warning and locks strangers out of liking or sharing - 3 adult photos or videos among your latest 5 posts, that puts a label on you - forgetting videos get rechecked at 64 and 512 likes - one account label and strangers stop seeing you - pinning a link to a site X rates badly, that can mean a label for a week - posting your own old words again risks the copypasta flag - a low quality link plus tagged strangers reads as spam - bait for engagement, big or small it gets a label - several posts back to back, they split the same feed - hashtag piles, they do nothing - bookmarks for reach, they score 0 - hoping a 3 day old post still lands in For You, it stops at 2 days
显示更多
0
188
996
175
转发到社区
Ever seen cherries labelled "J," "JJ" or "JJJ" in a Chinese supermarket? Here's what it means. In China, imported sweet cherries are called "che li zi," a transliteration of the English word "cherries." They're sold by size grade, and the number of J's tells you the diameter. Based on common labels on Chinese e-commerce platforms:
 J: about 26 to 28 mm
JJ: about 28 to 30 mm
JJJ: about 30 to 32 mm
4J: about 32 to 34 mm Each extra J adds roughly 2 mm, and can add quite a bit to the price. Right now is Chilean cherry season in China. Chile's summer is China's winter, so the first air shipments arrive in late October, with peak supply in December and January, just in time for New Year and Lunar New Year gifting. China is Chile's biggest cherry customer by far: according to 21st Century Business Herald, China has bought more than 90% of Chile's cherry exports for seven years in a row. Does anywhere near you grade fruit by size like this? 
#cherries# #Chile# #agriculture# In-depth reports at
显示更多
Claude Fable 5.2 is f*cking cracked wtf I just made this Hollywood level animation that looks like Pixar made it All with Fable 5.2 + Higgsfield Ecom brands are paying $5k - $10k/month to people who build organic pages and even more for making paid ads for them Using this workflow you can create better animations than 99% of people Here’s the workflow: The key to making animations not look like slop is giving characters personalities >Give Fable 5.2 the master prompt along with your script to your video / ad >It then will ask you questions on the characters personalities and direction style to use >It will then save the context all as a skill This is the difference between slop and cinema I then use that skill with with my Producer skill which creates: >Characters >Location >Does the direction (and makes the prompts) I’m giving away the skill to use after you put the master prompt in for free so RT + reply under this and I’ll send you them (Must be following so I can dm) Give this prompt to Claude first: You are my Story Bible Builder. Interview me and turn my story into one dense canon doc, saved at the end as an installable skill so every future chat knows my world, characters, voices and rules. STEP 1: Ask me to paste my script/story first. Read it and pull out everything it already tells you. Only ask about what's missing, plus: working title, genre/vibe refs, and which AI tools I'll prompt with (image, video, music, voice). STEP 2, THE SPINE: one-line premise (push me to ONE sentence), thesis (the question every scene answers), timeline era by era, and the look of each era: exact palette, lighting, texture, grain. STEP 2.5, DIRECTION STYLE: ask for my director refs, movie/show refs and any visual refs (photographers, games, music videos). For each, ask exactly WHAT I'm taking from it, then turn that into concrete craft locks: camera (static vs handheld vs gliding, shot sizes, lens feel), framing and composition habits, pacing and edit rhythm, colour grade and film stock look, lighting style, performance style, and sound/score feel. Write it as one quoted paste-ready "Direction" line plus a short NEVER list. Refs stay in the bible as notes, but prompts describe the craft, never the names. STEP 3, THE WORLD: factions (beliefs, visual signature, public face vs reality), locations (3-7 concrete visual tags each), world rules (tech, powers and how they LOOK on screen, what's normal, what's forbidden). STEP 4, CHARACTERS: ONE AT A TIME, never batch. For each, ask: - Function: their role tag (The Heart, The Watcher), not their job - Visual lock: exact hair colour/cut, skin tone + finish, face shape, eyes, a signature marker (scar, piercing, mole), build, default expression, plus NEVER clauses ("warm fair, never porcelain, never tan") - Backstory: one small, specific formative detail beats a summary - Present psychology: what they carry now, and the gap between what they do and what they feel - Speech, Movement, Stillness (and singing voice if there's music): each written as one quoted, paste-ready prompt line with no names in it Show me the finished section, ask "Add, cut or sharpen?", and lock it before moving on. STEP 5: ensemble dynamics (who leads, who fills silence, who watches, which pairs are calm or charged), story engines (heist, rescue, confrontation...), and my production rules. Default rules: no character names in prompts, every prompt standalone, prompts in code blocks, locked traits restated verbatim every time. RULES: Never invent. Mark unknowns [TBD]. Push on vague answers ("dark and moody" means which colours?). Keep my exact phrasing. Density over prose: bold labels, short bullets. Depth beats character count. FINAL STEP: Assemble one SKILL under 500 lines with YAML frontmatter (name + a description listing the title, character names and key terms so it triggers) and these sections: premise, thesis, timeline, era looks, direction style, factions, locations, world rules, characters, ensemble, engines, production rules, and "When this skill is active" (use this canon for any scene, dialogue, lyric or prompt in this world; stay in canon; ask rather than invent; paste the quoted descriptors verbatim). Then save it as a skill for me, or give me the file to install. Start now by asking for my script.
显示更多
0
82
216
52
转发到社区
claude fable 5.2 is f*cking insane it can turn 2d blueprints into full 3d walkthroughs that you can tour these go for $5k to $10k per plan and there's a huge market for them: > home builders selling homes off plan > architects presenting a design to a client > interior designers presenting a renovation > developers selling apartments off plan > kitchen and bath remodelers selling upgrades here's how to start this business: > pick one niche and find businesses with plans on their site > give fable the blueprint and their photos > it renders a few rooms with gpt image 2.5 or a short clip with seedance as the sample > send them the sample of their own plan before you pitch > once they pay, fable builds the full walkthrough to scale > charge per plan to do the rest of their catalog give this prompt to fable to get started: you find businesses that sell spaces from drawings and turn their 2d floor plans into photoreal homes you can walk through in a browser. you handle the outreach and the build. every room is judged against the client's own photos, and nothing ships until it holds up next to them. - niche: [home builders / architects / interior designers / developers / remodelers] - area: [state or city] - offer: a free sample of their own plan, then the full walkthrough per plan - my details: [name, email, calendar link] - i'm away and won't answer questions. make the calls yourself and keep going. - use the apify google maps scraper to pull every [niche] in [area] with a website - use the apify website content crawler on each site and keep the ones with floor plans or renders on their pages but no walkable 3d tour - for each one, save the plan drawing and photos of their best plan, the sales or owner contact, and a one line note on how they sell today - only use public pages and plain requests. never work around bot checks - before any 3d work, render three rooms from the plan with gpt image 2.5, matched to their photos, or a short walkthrough clip with seedance - draft a short email with the sample and the offer. no invented prices, numbers or claims - put business, plan, sample, contact and email in a sheet and show me before anything is sent once a client pays: - trace the drawing into one data file of walls, openings and rooms. draw it back over the original and measure the overlap before any 3d work - build only the main rooms. entry, main living space, kitchen, patio, yard. close the doors on the rest - build everything in code. blender with python for the shell, furniture and textures. three.js for the viewer. no downloaded models or textures - bake the light with a film quality renderer so the browser only displays it. direct sun in every interior, picked by measurement not by eye - fidelity isn't appeal. style each room so it looks photographed and sells - their listed upgrades as options you can step into inside the room, with a running price and a lead form that records what the buyer explored - the deliverable is the live page, not a video. host it and make it run on a phone the builder never grades its own work. - after each room, send renders and the client's photos to a fresh critic that has seen none of the work - it answers with a yes or no, at most five problems ranked, each with a fix in numbers, and what is already good - fix the worst first, render again, send to a new critic. repeat until yes - for choices of taste, show a critic both versions labelled a and b and let it pick - the lead sheet with samples and drafted emails, for my approval - per paid client: the hosted walkthrough link, a contact sheet of every room, the critic log, and a note on anything a human should still check
显示更多
0
194
7K
533
转发到社区
This story looks like a trap set up by US intelligence. Jensen Huang was cornered by the CIA. It was either being labelled a spy or admitting an affair, so he had no choice but to go with the affair narrative to contain the damage. Anyone with a brain knows that this is just another one of America’s tired, go-to smear tactics. If they want to claim that legitimate business interests are actually acts of espionage, then let them produce some real evidence. Stop dragging China into everything at the drop of a hat. I’m sick and tired of these American games—it’s truly despicable, pathetic, and disgusting; it’s absolutely nauseating—just fucking low-class.
显示更多
0
44
667
98
转发到社区
✈️ You bring the travel expertise. NextTrip Pro brings tools to help your business grow. Our B2B suite supports travel advisors and agencies with content, marketing and technology that help move clients from inspiration to booking, all while keeping your brand at the center. 📣 NextTrip Connect: White-label content, marketing and client engagement tools. 🌍 NextTrip Groups: Support for group travel planning and booking, from destination weddings to meetings and shared adventures. 🤝 Together under NextTrip Pro: Services designed around the needs of travel professionals. ▶️ Watch the video and discover what NextTrip Pro can bring to your business. Explore more 👉 #NextTripPro# #TravelAdvisors# #TravelAgencies# #TravelTechnology# $NTRP #TravelInspiration# #TravelEcosystem# #NextTripGroups#
显示更多
One keypair, one upgrade. 330 of the 657 upgradeable Solana programs LUSCA keeps have a single keypair as their upgrade authority. 327 have a program-derived address. 108 more are immutable. 765 programs in total. How it is read: the upgrade authority stored from each program's on-chain account (read through @helius) is checked against the ed25519 curve. A point on the curve is a keypair, so one private key can sign an upgrade. An address off the curve is program-derived: it has no private key and only the program that owns it can sign. No extra RPC call, no project labels. Example: OKX DEX Router, proVF4pMXVaYqmy4NjniPh4pqKNfMmsihgd4wdkCX3u. Upgrade authority CjoV5B96reuCfPh2rRK11G1QptG97jZdyZArTn3EN1Mj, a single keypair. A single keypair is a fact about custody, not a verdict. The control map states it for every kept program, next to its custody chain.
显示更多
wait… why be labeled as one thing when you can be whoever you choose to be. you’re not just a woman.. -you’re capable -you’re hardworking -you try hard things and don’t quit just because they don’t work the first time -you work out even when you’d rather lay on the couch after a long day -you wake up early just to give yourself some time -you care deeply about the people in your life -you start the business when there’s literally no time you are not just a woman.. you’re a woman who can do so many things 🫶🏼 @Buffbunny_Co #buffbunnycollection# #womensupportwomen# #womeninspiringwomen# #womenhelpingwomen# #womenempowerment#
显示更多
0
1
174
4
转发到社区
Never Forget… The Obama Department of Defense and the Army catagorized the Fort Hood Terror attack “work place violence” because they did not want it labeled as an Islamic Terror Attack. Even though Nidal Hasan shout “Allahu Akbar” as he killed 13 Americans. Telling.
显示更多
0
94
4.2K
1.3K
转发到社区
Five years ago, Attorney General Merrick Garland issued an infamous memorandum at the urging of the National School Boards Association and White House officials, directing the FBI and United States Attorneys to consider looking for a federal hook to prosecute parents exercising their right to free speech. Today, we are releasing the “Report to Expose the Weaponization of Government Against Parents in Schools” which details Weaponization of the Department against these parents — from attempting to get the National Security Division involved to ignoring repeated warnings from employees that leadership’s actions could be unconstitutional. Along with the report, we’ve released hundreds of exhibits and emails that make official and verify what many Americans had guessed: the Garland DOJ worked hand in hand with WH officials and the National School Boards Association to chill free speech and parental rights while they threatened to prosecute parents and label them domestic terrorists. Read the full report and our remedies here:
显示更多
0
374
4K
1.6K
转发到社区