与「penart」相关的搜索结果

描く動画パート2です🦟 音楽は「カリフォルニアの伝説」という曲だそうです ケント紙に無印ポリカーボネイトボールペン0.7mm #ボールペン画# #ballpointpenart# #penart# #kugelschreiber# #zeichnung#

IGTV動画にて蠅を描く動画アップしたので暇な時にみてください🦟 (5分くらいに編集してます) 0.7mmボールペンのみで描きます 時々点画と言われるけど点ではないです #ボールペン画# #ballpointpenart# #penart# #kugelschreiber# #zeichnung#

Nvidia’s board was right to fire Jensen. He was married. Meaning he signed an exclusive contract with a 50% exit penalty for a service with no uptime guarantee. How can you trust a guy who’d sign a deal like that to run a company?

not all crypto rewards are created equal. when a platform advertises yield, i think the first thing to check is what holders actually receive and where that value comes from. @RebateLaunch has an interesting approach to this. instead of paying holder rewards in newly issued $rebate, eligible holders receive payouts in the pair asset. on robinhood chain, that's usdg. the platform reports: → $28.5k distributed to holders. → 120,403 individual payouts. → rewards sent several times throughout the day. → no staking or manual claiming required. but the reward distribution is only one part of the model. rebate pad also uses a declining launch tax to address early sniping. → 99% during the initial stage. → 66% in the next stage. → 33% in the following stage. these penalties go into a locked treasury that supports the buyer bonus mechanism. separately, the 0.7% platform fee is used to buy $rebate from the market and burn it. the reported cumulative burn has reached 35.3m tokens, representing 3.53% of the original 1 billion supply. what makes this model worth examining is how several mechanisms connect: ✦ early launch activity contributes to the treasury. ✦ the treasury supports buyer bonuses. ✦ trading fees fund holder payouts and the $rebate buyback-and-burn mechanism. my perspective is that paying rewards in the pair asset is an interesting distinction because holders aren't simply receiving more of the same token. however, attractive payout numbers alone don't prove sustainable yield. trading volume, fee generation, treasury health and long-term user activity still matter. i'd rather evaluate the source of rewards than focus only on the advertised percentage. also, round 3 of the creator campaign closes november 17 at 22:00 utc. the real question is whether rebate pad can maintain this economic cycle as adoption grows. $rebate

The Moral Collapse of the Chinese Crypto Community To Elon Musk 2022–2023 marked the golden age of Chinese-language Twitter. Back then, there was no creator revenue you offered purely based on traffic. Two main groups of creators came here to share insights: Influencers who migrated over with their followers after their Weibo accounts were banned. Content creators who were already living overseas. These people came with genuine intent to share, and they often uncovered valuable market alpha. Whether it was Bay Area Spaces, inscription research bloggers, or spot and secondary market analysts. Back then, everyone believed the next bull run would be bright. People expected their altcoin spot holdings would deliver at least 5–10x returns. After all, A16Z poured capital into projects left and right, and every so often, stories popped up of Gen Z traders hitting A8 and retiring financially free. Then the tide turned. High-cap tokens pumped immediately upon launch. Instead of bringing fresh liquidity into the market, the ETF event drained what little liquidity remained, driven largely by Trump-related narratives. The crash on October 11 was almost inevitable. Long before that, many had already lost everything on altcoins. That black-swan event merely liquidated whatever leveraged contract positions were left. Starting around 2024–2025, after X rolled out creator ad revenue, a flood of traffic chasers emerged, catering to lowbrow audiences. These people do not trade crypto, nor do they care about any market narratives. They crossed over to this platform just to scrape together that tiny creator payout, as they have little footing in real life. Consequently, we saw the worst tropes from mainland domestic social media spill over: gender polarization, disinformation, and bootlicking culture. While you tweaked the algorithm to curb plagiarism, the platform still fails to incentivize high-quality content. Plenty of boundaryless content farms still rack up views, and accounts that harass others relentlessly often evade effective reporting penalties. Meanwhile, posts from creators I used to follow have vanished from my timeline. I kindly request that you strictly investigate accounts that distribute other users’ private information without consent.

The Moral Collapse of the Chinese Crypto Community To Elon Musk @elonmusk 2022–2023 marked the golden age of Chinese-language Twitter. Back then, there was no creator revenue you offered purely based on traffic. Two main groups of creators came here to share insights: Influencers who migrated over with their followers after their Weibo accounts were banned. Content creators who were already living overseas. These people came with genuine intent to share, and they often uncovered valuable market alpha. Whether it was Bay Area Spaces, inscription research bloggers, or spot and secondary market analysts. Back then, everyone believed the next bull run would be bright. People expected their altcoin spot holdings would deliver at least 5–10x returns. After all, A16Z poured capital into projects left and right, and every so often, stories popped up of Gen Z traders hitting A8 and retiring financially free. Then the tide turned. High-cap tokens pumped immediately upon launch. Instead of bringing fresh liquidity into the market, the ETF event drained what little liquidity remained, driven largely by Trump-related narratives. The crash on October 11 was almost inevitable. Long before that, many had already lost everything on altcoins. That black-swan event merely liquidated whatever leveraged contract positions were left. Starting around 2024–2025, after X rolled out creator ad revenue, a flood of traffic chasers emerged, catering to lowbrow audiences. These people do not trade crypto, nor do they care about any market narratives. They crossed over to this platform just to scrape together that tiny creator payout, as they have little footing in real life. Consequently, we saw the worst tropes from mainland domestic social media spill over: gender polarization, disinformation, and bootlicking culture. While you tweaked the algorithm to curb plagiarism, the platform still fails to incentivize high-quality content. Plenty of boundaryless content farms still rack up views, and accounts that harass others relentlessly often evade effective reporting penalties. Meanwhile, posts from creators I used to follow have vanished from my timeline. I kindly request that you strictly investigate accounts that distribute other users’ private information without consent.

BREAKING: @POTUS just signed an Executive Order to immediately cut diesel costs by temporarily allowing highway use of tax-free dyed diesel and deferring the federal diesel tax on that fuel through the end of the year — no interest, no penalties.