注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「pissing」相关的搜索结果

pissing 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 pissing 的内容
College Football 27 Is Pissing Everyone Off
0
111
3.1K
239
转发到社区
Sydney Sweeney’s ‘Euphoria’ sex worker storyline is really pissing off OnlyFans models...
Actually I’ve decided after men pissing me off to never return to OF
0
30
506
0
转发到社区
rage baiting men on this app and farming interactions by pissing them off only for them to shout “onlyfans wh*re!” from the rooftops, advertising & further promoting me for free like the good little sleeper agents they are. god is good.
显示更多
0
11
635
10
转发到社区
I decided to strictly implement my own ideas that only promote English interaction. Many Chinese users in Chinese platform complain to English users when they use English. Their arguments is: This is a Chinese platform so please respect us by using Chinese. OK, let us be consistent in rules: X is an English platform and everyone should use English to respect the most broad users. In particular, X should not be accessed by Chinese law. ENGLISH AND GERMAN USERS also dislike Chinese letters saturated here as I keep receiving feedbacks. I also need to respect their feelings. The trade-off is: this account is more meaningful to let international users see what my nice life in China is and make them no more trust western propaganda. This is a real constructive thing. For that purpose, Im happy to dump the subscribers who cannot understand the complexity of international communication. Besides, I post most of contents already in Chinese platforms. I know what I'm doing and I'm not purposely pissing anyone. What I gain from it? There are must be a reason behind it. The hard fact is the oversatured Chinese comments begin to cause this account less attractive to international users. I dont know who is good willed and who is bad willed behind those comments. If you have better suggestions, please share.
显示更多
0
160
295
9
转发到社区
pissing all by yourself handsome?
0
277
30.6K
1.3K
转发到社区
NFC South QBs lead the way in passing yards.
0
91
9.6K
524
转发到社区
Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo
显示更多
0
5.5K
16.3K
1.3K
转发到社区