与「pos」相关的搜索结果

my turn! i do not have an agency. all of my pages are entirely self-managed. all of my posts, replies, and messages are my own on socials and NSFW sites alike. with that being said, i also do not play games and will quickly tell you to piss off if you're disrespectful of my time

Britney's response is very interesting. She completely dodges the fact that she was hunting the boss, and dresses it up as "helping young pros grow." What a joke. She always twists facts by taking people’s words out of context, exactly like what she did to C. Ye and she only shared snippets of the conversation to make herself look good. Ask herself: with Britney's actual poker skill, how does someone survive in the poker world for over a decade? (Yes she was already setting up these hunting games in Shanghai ten years ago, yet in the US she claims she had never played poker before. She is extremely good at lying and inventing facts. She burned her bridge in Shanghai but she built her rich Chinese image here thanks to Ryan Feldman) Be careful to play with her. @RyanGarcia @neymarjr I want to say sorry to Alan, because he didn't want his name brought up. But for the sake of the truth of this story, I had no choice but to name several people , including @lsghank1 , @yuchao and Jimmy. Alan's video and Hank's statement together prove the following: 1. On Day 1, Britney staked 40%+ of every player at the table. So counting Britney herself, Day 1 was effectively 7v1 against Peter. That's a textbook pig-butchering setup not "supporting young pros." On Day 2, she cut Hank's and Jimmy's pieces, so it became 5v1v1v1. LMAO. I believe those pros wouldn't collude at the table, but I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions. 2. Hank did take chips off the table, but he did NOT steal them. The only reason I used the word "steal" in my original post is that Britney herself has been telling everyone ever since that Hank is a chip thief, her good friend Jeff can confirm this too. After Britney and Hank fell out over other matters, she started smearing and defaming him nonstop, which is why so many people in the high-stakes community have misunderstood him. 3. I never said Britney owed Alan money. I said she paid in the end. From Alan's perspective, he did get the money within a day (24h) of finishing the CCTV review , so from where he sat, Britney paid quickly. What he doesn't know is how hard that process actually was. According to L, Alan's limited Chinese and his Western mindset meant he wasn't involved in the final step of collecting the money, so he never saw how difficult it was. In the end, Britney owed the pros on L's side roughly $200K, and she initially planned to walk away from it. The host at the time, and another Chinese pro (the one who investigated together with Alan), can both confirm this. She only paid because the other host threatened to call the police and to tell Peter everything. In fact, she had already booked a flight for the next day and was ready to run , Hank's statement confirms this too. #poker# #hustlercasinolive#

Hi everyone ^_^ I’m going to be taking a lil break from social media to focus on a few things … I do have some scheduled posts for this week & I may be on OF still sometimes due to it being my only source of income & I need to survive somehows :3 love u 🤍

Originally, I didn’t want to comment publicly on all of the drama. However, once there were multiple lies and false or exaggerated accusations, I felt I had no choice but to clear my name and state the facts with evidence so that we can put this issue to rest. Regarding the issue with C Ye at Venetian — the post below includes a link to a video from Xuan Liu, who is very reputable in the poker community and was there with me at the time. She can confirm that the floor staff told us they had checked the surveillance footage, and that the amount of chips C Ye actually had at the end of the game was different from the amount she reported to us. People have asked what C Ye’s motivation could have been for misreporting. I can’t say for sure, but I do know that in the days leading up to June 7, she was on a huge downswing across private games, HCL, and baccarat — easily over $100K of her own money. We also later got in touch with someone at the Venetian, who checked their internal records for us and found a record related to the surveillance inquiry. The record shows that the report was reviewed on June 21 at approximately 11:03 PM, and there is an internal report number associated with it. I also have additional evidence supporting my account that Venetian security did in fact help me review the surveillance footage. However, I gave my word that this material would never be shared publicly, and I intend to honor that. That said, we are willing to share the original materials privately with well-respected and credible members of the poker community who genuinely want to review the evidence. If that applies to you, feel free to DM me. Because these materials contain internal Venetian information and involve staff who helped us, we will not post them publicly. We don’t want anyone at the Venetian getting in trouble for helping us. C Ye tweeted that she put all of her chips in my bag ($187K). Venetian told Xuan that C Ye made a cage transaction for $106K after the game. That would explain where the rest of the chips went. Further, attached is a video from Jeff the Cash, who was there that day and says he personally saw chips being taken off the table. Jeff is a very reputable high-stakes player and is willing to publicly speak about what he personally witnessed. Regarding Wesley’s story — attached is a video from Aussie Alan confirming that I never owed anyone money and that Wesley’s allegations aren’t true. Alan also spoke directly with L, the person referenced in Wesley’s post. L apologized to Alan and said that Wesley using his name without his approval was very wrong, especially when what Wesley was saying was not factually correct. The chat confirming this is attached below. Charles, a well-known and reputable player on HCL who was mentioned in Wesley’s story, is also willing to publicly confirm on X that Wesley’s allegations against me are not true. Charles was at the table that day and can confirm two things: first, he had bought action in Hank; and second, Hank did in fact secretly take chips off the table. Charles is willing to speak publicly about what he personally knows and witnessed. Lastly, I want to make it clear that Ryan and HCL had no knowledge of me buying pieces of other players. I understand now that this can create a conflict of interest in certain games, but at the time, I sometimes bought action because I wanted to help younger players who might not otherwise have been able to play in those games. Going forward, I will not do it again. I’m not perfect. I’ve made some mistakes, but never out of a lack of integrity. Things get heated and words get thrown around when poker players are no longer welcome in or able to access games they want to play. Take the evidence below as you wish and decide for yourself. I just wanted one last opportunity to put all of this information and evidence out there, clear things up, and hopefully put this issue to rest once and for all.

We're giving away a CONTROL Resonant custom wrapped NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 to celebrate its official release with #RTXON#. To enter: 🟢 Share this post 🟢 Comment #RTXON# T&Cs:

🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: Premier League confirm an independent Commission has found Manchester City GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES related to serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules over a nine-season period, and the majority of charges in relation to its failure to co-operate with the League’s investigation. The club has the right to appeal the independent Commission’s findings and has until Friday 2 October to exercise that right. The Premier League Board’s intention is that the full process (including any appeals and publication of relevant decisions) is concluded as soon as possible. The independent Commission found that between Seasons 2009/10 and 2017/18: - Manchester City arranged ‘sham’ contracts (which misrepresented the true agreement between the parties) with a number of its commercial partners, as well as relying on ‘sham’ agreements with others, to artificially inflate the club’s revenues and reduce its costs - The club filed misstated accounts and concealed the true state of its finances from its auditors and football regulators - Manchester City was significantly in breach of both the Premier League’s and UEFA’s spending limits - During the Premier League’s investigation, Manchester City committed multiple breaches of its duties of co-operation and utmost good faith towards the League (three of the four alleged breaches were upheld)

The latest work has been focused on what happens after a user already has exposure. Getting into a position is only one part of the experience. Managing it needs to feel just as clear. We’re refining how users can understand what they currently hold, what actions are available, and what happens when they make a change. None of this is about adding complexity for the sake of features. It’s the opposite. We want someone to open Zero Stocks, understand their position quickly, make the change they want, and move on without wondering whether they missed something. The privacy infrastructure can be complex underneath. The product itself shouldn’t feel that way.