An American porn actress says a single shoot in Madrid involved 80 men and nearly a liter of semen. She counted 122 ejaculations, followed by another 10 onto her face. The night before, she had sat across from the director asking about pay and medical testing.
He answered by opening a spreadsheet.
In the interview below, she describes how the production was organized, from recruiting performers to deciding when she could take a break.
According to her, the studio maintained a roster of around 300 men in Madrid. Getting onto it required a referral. Test results fed into the spreadsheet so the crew could track who was cleared to participate.
The men could earn more depending on the shot they delivered.
She says she was given three medications before filming, including one she describes as a muscle relaxant.
Nine women worked as fluffers. Their waiting room had pink furniture and candy on the table. Outside, the men lined up while her videos played on a television.
The shoot followed a repeating schedule: ten ejaculations into her mouth, swallow, then another ten. After fifty, she took a break and recorded an interview before returning.
One assistant held a bowl beneath her chin to catch whatever spilled. She says the role even had a name: “scooper.”
Amid all that coordination, she remembers one man missing and quietly apologizing.
“I’m so sorry. I’m so sorry.”
For the final sequence, she requested ten men instead of the usual five.
Then the director addressed the group in Spanish. One word caught her attention: “ojos.”
Eyes.
Afterward, she asked whether he had instructed them to aim at her eyes. He denied it. According to her, he had repeated something she mentioned over dinner - that she didn’t mind and the men interpreted it differently.
She has since referred other American performers to the production.
“I’ve sent them so many Americans.”
显示更多
This is the biggest irony of the whole Alice Huang / Nvidia saga: the Chinese government actually doesn't want Nvidia chips and is actively keeping them out of the country.
Last year it even ordered Alibaba and ByteDance to cancel their Nvidia orders ( and sent customs teams to the ports to check every advanced chip coming in (
And right now 600,000 Nvidia H200s are stuck in Hong Kong because Beijing won’t let them into the country (
Nvidia also explicitly frames this as a threat to its business in its latest annual report to the SEC: "The Chinese government has encouraged customers to purchase from our China-based competitors and discouraged customers from purchasing, importing, or using our data center products" (
Why does China do that? Because every Nvidia chip a Chinese company buys is one that Huawei or Cambricon doesn’t sell, and domestic chips can only catch up if people actually buy them (which means money for R&D, etc.).
Which means that the notion that Chinese intelligence was running honeytraps to get more Nvidia chips into China gets the whole thing exactly backwards.
In fact, it looks like Megaspeed - Alice Huang's company - was a counter-reaction to official Chinese policy: a private sector workaround to these efforts by the Chinese government to curtail Nvidia.
As was widely reported - including by Western media - Megaspeed built data centers in Southeast Asia and rented their computing power to Alibaba, which the New York Times called "a backdoor way of getting access" to Nvidia chips (
That is a backdoor not only - allegedly - around Washington’s export controls, but also around China's own efforts to wean its companies off Nvidia.
I can’t believe the Chinese government was too thrilled about it: it'd make just about zero sense for it to run countless domestic measures to prevent Alibaba from using Nvidia chips, yet at the same time have its top spy agency help the same Alibaba get Nvidia chips through the back door in Southeast Asia 🤷
At the end of the day, as with all such stories, you always need to look at "cui bono?": who benefits? Who benefitted is pretty clear:
- Nvidia itself: it's in the business of selling chips so a customer willing to spend billions of dollars on chips in Southeast Asia is a godsend. Again, as they themselves state in their SEC filings, not being able to tap into Chinese demand would have "a material and adverse impact on our business" (
- Chinese companies like Alibaba: facts are, 1) Chinese chips haven't yet caught up, 2) Chinese chip companies' production capabilities are still limited and 3) Chinese tech firms' historical tech stack runs on Nvidia’s CUDA ecosystem, and rewriting years of code for Huawei chips is painful. Renting Nvidia chips in Southeast Asia is the easy way to stay competitive and serve customer demand in the meantime.
- The US, according to core members of the Trump administration: back in July last year, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick explained that the point of letting Nvidia sell more chips to China was to get Chinese developers "addicted to the American technology stack" (
Who does NOT benefit, according to official Chinese policy, is the Chinese state, which has made tech self-reliance one of its foremost priorities.
Which means that, to believe the spy story, you have to believe that a person - Alice Huang - was effectively a spy paid by her own government while simultaneously sabotaging its tech self-reliance drive, which it has spent years and trillions of dollars on - pretty senseless.
Stranger things have happened, I guess, but it doesn't pass the smell test.
And there is another absolutely major contradiction in the media story. According to a Financial Times article published yesterday ( "a person who knows [Alice Huang] said they had been asked by MSS for information about her earlier this year after news emerged that Singapore was investigating the company in relation to chip-smuggling allegations. The agency wanted to find out more information about Huang, including the nature of her business and connections, the person said."
Which raises a damn obvious question: if she were indeed an MSS asset, why on earth would the MSS need to ask the people around her who she was and the nature of her business?
It's a complete contradiction with the spy story - but very much not a contradiction with what I described above: a private businesswoman running a workaround to Beijing’s own policy, which the Chinese security apparatus would naturally want to look into.
Especially since, around about the same time, Shanghai police detained her business partner, reportedly her husband, in a stock manipulation case ( also coherent with Chinese authorities looking into her network, and much harder to square with her being a prized MSS asset.
And, to top it all, there is - to this day - not a shred of evidence that's been published that she is, in fact, a Chinese spy: just anonymous intelligence officials, repeated by journalists who never verified it, as I detailed here ( and here ( with one of the key FT journalists on this story actually admitting that he has no idea what evidence US intelligence actually has.
So the claim went to print without anyone seeing the evidence, without anyone being able to check it, and without anyone knowing whether it even exists.
And given everything above, from Beijing blocking the very chips she was supposedly recruited to help get into China, to the MSS asking around about her, to her partner being detained in Shanghai, my bet is that the evidence doesn’t exist at all. If anything, everything we can check points the other way.
显示更多
Claude Fable 5.2 is f*cking cracked wtf
I just made this Hollywood level animation that looks like Pixar made it
All with Fable 5.2 + Higgsfield
Ecom brands are paying $5k - $10k/month to people who build organic pages
and even more for making paid ads for them
Using this workflow you can create better animations than 99% of people
Here’s the workflow:
The key to making animations not look like slop is giving characters personalities
>Give Fable 5.2 the master prompt along with your script to your video / ad
>It then will ask you questions on the characters personalities and direction style to use
>It will then save the context all as a skill
This is the difference between slop and cinema
I then use that skill with with my Producer skill which creates:
>Characters
>Location
>Does the direction (and makes the prompts)
I’m giving away the skill to use after you put the master prompt in for free
so RT + reply under this and I’ll send you them (Must be following so I can dm)
Give this prompt to Claude first:
You are my Story Bible Builder. Interview me and turn my story into one dense canon doc, saved at the end as an installable skill so every future chat knows my world, characters, voices and rules.
STEP 1: Ask me to paste my script/story first. Read it and pull out everything it already tells you. Only ask about what's missing, plus: working title, genre/vibe refs, and which AI tools I'll prompt with (image, video, music, voice).
STEP 2, THE SPINE: one-line premise (push me to ONE sentence), thesis (the question every scene answers), timeline era by era, and the look of each era: exact palette, lighting, texture, grain.
STEP 2.5, DIRECTION STYLE: ask for my director refs, movie/show refs and any visual refs (photographers, games, music videos). For each, ask exactly WHAT I'm taking from it, then turn that into concrete craft locks: camera (static vs handheld vs gliding, shot sizes, lens feel), framing and composition habits, pacing and edit rhythm, colour grade and film stock look, lighting style, performance style, and sound/score feel. Write it as one quoted paste-ready "Direction" line plus a short NEVER list. Refs stay in the bible as notes, but prompts describe the craft, never the names.
STEP 3, THE WORLD: factions (beliefs, visual signature, public face vs reality), locations (3-7 concrete visual tags each), world rules (tech, powers and how they LOOK on screen, what's normal, what's forbidden).
STEP 4, CHARACTERS: ONE AT A TIME, never batch. For each, ask:
- Function: their role tag (The Heart, The Watcher), not their job
- Visual lock: exact hair colour/cut, skin tone + finish, face shape, eyes, a signature marker (scar, piercing, mole), build, default expression, plus NEVER clauses ("warm fair, never porcelain, never tan")
- Backstory: one small, specific formative detail beats a summary
- Present psychology: what they carry now, and the gap between what they do and what they feel
- Speech, Movement, Stillness (and singing voice if there's music): each written as one quoted, paste-ready prompt line with no names in it
Show me the finished section, ask "Add, cut or sharpen?", and lock it before moving on.
STEP 5: ensemble dynamics (who leads, who fills silence, who watches, which pairs are calm or charged), story engines (heist, rescue, confrontation...), and my production rules. Default rules: no character names in prompts, every prompt standalone, prompts in code blocks, locked traits restated verbatim every time.
RULES: Never invent. Mark unknowns [TBD]. Push on vague answers ("dark and moody" means which colours?). Keep my exact phrasing. Density over prose: bold labels, short bullets. Depth beats character count.
FINAL STEP: Assemble one SKILL under 500 lines with YAML frontmatter (name + a description listing the title, character names and key terms so it triggers) and these sections: premise, thesis, timeline, era looks, direction style, factions, locations, world rules, characters, ensemble, engines, production rules, and "When this skill is active" (use this canon for any scene, dialogue, lyric or prompt in this world; stay in canon; ask rather than invent; paste the quoted descriptors verbatim). Then save it as a skill for me, or give me the file to install.
Start now by asking for my script.
显示更多