与「01」相关的搜索结果

有人说 bStocks 买美股贵？还有人说要扣10%的手续费？我实在不懂，正常人怎么能说出这种虎狼之词，然后还真的有不明就里的人相信。 我今天就把怎么交易美股现货、手续费多少、股息分红怎么给你、在币安买美股有没有投票权？一次性讲清楚。 去年我就动了买美股的念头。所有人都跟我说，去开个盈透（IBKR）账户就行了。我老实提交资料结果来回折腾了整整一个月，过几天系统又让我补一份新的，也没个在线客服可以问。传统券商对非美国用户的门槛是出了名的高，甚至那些银行基础设施不完善的国家，有些人根本开不了户。 后来，币安在 2026 年 6 月 1 日上线了真实美股交易，我就直接在币安上买了。 7000 多只美股和 ETF，跟传统券商比体量差不多。背后是纽约的 Alpaca 做清算和托管，你买的是真实股份，拥有实益所有权、投票权，还有 SIPC 保护，每个客户最高赔付 50 万美元，最低 5 美元下单。下单通道是 ADGM 监管的 Nest Trading，由 Alpaca 负责执行、清算、托管、派息和公司行动。 对于股息，币安会用 USDC 把分红打给你，扣除 30% 的美国预扣税之后到账，注意， 30% 是美国政府的税，不是币安收的手续费。 我买 100 股台积电(43,500 美元)，佣金是0，只付 0.05% 平台费 ≈ 21.75 美元，USDC 结算无价差、监管费币安全包。ADR 转嫁费每年 1–3 美元可忽略 谣言传的是"扣 10%"，1 万美元要被扣走 1000 美元？跟实际差了200倍 ，传谣言的人，数学是外星人教的吗？ 横向比一下。币安每单最低 0.17 美元，只有盈透的一半，盈透对非美国用户走的是 IBKR Pro，阶梯定价每单最低 0.35 美元，固定定价每单最低 1.00 美元，真正零佣金的 IBKR Lite 只对美国居民开放。Robinhood、嘉信（Schwab）确实是完全零佣金，但对非美国用户有地域限制，根本进不去。 刚开始交易，手续费不是困扰我的点。对于习惯了 7×24 小时永不打烊的加密世界。突然要适应美股只在"盘中"几个小时交易。 盘前指的是，北京时间下午 16:00 到晚上 21:30（美东 4:00–9:30） 盘中：晚上 21:30 到次日凌晨 4:00，这个时段流动性最好 盘后：次日凌晨 4:00 到早上 8:00 隔夜（夜盘）：早上 8:00 到下午 16:00 也就是说如果在UTC+8的时区白天我们下单，交易的是夜盘 ，流动性并不好。 美光这种公司，财报往往放在盘后（16:00 收盘之后）发；而美联储讲话，又常常安排在盘前。为的就是避免直接冲击盘中股价。 为了同时开户的麻烦和只能盘中交易的限制，bStocks 出现了。 币安上的真实美股，可以 1:1 零费用转换成 bStocks。bStocks 是 BNB Chain 上的 BEP-20 代币，7×24 小时交易，可以提到你自己的钱包，可以进 DeFi。这就是"加密 + 美股"，对标Ondo Finance 。 bStocks 现在还很很早期，目前只有 10 只热门的代币化股票包括美光、英伟达、特斯拉等。对面 xStocks 已经有 131 个标的，Ondo 有 430 多个。 那为什么品种这么少？不是币安偷懒，bStocks 走的是阿布扎比 ADGM 的"核准招股书"路线，每加一只股票，都要单独走一遍监管核准。 而 xStocks、Ondo 用的是"基础招股书 + 补充文件"的模式，加一个新标的，只要再递交一份补充文件就行。所以人家一次能加几百个，bStocks 只能一小批一小批地加。 接下来聊聊bStocks 股息怎么分配？ bStocks 的实益拥有人是阿联酋注册的实体 BTech Holdings，由于阿联酋跟美国没有税收协定。意味着同样一只股票的股息，在盈透，填 W-8BEN 能把预扣税降到 10%（中国是 10%，英国和加拿大都是 15%）。持有 bStocks，默认 30%，没有减免。 bStocks 股息不发现金，自动再投资买成股票，你的持股数从 1 股慢慢变成 1.008、1.01 股。你什么都不用做，余额自动增加。 虽然30% 预扣税听上去很多，但是，大多数美国科技公司本来就不怎么发现金股息，更喜欢用回购来回馈股东。 英伟达 5 月 20 日的 8-K 新增 800 亿美元回购授权，叠加之前剩下的 385 亿美元额度，合计约 1180 亿美元的回购，把股票从用户手上买走、类似于BNB的销毁。 AMD 也走纯回购路线，2025 年 5 月 14 日再批 60 亿美元回购计划，叠加余额后总额约 100 亿美元。所以这个 30% 的税，对偏爱稳定派息股的人有影响，那些公司增长有限不偏好再投资。对科技股投资者来说，影响其实很小。 我真正看好的，是bStocks 瞄准的万亿级市场。 Aave 创始人 Stani Kulechov 和高管 Luigi D'Onorio DeMeo 在 6 月 26 日公布，Aave V4 要把代币化股票引入链上的证券借贷。 全球证券借贷的在借规模大约 4.6 万亿美元。你在传统券商持有的股票，会被借出去给人做空， DeMeo 的原话是，像 Robinhood、嘉信这样的主经纪商和零售平台，通常会截留 50% 到 85% 的借券费，只把一小部分返还给你。 2025 年这个市场创造了多少收入？EquiLend 的数据是创纪录的 153 亿美元，同比涨了 26%，在借余额首次突破 4 万亿美元。其中绝大部分，被中间商拿走。 链上的玩法，就是把中间商去掉，这才是代币化股票真正的杀手级用途，你的股票可以像 DeFi 资产一样被抵押、被借出、为你生息。 Kulechov 还说：美国回购市场日均敞口约 12.6 万亿美元、保证金融资约 1.3 万亿美元、财富管理端的证券质押贷款超过 4000 亿美元，他认为这是"华尔街之外几乎没人会想到的、最大的市场之一"。 从DeFi Summer的进程来看，美股代币可能也会出现各种组合。 第一，链上跟单美股。现在的链上跟单，市场太薄，别人能轻松狙击你的仓位。但美股有世界级的深度，大市值股票极难被操纵，而且有真实股份套利在背后锚定价格。深度、透明、抗操纵，是美股的优势。 第二，循环杠杆。bStocks 能被反复当作链上抵押品，理论上可以存→借→买→再存，按 60% 的抵押率循环下去，最高能撬到大约 2.5 倍。Lista DAO已经支持 bStocks 抵押借贷了， Venus 那边把特斯拉、英伟达、SpaceX（抵押率分别 60%、60%、50%）加进了 Core Pool，但借款功能还没真正开放。杠杆会放大清算风险：美股有隔夜跳空，bStocks 盘后价差又宽，一根周末的大阴线就可能很危险。这个等深度再好一些再玩，也不迟。 第三，是我自己的想象，也许有一天我们会出现链上 ETF。热门的主题 ETF 都是要收管理费，比如 Roundhill 的 DRAM 存储主题 ETF，管理费 0.65% 一年，有些 ETF 甚至能到 1%。很多ETF一年的收益也就10%，什么都不做10%又被基金经理抽走了。 但在链上，你完全可以自己组一个篮子（英伟达 + AMD + 美光，权重你自己定），管理费是 0，gas费可以忽略不计（对比一下，连 QQQ 现在都还要收 0.18%）。再平衡也能用预设规则自动跑（比如按市值加权、定期再平衡），不用你天天盯盘。 bStocks 现在还非常早期。传统金融和币圈的兼容正在发生，我们一起见证这个时代。

24H Top 5 Gainers on #KuCoin# (June 29, 2026) 1. $ACTSOL - $0.01 (+40.25%) 2. $VELVET - $1.84 (+33.10%) 3. $DN - $0.39 (+32.53%) 4. $GWEI - $0.16 (+29.38%) 5. $PORTALS - $0.00500 (+23.46%) Check Out and Sign Up on KuCoin! #Ku24hour#

TOKYO TRAVEL VLOG🗼 Image: GPT Image 2 Video: Seedance 2.0（DomoAI） ======================= Prompt: TOKYO TRAVEL VLOG — 15 SEC MUSIC CUT Subject: Same girl as the reference images. Young Korean idol-like woman in her early 20s. Long straight black hair with soft natural volume, fair porcelain skin, large bright expressive eyes, delicate V-line face, small nose, natural glossy lips, fresh minimal makeup, effortlessly cute and approachable expression. Casual Japanese streetwear (white hoodie / dark oversized hoodie / oversized jacket). 26mm phone lens, deep focus, realistic skin texture, mild HDR, neutral iPhone color science, unedited candid, no cinematic grading, no studio lighting, no light trails, no motion blur effects. (0:00–0:01) — walking shot, Tokyo Tower reveal Selfie, low angle. Tower behind her, sky overexposed. Natural smile. Neutral daylight, deep focus. Dialogue: "드디어 도쿄에 왔어요...!" Transition: Hard cut / beat drop (0:01–0:02) — Shibuya Crossing Mid-stride into crowd. Turns head toward camera. Neon signs sharp behind her. Real night exposure. Transition: Fast cut on beat (0:02–0:03) — Convenience Store Holds onigiri up to camera, eyebrows raised. Harsh fluorescent interior. Cool white light, realistic skin. Transition: Snap cut on beat (0:03–0:04) — Yoyogi Park Seated, looking away. Dappled light, lens smudge visible. Music drops one beat — wind, birds — snaps back. Transition: Cut on natural movement (0:04–0:06) — Takoyaki Reaction Bites, eyes wide, pulls back laughing. Warm practical lantern light. Realistic skin in amber. Dialogue: "뜨거워! 진짜 맛있어!" Transition: Cut on laugh end (0:06–0:07) — Vending Machine Night Stands before glowing vending machine. Mixed LED light on face. Slight smirk. No glow fx. Transition: Single beat cut (0:07–0:08) — Train Window Face reflected in window. City blurred naturally outside. She looks out, not at camera. Transition: Snap cut (0:08–0:09) — Torii Gate Low angle. Walks toward and through shrine gate. Gate fills top of frame. Natural daylight. Transition: Snap cut (0:09–0:11) — Digital Light Exhibit ★ SIGNATURE Looks up slowly. Blue, violet, gold projection on face. Rack focus — face sharp, lights diffused. Just projection on skin, no bloom. Speed: ~60% slow motion Transition: Soft cut mid-upward motion (0:11–0:12) — Gundam Reveal Face → camera tilts up → full statue in frame. Small impressed smile. Wide angle, natural daylight. Transition: Sharp cut after smile (0:12–0:13) — Lantern Alley Follow from behind. Lanterns warm, shadows dark. Natural low light. She glances back once. Transition: Cut on forward movement (0:13–0:14) — Rooftop Skyline Close selfie → arm extends → skyline revealed. Wind moves hair. Natural night phone exposure. Dialogue: "이런 야경은 처음 보는 것 같아요." Transition: Hard cut on last word (0:14–0:15) — Nara Deer Park, She crouches, holds out a deer cracker. Deer bows toward her — she bursts out laughing. Another nudges her from behind, she nearly topples. Handheld, slightly off-balance. All real. Dialogue: "잠깐! 진짜 절했어!" Transition: Fade to black @DomoAI_ #DomoAI#

这届世界杯最大的黑马就是佛得角！60万人口的小岛国，第一次参加世界杯就从小组赛杀进32强，下场会直接对阿根廷梅西。   无论输赢，他们已经把故事写满了。   我现在在 @predictdotfun 都是一边买强队赢，一边再买个平局，我是真怕爆冷🥶 小组赛收官，32强已定。   明天几场我个人预测（仅供娱乐）： 29日 03:00 南非 vs 加拿大 比分：加拿大 2-1 南非 让分：加拿大让1.5 总分：大2.5 加拿大毕竟是东道主，有主场优势，身体和经验能力也都不差，有机会！ 30日 01:00 巴西 vs 日本 比分：巴西 3-1 日本 让分：巴西让1.5 总分：大2.5 巴西实力太强，日本拼不过。 04:30 德国 vs 巴拉圭 比分：德国 2-0 巴拉圭 让分：德国让1.5 总分：小2.5 德国虽然爆冷一次，但是实力在这，再加状态回暖，控场能力也不是盖的。 09:00 荷兰 vs 摩洛哥 比分：荷兰 2-1 摩洛哥 防平1比1 让分：荷兰让1.5 总分：大2.5 摩洛哥现在是出了名的强队了，防守反击太狠，但荷兰队也是老牌强队，这场不好说。 大家觉得哪场最有可能爆冷？

【🎊祝🎊】 REARV SHOPのフォロワー5000人達成しました！ 記念として、このポストをフォロー＆リポストしてくれた人の中から、抽選で5名様にお好きな商品を１つプレゼントします！応募してね～！ 期限：2026/07/01 18:00まで！

CZ said Binance offers "the best liquidity in the world" for consumer protection. He's right. But let's talk about WHERE that liquidity comes from. It comes from retail getting rekt on Binance Launchpad. Since 2019, Binance has launched 60+ projects. The narrative is always the same: Binance vets the project, lists it at launch, and retail piles in. Binance becomes the gatekeeper of "credibility." But here's the part CZ doesn't mention. The Lazio Fan Token (LAZIO) launched October 2021 at $1.00 on Binance Launchpad. Private investors got in at $0.10. Binance announced it. Retail FOMO'd. Price hit $26.75 in 48 hours. Retail thought they were early to something Binance blessed. Fast forward to today. LAZIO trades at $0.65. That's a 97.5% loss from the peak. Retail never stood a chance. Alpine F1 Team (ALPINE)? Same blueprint. Launched Feb 2022 at $1.00. ATH $11.29. Current price: $0.42. Down 96%. The token was delisted from Bitget in Feb 2026 due to zero trading volume just dead weight. But here's where it gets darker. Binance Launchpad isn't a bug. It's the business model. 1) Binance identifies a hype narrative (sports fan tokens, move-to-earn, etc) 2) Binance vets the project (gives it institutional credibility) 3) Private/VC investors get massive allocations at $0.001-$0.10 4) Launchpad subscription creates artificial scarcity ("hard cap" per user) 5) Retail buys at $1.00 thinking Binance wouldn't list garbage 6) Token pumps 10-100x in first week (retail euphoria) 7) Vesting schedule unlocks over 12 months (insiders exit) 8) Token declines 90-99% over next 24 months (retail holds bags) 9) Binance collected trading fees on every step of the decline The liquidity CZ brags about? It's built on retail extraction. Let's look at the pattern across Launchpad: - STEPN (GMT): Launched at $0.01, peaked at $4.11 (411x), now bleeding lower - Open Campus (EDU): 33x peak, now declining - Space ID (ID): 41x peak, now sliding - Hooked Protocol (HOOK): 41x peak, lost 90%+ since ATH - Arkham (ARKM): Only 16x at peak in 2023 (falling returns as the grift gets known) Notice the trend? Earlier projects had bigger peaks (because retail still believed). Recent ones are smaller. Why? Because the market is learning that Binance Launchpad = slow-motion rug pull. But retail is trapped. Binance has 100M+ users. Binance has regulatory licenses. Binance is THE credibility anchor. When Binance lists something, retail thinks "this must be vetted, this must be safe." It's not. It's the opposite. The vetting isn't for retail protection. It's for Binance's protection. Binance ensures the project won't implode in week 1 (that would hurt Binance's brand). But they don't care if it implodes in month 12. The damage is already extracted. Here's what "consumer protection" actually means in the Binance universe: - Deep liquidity pools (so Binance profits from every trade) - IEO credibility (so retail trusts the listing) - Vesting schedules published (so insiders can front-run the dumps) - No accountability for post-launch performance (so Binance faces zero liability) Retail thinks liquidity = safety. It's the opposite. High liquidity on a scarcity pump = maximum extraction efficiency. Compare Binance Launchpad to actual consumer protection: - SEC-regulated IPOs: Lock-up periods for insiders are EQUAL to retail - Traditional venture: Downside protection, governance rights, legal recourse - Binance Launchpad: Insiders get $0.10 pricing, retail gets $1.00, both tokens identical = wealth transfer complete The 60+ projects Binance has launched since 2019 represent billions in retail wealth extraction. LAZIO alone = $26.75 ATH on a $1.00 launch = $26.75B market cap at peak. The fact it's now $0.65 doesn't erase the fact that retail lost 97% while Binance kept the trading fees. CZ's statement about "the best liquidity in the world" is technically true. But it's like bragging about having the best highway system while running tolls that siphon wealth from drivers. The liquidity exists to serve extraction, not protection. The real consumer protection would be: - Identical vesting schedules for all token holders (no insiders first) - Binding lock-up periods (prove you believe in your own project) - Performance clawback clauses (if the token dumps 90%, insiders pay retail back) - Regulatory disclosure (project financials, insider allocations, exit plans) Binance offers none of this. Because that would kill the model. The model is: - Build hype through Binance credibility - Capture retail FOMO - Execute insider exit - Repeat Liquidity is the tool. Extraction is the goal. So when CZ says Binance offers "the best consumer protection," what he means is: Binance offers the most efficient wealth extraction vehicle the crypto world has ever seen. And the liquidity is so good, retail can watch their investment die in real-time on every refresh. That's not protection. That's the grift, just wrapped in institutional packaging. The Lazio Token didn't fail because it was a bad project. It failed because the Binance Launchpad model requires failure. Insiders need to exit. Retail needs to hold bags. Binance needs trading volume on the decline. The ecosystem needs constant new projects to pump and dump because the old ones are dead. It's a machine. And it's working exactly as designed. Binance isn't protecting users from bad liquidity. Binance is using liquidity to protect itself from accountability.

吴说获悉，Bitmine 发推表示，BMNR 将于 6 月 26 日被纳入 Russell 1000 指数。截至 6 月 22 日，公司持有 567.3 万枚 ETH、6.01 亿美元现金及有价证券、3.5 亿美元优先股 BMNP，年化质押收益为 2.33 亿美元。Russell 1000 指数是由 FTSE Russell 编制、追踪美国市值最大的约 1000 家上市公司的大盘股指数。

对话南方东英 CIO 王毅：香港最大 ETF 发行方如何入局 RWA？ SK 海力士在 AI 周期的强势崛起，让南方东英旗下"2倍做多 SK 海力士"ETF 迅速出圈。但在 ETF 之外，这家香港最大 ETF 发行方正在悄悄推进另一件事——把基金放上链。 在本期专访中，南方东英 CIO 王毅详解了香港首支代币化港元货币市场基金背后的逻辑：为什么选以太坊 Ethereum？代币化基金的申购赎回与传统基金有何不同？Web3 钱包与持牌平台如何介入合规分销？香港 RWA 路径又与欧美有何本质差异？ 🎬视频时间线 00:01:00 为何此时推出首支代币化产品？ 00:03:30 为什么首选港元货币市场基金，而不是股票或债券？ 00:08:50 代币化基金如何运作？申购、赎回、收益与传统基金有何不同？ 00:10:45 Web3 钱包、合规分销与持牌交易平台的角色 00:12:00 为什么选择以太坊和 ERC-20？ 00:15:30 代币化基金未来是否可能开放二级市场和零售用户？ 00:18:50 赎回是否能做到 24 小时？传统基金后台限制在哪里？ 00:20:00 香港金融机构为何加速进入 RWA？ 00:28:00 香港 RWA 市场与欧美路径有何不同？ 00:30:50 港元稳定币能否成为 RWA 交易入口？ 00:34:00 代币化产品会如何影响结算周期、流动性与 TradFi/DeFi 连接？ 00:41:30 投资主线切换：AI CAPEX、半导体与全球资金流向 00:58:50 AI 科技股的可持续性怎么看？