与「20260524許さないぞこんなことの会」相关的搜索结果

【cosplay】 勝利の女神NIKKE フォービースト レヴィアタン@tetoteto_cos 様 ジズ@Mihieinori 様 バハムート@Hazukki_cos 様 ベヒモス@sayukichi227 📸@rky_28 様 #NIKKEcosplay# #20260524許さないぞこんなことの会#

20260524 PlayX4 에픽세븐 - 아람 Cos. 유수정님(@crystal613vv) 이날 저는 제 소원을 이루었습니다! 감격스럽네요. 다시 한번 큰 감사를 드립니다!

Very welcome recent news from Signal: they are working on letting you register an account without a phone number. That said, an important counterpoint about what this would and would not accomplish. The good #1#: reducing dependence on phone numbers. Even aside from privacy benefits, reducing dependency on a highly oligopolistic system of chokepoints is good in itself. The good #2#: phone numbers are for many people not a good "root" of identity from an access control perspective. Phone numbers get sim swapped all the time. The good #3#: allowing phone-number-free accounts will make it harder for them in the future to discriminate against people by country - and so make it harder for governments to pressure them to block their own citizens. Now, on privacy. Significantly better than status quo, so yes it is good #4#, but... In practice, in 2026, I believe that pseudonymity (a long-term persistent account that is not tied to your primary identity) is a dead concept. There are just too many channels by which we accidentally slowly leak data about who we are - timing of messages, the pattern of who we send messages to with what frequency, size, etc. And too many highly effective AI-based means (both using LLMs per-user, and LLMs helping every person and agency under the sun use math that we had all along) to uncover and piece together those hints. As a trivial example, whatever server you interact with learns your IP address, but even if you hide *that* with a VPN or Tor, there are many other identity leakage vectors. And so the only defensible form of privacy is *message-by-message unlinkability* - no one except sender and receiver knows the (sender, receiver) pair, ideally even not knowing who the sender or the receiver are. A natural taxonomy of privacy is the following 2x2: * Sitting duck: adversary knows "X did Y" * Confidentiality: adversary knows "X did ???" [E2E encryption provides this] * Anonymity: adversary knows "??? did Y" [aka message-by-message unlinkability] * Ideal: adversary knows "??? did ???" Signal has already had confidentiality for a long time. (Note: in other contexts, "confidentiality" sometimes means "someone knows X did Y, and we trust that someone to not reveal it", ie. not true privacy. Here, by confidentiality we mean hiding contents from third parties) This adds pseudonymity: in the above schema, adversary knows "0x8b512c... did Y", where they don't initially know who 0x8b512c... is, but may figure that out over time. The ideal is getting to message-by-message unlinkability. Actually accomplishing that gets into territory that is currently being explored by mixnet projects as well as newer messengers, eg. @session_app and @SimpleXChat. Once we get deeper into this territory, I suspect the primary frontier will be spam and DoS protection. Right now, much of the internet blocks all Tor exit nodes - not because they personally hate privacy, but because that's where DoS attacks come from. So we need ways for people to prove their non-spammer status while maintaining message-by-message unlinkability. See here for one direction (which complements nicely). So I hope that we appreciate the victory that is mainstreaming of end-to-end encryption, that we actually get Signal accounts without phone number dependency (it's a great thing even if it had zero privacy consequences), and then that we keep moving forward and pushing the frontier of data leakage minimization.

2026.08.01 #ゼンゼロ2周年 記念オフラインイベント# ゼンレスゾーンゼロ レミエール　月夜のささやき/菌烨takoさん(@Takomayuyi ) 指ハートしたら返してくれたやつ 嬉しい〜！🫶 #ゼンゼロ記念イベント# #ゼンゼロ#

很感谢 @BlockBeatsAsia 这篇内容的信息， 给了我很多关于 Dex 新的思路和方向， 《加密成交缩水63%、HLP收益归零，股票需求恐难接住Perp DEX退潮》 下面是关于这篇内容我的一些想法，如果你准备或者已经押注这个赛道下一轮的爆发，推荐阅读： 1️⃣Perpdex 63% 的成交缩水； 2️⃣关于 Hyper 可以看到大量钱还停在里面，但是大家不想频繁下注了，也能代表当下 Crypto 行业现状； 3️⃣Crypto Perps 在萎缩， 但是 Trade xyz 日均成交反而 +32.1%。 这意味着 Hyperliquid 正在发生一个非常有意思的变化，以前：Hyperliquid = Crypto Perp DEX； 现在：Hyperliquid = Crypto + 股票 + 指数 + 商品 + FX + Pre-IPO 的链上交易基础设施，如果这个趋势成立，我甚至觉得这是Hyperliquid 长期逻辑的升级，而不是削弱。 4️⃣未来趋势：Global Trading Venue。Crypto Market Structure 正在和 TradFi Market Structure 合流。 5️⃣二线 Perp DEX 明显更悲观，需要有自己的特色否则无法突破，Hyperliquid 现在仍有约 2000 亿美元 30D Volume + 107 亿美元 OI，护城河相对清楚，其他 Dex 的优势在哪里？ 6️⃣我的判断： Perp DEX 1.0 的结束，而不是 Perp DEX 的结束。 Perp DEX 1.0 是：空投 + 积分 + 高杠杆 + Crypto 牛市 + 疯狂换手。 下一阶段如果成立，会变成：真实用户 + 真实 OI + 真实 Fee + 多资产 + 全球 24/7 市场。 Hyperliquid 的“股票化、商品化、指数化”非常关键： 如果 HIP-3 走成了，HYPE 的叙事会从「最好的 Perp DEX Token」升级成「链上全球交易基础设施」； 如果 HIP-3 没走成，而 Crypto Perp 又长期萎缩，那么现在几十亿美元级别的年化估值预期就会开始受到真正考验。

Meta又被开了一张天价罚单，接近10个小目标。 之前，Meta被指控明知 Instagram 和 Facebook 会让孩子上瘾，仍用无限滚动和推荐系统把他们留在屏幕前。 平台还会向未成年人推送自残，饮食失调内容，把他们和陌生成年人相互推荐，让性剥削者更容易接触孩子。 Meta早收到警告了，却还是对家长宣称平台安全。 今年3月，陪审团先罚了3.75亿美元。 这周，法官又认定 Meta的所作所为已经构成“公共妨害”，又追加了5.67亿美元。 不过，Meta去年利润有600亿美元，10个小目标，还不到去年 利润的2%。

老乡别走，村里发金条了！ 每股142万韩元的SK海力士，派发375韩元现金股息， 换算成美元就是约$1,000美元，分$0.26美元，万分之二点六。 好消息是董事会批了 54.3 万亿韩元（384亿美元）建两座新厂扩张芯片业务。 韩国棒子是确实抠门，这股息不要也罢，只希望SK海力士早日上$2,000行不行？🫣