与「AIResearch」相关的搜索结果

The future of humanoids isn't just mechanical—it's neural. A humanoid robot is an embodied AI system. Motors, sensors, and actuators provide the body, but neural intelligence provides the mind. Neural models power vision, speech, language, navigation, manipulation, planning, memory, decision-making, and continuous learning. As robotics evolves, nearly every cognitive subsystem is becoming neural-first. That's why represents more than a niche—it's a foundational concept for the next generation of intelligent robotics. #HumanoidRobots# #EmbodiedAI# #PhysicalAI# #NeuralNetworks# #ArtificialIntelligence# #Robotics# #MachineLearning# #DeepLearning# #RobotLearning# #ReinforcementLearning# #ComputerVision# #GenerativeAI# #AIResearch# #Automation# #FutureOfAI#

🎉 Congratulations to Daniel Povey, Xiaomi Distinguished Scientist, on being elected a 2026 ISCA Fellow. 🏆 ISCA Fellowship recognizes outstanding and sustained contributions to speech communication science and technology. Daniel's pioneering work on the open-source speech toolkit Kaldi has made foundational contributions to modern speech AI. At Xiaomi, he continues advancing the next generation of open speech technologies through projects and technologies including k2, Lhotse, Icefall, Sherpa, OmniVoice, and Zipformer. 👏 Congratulations on this well-deserved recognition! #XiaomiAI# #SpeechAI# #OpenSource# #AIResearch# #ISCAFellow#

A good research agent should't just answer a question. It should know which tool to call next. At every research workflow is carefully designed as a sequence of actions: 1. Clarify needs 2. Plan the study 3. Search personas 4. Scan social media 5. Build new AI Personas 6. Interview or run group discussions 7. Generate the research report and reusable panel Each step uses different tools to move the research forward. And the report is not the end. The Personas involved become a reusable AI Panel — a consumer asset you can return to whenever you have a new question. Validate an idea. Design a product concept. Analyze competitors. Build a go-to-market plan. One research workflow can become a reusable system for understanding the people you're building for. 👉 Start your AI research from here:

Find & fix software vulnerabilities with CodeMender, our AI code security agent—in preview. Born via @GoogleDeepMind's pioneering AI research, CodeMender transforms vulnerability management from a manual bottleneck into an autonomous, high-speed system →

Benchmark GP @EverettRandle does not think every app company needs an AI lab. “They’ll hire a few researchers from Meta, and then all of a sudden it’s like, ‘We can defend ourselves from the labs because we also have a research team. We’re doing AI research... We don't have risk from the labs.'" He adds that the real advantage still sits with the companies that have the most compute: “There’s not that many opportunities for an in-house research team to be doing that much groundbreaking work relative to the places that have the most GPUs, which is the frontier labs.”

AI Is Moving Beyond “Generating Videos” — Toward “Generating Worlds” Over the past two years, AI video models have advanced at an astonishing pace. From Runway and Pika to Sora and Veo, AI-generated videos have become increasingly realistic and more consistent with the physical laws of the real world. Many people believe the next objective is simply to generate videos that are longer, sharper, and more lifelike. But if we take a step back, we can see that the real transformation is not happening in video itself. It is happening in world models. What Is a World Model? In 1943, psychologist Kenneth Craik proposed an idea that would influence artificial intelligence research for decades. He argued that the human brain does not merely react to the outside world. Instead, it maintains an internal model of how the world works. Because we have this internal model, we can predict the outcome of an action before we actually take it. Before crossing a road, we estimate whether a car will pass by. Before catching a ball, we predict its trajectory. These abilities come from continuously simulating the world in our minds, rather than relying entirely on trial and error. This idea later became known by a more formal term: World Model. A world model does not describe a single image or a fixed video clip. It is an internal representation capable of continuously simulating the rules and dynamics of the real world. Why Is AI Research Turning Toward World Models? Because predicting “what comes next” is becoming increasingly central to how AI systems work. Language models predict the next token. Image models predict the next step in the denoising process. Video models predict the next frame. A world model, however, attempts to predict something broader: What should the world look like in the next moment? In 2018, David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber proposed in their paper World Models that an intelligent agent could first learn a model of the world, and then use that internal model to plan its actions. The Dreamer series later demonstrated that many complex tasks could be learned by training agents inside an “imagined world.” At the same time, the development of video models such as Sora and Veo led researchers to another realization: A model capable of continuously generating video has already learned, at least implicitly, many of the rules governing the real world. As a result, these two research directions have gradually begun to converge. But Video Is Not Yet a World This is where the distinction is often misunderstood. For a world model to support meaningful real-time interaction, it must solve several critical problems. Most video models today are essentially answering one question: What should the next frame look like? A true world model needs to answer much more: What happens if I take one step forward? If I walk behind a building and then return, will the building still be there? If I suddenly change the camera angle, will the entire space remain consistent? If I enter a command such as: “Summon a dragon.” Will the world respond immediately? In other words, a world model must do more than generate content. It must understand space. It must understand time. It must understand causality. And it must understand interaction. Moving from watching to participating is where the real difficulty of world models begins. World Models Are Entering the Interactive Era One of the latest attempts in this direction is Alaya World, recently open-sourced by Alaya World, or @alayastd. Instead of generating a fixed video clip, it generates a world that users can explore in real time. Users can begin with text, an image, or a video, enter the generated scene, move freely through it, and introduce new prompts at any moment during generation. The world responds immediately. According to the publicly released information, Alaya World provides: Real-time streaming generation at 720p and 24 FPS Stable continuous exploration for more than one minute The ability to switch prompts and trigger skills or events during generation Model weights and inference code released under the Apache 2.0 License Training code and datasets planned for future release What makes these capabilities important is not simply the technical specifications. It is that the generated “world” can now support continuous interaction. The official demo shows that users can genuinely control, transform, and explore the generated environment. AI Is Evolving From a Tool Into an Environment Over the past few years, most discussions around AI have focused on content generation. Generating text. Generating images. Generating videos. But world models raise a fundamentally different question: Can AI generate an environment that people can inhabit, explore, and continuously evolve? If the answer is yes, the impact will extend far beyond video generation. Game development, robotics training, embodied intelligence, digital twins, virtual production, and many other fields could be transformed by the development of world models. World models are still at a very early stage. Yet from Craik’s proposal of an internal mental model more than eighty years ago to the emergence of today’s interactive world-generation systems, a clear evolutionary path is beginning to take shape. Perhaps what AI is ultimately learning has never been limited to images, videos, or language. Perhaps it is learning the world itself. References GitHub: Technical Report:

📣 We are presenting 6 main conference papers 🚀and 14 workshop papers (including 🏆2 Best Papers🏆) at #ICML2026# in Korea! Also hosting one of the largest workshops, Trustworthy AI for Good, on July 10th 🌍❤️. We push the frontiers on #AISafety#, #MultiAgent#, and #CausalReasoning# at @JinesisLab! 🎉 Huge congratulations to all collaborators and co-authors. Excited to discuss these projects in Seoul! Feel free to reach out and talk to our 20+ members and collaborators in Korea @ZhijingJin, @_AndreiMuresanu, @iarthsingh, @ChanglingXavier, @davidguzman1120, @EmanuelTewolde, @ettogran, @FurkanDanismann, @Jerick1380, @PepijnCobben, @rishit_dagli, @_rfaulk, @SimkoSamuel, @TerryJCZhang, @vantru0ng, @zhxiao03, @x_angelohuang, @yahang_qi, @ozzaney0101, @_yongjinny. Happy for collaboration on any of the above topics 🤝 EuroSafeAI, University of Toronto, ETH Zürich, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Main conference spotlight 🌟 Safe Models Do Not Guarantee Safe Societies: The Case for Sociopolitical Risk Main conference posters 📌 CauSciBench: Can LLMs Automate Causal Inference in Real-World Scientific Research? 📌 Training with Honeypots: Reshaping How LLMs Fail 📌 CoopEval: Benchmarking Cooperation-Sustaining Mechanisms and LLM Agents in Social Dilemmas 📌 Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution 📌 LLM for Physics Research Requires Domain-Specialized Training and Tooling Workshop best papers 🏆When Agents Lie: Premeditation, Persistence, and Exploitation in Repeated Games BEST PAPER@NExT-Game Workshop 🏆Transferability for General Reasoning: An Automated Curriculum for Multi-Domain LLM RL BEST PAPER@RLxF Workshop Workshop oral and spotlight 🎤 AF-ARENA: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Suite for Alignment Faking — AIWILD 🌟 Multi-Agent AI Systems Need Institutional Design, Not Just Model-Level Alignment — AI4GOOD Workshop papers 📄 The Wedge Questions: Latent Cultural Boundaries in LLMs via Persona Projection Divergence — Pluralistic Alignment 📄 GT-HarmBench: Benchmarking AI Safety Risks Through the Lens of Game Theory — NExT-Game 📄 Stargazer: A Scalable Model-fitting Benchmark Environment for AI Agents under Astrophysical Constraints — AI4Physics 📄 Test of Time: Rethinking Temporal Signal of Benchmark Contamination — FoGen 📄 CoopEval: Benchmarking Cooperation-Sustaining Mechanisms and LLM Agents in Social Dilemmas — AI4GOOD 📄 Weight-Level Defenses Improve LLM Agent Adversarial Robustness — AI4GOOD 📄 Evaluating Cooperation in LLM Social Groups through Elected Leadership — AI4GOOD 📄 Causal AI Scientist: Towards End-to-End Causal Inference with Large Language Models — AI4Research 📄What Game-Theoretic Benchmarks Miss: Strategic Silence in Multi-Agent LLMs — FAGEN 📄Proving Your Way to Cooperation: Formalizing Proof-Based Open Source Game Theory in Lean — AI4Math

Beautiful paper from Google DeepMind. Explains the pathways from AGI to ASI, and why that jump could happen through several routes. The authors frame the AGI-to-ASI transition around 4 technical pathways: - continued scaling of compute, model size, data, and test-time inference; - algorithmic paradigm shifts beyond today’s transformer-based foundation-model stack; - recursive self-improvement, where AI accelerates AI R&D and improves future systems; and - multi-agent collective intelligence, where large populations of specialized agents coordinate into a superhuman group agent. Scaling may work for a while, but it could hit limits in data, compute, energy, or weaker returns from making systems larger. Recursive improvement is the most uncertain path, because AI could speed up AI research, but that loop may also slow if hard research problems need real-world testing, scarce hardware, or new ideas. Multi-agent collectives may be the most underappreciated path, because a society of competent digital workers could outperform a brilliant individual model through specialization, speed, and coordination. The big point is that ASI may not arrive as 1 sudden event, but as a chain of faster changes as AI helps create better AI and stronger scientific tools. ---- – arxiv. org/abs/2606.12683 Title: "From AGI to ASI"

Gatsbi is an AI research platform loved by users in 150+ countries. It streamlines the entire research workflow from idea discovery to evidence synthesis, with automated literature reviews, citations, visuals and more.

我花了 10分钟 + 30元Token做的大富翁Demo，被我以299的价格在小红书卖掉了🎉🎉🎉 我一个对Marketing完全不懂的人，全靠Atypica给我的策略 整个过程SOP免费分享给大家，希望能帮到你👇 起因是我做了一个大富翁Demo发小红书，真有老师来问能不能买去给学生上课用。 但我完全不知道该怎么卖。 我第一反应是：9块9？或者干免费送？ 然后我把这个问题丢给Atypica。 它没直接给价格，而是先问了我一堆问题——老师的诉求是什么，我现在能交付什么，短期想成交还是长期想验证方向。 然后它去搜了小红书、抖音、TikTok、Ins，模拟老师和教育内容创作者的视角，讨论这个Demo到底值多少钱。 结论和我预想的完全不一样——不是9块9，而是建议我定价199-299，分基础版和课件配套版。还告诉我客户觉得贵时怎么回应，Demo需要补哪些交付物。 我按它的方案补了使用说明和课件搭配，定了299，老师爽快成交。 说实话，我之前只是觉得"有人问了，是不是可以卖"——典型的自嗨。 但Atypica帮我把一个模糊的直觉，拆成了：谁会买、为什么买、愿意为为什么付费、这值不值得继续投入。 这类AI research工具真正有价值的，不是替你拍脑袋做决定，而是帮你在花钱花时间之前，先把自嗨的方向排掉。 感兴趣的可以去试试： 注册送1M Token，完全够用~ 详细报告链接放评论区，需要的自取~