与「ALCHEM_Eプレゼント」相关的搜索结果

🎉フォロー＆RTで1名様に🎧プレゼント🎉 シンバルの老舗Zildjianから初のヘッドホン 「ALCHEM-E Perfect Tune」が登場！ ・ノイキャンや外音取り込み機能を装備 ・専用アプリでユーザーの聴覚特性を測定し、サウンドを自動最適化する「Perfect Tune」機能も搭載 🎁手順🎁 ① @snrec_jp をフォロー ②この投稿をRT ③ #ALCHEM_Eプレゼント# を忘れずに付けてください！ 米澤茜をフィーチャーした動画も公開中！ 🔽記事URLは下のリプライから #Zildjian# #ヘッドホン# #DTMerと繋がりたい#

#Zildjian# からリリースされ話題のヘッドホン＝ALCHEM-E Perfect Tune🎧 創業400年を超え、新たな境地へと辿り着いたZildjianの、“本気のヘッドホン”を、Ave Mujicaをはじめ、ソロ・ドラマーとしても注目の米澤茜さんが体感！ 日常遣いのリスニング用／レコーディング現場でのモニター用、どちらのシーンでも使っていただき、その音楽体験に迫りました🎶プロ〜アマチュアまで、そして高品質な音楽を楽しみたい方にも、シンバル・メーカーが作った全ユーザー対象のヘッドホンの詳細を、特別に撮り下ろした動画と共にお届けします📖 ※先ほどの投稿に不備があったため、改めて投稿いたしました。

在基于Cloudflare 部署 OpenSEO 的项目，发现它的部署层没有直接使用 Cloudflare 官方的 Wrangler，而是选择了 Alchemy。通过 OAutch 直接授权操作 CF 权限好方便。 研究后才知道，Alchemy 是一个比较新的 TypeScript 原生的 IaC 框架。如果说 Wrangler 是 Cloudflare 官方工具箱；Alchemy 更像拿着工具箱、按照图纸施工的项目经理。 相比 Wrangler，Alchemy 更适合统一管理多个资源、依赖关系和不同部署环境；代价是抽象更重、需要管理部署状态，而且 v2 仍处于 Beta，成熟度和生态暂时不如 Wrangler。 一个新工具，继续观察。

吴说获悉，加密支付公司 Alchemy Pay 宣布获得美国伊利诺伊州汇款牌照（MTL），可在该州开展涉及法币和数字资产的汇款业务，包括电子资金转账及虚拟货币相关服务。至此，Alchemy Pay 已在美国 18 个州持有汇款牌照。Alchemy Pay 表示，该牌照将支持其合规法币与加密货币出入金、支付服务扩展，以及未来合规稳定币产品发行和 Alchemy Chain 发展。

0x Swap API now supports autonomous agent payments. Agents call 0x Swap API and pay $0.01 per request in USDC from their own wallet. No API key required. Built with @Alchemy's AgentPay.

It is with a heavy heart that we announce we are winding down the Botanix network. This decision is the hardest one we have made in four years, and we want to share the reasoning openly because the people who backed us, built with us, and used what we shipped deserve more than a quiet shutdown notice. First off, an immediate practical consideration for the Botanix community: please withdraw your Bitcoin and other assets before July 9th, 2026. When we started in 2022, the pitch was simple enough to say in a sentence: bring real utility to Bitcoin. What that actually meant in practice, and what we have spent nearly four years building toward, was more ambitious than that sentence made it sound. We were trying to build a Bitcoin-based blockchain that could find genuine product-market fit as a platform for Bitcoin applications, without using token incentives to drive growth, manufacture users, or simulate utility. Almost every chain that has launched in the last cycle has reached for the same playbook (issue a token without PMF, engineer the incentive surface, point at the resulting metrics), and we did not believe this route is a viable strategy in the long term. We wanted to know whether a Bitcoin chain could earn its users on the strength of what was built on top of it, the value it brings in the market with Bitcoin itself as the only meaningful economic primitive in the system. And we built it. The Spiderchain went live and stayed live, a year of mainnet operation with one hundred percent uptime and zero security incidents on a genuinely novel cryptographic architecture. We built Dynafed, a dynamic federation that turned the Spiderchain from a static multisig set into a rotating, decentralized one, the technical milestone that most people in this space said could not be built on Bitcoin without compromising trust assumptions. Twenty-five million transactions, two hundred thousand wallets, and tens of millions of dollars in assets moved across the chain, every single number of that earned organically without a token, without airdrops, without points programs, or any of the manufactured-demand machinery. Chainlink, Morpho, GMX, Dolomite, Fireblocks, Alchemy, Galaxy, OKX Wallet, all integrated. We shipped a Bitcoin neobank with BINK on iOS and Android, with self-custodial email login for Bitcoin (something that had never existed before), native Bitcoin yield, and the lowest borrowing rates against Bitcoin anywhere in the world, all of it downstream of owning the infrastructure. The point of saying this is not to argue with our own conclusion. The protocol works, the product works, and our team and ecosystem worked in concert to do exceptional work. We have run this experiment in earnest, with a working protocol, real applications, and a serious team, for over a year on mainnet and nearly four years in total. The honest answer we have arrived at, after living inside it every day, is that it did not work, at least not in this market and not on this timeline. We want to share what we think we learned, with the caveat that some of this is conviction and some of this is still suspicion, and we would rather be transparent about the difference than pretend to have clarity we do not have. The first thing I've had to sit with is timing. Bitcoin utility, making Bitcoin programmable, productive, and integrated into real financial activity, isn't where the real world users sit right now. The conversation is still on Bitcoin as a reserve asset, on its monetary and political positioning, on base-layer conservatism. Those questions are upstream of the ones a Bitcoin L2 needs people to be asking. I still believe Bitcoin gets there, but belief in the destination is not the same as being able to predict when, and nobody can. It's also possible the destination never materialises at all, and that Bitcoin's role as a reserve asset is simply where it settles. If that's true, there will never be a market for what we were building, and no amount of time or capital would change that. The second is the token question. We intended to eventually launch a token. We saw it, and still see it, as a genuinely new form of equity, something closer to an IPO than an airdrop, to be done when you reach product market fit and the moment is right. That moment never came. What became clear over the last year is that the market largely stopped rewarding even the more considered versions of that playbook. Token launches across the board have broadly underperformed, and those that did go to market with tokens haven't seen the outcomes or PMF that the model is supposed to produce. The third lesson is about where DeFi demand on Bitcoin actually lives. For most use cases that exist today, lending, yield, leveraged exposure, WBTC on a mature general-purpose L2 is genuinely sufficient. Users have voted with their behaviour, and the verdict is that the trust assumptions of a wrapped representation on Ethereum are acceptable to almost everyone who wants Bitcoin-denominated DeFi. Decentralisation matters to people in principle and in conversation; in practice, when something cheaper and easier is in front of them, they use it. The security case for a dedicated Bitcoin L2 is real, but it only matters for a narrower band of applications than our thesis required, one of the clearer lessons this market has taught us. The fourth lesson is structural. The on-chain economy is consolidating around venues that own the user relationship: Hyperliquid, Robinhood, the major CEXes, and now TradFi participants absorbing an ever-larger share of attention, flow, and revenue. Convenience and institutional credibility win, every time, as soon as they're available. As retail participation thins, that concentration only deepens. We were, and still are, believers in decentralisation, but the current direction of on-chain growth is running through distribution, and any team building base-layer infrastructure today is rowing upstream against that current. We were no exception. The fifth lesson is the most concrete. Both of the above played out directly in our economics. The users we attracted were primarily using Bitcoin as a store of value for yield, a legitimate use case, but not the high-frequency transaction volume that drives fee revenue on a network like ours. BINK was our answer to that: a Bitcoin neobank designed to bring daily usage of BTC and stablecoins on-chain, driving the transaction volume the network needed. It was the right strategic instinct, and one we never got the chance to fully test. BINK only landed on both app stores in the last few weeks, a product that by its nature could only be built once the underlying infrastructure was proven and live. When users choose the convenient option and economic gravity pulls toward distribution, what's left on a decentralised infrastructure layer is a user base that costs more to serve than it generates. Infrastructure costs are what they are, and the fee income never came close to covering them. If you would like to see how we were imagining a Bitcoin future and what we have been working on since September, feel free to download BINK and give it a spin: it’s a full-fledged self-custodial Bitcoin Neobank with email login, one click borrowing, a Lightning integration and more. App store: Play store: This UX is where we think Bitcoin is ultimately heading towards although it feels too early. You can use invite code 1SD31R, but remember to remove your funds by July 9th. We could keep going. We have chosen not to, however, because continuing past the point where additional time stops producing additional learning is not conviction, it is something that looks like conviction from the outside while corroding into something else on the inside. We would rather stop now, with integrity intact and resources available to take care of the people who took a chance on us, than push the experiment past the point where it still has something to teach us. Reminder: Please withdraw all your assets by July 9th. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. To our investors, who backed a thesis that was harder to defend than it should have been, to our partners who built alongside us and bet pieces of their own roadmaps on ours, to the developers who deployed on Spiderchain, to our users and the BINK community who showed up for something experimental and stayed, and most of all to the Botanix team who shipped a genuinely novel system with rigour and care and who made every hard day worth the difficulty: Thank you, more than the words available here can carry.

Just a heads up, I've uncovered a bot farm with dozens of accounts used to spread disinformation about $SIVE in the past few days. This illegal campaign likely stems geographically from Asia. As these accounts were used to do marketing for the same Asian projects like Alchemy Pay. Or bought brand new bought X accounts. All of which have no activity, but have an abrupt shift in timeline to repeating false claims about selling $SIVE positions and telling others to sell. With some getting caught using AI prompts to create a negative reply. This will be passed along to the SEC for investigation given there's certain traceability logs available. While the regulators investigate, maybe not a good idea follow along false bot farm advice.

Your dedicated on-chain scanner is live! I spent the whole night reverse-engineering the entire launchpad contract with AI, and finally managed to decode all the data. Tool overview: 0️⃣ The dashboard is split into two sections: top and bottom. 1️⃣ Top section: Left: real-time trade feed Top right: internal market cap leaderboard Bottom right: external market cap leaderboard 2️⃣ Bottom section: Internal and external trades are grouped by token. How to use: 1️⃣ The original frontend is basically unusable right now because the RPC is overloaded. 2️⃣ My dashboard also can’t afford some insanely powerful RPC yet. 3️⃣ So you’ll need to get your own RPC from somewhere like Alchemy and plug it in. Format example: Happy trading! @altdotfun @HyperliquidX @tradexyz

你的专属 扫链工具上线了！ 花了一晚上和AI一起逆向了整个launchpad的合约，终于解析出来了所有的信息。 工具介绍 0️⃣整个面板分为上下两部分： 1️⃣上半部分： 左侧是实时的交易流 右上是内盘市值排行榜 右下是外盘市值排行榜 2️⃣下半部分： 内盘和外盘的交易按照token分类 使用说明： 1️⃣原版前端因为RPC过载什么东西都加载不出来 2️⃣我的面板现在也没有钱买超级屌的RPC（有老板看到欢迎赞助） 3️⃣所以你需要去alchemy等地方获取你自己的RPC填入 格式类似： Happy Trading！ @altdotfun @HyperliquidX @tradexyz

錬金術科の制服。もう少し記述を整理したいです 服装部分のプロンプト alchemy student outfit, lab coat, leather apron, multiple utility pouches, tool belt, goggles around neck, rolled-up sleeves, fingerless gloves, pleated skirt, socks, loafers, glasses, holding potion #AIイラスト#