与「BUBBLE_AKASAKA」相关的搜索结果

《総額110万相当の引リツキャンペーンあり》 ꧁—————————————————꧂ プライズ総額2000万オーバー💥 グランドオープントーナメント詳細公開‼️ ꧁—————————————————꧂ いよいよオープンまで7日。 #BUBBLE_AKASAKA# グランドオープニングイベント🔥 全イベントスケジュールを発表します！ 開催期間【6/20-6/29】 メインイベントのプライズ総額 600万coin保証‼️👀 6-Maxやタッグチーム戦など 様々なトーナメントを開催！ 計16個のトロフィー🏆もご用意してます♪ 🔻プレイヤーズガイド🔻 ◤ 無料招待🎁引リツキャンペーン ◢ 総額110万相当のトーナメント権利が当たる⁉️ 下記条件をクリアした方の中から抽選で 各トーナメント1名様、無料ご招待！！！ (6-maxを除く) 《条件》 ・@BUBBLE_AKASAKA をフォロー ・開始1hまでのご着席 ・希望日程と意気込みを書いて引用リツイート ・いいね&ブックマーク👈 当選発表：各開催日の12:00 皆様のご参加お待ちしております🙌

关注了两年的项目 @dappOS_com TGE 了。 真正让我持续关注的，不只是顶级机构和上所预期，而是它已经把 Web3 AI 做成了能落地、能收费的产品。 dappOS 的定位是一套低门槛 AI 操作系统，旗舰产品 xBubble 可以理解为「Web3 版 Codex + WorkBuddy」。 Codex 提升专业开发者的效率，WorkBuddy 让 AI 进入日常工作；xBubble 则进一步面向有想法、有行业资源，却缺少技术团队的 OPC（One Person Company），帮助一个人完成从想法验证到业务上线。 它的核心不是聊天，而是执行：Bubble Engine 用于开发和优化特定任务的 SOP；Bubble Pilot 负责将需求匹配给合适的解决方案；Bubble Code 则把同一套系统延伸到软件与业务创建。 用户无需处理服务器、域名或 API Key，也能生成报告、商城、宣传片、虚拟人、行情与套利分析等成果，并用 xBubble Credit 统一结算相关费用。 Web3 也不是装饰。地址登录、稳定币支付、第三方基础设施和数据隔离，让 OPC 能以更低门槛开展全球业务；预置的 Web3 SOP 还能把稳定币、预测市场等能力接入真实商业场景。 比如以下测试视频，我最近给自己房子装修，把装修图纸和风格给他，他就可以设计成品，最终用稳定币结算设计费。 官方披露，xBubble 自 4 月上线以来已帮助超过 1 万个 OPC 启动，并取得 680 万美元订阅收入。对 AI 项目来说，真实用户与订阅收入，比单纯讲故事更有说服力。 再看 $DOS：总量 10 亿枚，初始流通 20%，用于优质 AI 服务访问、生态角色参与和协议治理，协调用户、服务商、基础设施伙伴及社区贡献者。如果产品使用持续增长，收入用于生态建设与回购，就有机会形成「使用增长—收入增加—回购与激励—代币价值承接」的闭环。 资本层面，项目获得 Polychain、红杉中国、IDG、OKX Ventures、HashKey Capital 等机构支持。机构背书提供资源与市场预期，但决定长期价值的，仍是 xBubble 能否不断把 AI 能力转化为真实业务和持续收入。 所以临近 TGE，我关注的不只是短期价格，而是 dappOS 能否成为 OPC 时代真正可用的 AI 商业操作系统。 就目前的技术能力、真实收入、融资背景，很期待dappos能在TGE中来个大满贯。

Is the AI boom facing its first major credit market warning sign? ⚠️📉 NVIDIA’s 5-year Credit Default Swaps (CDS) surged to a record high of 82 basis points as market concerns mount over massive $750B+ AI infrastructure commitments and vendor financing loops. The latest KuCoin blog breaks down what this credit risk spike means for tech equities and the crypto market: 📉 Credit Default Swaps Surge: Five-year CDS on NVIDIA debt hit a record high of 82 bps—its largest single-day jump—as credit markets aggressively reprice contingent liabilities. 💼 The $750B AI Web: Massive deals including a $500B+ partnership with SK Group and a potential $250B financing backstop for OpenAI are raising concerns over balance sheet complexity. 🔄 Circular Financing Fears: Credit markets are questioning vendor financing feedback loops, where chip demand is partially supported by the supplier's own capital commitments. ⚡ Crypto Market Spillover: As high-beta risk assets, digital assets continue to show tight correlation with technology risk sentiment, reacting directly to credit market signals from the AI complex. Are we seeing the early warning signs of an AI capital bubble, or is this just near-term noise? Read the full analysis here:

$INTC and $AMD to sign CPU LTAs with Chinese customers for AI DCs (Reuters). - Prices of some CPU products have risen more than 40% in China since the start of the year from sources. - Month-on-month increases topping 10% for some products CPUs were already a bottleneck, following CPU ratios due to AI inference... But the broader trend of LTAs seems to be appearing from: - Memory, with $MU, Samsung, $SNDK, and SK Hynix signing DRAM/NAND LTAs. - Photonics, with $LITE, $COHR signing EML LTAs. And recent Trendforce reports that $AMD and hyperscalers are now pursuing CW LTAs. And I'm sure there's many more from MLCCs to all the way to substrates. +1 for the bottleneck investors... hard to be a "bubble that pops" if you have take or pay demand spanning multiple years.

Feels bad, -49.4% drawdown this month after the recent crash. My portfolio is mainly AI chokepoints and bottlenecks. In the memory, photonics, robotics, and upstream semis, (on margin) which all tend to be higher beta than others. But reduced leverage recently from the crash. I see a lot of people making fun of the drop or AI names, saying it’s obvious that: - “AI is a bubble” - “memory/kospi is a bubble” - “photonics is a bubble” - “humanoids won’t get anywhere” - “neoclouds will get replaced by hyperscalers like Meta” And a bunch of retail + bots saying “sell everything, it’s never going to recover”. But I have conviction that all these themes are backed by structural revenue growth or technological shifts. And I’ve had similar drawdowns back when there admin threatened global tariffs, before markets pulled off a recovery. I personally have a longer horizon + higher tolerance for volatility than others, to see how this plays out. Especially considering a lot of retail view things on a week to week basis: no, my thesis isn’t wrong yet if I project revenue inflection in H2 2027 and it’s 2026 now. Anyway, feels bad short term just wanted to share anyway for transparency.

Code mode is not a one-shot build. If the result does not fully match your product goal, submit a Bubble Up. Bubble Engine will test, evaluate, and iteratively optimize the underlying Coding SOP, moving refinement from the user to the system. State the goal. Build with Bubble Code. Improve with Bubble Up.