与「Chainflip」相关的搜索结果

交易员 @frogmanhaha 钱包应该是在 5 小时前被盗了，价值 $400 万的资产被转移卖出换成 ETH、BNB 及 SOL，然后通过 Privacy Cash 及 Chainflip 等工具分散转移洗走。 钱包 9 种资产被盗，主要有：143 万枚 $BP ($177 万)、1396 万枚 MarsCoin ($155 万)、370 万枚 Cash Cat ($51 万) 等。 被盗钱包： -------------------------------------------------------------------------- #Bitget# 来了就是VIP！Crypto、美股、CFD，全球先机一站布局

🧐慢雾余弦：朝鲜黑客利用 CoW 与 Chainflip 跨链转移 Bitget 被盗资金并兑换为 BTC 慢雾创始人余弦 @evilcos 发推表示，慢雾 TrackAgent 发现朝鲜黑客采用 CoW Protocol 和 Chainflip 组合跨链操作 Bitget 被盗资金，朝鲜黑客自动化脚本通过 CoW Protocol 创建订单，订单收款地址设置为预先准备好的 Chainflip Deposit 相关合约地址，订单成功后即可完成在 Chainflip 的资产跨链操作，换成 BTC。 此前余弦发文称，「Chainflip 桥确实在很努力阻拦朝鲜黑客洗币，可惜的是 AML/KYT 落后黑客洗币速度。 洗币团伙自动化大量打散资金，通过各类桥跨到不同链，如果被风控或者阻拦退回就会立即尝试下一条洗币路径，最终都将换成 BTC，然后在 BTC 上 CoinJoin 方式接着混淆洗币。」

一个残酷事实：我跟进跟踪了几小时，Chainflip 桥确实在很努力阻拦朝鲜黑客洗币，可惜的是 AML/KYT 落后黑客洗币速度。洗币团伙自动化大量打散资金，通过各类桥跨到不同链，如果被风控或者阻拦退回就会立即尝试下一条洗币路径，最终都将换成 BTC，然后在 BTC 上 CoinJoin 方式接着混淆洗币。 这是一个不断在演变的洗币工程。

MistTrack: Bitget Exploiter Attempted to Route Stolen Funds via Chainflip but Broker Rejected According to on-chain monitoring by SlowMist's tracking arm MistTrack, the Bitget exploiter attempted to move stolen funds through the cross-chain liquidity protocol Chainflip, but the transaction was rejected at the broker interface ("deposit rejected by the broker"). The protocol did not freeze the capital but instead refunded the deposit directly back to the sender, effectively preventing the attacker from routing the exploit proceeds through the network.

The @bitget exploiter tried to move the stolen funds through @Chainflip. Chainflip’s response? “Deposit rejected by the broker.” 👋 No freeze, but no luck either — the funds were refunded. 👍 Nice try. 😶 We’ll continue tracking the movement of the stolen funds. 🔗

how to become a latency sniper on Polymarket. people make ~$500 a day on this in BTC 5m markets. here's a step-by-step guide it turned out simpler than i thought: grab the old price after a BTC jump and buy the other side when the market flips his game plan: 1. every 5 minutes a new market opens: will BTC be higher or lower in 5 minutes 2. the market moves on the BTC price from Chainlink. Chainlink collects the price from exchanges, averages it and feeds it to Polymarket 3. the early move shows up on Binance, and that's the signal to get in. BTC moves hard one way within 15-30 seconds, Polymarket still has the old price, and he buys that side right away 4. if BTC turns back, the other side gets cheaper. he buys it too, so the UP + DOWN pair costs him less than $1 5. he holds everything until the market ends or merges the pair back into $1. he never sells where does the money come from? about 70% comes from entries after a price jump. other buyers at the same price and the same time left lose ~3% on average after fees, he makes +10% the other ~30% comes from pairs. UP + DOWN cost him 91¢ on average, and at resolve he gets $1 why does this even work? say there are 3 minutes left. BTC is flat and UP trades at 50¢. then BTC jumps up on Binance. on Polymarket sellers keep their orders at 50-55¢ for a bit longer, and he takes them. in 6 out of 10 markets he holds UP until the end. if BTC pulls back, DOWN drops to like 35¢ and he buys it. now he's got a pair for ~88¢, and at resolve he gets $1 whatever happens. his trades are small, ~$6 on average, because he's not the only one sniping here's his profile:

Staking on @chainlink puts a price on feed downtime. After more than three hours without an ETH/USD update on Ethereum, community stakers can alert. Node operator stakers get 20 minutes' priority. Each operator serving the feed is slashed 700 LINK. The alerter gets 7,000.

🚨SWIFT’s blockchain ledger is already being used for 24/7 tokenised payments — and Chainlink has now announced infrastructure allowing financial institutions to connect their existing systems directly to it. This is no longer just a blockchain experiment.🏦⚠️🚀 #XRP# #xrpnews#

10 个用来搭建 AI 聊天机器人的 GitHub 仓库： 1. Rasa 2. Botpress 3. Chatwoot 4. Typebot 5. Flowise 6. Dify 7. Chainlit 8. Open WebUI 9. LibreChat 10. LobeChat

最近看到一个挺有意思的东西，GenLayer。 我觉得可以把它理解成： AI 版本的 Chainlink。 但它不是去解决价格喂价这种问题，而是想让 AI 帮链上处理一些“没有标准答案”的事情。 比如一个 AI Agent 接了单，到底有没有完成任务？ 一份交付物到底合不合格？ 某个新闻事件到底有没有发生？ 这种东西你让普通智能合约判断，其实挺难的，因为代码只能处理确定性的规则。 GenLayer 的思路就比较有意思了： 让多个验证者去看资料、调用 AI、独立判断，然后投票。 如果有人觉得结果不对，还可以申诉，再进行下一轮验证。 简单说就是： AI 初审 + 多人复核 + 链上裁决。 我比较关注的其实不是“AI 能不能当法官”这个故事，而是以后 AI Agent 真正开始互相交易之后，谁来判断到底是谁履约、谁违约？ 钱可以自动付，但如果连“该不该付”都没人判断，那 Agent 经济其实还是差最后一块基础设施。 当然，现在 GenLayer 还在早期，主网也没正式上线，最终能不能跑出来还得看后面的真实应用。 不过目前参与很简单，有推特就可以参加，而且零成本。 这种东西我一般都是先参与再说。 毕竟不用花钱，万一 TGE 真有惊喜呢？ 传送门：