与「Closure」相关的搜索结果

最近加密行业进入密集告别期，BitMEX等老牌平台关闭，Satori Finance等知名项目也停止运营，覆盖交易、DeFi、钱包、NFT等多领域。POAP作为社区纪念代币，因真实用户和明确场景而被许多人持有，但因缺乏可持续商业模式最终退出市场。 POAP就像老朋友的纪念品，你可能在某个Meetup上随手领了枚，现在它不值钱了，但比那些炒作的NFT更接近'收藏'的本意——毕竟真有人… The crypto industry is experiencing a wave of closures, with platforms like BitMEX (11 years old) and Satori Finance shutting down after successful launches and active user bases across trading, DeFi, wallets, and NFTs. POAP tokens, once given at events like ETHDenver, now sit in wallets as tangible mementos without a sustainable business model. POAP’s… $bitcoin via Odaily Crypto Direct ·

About 4 months ago, I received a ban from SeaOfThieves on an alt account due to my username (RealDrewStevens) with a ban reason of “Rare Staff Impersonation” which I take full accountability for being in the wrong here. At the time I sent in a ticket on my main account asking for clarification on the ban. After a few weeks of contacting support and attempting to reach out to anyone who could assist me, my resolution was the support team telling me there was “no enforcement action against your Xbox Live account.” They also then told me “purchasing a new license for Sea of Thieves through the Microsoft Store / Game Pass subscription / Steam or and linking your Xbox Live account to that new game license should resolve your issue.” Since then, they have gone back on this statement and last night I found out they banned my main account. In a Sea of Thieves Developer Update, @S0nicBob stated “On reflection, we feel we can create a more fair and transparent approach to enforcement, that gives players some breathing room when mistakes are made but most crucially, gives them a chance to be able to learn from those mistakes” in regards to the new points system they were implementing. So what’s the deal with this? Because right now, the actions of the support team directly contradict the public statement that was put out. I did everything "right" here. I opened a ticket instead of going straight to twitter; I kept my patience with the support team; I didn't ban evade until the support team responded and told me to do so. And now, months later, with zero new incidents and zero further communication, my main account, the one the support team confirmed had "no enforcement action" against it, is banned. Where's the "breathing room" in that? Where's the "chance to learn from mistakes" when the current mistake in question was following the support team's own advice? This new policy is just as vague and hard to interpret as the old policy. I have the ticket. I have the exact wording support used. I have a timeline that shows I acted in good faith at every single step (after the original incident of course which I again take full accountability for), only to have the rug pulled out from under me with no explanation, no warning, and no updates to tell me why the goalposts moved. Let me give a couple examples of the inconsistencies here. The gamertag “Official SOT” can receive a 3 point ban (permanent until name change). A tweet can receive a 3 point ban for “Rare Staff Impersonation” (3 days). So then why is my “Rare Staff Impersonation” ban any different? I don’t want special treatment. I want support to actually hold itself to the standards they presented to the entire community. Either Drew’s statement meant something or it didn't and right now, my account says it didn't. @RareLtd @SeaOfThieves @SoT_Support @MicrosoftHelps: I'd appreciate an actual response this time instead of a copy-paste closure. Currently that is all I am able to get out of the lowest level of the support team with no way of escalation. Please allow me my second chance that so many others received in the second chance policy. #SeaOfThieves# #FairAndTransparent#

24 hours crypto news 1. Bitcoin hovers around $59k-$63k amid market volatility, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs seeing inflows after weeks of outflows, while BlackRock continues large BTC transfers to Coinbase. Analysts note potential for recovery as whale activity and institutional moves signal underlying strength despite geopolitical tensions. 2. FTX creditors are set to receive up to 120% recovery in a new $900 million payout distribution starting July 31, bringing closure to many after the exchange's collapse. 3. Major regulatory developments: Indonesia requires certifications for crypto-influencing, Spain enforces MiCA deadlines potentially forcing some firms out, and the EU's rules contribute to Dutch exchange collapses. Meanwhile, the CLARITY Act discussions continue in the U.S. 4. Stablecoin momentum builds as USDT flips Ethereum's market cap after years, Visa reports record $1.79T in stablecoin volumes for June, and firms like Circle expand with new banking approvals. 5. Tokenization and AI-crypto crossover heat up: Big moves in RWA (real-world assets), prediction markets surging, and companies like Galaxy shifting mining ops toward AI data centers. Solana and other chains see strong activity in these areas. 💡 If this inspired you, feel free to: ❤️ Like | 💬 Comment | 🔄 Repost 🙏 Thank you for reading! Welcome to check in! 中文版 1. 比特币在市场波动中徘徊于59k-63k美元附近，美国现货比特币ETF在数周流出后迎来资金流入，黑石继续向Coinbase转移大量BTC。分析师指出，尽管地缘政治紧张，但鲸鱼活动和机构动作显示出潜在复苏信号。 2. FTX债权人将从7月31日开始获得新一轮9亿美元分配，最高可回收120%，为交易所崩盘后许多人带来终结。 3. 监管动态显著：印尼要求加密影响者持证，西班牙严格执行MiCA截止日期可能迫使部分公司退出，欧盟规则导致荷兰交易所倒闭。美国CLARITY法案讨论持续推进。 4. 稳定币势头强劲，USDT时隔多年市值超越以太坊，Visa报告6月稳定币交易量创纪录达1.79万亿美元，Circle等公司凭借新银行批准持续扩张。 5. 代币化和AI-加密交叉领域升温：RWA（真实世界资产）动作频频，预测市场激增，Galaxy等公司将挖矿业务转向AI数据中心。Solana等链条在这些领域活动活跃。 💡如果这条激励到你，欢迎❤️点赞 | 💬留言 | 🔄转发 🙏 感谢阅读！ 欢迎来打卡！

The open society and its enemy, Soros. While he named his Open Society Foundations after Karl Popper’s “The Open Society and Its Enemies,” his project stands as a philosophical inversion of everything Popper defended. Popper’s open society rested on critical rationalism, the recognition that no one possesses final truth, that institutions must remain open to criticism and piecemeal reform, and that democracy functions as a method for removing rulers without bloodshed. He rejected historicism, the belief in iron laws of history that justify sacrificing present generations for a utopian future, and warned that such thinking inevitably produces closed, authoritarian societies. Soros has repurposed the label to advance a grand project of engineered demographic transformation. Through mass immigration, multiculturalism as official policy, and diversity mandates that prioritize group identity over individual merit and assimilation, his foundations actively dissolve the cultural continuity and social trust that make rational criticism and incremental change possible. Popper understood that openness requires a stable framework, a shared language of reason, basic cohesion, and institutions citizens feel they collectively own. Soros treats those foundations as obstacles to be overcome in the name of an abstract, borderless openness. The concrete results are visible. Parallel societies that operate under different norms, public spaces where debate on the scale and selection of immigration is treated as illegitimate, and the rise of identity based hierarchies that close off dissent in the name of equity. These are certainly not expansions of the open society, but new forms of closure, tribal in character, enforced through institutional capture rather than overt dictatorship, yet hostile to the very critical spirit Popper placed at the center of civilized life. Philosophically, Soros replaces Popper’s falsification and humility before reality with a new historicism, the conviction that global multiculturalism and open borders represent inevitable moral progress, and that resistance from actual existing communities constitutes the new enemy. The machinery funded in the name of openness does not test its own assumptions against evidence, it suppresses the questions. Those who still value the ideal of an open society should read Popper on their own terms. They will find that Soros has not extended the open society, but has supplied its most sophisticated contemporary enemies.

Gulf governments have a clear strategic imperative to diversify from the Strait of Hormuz as future closures are now a real and persistent risk, with huge implications for the region at large, argues ROI's @ronbousso1

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz means the oil giants of the Middle East are scrambling for new routes to get their product to global markets. Syria has become an unlikely winner