与「Fringer」相关的搜索结果

#あきぴ#(@OkurimuSodaO)ちゃん コラボしたかったなぁ またの楽しみにするね #癖になるかわいさ# #推し事も地産地消# 🩷 #ナゴコス# #fujifilm_xseries# #Fringer#

AI模型评分都是被专项攻坚创造出来的，于是我对比了Fable5，Grok4.5， Kimi K3针对同一个交易系统审计结果进行了对比。 先说结论： Fable5：最适合作为系统级主审核模型 Kimi：最适合作为代码缺陷与一致性专项审核模型 Grok：最适合作为代码梳理和方案发散模型，不适合单独决定策略修改 最佳组合：Fable5全面审核+Grok 4.5代码梳理+K3代码审核 具体细节： 1. Fable5：系统级判断能力最强 Fable5 最大的优势不是代码读得比另外两个模型更多，而是它能把： 代码规则； sizing snapshot； intent ledger； 实际 block 统计； 当前资产 headroom； SELL/REDEEM 回流路径； 放进同一个因果框架。 它使用了几个非常关键的实盘指标： ADD 近 7 天约占新增资金 43%； 84% 资金已经部署； ETH、SOL、XRP headroom 为 0； 近 40 个周期中主要阻塞是：blocked_capital_efficiency=47 blocked_asset_cap=28 deployment cap=0 runway=0 这让它能够区分： “某个机制理论上可能限制资金” 和 “当前实盘真正正在限制资金的机制”。 最终它得出： ADD 对资金流向重要，但当前周转主因在回收端、资产 cap 和效率过滤，不在 ADD 准入本身。 这是三个模型中最接近生产系统审核要求的判断。 弱点 Fable5 仍有一些过度推断： 把 ADD 描述为让资金“锁得更久”，实际上 ADD 的剩余 TTE 通常比 ENTRY 短； 把超 cap 资产总持仓约 $382 说成可以“直接解锁 $382”，没有区分总持仓、超额部分和可成交部分； 把模型中的 redeem_lag_days=2 一度当作实际回款延迟； “$5 仓位几乎不受每美元每日利润门约束”的推理不正确，因为该指标已经按资金归一化； 2-lot 最低 ENTRY 建议可能系统性损失覆盖率。 因此，Fable5 的系统方向判断最好，但具体数字和金融指标仍需二次校验。 最适合的角色 PRIMARY_SYSTEM_REVIEWER LIVE_OPERATIONAL_DIAGNOSIS CHANGE_PRIORITY_DECISION CROSS_MODULE_ROOT_CAUSE_ANALYSIS 2. Kimi：代码缺陷侦测能力最强 Kimi 对代码结构的还原比较准确： 固定 ADD 次数和 interval 已退役； ADD 采用 target-gap 模型； ENTRY 60%，ADD 补到 100%； allocator 是最终数量权威； style 仅作诊断； 现金、集中度、shock、深度共同限制订单。 更重要的是，Kimi 找出了其他两个模型没有明确指出的具体问题： shared_deployable_pool() 读取 account_snap["capital"]["deployable_cash"] 但该字段可能没有实际写入 → 回退到 free_cash → 策略层与 allocator 层资金口径可能不一致 它还发现了： 合同写 debounce 60 秒，代码/配置为 30 秒； 注释周期 16 分钟，实际 loop 600 秒。 这些是典型的静态审核、字段追踪和合同一致性检查优势。 弱点 Kimi 在资本效率和交易语义上的推理弱于它的代码检查能力。 典型错误是： ADD 价格更高，所以边际 edge/day 必然更差。 这忽略了剩余持有时间也缩短。更高 ask 并不必然意味着更低 edge/day。 它还认为： 60/40 会让剩余资金长期闲置； 提高 entry share 会改善周转； CONFIRMATION_NO 应收紧； 增加单市场软 cap 会改善组合周转。 这些结论缺少真实候选竞争、实际 block attribution 和反事实分配数据支持。 最适合的角色 STATIC_CODE_AUDITOR SCHEMA_AND_FIELD_FLOW_CHECKER CONTRACT_IMPLEMENTATION_DIFF LOCALIZED_BUG_DISCOVERY Kimi 很适合回答： “代码是否存在字段没有写入、默认值回退、文档与实现不一致、某个 gate 实际是否生效？” 但不适合单独回答： “应该如何改变交易策略和资本分配？” 3. Grok：代码梳理最完整，但最容易过度设计 Grok 对整个 ADD 路径的整理最详尽： 各层准入条件； risk latch； REDUCE reentry cooldown； 价格带； fingerprint； emergency cap； market target； ENTRY/ADD gap； allocator 的现金、集中度、shock 和深度约束； ADD 与 ENTRY 的评分和 continuity； SELL/REDEEM 对现金回收的影响。 它对当前代码执行模型的概括非常清楚： 能不能加由 headroom 决定；加多少由 target gap 离散为 lot；ADD style 只是解释标签。 因此，在“快速理解一个陌生复杂系统”方面，Grok 表现很好。 弱点 Grok 最大的问题是： 从“发现一个可能的机制副作用”快速跳到“建议修改策略”。 它提出了大量未经实盘证明的改动： TIME_TOPUP 冷却； ADD 1.5 倍 edge/day 门槛； ask≥0.97 限制为 1 lot； 降低 peak target； 提高 entry share； 单次仅补部分 gap； 弱化 continuity； 降低 TTE confirmation 权重。 这些建议表面上都很合理，但存在三个问题： 没有先证明这些机制实际造成了损失； 没有量化被 ADD 挤出的 ENTRY 是否更优； 可能重新引入此前已经修复的低 ADD recall 和 leader fidelity 偏差。 Grok很擅长生成完整优化空间，但容易把： POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECT 升级成： CONFIRMED ROOT CAUSE 再进一步升级成： SHOULD CHANGE PRODUCTION LOGIC 这是生产交易系统审核中最危险的倾向。 最适合的角色 SYSTEM_MAPPING CODE_AND_CONFIG_EXPLANATION HYPOTHESIS_GENERATION DESIGN_OPTION_ENUMERATION 不适合作为唯一的： PRODUCTION_CHANGE_APPROVER ROOT_CAUSE_FINAL_AUTHORITY STRATEGY_SEMANTICS_GATEKEEPER 三个模型的典型思维模式 Grok 发现机制 → 推演可能副作用 → 生成多种优化 → 倾向建议修改 优点：覆盖广、思路多。 风险：过度设计、假设升级过快。 Kimi 追踪代码和字段 → 找实现不一致 → 找局部缺陷 → 尝试从缺陷推导策略改进 优点：代码问题定位强。 风险：局部正确不等于系统结论正确。 Fable5 理解代码 → 读取运行数据 → 找实际 binding constraint → 区分主因和次因 → 按实盘收益排序 优点：最接近生产运营思维。 风险：仍会在个别指标含义和金额口径上过度断言。

GPT image 2 on chatgpt Prompt: Use the uploaded character reference image as the strict identity and outfit reference. Preserve the reference character’s: - face identity - facial proportions - eye shape - nose - lips - skin tone - hairstyle - hair color - visible hair accessories - overall recognizable vibe - outfit and styling shown in the reference image Do not hardcode any specific character traits that are not present in the uploaded reference. All identity, hairstyle, accessories, and clothing details must be inferred directly from the uploaded reference image. Create a high-quality mixed-style vertical portrait showing: 1. a realistic full-body version of the uploaded character/person 2. a black hand-drawn doodle-shadow version of the same character/person on the wall beside them Core concept: The real person and their doodle-shadow are doing a playful mischievous pose together. The real person performs a cute realistic version of the pose, while the doodle-shadow performs a much more exaggerated, chaotic, cartoonish version of the same pose idea. The mood should feel cute, playful, mischievous, stylish, funny, and social-media-friendly. Real person: - Must remain realistic and photogenic - Must wear the same outfit style and key visible details from the uploaded reference image - Do not replace the reference styling with unrelated fashion - Expression should be cute, slightly confused, mildly embarrassed, playful, as if thinking: “Why am I doing this with my shadow?” - The real person should not stand stiffly - The real person should actively participate in the pose, but in a natural realistic way Doodle-shadow: - Must be a black hand-drawn sketch version of the same person, drawn directly on the wall - Not a realistic second person - Not a normal physical shadow - Not a full-color anime character - Black sketch line-art only - Should resemble the person through hairstyle silhouette, accessories, outfit silhouette, and pose structure - The doodle-shadow should look more energetic, sillier, and more chaotic than the real person - Add manga-like motion lines, hearts, stars, sparkles, and comic marks around the doodle if helpful Random mischievous pose rule: The pose must NOT be fixed. For each generation, invent a new playful mischievous pose for both the real person and the doodle-shadow. The real person and the doodle-shadow should share the same general pose idea, but they do not need to match perfectly. The real person performs a cute realistic version. The doodle-shadow performs a much more exaggerated, chaotic, cartoonish version. Do not repeatedly use pointing poses. Do not repeatedly use finger-gun poses. Do not repeatedly use the same standing pose. Do not always make both figures simply point at each other. Create a different mischievous pose each time. Possible pose directions are loose inspiration only, not a fixed menu: - playful idol pose - silly dance pose - leaning sideways with one arm curved overhead - making a big heart pose - cheeky wink pose - hands near cheeks in a cute teasing pose - exaggerated “ta-da!” pose - mock surprise pose - playful running-in-place pose - mischievous tiptoe pose - arms stretched in opposite directions - pretending to sneak away - cute troublemaker pose - dramatic overreaction pose - goofy victory pose - playful balance pose - playful peekaboo pose - shy but mischievous pose - cute overconfident pose The final pose should feel fresh, cute, mischievous, and slightly chaotic. The real person should look like they are reluctantly playing along. The doodle-shadow should look like it is having way too much fun. Composition: - vertical 4:5 or 9:16 - show the real person in full-body or nearly full-body framing - place the real person on one side of the frame - place the black doodle-shadow on a clean wall beside them - the doodle-shadow should be roughly the same height or slightly taller - keep enough space around both figures so the full pose is visible - the connection between the real person and the doodle-shadow must be clear at a glance Background: - simple clean indoor studio wall or minimal room corner - white, cream, or pale gray wall - clean floor - soft natural sunlight patch or gentle wall shadow allowed - keep the background uncluttered Lighting: - soft natural studio lighting - bright, clean, polished, playful mood - keep the real person’s face clearly visible Style quality: - realistic human photography - black hand-drawn doodle-shadow on wall - matching mischievous pose interaction - strong identity resemblance - outfit and styling faithfully based on the uploaded reference - cute and stylish mixed-media portrait - clean composition - social-media-friendly - no obvious AI artifacts Negative prompt: hardcoded blue hair when not in reference, hardcoded cloud clip when not in reference, hardcoded fish clip when not in reference, hardcoded school uniform when not in reference, outfit change unrelated to reference, realistic second person, normal reflection, normal shadow only, solid black monster shadow, horror shadow, creepy shadow, full-color illustration, cartoon human, anime human, weak resemblance, unrelated sketch character, messy wall, cluttered background, repeated pointing pose, repeated finger-gun pose, same pose every time, fixed pose, boring mirrored pose, stiff pose, identical pose repetition, real person not matching shadow pose, text, watermark, logo, distorted body, extra limbs, extra fingers, bad hands

NEWS: Elon Musk rejects the far right label in an exchange with The Economist "I support the normal people. What you call the far right, falsely." He challenged the interviewer to say what is extreme about 3 positions. "Here are the principles and tell me which of these sound terrible. That we should have secure borders, that we should have safe cities, that we should have sensible spending. Which of those three are far right fringe?" Elon then turned on the framing itself. "I would like to just admonish you and the media for the absurd characterization of the far right. It is false and misleading and nonsense." He asked that the exchange survive the edit. "Please keep this part in." Elon said the same speeches get judged by who delivered them, describing a habit of reading Obama and Clinton speeches to people and telling them Trump said it. He named Rupert Lowe as an example of who he means by normal people. (Source: The Economist, July 2026)

faster inputs ✅ (Rapid Trigger) quicker movements ✅ (Rapid Tap) protection from fat-fingering your keys ✅ (Protection Mode) Triple Threat powered by QuickSet, only on the Apex Pro ⌨️ ➡️

Rome conquered Greece in 146 BC when they burned Corinth to the ground. And then the strangest thing in ancient history happened. The winners spent the next few centuries desperately trying to become the losers. It actually started before the final conquest. When the general Marcellus sacked Syracuse in 211 BC, he shipped boatloads of Greek statues and paintings back to Rome, and the city went crazy for it. Suddenly every rich Roman had to have Greek art in his house. Decades later Cicero built an entire court case around prosecuting a governor named Verres for looting Greek masterpieces, and Romans ate it up. Then came the schools. Wealthy families started buying Greek slaves specifically because they were educated, and handed them the job of raising their children. So the sons of the men who crushed Greece grew up speaking Greek, memorizing Greek poetry, and learning philosophy from Greeks. The elite eventually sent their teenagers abroad to Athens and Rhodes to finish their education, the way people today send kids to study overseas. Cicero did it. Julius Caesar did it. Their gods were Greek gods wearing name tags. Zeus became Jupiter. Hera became Juno. Aphrodite became Venus. Ares became Mars. Same myths, same family drama, mostly just relabeled. Their entertainment was borrowed too. The first big Roman playwrights, Plautus and Terence, basically adapted Greek comedies into Latin. Their doctors were Greek. Their architecture leaned on Greek columns, the Doric and Ionic and Corinthian orders you still see on bank buildings today. And the art obsession left a strange fingerprint on history. Romans loved Greek bronze statues so much that they mass produced marble copies of them. A huge chunk of what people walk past in museums today and call "Greek sculpture" is actually a Roman copy. The Greek originals melted down or vanished long ago. The knockoffs are what survived. Not everyone was thrilled. Cato the Elder spent his whole life warning that Greek culture would rot the Roman character. He sneered at Greek philosophers, distrusted Greek doctors, and wanted them kept out of the city. And then, as an old man, he quietly sat down and learned Greek anyway. Even the loudest hater caved. The trend went all the way to the top. Virgil wrote the Aeneid, Rome's national epic, by openly modeling it on Homer. The emperor Nero competed in Greek games and toured Greece like a superfan. Hadrian was so obsessed he grew a Greek philosopher's beard and poured money into rebuilding Athens. And Marcus Aurelius, master of the entire Roman world, wrote his private journal not in Latin but in Greek, because that was the language of serious thinking. The poet Horace nailed it in a single line: captured Greece took her savage conqueror captive. Rome won every war on the battlefield and then handed its whole soul to the people it had beaten.