与「ONT」相关的搜索结果

The last mission was a success, so of course Lara Croft is already onto the next one 😈 New assignment, new location, and yes, it absolutely required a new costume 🖤

Amar'e Stoudemire BURST onto the scene in 2002-03! ☀️ 13.5 PPG, 8.8 RPG, 1.1 BPG ☀️ 140 dunks (#4# in NBA) ☀️ @Kia NBA Rookie of the Year S.T.A.T. would go on to make 6 NBA All-Star teams and 5 All-NBA teams... he enters the @Hoophall this Saturday!

bStocks Never Sleep. Neither Do Memes. One of the most interesting shifts I’ve been watching on BNB Chain lately is how RWA and Meme are starting to move closer together. And I don’t think this is just a story about one particular meme. I think it’s a story about the kind of culture BNB Chain could build around real-world assets. 1/ Real-world equities are rapidly moving onchain. Through bStocks: NVIDIA → NVDAB Tesla → TSLAB SpaceX → SPCXB Companies that already exist in the real world can now be represented as onchain assets on BNB Chain. When people used to talk about RWAs, the conversation was often centered around things like real estate or government bonds. Now, some of the world’s most recognizable companies are becoming part of the onchain economy. I think that shift matters. 2/ But this raises an interesting question: If real-world assets move onchain, what happens to the culture around those assets? Tesla has Elon Musk and Optimus. SpaceX has Mars. NVIDIA has Jensen Huang and his black leather jacket. A company is more than just a ticker. Every major company has its own: people, products, mascots, history, symbols, and culture. 3/ That’s why I look at RWA + Meme a little differently. RWA brings assets onchain. Memes bring culture onchain. If bStocks brings real-world companies and financial assets onto BNB Chain, memes can bring the culture, symbols, and collective identity surrounding those companies onchain as well. And when both begin to exist on the same chain, I think that could create a very interesting culture unique to BNB Chain. 4/ Take NVIDIA as an example. Through bStocks, we already have: NVDA → NVDAB And in the real world, the person most closely associated with NVIDIA is Jensen Huang. So what is the one object most associated with Jensen? For me, the answer is obvious: the black leather jacket. 5/ And this isn’t a narrative that was manufactured just to create a meme. Jensen has been wearing black leather jackets at major presentations and public appearances for nearly two decades. It started as something his family helped choose. But over time, repetition created an identity: Jacket → Jensen Huang → NVIDIA → AI The meme came after the history. Not the other way around. 6/ And now, that symbol even has a real-world price. A Tom Ford leather jacket personally worn and signed by Jensen Huang went to auction. Estimated value: $40,000–$60,000 Final sale price: $960,000. Nearly $1 million. People weren’t paying $960K simply for leather. They were paying for the: history, identity, and provenance attached to it. To me, that’s a fascinating example of how a cultural symbol can acquire real-world value. 7/ And this is where things get interesting on BNB Chain. Take NVIDIA: Financial layer NVDA ↓ NVDAB ↓ bStocks Cultural layer Jensen Huang ↓ Black Leather Jacket ↓ JACKET ↓ Meme One represents the company’s financial value. The other represents the cultural value surrounding it. Different markets. Different forms of value. But both originate from the same real-world company. 8/ This is also why I find BNB Chain-native meme infrastructure like FLAP interesting. If bStocks creates a new playground for real-world financial assets, meme infrastructure can become a playground for the culture surrounding those assets. And this idea doesn’t stop with NVIDIA. Tesla. SpaceX. Microsoft. Apple. Alibaba. Every major company already has years — sometimes decades — of culture, characters, products, symbols, and stories surrounding it. As the RWA universe expands, the potential cultural layer around those assets expands with it. 9/ So I don’t really think of this as simply: “putting memes on top of RWAs.” I think it’s closer to the convergence of: Financial Markets + Internet Culture Wall Street has tickers. The internet has memes. And now, on BNB Chain, both can exist inside the same block. 10/ That’s why I continue to find RWA + Meme on BSC so interesting. bStocks can bring new assets onchain. But assets alone don’t create culture. Culture begins when people start interacting with those assets. They trade them. Talk about them. Create stories around them. Turn them into images. And eventually, turn them into memes. That’s when an ecosystem begins to develop its own onchain culture. 11/ And that’s how I see JACKET. Not as the entire thesis, but as one example of what this model could look like. Because JACKET itself isn’t the most important part. What matters is whether this same structure can repeat across hundreds of real-world companies and assets. Real-world companies. Real-world assets. Real-world culture. All meeting on the same chain. bStocks brings the market onchain. Memes bring the culture onchain. Maybe that’s what RWA + Meme was supposed to look like. #BNBChain# @cz_binance @heyibinance

I had a blast being out until 4am with my family and friends at UNVRS in Ibiza for my 77th birthday and thought I’d pass it along to turn you onto it, in case you’re in the neighborhood.

Oui, j’en ai lu. Et justement, les livres des années 30 (et ceux écrits par des gens qui vivaient ça) disent exactement le contraire de la doxa d’après-guerre. Le programme de 1920 du NSDAP (points 11 à 17) n’est pas une glose moderne : abolition des revenus non liés au travail, nationalisation des trusts, participation aux bénéfices des grandes entreprises, réforme agraire avec expropriation, lutte contre le « capitalisme financier ». Les nazis le répétaient sans complexe. Hitler lui-même, dans ses discours et conversations privées, parlait de socialisme national et se situait dans la rupture avec le libéralisme économique. L’économie réelle sous le régime ? Contrôle des prix et des salaires (Preisstopp 1936), planification industrielle via le Plan de quatre ans, cartels obligatoires, allocation autoritaire des matières premières, entrepreneurs transformés en *Betriebsführer* qui exécutent les directives de l’État. Propriété privée nominale, pouvoir réel de l’État. Mises l’a décrit en temps réel comme une forme de socialisme (Zwangswirtschaft). Hayek, dans *La Route de la servitude* (1944), y a consacré un chapitre entier : les racines socialistes du nazisme. Avant 1935, le camp marxiste lui-même ne rangeait pas le national-socialisme à « droite ». Il le traitait comme un concurrent socialiste dévoyé. La théorie du « social-fascisme » (Staline/Zinoviev 1924, poussée jusqu’en 1933) assimilait social-démocratie et fascisme. C’est Dimitrov, au VIIe Congrès de l’Internationale communiste en août 1935, qui impose la définition qui va devenir canonique : « dictature terroriste des éléments les plus réactionnaires du capital financier ». Opération de branding pure. Il fallait monopoliser le mot socialisme et coller l’étiquette capitaliste à tout rival. Après 1945, les vainqueurs soviétiques ont imposé leur version. Les manuels occidentaux ont suivi. Et on a oublié que Mussolini venait du socialisme, que les Strasser et une partie importante du NSDAP se revendiquaient explicitement de la gauche anti-capitaliste, et que l’anticapitalisme racial n’est pas le contraire du collectivisme, c’est une variante. Le point factuel n’est donc pas faux. Il est même banal pour quiconque lit les sources primaires des années 20-30 au lieu des récits post-45. Le vrai clivage n’a jamais été « droite vs gauche » au sens scolaire. C’est contrôle collectif vs liberté individuelle. Une fois qu’on replace le national-socialisme dans la famille des collectivismes, le spectre redevient clair.

Arknights: Endfield EP - Liino [Mirairo Rider (English Ver.)] Let the engine roar, until my dreams and I find our way to you. Onto the stage I go, ready to light the future with every move.

$1.6 million dollars in Bitcoin was drained from my account on July 29th in the Cold Card wallet hack. My Bitcoin was in cold storage. My keys were on a ColdCard device kept in a safety deposit box that had never been connected to the internet. This part's nerdy, but here's what happened: Hackers discovered a vulnerability in the part of the hardware wallet code used to create seed phrases. This allowed them to use AI to brute force guessing seed phrases. I was at our cottage and heard about the hack today. "No way this affects me." I thought. I logged into Wasabi––software that lets me view my bitcoin wallets online. Right away I saw lines of red transaction–withdrawals–and I knew. From 9:36pm - 9:43pm on July 29th, every wallet I had had been emptied. 18.25245043 btc gone. That's just over $1.6 million dollars CAD. Perhaps the hardest part about this is that I did everything right. I never shared my seed phrase with anybody. My devices never touched the internet. Everything was kept in multiple safes and safety deposit boxes. None of it mattered. All because the hardware that created the seed phrase originally had one line in their code from 2021 that had a vulnerability. I'm filing a police report and a report with the Ontario Securities Commission. But I don't expect to recoup anything. A part of me is trying to make sense of what just happened. Or try to figure out a lesson in it. I'm struggling. $1.6 million is a staggering amount of money to have stolen. I guess all that I can think about right now is that I'm so damn happy that I'm an entrepreneur and that my earning potential is under my control. Mark my damn words. I'll recover.