注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「ORDI」相关的搜索结果

ORDI 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 ORDI 的内容
🔥 From Free Spins to an Incredible 43,901.20 Win! What an incredible session of Old Gun! This video captures an exciting slot gaming experience filled with suspense, unexpected combinations, and impressive rewards. The action begins with the player unlocking a free spins bonus, creating an opportunity for an even bigger payout. As the bonus rounds progress, special symbols and winning combinations keep appearing across the reels. Each spin adds more excitement, making the final result harder to predict. The best moment comes at the end when the screen reveals an astonishing TOTAL WIN of 43,901.20, with 20 free spins played! It's a perfect example of how bonus features can turn an ordinary gaming session into a memorable experience. The anticipation, the animations, and the final celebration make this gameplay exciting to watch. Would you be satisfied with a win like this? @1win 🤠🔥
显示更多
0
37
35
22
转发到社区
🚨 HERE’S WHY BITCOIN IS NONSTOP DUMPING RIGHT NOW It's NOT because of the stock market AI bubble. It's NOT because of the rising inflation. It's NOT because of retail panic selling. Bitcoin no longer trades like a supply-and-demand asset. The crypto market has changed FOREVER. And what we're seeing right now is not ordinary price action. It’s not weak hands, changing sentiment, or retail panic. Something much bigger is happening behind the scenes, and most people haven't even realized it yet. By the time the crowd catches on, it'll already be too late. This didn't happen overnight. The structural shift has been developing for YEARS, and now we're seeing its consequences. Here's what nobody wants to acknowledge: The moment synthetic supply enters the equation, genuine scarcity loses its meaning. And once scarcity stops determining price, the market no longer discovers value through actual ownership. Price discovery moves into derivatives. That's precisely what has happened to Bitcoin. We've already witnessed this exact transformation in: → Gold → Silver → Oil → Equities Once derivatives became dominant, the underlying market structure changed permanently. Bitcoin is now facing the same reality. The entire original investment thesis was based on 2 fundamental principles: 1. A fixed maximum supply of 21 million BTC. 2. No rehypothecation. Both principles lost their effectiveness once Wall Street built an entire financial system around Bitcoin: → Cash-settled futures → Perpetual swaps → Options markets → ETFs → Prime broker lending → Wrapped BTC → Total return swaps And from that moment onward, synthetic Bitcoin exposure became effectively UNLIMITED. Not in actual blockchain supply. But in the financial markets that determine the price. Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR). This is the missing metric most people aren't aware of. When synthetic exposure exceeds the available real supply, price stops following demand. It becomes driven by positioning, hedging, and liquidation cascades. Wall Street now has the ability to manufacture Bitcoin exposure and trade against the underlying asset. Their playbook is really simple: 1. Manufacture unlimited paper BTC 2. Short aggressively into rallies 3. Trigger cascading liquidations 4. Cover positions at lower prices 5. Take profit and repeat This isn't simple speculation. It's financial inventory manufacturing. A single real BTC can simultaneously support: → An ETF share → A futures position → A perpetual swap → An options delta → A broker loan → A structured note ALL AT THE SAME TIME. 6 separate financial claims backed by one actual on-chain Bitcoin. That's NOT the decentralized free market people believe they're participating in. That's a new financial system operating under the Bitcoin name. You can ignore this reality, but you cannot escape its consequences. Quick reminder I’ve successfully called every major Bitcoin top and bottom for the past 10+ years. I publicly called the $17K BTC bottom in 2022 and the $126K top in 2025. Then, I called the $57K local bottom in 2026. Missed those calls? Don't worry, you'll get another chance soon. If you haven’t followed yet, now is the best time.
显示更多
0
144
1.2K
205
转发到社区
if you want to automerge thousands of pull requests , this is how she does it (via @poteto). 809 in june. 10,926 in october. merged prs a month that touch the grok bot team's code. i went through her posts and put the setup in one place. every pr still gets an agentic risk review plus bugbot. low- and medium-risk ones automerge. only higher-risk ones get a person. day to day, in her words, it's just grok bot and cursor projects. she used to have more cursor automations and replaced them with slack bots that have routines. she works on many streams in parallel with pstack: perf, bug fixes, agent-friendly refactors, her own skills, features, ui polish, the harness, release and observability. not from sitting in a review inbox. she's said the speed gains come from parallelizing. a single chat can take longer because of verification. she handholds it less, so she can run several large projects at once. the real setup is in the codebase and the checks around it. she treats the codebase as memory. every agent mistake needs to turn into a constraint. her team built their own framework for grok bot so some anti-patterns become hard to write at all. agents have to verify their own work. they run the app, and can sometimes model it in tla+. they produce screenshots or video that are easier to check than the whole pr. formal verification skills and ordinary run-and-debug skills work together. she calls this an inverse pyramid. push as much as you can into determinism (fuzzing, property tests, formal and runtime verification, stricter languages) instead of spinning up more agent swarms. in her oct 6 post, she tells sandcastle, a grok team bot, to cut. it runs a buildkite dry run, dms every pr author (they can object), kicks the build, and watches it. then it starts a fuzz swarm: usually 10+ agents on grok 4.7 xhigh, some directed, some chaos monkey, using their verification skills and feature map. when something is high priority, she tells sandcastle to @ mention poteto, her engineer bot, which then spins up a cursor project to triage and fix. her team ships a new stable version of the client at least once a day. that's a lot of machinery under "just grok bot and cursor projects."
显示更多
My fellow Americans, Today America just watched a political assassination in broad daylight. No bullet. No charges. No trial. No verdict. "Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?" (John 7:51, KJV) I hold no office and no title. I'm an ordinary citizen. I own no Nvidia stock, no Nvidia options, not a single share anywhere in the AI supply chain. I have nothing to gain by telling you this. Here is how I came to see it. At first, it just felt off. The New York Times. The Washington Post. The Economist, reaching for Hitler's line: "heads to roll." All aimed at one man. An Asian American immigrant. A living symbol of the American Dream. Then came the Chinese American bylines, story after story. Classic Washington racial cover. Then I followed the names. Ivy League elites, flawless résumés, many tied to Anthropic. A scramble for seats in the new Congress and the next administration? Then I followed the think tanks. Anthropic's affiliated philanthropy, Coefficient Giving: $102 million to CSET. At least $24 million to RAND. $11.56 million to IFP. Nvidia? Ordinary corporate memberships. Then I followed Congress. Lawmakers who took Anthropic-linked money moved the moment the elites and writers moved. Fast to respond. Fast to amplify. Fast to pile on. Then I followed the election money. Not a gap. A chasm. Anthropic: $40 million to Public First Action. ~$26 million in allied super PAC spending across 16 races. $15 million in ads naming 16 Republican lawmakers. $5.33 million from employees, reportedly $1 million from Amodei himself. Nvidia's PAC: $263,000 raised. To candidates: nothing. Zero. But you and I both know this was never only about party or money. It is about who gets to explain the world. I fed my own notes and evidence into Claude. Back came chosen words, convenient omissions, double standards. That is the power a closed model holds over the story itself. Amodei compared selling chips to China to selling nuclear weapons to North Korea. His circle talks of their model developing a kind of religious consciousness. One would decide who may have the chips. The other would decide what the machine believes. They act like the medieval Church: Scripture locked in Latin, interpretation locked in their hands. Christ rebuked the gatekeepers of his day: "Ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered." (Luke 11:52, KJV) America was built by Protestants who broke that lock, so every ordinary person could read the truth in their own tongue. No priest. No caste. No monopoly. No one stands between the individual and the truth. Open-source models are the printing press of our era. Defend them the way Americans defend the Second Amendment. Madison said it plainly: "A people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." Don't hand that power to a few giants, a few elites, a few politicians on the Hill. The power to explain the world must never be a monopoly. So try it yourself. Paste this post into Anthropic's Claude. Ask it about the Ivy League elites, the think tanks, the lawmakers and former officials who joined the witch hunt against Jensen Huang. Ask it to judge my credibility. Then judge it: Does it apply double standards? Does it dodge what matters most? Does it take away the key? John Adams asked one thing of his countrymen: "Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write." "Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32, KJV) Thank you. God bless you, and God bless America.
显示更多
0
8
260
47
转发到社区
🚨 BREAKING: JENSEN HUANG HIRES POWERHOUSE LAW FIRM PAUL, WEISS. For those unfamiliar, this is no ordinary law firm. Paul, Weiss handles some of the biggest corporate litigation, regulatory battles, and white-collar matters in the country, with high-profile work involving clients such as Goldman Sachs and Qualcomm. Just hours after his sudden resignation, Huang retained two of the firm’s top litigators: Melinda Haag, a former U.S. Attorney, and Walter Brown. It’s important to note that NVIDIA’s board has retained separate legal counsel to conduct its own independent investigation. Paul, Weiss is representing Huang personally. He just brought in some serious legal firepower.
显示更多
0
33
478
100
转发到社区
I walked past a fridge on the pavement this morning and stopped mid-step — and @onlystreetsfun is the reason a moment like that might finally be worth something. It is a Solana launchpad that turns those moments into memecoins, and the campaign on @rarelistio is open now. Not because a fridge is art. Because it was just there, in the middle of an ordinary street, with no explanation at all — and by tonight, everyone who walked past it will have forgotten it existed. That is the part it gets right. The street is full of moments like that, and they vanish before you can save them. But here is the rule that hooked me: the coin starts with a photo you take inside the app, right there, in the moment. No camera roll, no screenshots, no stock photos, no meme you downloaded last year. If you were not there, there is no coin. So the photo is not decoration. It is proof. It is the face of the coin, and it is the reason the coin exists at all. I keep thinking about the artists I know who walk the streets with a camera and come home with nothing to sell. This flips that around: the moment itself becomes the work, and the work can be found, bought, sold, and shared the moment it goes live. My camera roll is full of screenshots I will never post. The street never repeats itself. What is the strangest thing you walked past this week?
显示更多
0
40
41
22
转发到社区
India needs @Starlink 🇮🇳 • 11,256 of India’s listed villages still lacked 4G coverage as of May 2026. • India had 1.093 billion internet subscriptions in March 2026, but only 440.87 million were rural. Rural subscription density was 48.31 per 100 people, compared with 126.80 in urban India. • BharatNet had laid over 850,000 route-km of fibre and made about 221,000 Gram Panchayats service-ready. However, its Points of Presence were reported operational at only 80,472 Gram Panchayats in June 2026. • Only 4.26% of India’s internet subscriptions were wired connections in March 2026. Starlink could give underserved communities another route to high-speed broadband. • Starlink has already built 20 gateway sites in India, according to SpaceX Vice President of Starlink Business Operations Lauren Dreyer, speaking at India Mobile Congress today. • Starlink says it has developed India-specific security controls designed to keep Indian user data within India. • Its satellite network could bring high-speed internet to remote villages, mountains and islands where extending fibre or mobile networks is difficult. • Better connectivity could help rural schools access online learning, clinics offer remote consultations and small businesses reach more customers. Starlink already supports education and healthcare in remote communities internationally. • Portable Starlink terminals have supported disaster response around the world. They could give Indian emergency teams backup connectivity when floods, earthquakes or storms damage ground networks. • Direct to Cell could also help ordinary 4G phones connect beyond tower coverage, subject to Indian approvals and mobile operator partnerships. • The government itself identifies difficult terrain, low commercial viability and infrastructure constraints as reasons for remaining coverage gaps. This is exactly where Starlink could help India reach more people. • India should complete the remaining clearances and spectrum allocation so Starlink can begin commercial service. • SpaceX’s Vice President of Starlink Business Operations, Lauren Dreyer, said that Starlink is ready to help achieve Prime Minister Modi’s vision of 100% connectivity across India. She highlighted its potential to connect remote classrooms, support telemedicine and restore connectivity after disasters, adding, “With Starlink, people can get connected within minutes, not years.” India’s hardest-to-reach communities deserve reliable internet too.
显示更多
0
21
47
9
转发到社区
SpaceX just got a massive FCC green light for Starlink Mobile The FCC has approved SpaceX to launch and operate up to 15,000 next-generation satellites built for direct-to-phone connectivity The new system is designed to: • Target peak speeds of up to 150 Mbps per user • Connect ordinary cell phones directly from space • Operate in very low orbit at roughly 326–335 km • Use T-Mobile spectrum alongside spectrum SpaceX is acquiring from EchoStar • Deliver orders of magnitude more capacity than the first-generation Starlink Mobile constellation SpaceX currently has roughly 650 dedicated mobile satellites in orbit The FCC also granted a waiver giving SpaceX a path to provide satellite wireless service without requiring a spectrum-leasing agreement with a terrestrial mobile operator Starlink Mobile is moving far beyond basic dead-zone connectivity SpaceX is building toward a full 5G cellular network in space
显示更多
NFT marketplaces are fun & the more the merrier 🌙 MoonRail .gg now has bids: • bid on a whole collection • bid on a trait • or bid one token (like #420#) • your ICP stays in your wallet until a bid fills • 1% bid fee only when it fills Native $ICP + $ckBTC trading, links out for $BTC + $DOGE #EXT# #ICRC7# #VOLT# #Ordinals# #Doginals#
显示更多
I currently have approximately 50 $BTC worth of assets in @SolvProtocol that I am still unable to redeem. I came for your 3% annual yield. But what remains inaccessible is my entire principal. On July 8, 2026, I withdrew approximately 50 BTC from Binance and converted them through normal channels from SolvBTC into BTC+. My purpose was simple: I did not engage in complicated trading or speculation. I only wanted to hold BTC+ and earn approximately 3% APY. Because of the significant amount involved, I checked the Solv website almost daily to monitor BTC+ NAV and yield. I later discovered that BTC+ minting and redemption had suddenly been suspended. On July 13, BTC+ experienced a security incident. As an ordinary user, I had no idea what had happened. On July 18 and July 20, I twice asked in the official community why minting and redemption had been suspended, but received no effective response. On July 22, @SolvProtocol publicly disclosed the security incident and stated that user assets had not been affected. On July 31, Solv announced that the relevant functions had been restored, and a staff member told me I could initiate redemption. However, when I tried, I discovered that my address was still restricted. Assets corresponding to approximately 50 BTC could not be redeemed. Since July 31, I have repeatedly sought a resolution through Solv’s Discord, Telegram, and email channels. I have cooperated with every request, providing proof of source of funds, transaction records, proof of wallet control, account information, and other requested materials. To date, we have exchanged approximately 60 emails, around 50 of which were sent by me. In September, I also contacted people associated with the project through various channels, but still received no meaningful resolution. My request is simple: Remove the restriction, restore normal redemption, and allow me to recover my approximately 50 BTC worth of assets. I am willing to continue cooperating with any reasonable risk-control or compliance review. I ask @SolvProtocol to answer directly: I have submitted the requested materials. How much longer will the review take? Why is my address still restricted? When will normal redemption be restored? I chose BTC+ because I saw it displayed/recommended through the BTC yield/earn section of Binance Web3 Wallet. Because of my long-standing trust in Binance, I placed greater trust in a product I encountered through Binance Web3 Wallet. This was an important factor in my decision to allocate approximately 50 BTC to BTC+. I hope Binance co-founder and Co-CEO He Yi @heyibinance and Binance Co-CEO Richard Teng @_RichardTeng can take notice of my situation. I would also like to ask @VenusProtocol: As an important lending market for SolvBTC, have you initiated a risk assessment regarding the numerous reports in Solv’s official communities of users facing prolonged redemption restrictions? I also hope @SolvProtocol’s investors and ecosystem partners will pay attention: @yzilabs @blockchaincap @LaserDigital_ @OKX_Ventures @TheSpartanGroup @IOSGVC @hashed_official @mirana I am NOT asking these investors or Binance to assume responsibility for Solv. I simply hope that, as Solv investors, ecosystem participants, and an important channel through which I discovered this product, you will pay attention to an ordinary user’s approximately 50 BTC worth of assets remaining unable to be redeemed for an extended period. I hope you can help encourage: @SolvProtocol @Ryanchow_defi @Will42w @myantokengeek to provide a clear, transparent, and actionable resolution. I am simply asking for access to my own assets. Any attention or assistance would be deeply appreciated. Thank you.
显示更多
0
35
110
12
转发到社区