与「PostQuantum」相关的搜索结果

很多基础设施项目，都是等到问题已经很明显、大家开始集体焦虑的时候，才突然火起来。 那个时候市场反应往往很激烈，留给早期参与者的窗口其实已经很短。 @quipnetwork 让我觉得有意思的地方在于，它选择在“问题还没那么急迫”的安静阶段，就已经在认真布局了。 在机构还没大规模重视后量子安全之前， 在用户还没开始考虑迁移之前， 在算力安全还没成为主流话题之前。 这种时间差，其实比很多人想象的更关键。 因为当真正需要的时候，已经跑通、测试过、被用户熟悉的网络，往往会占据明显优势。 Quip 给我的感觉是它更专注在提前准备，而不是追短期的热点和注意力。 #QuipNetwork# #PostQuantum# @TermMaxFi @easydotfunX #Tenki# @River4fun XOOB @wallchain Alice @River4fun @NomismaNetwork @Polymarket

Preparing multi-chain assets for a post-quantum future. Illia Polosukhin explains how NEAR gets there. With Chain Signatures, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and stablecoins held via NEAR Intents can be secured with post-quantum cryptography and kept confidential, with protocol upgrades handling the transition automatically. Confidential and quantum-resistant. A powerful combination for future-proofing your assets.

I updated my 2023 roadmap diagram to overlay where the items that were there sit in the current Strawmap ( ). In general, a lot of overlap, but: * Some things got reshuffled in order (eg. quantum safety up-prioritized) * Some things deprioritized (eg. VDFs; many EVM improvements) * Some things replaced with superior constructions (eg. Verkle -> unified BT -> PBT; state expiry -> new state types) What's most striking, however, is that some completely new things are in the strawmap that are NOT in this diagram, because they were not in the 2023 roadmap at all. These reflect changing priorities. Notably: * First-class attention to strong privacy. This covers: keyed nonces and recent roots, aspects of FOCIL, lean privacy pool & wormholes * Aggressive scaling in the context of post-quantum. This covers: leanSPHINCS signatures and aggregation, zkzk frames (see ) * Lean-ification of the spec, to assist in formal verification (full FV of everything is only possible because of modern AI) * Blob and gas futures (this idea just didn't exist back in 2023) * Native rollups (SNARKs were nowhere near mature enough to even consider this back in 2023) * A more open design space for the "future of the EVM". zkzk frames already implies that the protocol will expose to users some ISA that's not the EVM - current leading candidates are leanISA and RISC-V. These ISAs are more simple, modern and efficient than the EVM. Once they're there, why not expose them to developers everywhere? (And then, why not turn the EVM into being an IR on top of that ISA, instead of an enshrined feature massively complicating the base protocol?) Though much of the deeper exploration here is too early even for the strawmap. * New state types are not just a replacement for expiry, they're a fundamentally different paradigm to how Ethereum does scaling A common theme in scaling, found in both state types and zkzk frames (both new ideas), is that instead of trying to maximally scale ALL ethereum activity, we try to create specialized mechanisms that have more restrictive properties that make them more scaling-friendly, while supporting the heaviest loads incurred by users and applications today (eg. token transfers, swaps) and tomorrow (eg. privacy protocols). The other common theme is treating STARKs and AI-accelerated FV as first-class objects, that we are okay betting the technical future of Ethereum on. There are recursive STARKs in many layers of the protocol, one particular primitive (the "aggregate to union verified dependencies" primitive) is expected to be used in *three* places in the protocol: EL, CL and DL. This can only be safe with formal verification, which is itself only feasible with modern AI tools. In general, many steps forward in maturity. And a huge amount of hard work by many dozens of Ethereum researchers and developers on all of these features. Ethereum will be quantum-safe. Ethereum will put users' privacy first. Ethereum will be secure. Ethereum will be censorship-resistant. Ethereum will be highly performant and scalable while satisfying the above. And Ethereum will be Lean.

First Principles Ep. 6 with Ron Rivest Long before the internet became a place to bank, transact, or build blockchains, Turing Award winner Ron Rivest helped solve a foundational problem: how can strangers communicate securely without first meeting to exchange a secret? Rivest tells the story of inventing RSA with Adi Shamir and Leonard Adleman, why digital signatures fascinated him even more than encryption, and how cryptographic hashes, government pressure, patents, and standards shaped the security infrastructure we rely on today. Rivest shares his unusually candid views on quantum computing, post-quantum security, and more. Hosted by @Tim_Roughgarden with @danboneh. 00:00 Intro: the two problems that could break modern cryptography 01:10 Why Ron Rivest’s work underpins the internet and blockchains 08:10 Before public-key cryptography, there was no theory of security 11:05 The open problem that led to RSA 13:55 The night Ron Rivest discovered the core idea behind RSA 17:55 Why digital signatures were the real breakthrough 19:14 The RSA challenge — and a prediction that was off by quadrillions of years 28:33 How government pressure shaped cryptographic standards 30:36 Designing the hash functions that made digital signatures practical 33:26 The Fiat–Shamir transformation, explained 38:04 Building a cryptography company before the web existed 42:31 Will quantum computers ever become powerful enough to break RSA? 48:02 The cryptography securing the internet, elections, and everyday life 50:11 What surprised Dan: Quantum giveth and quantum taketh away

Tim Roughgarden, mathematician at Institute for Advanced Study and head of research at a16z Crypto, on quantum computing, blockchain as a laboratory for social science, and AI transforming mathematics right now the way it transformed coding six months ago. 1:35 — The story from Turing to 2026 3:43 — Quantum was "25 years away" for 25 years, then something changed 4:25 — Q-Day prediction + Shor's algorithm + how to spot a quantum agenda 6:37 — Positive quantum applications + we're not doomed on cryptography 9:16 — Post-quantum migration is a coordination problem 12:22 — Blockchain as a laboratory for social science 15:50 — The sociology big bang analogy 17:37 — Computation is a law of nature 19:56 — AI is transforming mathematics right now 25:54 — Start with what you want to build @Tim_Roughgarden

Crypto's quantum arms race is accelerating fast In the past two weeks alone: @trondao put post-quantum signatures on testnet, @NEARProtocol shipped quantum security in its 2.13 upgrade, and the $XRP Ledger advanced a five-part post-quantum roadmap. Zcash's Tachyon upgrade targets quantum readiness too, per CoinDesk Research. The industry isn't waiting for Q-Day to arrive before hardening its cryptography.

Post-quantum signatures are now available for testing on the TRON Nile Testnet. Following the successful passing of Committee Proposal #20628#, FN_DSA_512 has been enabled on Nile, allowing developers to try one of the supported post-quantum signature algorithms in a testnet environment. Please Note: Nile Testnet proposal status applies only to Nile and does not indicate Mainnet activation. More Details here: 👇

TRON's Quantum-Resistant Signature Feature Is Now Live on Testnet! TRON's post-quantum signature capability has officially arrived on testnet — developers are welcome to start building with it. In the face of the quantum era, TRON is taking action to build the most secure blockchain for the post-quantum age. The TRON Nile testnet passed Committee Proposal No. 20628 on July 2, 2026 at 12:10 (Singapore time). Under this proposal, the Nile testnet has officially enabled its post-quantum signature feature, with FN-DSA-512 as the first signature algorithm to go live.

TRON is taking the next step toward long-term blockchain security. The Nile Testnet’s post-quantum signature upgrade brings NIST-standardized quantum-resistant signatures to public blockchain infrastructure. More details from @Crypto_Briefing 👇