与「Publications」相关的搜索结果

Billie Eilish’s concert film ‘HIT ME HARD AND SOFT: THE TOUR (LIVE IN 3D)’ has received raving reviews from various publications: “An epic coming-of-age movie as much as concert film.”

We can track usage in the research community in two categories: ArXiv, which represents "pure deep learning" research, and Google Scholar, which represents all publications, including applications of deep learning to biology, medicine, etc.

Here's an overview of key adoption metrics for deep learning frameworks over 2020: downloads, developer surveys, job posts, scientific publications, Colab usage, Kaggle notebooks usage, GitHub data. TensorFlow/Keras = #1# deep learning solution.

Today a crazy quantum story just got wilder. On March 31, the Google Quantum AI team published a landmark result on Shor's algorithm for elliptic curve cryptography. Technically, the paper was a bombshell: a dramatic 10x improvement over the state-of-the-art. As a stunt and wakeup call to the blockchain space, those optimisations were illustrated on secp256k1, the elliptic curve underlying Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. But perhaps the most striking part of the paper was sociological, not technical. Instead of following standard academic process, the optimisations were kept secret, hidden behind a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof. Google's accompanying blog post mentions they "engaged with the U.S. government". The ZK proof demonstrates the existence of algorithmic improvements without leaking details. Academic censorship with ZK, a historic first! As a co-author of the Google paper I witnessed some of the context surrounding this censorship. To be honest, multiple aspects of that context don't sit well with me. As much as I believe the general public ought to know more, I am limited in my ability to whistleblow. Though let me be clear about one thing: the Google team's professionalism has been absolutely exemplary, and they deserve nothing but praise. Censorship has a way of backfiring. The Streisand effect, where an attempt to bury something only draws more attention to it, is exactly what's unfolding today. First, Google's key optimisation has been rediscovered by the French. And in a thrilling turn of events, a collaborative Shor-at-home challenge just launched. The initiative, available at ecdsa[.]fail, breached a new Shor world record in a matter of hours. Let's start with the rediscovery. Just two months after Google's paper, French quantum expert André Schrottenloher cracks the main secret optimisation. His paper, titled "Optimized Point Addition Circuits for Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithms", landed on the arXiv today. Big congrats to André, who beat several other nerdsnipped experts to it. In a blog post also published today, Craig Gidney, the world expert on Shor optimisations, revealed that he'd been sitting on this very optimisation for a whole year under censorship pressure. Interestingly, André missed a handful of minor optimisations, both from Google's original publication and from improvements found since. It's plausible there's still plenty of juice left to squeeze out of Shor, and this is exactly what the ecdsa[.]fail challenge is about. The verifier program developed for the ZK proof does double duty, automatically filtering for valid submissions. Dozens of compounding small and micro improvements are rolling in. As of the time of writing there's an 8.4% improvement to Google's circuit, as measured by the product of logical qubit count and Toffoli gate count. Nice! The nerdsnipping ran deeper than anyone expected. Over the last few weeks it became clear it extended well beyond André and other quantum experts. Behind the scenes, a small army of amateurs quietly got to work. Inspired by Karpathy-style autoresearch, they turned AI on Shor. Ironically, the verifier program for the ZK proof makes an ideal reward function for AIs. The barrier to entry for this modern style of research is refreshingly low, with several non-experts, even a teenager, finding nice optimisations. Get in touch if you'd like to join a Telegram group with fellow autoresearchers :) Part 2: neutral atoms and qday The story doesn't end with Google. On the same day Google went public, a stealthy startup called Oratomic published its own Shor paper in a coordinated release. It made a splash, ultimately becoming the most upvoted paper on scirate[.]com, a website ranking arXiv papers. Oratomic's claim was wild. By building on Google's logical optimisations and applying custom physical optimisations for neutral atoms, they claimed just 10K physical qubits were sufficient to run Shor's algorithm on secp256k1. That number is mind-bogglingly low. Knowing essentially nothing about neutral atoms when Oratomic's paper landed, I was intrigued and decided to learn more about the tech. I fell straight down the rabbit hole and spent a couple hundred hours on the topic. I got a little obsessed and watched every YouTube video I could find and spoke to a bunch of experts. My conclusion? The tech is real, very real. Even Google recently decided to start a neutral atom lab, a notable pivot from their sole focus on superconducting qubits. If you care about qday, i.e. the day a quantum computer will break the first piece of cryptography in production, neutral atoms demand your attention. I shared some of my learnings on Shor and neutral atoms in a 30min talk at the ZKProof cryptography conference. You can find it on YouTube by searching "zkproof neutral atom". Here's an interesting observation about this duo of breakthrough papers: neither Google nor Oratomic say a word about what their results mean for qday. No timelines. Zero. Nada. That is especially baffling given that the whole point of whitehat quantum cryptanalysis is to inform qday estimations and help the general public make good decisions. So let me attempt to partially fill the silence, similarly to what Scott Aaronson did in his April 29 post. Given everything I know, including scary non-public information, I now put the odds of qday by 2032 at 50%. 10% by 2030. Anecdotally, the US government has its own date: 2035. Originating at the NSA and later adopted by NIST, it's when branches of the US government will be disallowed from using quantum-vulnerable cryptography. In plain language: with hindsight, that date is a joke and should be discounted entirely. I don't see how NIST avoids being forced to pull it forward by years. Part 3: post-quantum cryptography There are good reasons to sound the alarm today, but please do not panic. Rushing carelessly towards immature post-quantum cryptography is a recipe for disaster. IMO a good target date for migration is 2029, roughly 3.5 years out. 2029 happens to be the date selected by Google, Cloudflare, and the Ethereum Foundation. These days most of my time goes to safely migrating Ethereum towards post-quantum cryptography as part of the broader lean Ethereum effort. There's a lot to do. We need to rip out and replace BLS signatures at the consensus layer, KZG commitments at the data layer, and ECDSA signatures at the execution layer. The plan to get there is compelling, and is based on hash-based cryptography. Within the Ethereum Foundation we've developed a Swiss army knife called leanVM (github[.]com/leanEthereum/leanVM) powered by the magic of hash-based SNARKs. Thanks to truly exceptional work by Emile, Thomas, and others, its performance is derisked. Regarding security, leanVM is a jewel, a minimal zkVM crafted for end-to-end formal verification and maximum security. Want to help? There are two $1M initiatives. First, the Proximity Prize (proximityprize[.]org). Solve a long-standing mathematical conjecture in coding theory, improve hash-based SNARKs, and go home a millionaire. Second, the Poseidon Initiative (poseidon-initiative[.]info), offers $1M for breaking Poseidon, the SNARK-friendly hash function.

Défis du JEUDI special femme ou couple 🔞🥵 POSITION LEVRETTE 👄 TIRE MOI LES CHEVEUX 👄 Photo en commentaire 🥵 Ou Video en mp pour une publication exclusive 😱 Merci a 🇫🇷 @Miss_Paola_off Pour la photo ❤️ #like# #commentaire# #defis# @up_crea @kissorpasss @LesdefisdeGlam

An Econ PhD student at the 20th ranked program who is working on stuff they are passionate about will have a better job market than one at MIT who's been doing nothing but phd-app-maxxing since undergrad. People get confused by this because they don't observe *how* successful people came about their insane knowledge bases. It wasn't by relentlessly grinding away at stuff because they had to. They look at Scott Kominers and say "if i grind and learn as much math as he did, i will be successful." You can't! *You* can't learn as much math as Kominers because he gets energized by configuration results for type ii lattices. You will burn out if you try to do it this way. You cannot, through grind alone, learn more about the economics of cities than Glaeser, or about how to maximize a value function than Acemoglu. Research careers are long. Most people give up and stop working on research (graph is share of elite PhD graduates with at least one publication in year X after graduation). If you're starting a PhD, you're presumably doing it to have a successful 40-year research career. The number one factor in whether that happens is not which program you get into, it's whether you find a research angle that energizes you enough to push through the endless barriers an academic career throws in your path. This is why a lot of the received wisdom around PhD applications is wrong. If you're 100% consumed by the predoc rat race already, it's going to be a long, hard road ahead. Obv you still have to do admissions, you should study a lot for the GRE, sigh it seems like taking real analysis is probably worth it. But spending time on the things that energize you about economics is a no-brainer, whether it's policy, or blogging, or whatever, you gotta do the things that light your fire and make you want to be on this road.

🚨 node-ipc is compromised again. Three new malicious versions just dropped: 9.1.6, 9.2.3, and 12.0.1. Socket’s AI scanner flagged them as malware within three minutes of publication. The attack vector: a dormant maintainer account (atiertant) was likely taken over via an expired email domain. The attacker registered the lapsed domain, triggered an npm password reset, and gained publish rights to a package with millions of historical downloads. The payload is a credential stealer embedded in the CommonJS entrypoint (node-ipc.cjs). It activates on require(“node-ipc”), not through a postinstall script. Here’s what it does: •Fingerprints the host (OS, arch, hostname, uname) •Harvests 113-127 credential file patterns depending on platform (AWS, GCP, Azure, SSH keys, Kubernetes configs, npm tokens, .env files, shell histories, macOS Keychain databases, and more) •Dumps the entire process.env, capturing every CI secret and cloud credential in memory •Builds a gzip archive in a temp directory •Exfiltrates everything over DNS TXT queries to bt[.]node[.]js, using a bootstrap resolver at sh[.]azurestaticprovider[.]net:443 (a deliberate lookalike of Microsoft’s Azure Static Web Apps domain) The DNS exfiltration is chunked. A 500 KB archive generates roughly 29,400 TXT queries. The body is XOR-encrypted with a SHA-256 keystream, base64-encoded, alphabet-substituted, and split into 31-character chunks before hex-encoding into DNS labels. Header, data, and footer queries use xh, xd, and xf prefixes respectively. The malware forks a detached child process (env var __ntw=1) so credential theft runs silently in the background. It also exposes a __ntRun export, meaning any downstream code that calls require(“node-ipc”).__ntRun() can trigger a second collection/exfiltration cycle. ESM-only consumers using the import path are not affected by the reviewed package metadata. CommonJS consumers are. This is the same package involved in the 2022 protestware incident. It has a history. If you use node-ipc: •Do not install 9.1.6, 9.2.3, or 12.0.1 •Audit your lockfiles for these versions •If you loaded the CommonJS entrypoint, treat all environment variables, SSH keys, cloud credentials, npm tokens, and local secrets as compromised. Rotate immediately. •Hunt for DNS TXT queries to bt[.]node[.]js and sh[.]azurestaticprovider[.]net in your network logs •Check for temp files matching /nt-/.tar.gz Credit to Ian Ahl (@TekDefense) for first publicly identifying the expired-domain account takeover vector. Developing story. Full technical breakdown and IOCs on the Socket blog:

Today, WorldClaw launches WorldRouter with @worldlibertyfi, one simple account to access 300+ AI models with competitive fees*. No more jumping between ChatGPT, Claude and all the others. Same power, way cheaper. This is your first step into the WorldClaw AgentOS. 👉 #USD1# #WLFI# #AI# #AgentOS# #WorldClaw# #WorldRouter# *WorldRouter rates shown are priced approximately 30% below the corresponding model providers' published list rates at the time of publication. See website for more pricing details.

Ghost 官方主題現在都支援繁體中文了，如果你後台 publication language 設定 zh-Hant，新主題（或是舊主題按 update）就會自動下載繁體語系介面。 1/