与「Purpose」相关的搜索结果

Now that Solana has abandoned the expedition into geographically distributed MCP, it's high time we revisited Solana's broader approach to geographic distribution. Geographically distributed MCP was always weak at best. Even if you ignored the insane latency involved in going from transaction submission to assembled blocks and execution results, it was not a good CR mechanism. MCP's CR guarantees depend heavily on users' ability to send transactions to at least two proposers, and this imposes a trade-off between slot duration and geographic decentralization. If the ratio is not managed, there will be instances where your transaction cannot make it to more than one leader within the slot time. Sending it to a leader you trust defeats the purpose of MCP; it has the same bound on geographic decentralization and it's unclear whether all the extra complexity is justified by this weaker guarantee compared to the status quo. Constellation's leader colocation fixes that completely. Users can now send to all the leaders with ~the same latency, and the Nash equilibrium is to include the top fee-paying transactions. However, I think the current Constellation is not aggressive enough. Solana is rechoosing its spot on the physical distribution spectrum, and current Constellation leaves some chips on the table. In the coming days, I'll write up a design I've been working on that I think maximizes what's possible. I'm talking fully onchain orderbooks that are competitive with centralized systems. All said, the most important takeaway from Roger's talk and the entirety of today is that Solana's people and culture are its greatest assets. There is a pragmatism and relentless dedication to winning that I haven't seen anywhere else!

Immigration Officer ने एक ऐसा सवाल पूछ लिया, जिसकी मैंने उम्मीद ही नहीं की थी Officer: U.S. आने का purpose? मैं: Tourism. Officer: कहाँ घूमने जाओगे? मैंने कुछ जगहों के नाम बता दिए। फिर उसने passport देखा और पूछा पहले भी U.S. आए हो? मैं: हाँ, दो बार। उसने passport बंद किया और मुझे देखने लगा। फिर बोला हर बार U.S. क्यों आते हो? मैंने कहा, बस घूमने के लिए। वो बोला, हर बार वही जगह? मैं: हाँ। अब मुझे थोड़ा अजीब लगने लगा था। फिर उसने जो सवाल पूछा, उसे सुनकर मेरे पास जवाब ही नहीं था और उसी वक्त मुझे लगा कि आज तो गया काम से.. 1/2

The future has arrived Our Robotaxi vehicle lineup now includes Cybercab, our first purpose-built autonomous vehicle without a steering wheel or pedals — launching now in Austin, Texas Designed for safety, accessibility and comfort, Cybercab is bringing autonomy to everyone.

Everyone believes CUDA is NVIDIA's moat, the reason we've maintained our dominance in the AI era. I've never believed that. NVIDIA has only one true moat: its people. And the most important of them is Jensen Huang. I've worked on CUDA compilers, libraries, and DSLs for eight years, from Volta to Rubin. I think I've earned the right to share my perspective on what NVIDIA's moat really is. I hope you'll bear with me. 1. What is CUDA? Many people think CUDA is just a programming language and its compiler, and that NVIDIA's moat comes from the massive amount of software written in CUDA, making it impossible for developers to leave NVIDIA GPUs. This is completely wrong. It's an incredibly naive understanding of CUDA. To me, CUDA is everything NVIDIA does. CUDA isn't just a language, software, or hardware architecture. It's a product defined by a unique customer experience. When you find GPU programming too difficult, CUDA gives you an easier way. When your GPU code isn't fast enough, NVIDIA engineers respond and help you solve it. When a handful of GPUs can no longer push your technology forward, NVIDIA has already scaled its computing platform from desktops to massive data centers. When you need more data centers than anyone else can supply, NVIDIA has already secured wafer and HBM capacity years in advance to meet your demand. That experience is CUDA. It's made possible by the relentless, day-to-day work of everyone at NVIDIA. And the person who brings all these people together, who gives them a shared vision and purpose, is Jensen Huang. 2. What made CUDA possible? Patience. Perseverance. An unwavering commitment to a vision. Around 2006, NVIDIA bet that the future would demand far more computing power, and began transforming GPUs from graphics processors into a platform for general-purpose computing. Initially, it was a commercial disaster. The added costs hurt margins, the market wasn't ready, and the strategy faced enormous skepticism and pressure, including questions from the board. But Jensen persisted. For roughly a decade, NVIDIA kept investing in CUDA, building its hardware, software, and developer ecosystem long before the commercial payoff became clear. Eventually, deep learning arrived. And NVIDIA was ready. Today, this sounds like an inspiring story. But for those who lived through it, it meant a decade of perseverance, doubt, and being misunderstood. Looking back at the history of technology, how many people could have done the same? This is what I've always loved most about NVIDIA. And now, Jensen has been pushed out. This won't kill NVIDIA. The company can still create tremendous commercial value. But it has killed NVIDIA's soul. And how far can a body go without its soul? If this is how Jensen Huang is treated today, how will those of us who built CUDA be treated tomorrow? I love NVIDIA deeply, but I have to say it: NVIDIA is dead.

SpaceX has just unveiled a massive new $50 billion Supercomputing Campus that they want to build in Cochise County, Arizona. All info: • Up to 6 GW across the 9 supercomputing buildings • Construction starts 2027 • Size of each supercomputing building: ~493,000 square feet. • Total supercomputing building space: 4.44 million square feet, excluding support facilities. • SSVEC residential customers are projected to see electricity bill reductions of 10–40%. • Up to 24 GWh of grid-connected battery storage to provide backup power, stabilize the regional electric grid, support local voltage, and absorb fluctuations in electricity demand. Among the largest planned battery installations in the United States. • Additional solar generation in the region is planned to supply renewable electricity during the day and reduce demand on the local grid. • No dedicated on-site power plant or fuel storage yard is planned. • Each supercomputing building will have 10 MW of natural-gas-powered standby generation for critical equipment, operating only during utility outages and periodic testing. • No gas turbines will be installed at the site. • SpaceX plans to fund $3.6 billion in grid infrastructure upgrades, transferred to AEPCO at no cost to its members. • Up to $260 million annually in additional benefits for cooperative members at full buildout, on top of residential bill reductions. • Up to $200 million annually for cooperative members statewide, in addition to SSVEC benefits. • The supercomputers will use dry cooling with a closed-loop water circulation system rather than evaporative cooling. • SpaceX projects zero ongoing industrial water consumption. • The cooling system will be filled initially, with water reused for up to 10 years. • SpaceX estimates annual water usage equivalent to approximately 20–30 Arizona residential homes. • Projected annual water use would be less than 2.5% of a single center-pivot irrigation system's annual consumption. • Permanent jobs: Approximately 1,000. • Construction jobs: Approximately 5,500. • Annual property tax revenue: Up to $103 million in estimated new annual revenue. • Regional economic benefits: SpaceX says its investment will support public education, infrastructure, essential local services, and economic development. • Local suppliers: SpaceX is encouraging suppliers to participate in construction and development of the campus. • Noise mitigation: Equipment will be positioned away from neighboring properties where possible, with setbacks and additional screening to reduce noise. • Nighttime lighting: Outdoor lighting will remain off unless work is underway, with active lights shielded and directed downward. • Dark-sky protection: The campus will comply with Cochise County's dark-sky requirements to limit light pollution. • Nighttime construction: SpaceX says it will seek waivers when nighttime construction lighting is necessary. • Wildlife protection: The campus is being designed with consideration for the region's sandhill crane wintering habitat. This campus's purpose is to build one of the world's most advanced AI supercomputing campuses to train SpaceX's superintelligence models and support scientific and engineering breakthroughs. Learn more:

How does a product get tens of thousands of users with $0 in ad spend? Spotify Wrapped’s share card does it on purpose. The person who sees it immediately thinks what would mine say?

Image 2 Low Poly I gave Fable 5.2 and Opus 5.5 one photo of a cat and a hard triangle budget. They rebuilt it four times in Blender: 100, 200, 500 and 1000 triangles, every count exact. No textures, no image-to-3D model. Just triangles, placed on purpose

🚀 Summer 2027 Research Internship Opportunity! We are looking for passionate research interns to join the Deep Learning Group at Microsoft Research in Redmond for a 12-week internship. Our research interests include: 🤖 Computer-Use Agents: Building general-purpose agents that operate across coding, command-line (CLI), and graphical user interfaces (GUI). 🧩 Environment, Task & Verifier Synthesis: Creating scalable ecosystems for agent training and evaluation. 🧠 Reinforcement Learning: Developing scalable RL methods to advance agent capabilities. 🔄 Recursive Self-Improvement: Exploring how agents can continuously improve their own capabilities and learning processes. Who we're looking for: 🎓 PhD students with strong research backgrounds and a passion for advancing agentic AI. 💡 Experience with LLMs, VLMs, reinforcement learning, or agentic systems is a plus. 📄 A strong research track record, demonstrated through publications or impactful projects, is highly valued. If you're excited about these directions, feel free to reach out with your CV and research interests at qianhuiwu@microsoft.com!

While building Wormbook, we started scanning every launch on @ponsdotfamily for research purposes. 99,866 tokens checked. 351 flagged. 338 had zero-width characters: invisible text hidden in the name, ticker or description 13 had trading orders written straight into the metadata, aimed at AI agents To a human, these look like normal coins. An agent reads every byte, so it can be pushed to buy a token it should never touch, or fooled by a ticker that only looks real. That's roughly 1 in every 285 launches. Every scan is public. See them all yourself:

I currently have approximately 50 $BTC worth of assets in @SolvProtocol that I am still unable to redeem. I came for your 3% annual yield. But what remains inaccessible is my entire principal. On July 8, 2026, I withdrew approximately 50 BTC from Binance and converted them through normal channels from SolvBTC into BTC+. My purpose was simple: I did not engage in complicated trading or speculation. I only wanted to hold BTC+ and earn approximately 3% APY. Because of the significant amount involved, I checked the Solv website almost daily to monitor BTC+ NAV and yield. I later discovered that BTC+ minting and redemption had suddenly been suspended. On July 13, BTC+ experienced a security incident. As an ordinary user, I had no idea what had happened. On July 18 and July 20, I twice asked in the official community why minting and redemption had been suspended, but received no effective response. On July 22, @SolvProtocol publicly disclosed the security incident and stated that user assets had not been affected. On July 31, Solv announced that the relevant functions had been restored, and a staff member told me I could initiate redemption. However, when I tried, I discovered that my address was still restricted. Assets corresponding to approximately 50 BTC could not be redeemed. Since July 31, I have repeatedly sought a resolution through Solv’s Discord, Telegram, and email channels. I have cooperated with every request, providing proof of source of funds, transaction records, proof of wallet control, account information, and other requested materials. To date, we have exchanged approximately 60 emails, around 50 of which were sent by me. In September, I also contacted people associated with the project through various channels, but still received no meaningful resolution. My request is simple: Remove the restriction, restore normal redemption, and allow me to recover my approximately 50 BTC worth of assets. I am willing to continue cooperating with any reasonable risk-control or compliance review. I ask @SolvProtocol to answer directly: I have submitted the requested materials. How much longer will the review take? Why is my address still restricted? When will normal redemption be restored? I chose BTC+ because I saw it displayed/recommended through the BTC yield/earn section of Binance Web3 Wallet. Because of my long-standing trust in Binance, I placed greater trust in a product I encountered through Binance Web3 Wallet. This was an important factor in my decision to allocate approximately 50 BTC to BTC+. I hope Binance co-founder and Co-CEO He Yi @heyibinance and Binance Co-CEO Richard Teng @_RichardTeng can take notice of my situation. I would also like to ask @VenusProtocol: As an important lending market for SolvBTC, have you initiated a risk assessment regarding the numerous reports in Solv’s official communities of users facing prolonged redemption restrictions? I also hope @SolvProtocol’s investors and ecosystem partners will pay attention: @yzilabs @blockchaincap @LaserDigital_ @OKX_Ventures @TheSpartanGroup @IOSGVC @hashed_official @mirana I am NOT asking these investors or Binance to assume responsibility for Solv. I simply hope that, as Solv investors, ecosystem participants, and an important channel through which I discovered this product, you will pay attention to an ordinary user’s approximately 50 BTC worth of assets remaining unable to be redeemed for an extended period. I hope you can help encourage: @SolvProtocol @Ryanchow_defi @Will42w @myantokengeek to provide a clear, transparent, and actionable resolution. I am simply asking for access to my own assets. Any attention or assistance would be deeply appreciated. Thank you.