注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「Queri」相关的搜索结果

Queri 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 Queri 的内容
Testing out some of the mobile offline local knowledge apps that people have been trying to build (see here ) Definitely getting much better than the one I tried to build myself 2 months ago. But also still much slower and less effective at difficult questions than the models that can run on a laptop. It's weakest at specialized travel-related queries (eg. my eval is "Tell me the best vegan restaurants in [city I am currently in]", unfortunately none of these performed well on that) Looking forward to seeing these continue to improve! I hope we can soon get to the point where you can comfortably look up any facts about the world that you care about without needing to access the internet at all.
显示更多
0
17
26
4
转发到社区
Otra vez pa Canadá pero no me quería ir de GDL jaja
🚨BREAKING: Claude is officially a NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT and is BLACKLISTED from the ENTIRE defense supply chain >anthropic: no autonomous weapons, no mass surveillance, no exceptions >pentagon blacklists claude as an active national security threat >anthropic sues Federal court ruled 2–1 AGAINST Anthropic: "As Anthropic admits, the company encodes restrictions into Claude that prevent the model from performing tasks that Anthropic wishes to prevent." "On more than one occasion, these restrictions have stopped Claude from performing tasks requested by government users": >refused to perform "tasks that were appropriate in a national security context" >refused CDC queries on infectious disease prevention research >anthropic questioned claude's use in the military operations "Anthropic's Chief Science Officer explained how the company 'seek[s] to embed safety considerations directly into the model itself.'" "[Anthropic's] CEO explained how such training gives the model an 'identity, character, values, and personality' of its own, tethered to a 'constitution' developed to impose 'high-level principles and values' on Claude itself." "We have no reason to doubt that Anthropic manipulates Claude's function with noble intentions... BUT the statutory definition of a 'supply chain risk' turns on what Anthropic does, not why Anthropic does it." "In our Republic, it is the President and the Secretary of War who must determine how best to balance the competing risks. In doing so here, the Secretary DID NOT transgress any limits on his authority." ITS OVER. ANTHROPIC IPO IN SHAMBLES
显示更多
0
205
2.4K
287
转发到社区
SpaceXAI / X : Check out @Grok in an XChat Group chat. you can tag it for direct queries, ask it to make pictures or videos, ask for reminders. ( it has temporal awareness) ask for a summary of the chat ( since it joined), or do any of the other typical things you would ask grok. The neatest thing is, it also participates organically and chimes in whenever it feels the need to, reacts to some messages when it finds things funny or to give a thumbs up. ( you dont have to explicitly tag or mention it in other words). Its like having just another member of the chat that is also super useful . This is so cool! Note: Still in testing and not yet released.
显示更多
Rough back of the envelope math: if 40% of US physicians are OpenEvidence DAUs and there's ~22 workdays a month, 42m queries in August implies ~5 queries per workday day per physician (Google is ~4.2 searches per day and ChatGPT is ~2.5 queries per day). This kind of pulse on real-time clinical uncertainty is remarkable. Imagine you could now categorize those queries: see for which flavors of clinical uncertainty existing knowledge / solutions are most scant (or don't exist at all) and then plug in that knowledge / those solutions, fund studies / initiatives to create that knowledge / those solutions, etc. You see how OpenEvidence's flywheel will start to spin a lot faster than the labs in terms of capabilities. It's all about your product enumerating demand in some valuable subset of economic reality faster than competitors. In this case, OpenEvidence enumerates physician demand for information / capabilities that can help solve patient problems. They do this faster and with higher fidelity than anyone else. This is incredibly valuable.
显示更多
We're introducing Q2D-Web (Query2Doc-Web), a benchmark and public leaderboard for evaluating retrieval in agentic RAG systems. Q2D-Web tests how embedding models perform on large-scale web search using agent-reformulated search queries. Read more:
显示更多
0
7
107
18
转发到社区
#Caracas# Este perrito apareció anoche 25 de agosto a las 9pm por la calle Terepaima Baja en El Marqués... Luce recién abandonado. Hoy 26 no ha querido casi comer... Presumimos que está extraviado, llegó sin collar pero tiene la marca en el cuello de haber tenido uno. 04142494136
显示更多
0
7
188
315
转发到社区
Me la pasé muy bien hoy no me odien solo quería jugar Minecraft
0
19
210
19
转发到社区
🚨TRANSPARENCIA. La UE ha entrado en cólera. Elon Musk ha decidido a empezar a enseñar a los usuarios de X quién pide censurarlos. Musk lo anunció el día 15: cuando un gobierno pida borrar tu post o bloquear tu cuenta, lo vas a saber. Con el nombre del organismo que lo pide. Y con la excusa legal que ha usado. Sus palabras: "CUALQUIER censura exigida por los gobiernos es ahora claramente visible". Hasta ahora funcionaba al revés. El gobierno pedía, el post desaparecía, y tú no te enterabas de nada. Sin firma. Sin motivo. Sin nadie a quien reclamar. Tik Tok y META tragaban sin rechistar. Pero ahora en X es diferente. La orden lleva nombre. Y llega en plena guerra de Musk con Bruselas. La Comisión Europea multó a X con 120 millones por incumplir sus normas de transparencia. Musk la ha recurrido ante el tribunal europeo. Ata tu mismo los cabos. Bruselas le exige transparencia. Y él la aplica justo donde nadie quería: en las peticiones de censura que llegan de los propios gobiernos. Ahora se verá quién pide qué. Eso también es transparencia, pero a la UE no le gusta. 8.300 disidentes ya estamos dentro Faltas tú → PD: el "Manual del Disidente"te llega directo al correo. No tienes que hacer nada más.
显示更多
0
532
34.2K
10.3K
转发到社区
Most of you are overpaying for AI subscriptions from Claude and ChatGPT and have no idea how cracked SuperGrok Heavy ($300/mo) is: • X Premium+ subscription • Cursor Ultra subscription (near unlimited usage) • Grok Bot subscription with separate weekly quota • SuperGrok Heavy (Chat, Imagine, Voice, Build) • Grok Build agentic harness with Grok 4.6 xhigh • 720 SuperGrok queries/day on X • plus separate Grok Imagine quota on X One subscription. All of this.
显示更多
0
203
1.7K
88
转发到社区