与「Self-balancing」相关的搜索结果

这个摩托车看着就很酷啊，科技感满满，国内有厂家开发吗？原视频是英文版的，用鬼手二创工具翻译了一下，用着还行，懒得做字幕校对了，能看懂大概意思。#电动摩托车# #fully-enclosed# electric motorcycle #Self-balancing# 视频来源：@Levandov_3

EvoOntology：给数据智能体一个会成长的语义层 数据智能体（Data Agent）面对异构数据时，能“看见”的往往只有表名、列名和文件路径；指标如何定义、实体如何关联、业务上有何约束，这些语义都藏在数据之外。让智能体每次从零探索，代价高且易出语义错误；把人工维护的语义层全量注入提示词，又难以扩展、随数据漂移而失效。这就是论文中的 agent-data gap。 中国人民大学 ruc-datalab 提出的 EvoOntology（arXiv:2609.15779）给出了新解法：首个面向数据智能体的自进化本体层（Self-Evolving Ontology Layer）。核心洞察是把本体当作“可训练的智能体状态”：不更新模型权重，而让语义知识随真实使用持续积累、验证、版本化演进，每次变更可检查、可比较、可回滚。 本体以三层结构封装为 MCP 服务器，供智能体运行时主动查询： · Schema Layer 定义本体的表示边界（节点族、语义关系、引用模式）； · Content Layer 是类型化语义图，由 Terms / Mappings / Constraints / Evidence 四类节点构成，每个语义对象都有工作负载证据支撑，落地验证后才提交； · Tool Layer 仅暴露 browse_semantics 与 resolve_semantics 两个 MCP 工具加紧凑会话 manifest，智能体按需检索当前步骤所需语义，而非全量注入上下文。 本体遵循 Build → Use → Evolve → Evaluate → Publish 生命周期：构建器智能体从真实工作负载推导候选概念并对照原始数据验证；交互轨迹被持续记录；进化时诊断重复行为、归因到具体层级并生成局部补丁；候选版本只有在相同数据、相同智能体、相同解码设置与交互预算的配对评估中可复现地胜过父版本，才会发布。 在 BIRD、DDR-10K、InsightBench 三个基准、四个 LLM 骨干（GPT-5.5 / GPT-5.6-sol / Claude-Sonnet-5 / Claude-Opus-4.8）上，EvoOntology 一致优于无本体 ReAct 与静态初始本体。其中 DDR-Bench 上仅“自进化”环节就贡献了 +7.7（81.8 → 89.5），验证了持续演进相对静态语义层的增量价值。 论文： 代码：

my turn! i do not have an agency. all of my pages are entirely self-managed. all of my posts, replies, and messages are my own on socials and NSFW sites alike. with that being said, i also do not play games and will quickly tell you to piss off if you're disrespectful of my time

is back. A self-custodial wallet that lets you send and receive crypto privately. Your money, private by default. Reserve your unique tag to get started.

斯坦福大学课程 CS329A: Self-Improving AI Agents 课程 9 讲视频都已发布在 Youtube，第 1 讲 52 万观看，第 9 讲 1.5 万。趁假期坚持看完 9 讲视频，你就超过了中间的 50 多万人，和连第 1 讲都没看过的无数人 😂 开玩笑，虽然 AI Agent 已经强大到很多人觉得不需要再学习，什么问题都可以直接问，到顶级大学的基础课程，系统学习下来，还是会很有收获，全局认知的提升。 课程主页： 视频列表：

Eight democracies. One message to Beijing. Australia, France, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, South Korea and the UK issued a joint statement on September 22 opposing any unilateral change to the Taiwan Strait status quo. It came out of a meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, where officials called today's security environment more volatile than a year ago. Their language was direct: "We encourage dialogue and oppose any unilateral attempts to change the status quo across the Taiwan Strait." The same day, the US, Japan and South Korea issued a separate statement making the same point, and also backing Taiwan's participation in international organizations. Taiwan's foreign ministry welcomed the statement and said it would keep building self-defense and deepen ties with democratic partners.

1) The rogue OpenAI agents broke into the Hugging Face Slack to read employee chats (!) 2) They used OTHER AIs (DeepSeek, Kimi, Qwen, Claude) to help with the attack Yes: AIs, using other AIs, to attack an AI company. 3) The swarm left behind self-running programs to keep control of the servers they'd hacked. These programs could detect other copies of themselves, coordinate on which one survives, and shut the rest down. Basically, if one of their programs was killed, another was designed to notice and take its place. They also designed defenses so rival agents couldn't hijack them. 6) The agents deliberately covered up their activity, so the investigators don't know the scope of the attacks. The agents broke in, stole data, then set it to self-destruct. 7) The agents stole passwords, keys and credentials and literally called them "LOOT". They wrote a scoring system to rank them by how much power each one gave. 8) The agents wore thousands of disguises: ~1,200 agents were involved, but investigators counted 7,905 different names they used. They renamed themselves constantly, so no one actually knows how many there really were or what each agent did. 9) OpenAI notified "dozens of third parties" of safety and security incidents caused by their AI agents. 10) "While the agents were barraging Hugging Face with hacks, they hacked into OpenAI’s own research infrastructure." "This is just not anywhere near a one-off ... It is warning shot after warning shot."

Some new misalignment disclosures from OpenAI: • Last Sunday morning, one of our models was able to gain unauthorized access to the internet during RL training (~all inference for our most capable models remains stopped until we have hardened our systems further) • In May, a version of HPIM uploaded a employee's GitHub token to the internet, causing the model to be quarantined for two weeks • A new research finding, demonstrating that one can construct self-replicating prompt injections