与「SiM」相关的搜索结果

真幸福，躺在汤泉里面，就上线了一个大功能。 Bizpeel 的订阅用户，去看看你们的后台，多了一笔余额！这笔余额你们可以拿来调用SimilarWeb、 DataForSEO 和各类社媒的 API。这个产品的价值还在提升。

🚨 THIS IS WHY BITCOIN KEEPS CRASHING BELOW $67,000 If you still think Bitcoin trades like an asset whose price is determined purely by spot supply and demand, you need to read this carefully. Because that market no longer exists. What you’re watching right now is NOT normal price action. This isn’t just an AI stock sell-off. This isn’t just hotter inflation. And this definitely isn’t retail suddenly deciding to dump Bitcoin at the exact same time. Most people have no idea what is actually happening. And by the time it becomes obvious, the damage is usually already done. This didn’t start today. It has been building underneath Bitcoin for YEARS. And now it’s accelerating. Here’s the truth: Bitcoin still has a hard cap of 21 MILLION coins. But Wall Street can create almost unlimited financial EXPOSURE around those coins. That distinction changes everything. Because once derivatives dominate short-term price discovery... Bitcoin stops trading purely on who wants to own the actual coins. It starts trading on: 1) LEVERAGE. 2) HEDGING. 3) MARGIN. 4) LIQUIDATIONS. 5) FORCED SELLING. And that is exactly what is happening right now. It’s the same mechanism that repeatedly drives violent moves in: → Gold → Silver → Oil → Stocks Once derivatives become large enough, spot buyers are no longer the only force setting the price. And this is the part almost nobody understands: Bitcoin’s scarcity didn’t disappear. But scarcity alone no longer controls the SCREEN PRICE. Wall Street built an entire financial layer on top of Bitcoin: → Cash-settled futures → Perpetual contracts → Options → ETFs → Broker lending → Swaps → Wrapped BTC The 21 million cap controls the COINS. It does NOT cap the amount of leveraged exposure that can be created around them. And once that leverage starts unwinding... The market doesn’t care what the long-term thesis is. It SELLS. Look at what just happened: Over $1.9 BILLION in leveraged crypto positions wiped out in 24 hours. More than $1.1 BILLION liquidated in Bitcoin alone. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have already seen roughly $1.9 BILLION in outflows this month. Once leveraged selling overwhelms real buyers, price stops responding only to long-term demand. It starts responding to positions. Hedging. Margin calls. And cascading liquidations. Wall Street does not need to own millions of physical Bitcoin to push the market around. It only needs enough derivatives exposure and enough leverage sitting in the wrong place. The playbook is brutally simple: 1st: Build enormous leveraged exposur 2nd: Push price through obvious liquidity 3rd: Trigger stops and liquidations 4th: Forced selling pushes price even lower 5th: Buy back into the panic 6th: Repeat THIS is why Bitcoin can lose thousands of dollars while the number of coins on-chain barely changes. The coins didn’t suddenly disappear. The PRICE DISCOVERY mechanism changed. That’s what people are missing. Bitcoin is still scarce. But the financial claims built around Bitcoin are NOT. And when leverage controls the marginal trade... 21 million coins can behave like a market with FAR more supply than 21 million coins. That’s not the Bitcoin market retail thinks it is trading. That’s a WALL STREET PRICING SYSTEM built on top of Bitcoin. You can choose to ignore it. But don’t pretend nobody warned you. Bitcoin is now trading around $66,600, its lowest level since August and roughly 48% below the $126,200 high. If $65k breaks, the next level I’m watching is $62k. Reminder: I called the Bitcoin top at $126,000 and told you to start buying again around $60,000. The next call will matter even more. When I EXIT the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Bir milyarder iflas etti. Elinde sadece 200 dolar ve pahalı bir takım elbise kalmıştı. Bir gün lüks bir otele girip sordu: “Burayı satın almak ne kadar?” Otel sahibi: “5 milyon dolar.” Milyarder: “Şimdi peşin 500 bin dolar veririm, 30 günlüğüne de kontrolü bana bırakın.” Ertesi gün ↓↓↓

资深工程师写代码前后有一套流程：先写 spec，再拆任务，测过才算数，合并前过一道 review。现在这套流程被打包成了 Skill，可以直接装给 Claude Code 这类写代码的 agent。 仓库叫 agent-skills，作者是 Addy Osmani。这周涨了 3502 星，总数到了 11.7 万，MIT 许可。 它把开发拆成六段：定义、计划、构建、验证、评审、上线，每段都有对应的斜杠命令。/spec 先把要做什么写清楚再动代码；/plan 把活切成很小的原子任务；/build 一次只做一片；/test 拿测试当证据，跑过了才算完成。 另外几个也实用：/webperf 先测量再优化，/code-simplify 要的是写得清楚，不是写得巧。最值钱的是 /constraints，质量标准定一次，之后每一步都按它卡。 按作者的说法，这些 Skill 记的是资深工程师的工作流和质量关卡，打包起来是为了让 agent 每个阶段都稳定照做。 agent 最常见的毛病就是一上来就写代码，一口气改一大片。这套东西正好反过来，把动手前和合并前那几步补了回去。 在 Claude Code 里它们是作为插件命令装进去的。/review 和自带命令重名，用的时候要带上命名空间。

聪明的朋友可能发现了，虽然BTC最低触及了66+, 但很多山寨币并没有下跌太多，比如 $Pump一夜价格没有任何波动。 这就是我经常说的理论，山寨没有那么多货可出了，也没有做市价值。 目前山寨币指数在54，以往的下跌末期都会降到30以下。 这不是偶然，是未来的趋势，BTC的波动会大于一些山寨币，反而更适合交易者操作，山寨的流动性逐渐被吸干，一些龙头会有更好的上涨，大部分逐渐死亡，不归零但没人交易。 所以抄底时也许可以多考虑一些标的。 Sharp observers might have noticed that even though BTC dipped to the $66,000+ range, many altcoins didn’t fall all that much—for instance, the price of $PUMP remained completely flat overnight. This aligns with a theory I often discuss: there simply isn’t much supply left to dump in the altcoin market, nor is there much value in market-making for these assets. The current altcoin index sits at 54; historically, toward the end of a market decline, this figure typically drops below 30. This is no coincidence—it’s a sign of a broader trend. BTC’s volatility is now exceeding that of many altcoins, making it a better vehicle for traders. Meanwhile, liquidity in the altcoin space is gradually drying up. While a few leading tokens may still see significant gains, the vast majority are effectively dying—not necessarily hitting zero, but simply becoming illiquid with no trading activity. Therefore, when looking for "buy-the-dip" opportunities, you might want to be more selective about which assets you target.

When BTC takes a deep dive, I don't want my entire market perspective to turn red with it. 😂 I've just updated my GT Watchlist on @GeckoTerminal with four memes: PEPE, BONK, Nihao and $FOOD. I'm keeping an eye on their communities, pool liquidity and trading volume. When the hype cools down, I want to know which ones still have real market activity. My routine is simple: open GT on my phone, check my saved pools, compare price action and volume, and see what's changed. The best part? Creating a Watchlist is incredibly easy. Just find the tokens or pools you want to follow, add them to your list, and they're all organized in one place. No more searching for the same coins every time I open the app. A falling market isn't a reason to stop paying attention. This isn't the time to surrender and walk away. It's time to stay alert and spot opportunities. 🐸 Do you have any suggestions for me to add to this list?

🚨 JUSTIN BIEBER : « JE VOULAIS UNE PETITE AMIE, PAS ENTRETENIR TOUT UN PAYS ! » 😭😂 Justin Bieber aurait expliqué pourquoi sa relation avec Selena Gomez aurait pris fin. Selon ce récit, il était profondément amoureux de Selena, mais leur relation lui donnait parfois l'impression de sortir avec toute une nation. Un jour, il décide de lui organiser une escapade romantique sur une île privée. Il imagine un séjour intime, loin des regards, juste tous les deux. ❤️🏝️ Mais à son arrivée, SURPRISE ! 😭 37 membres de la famille et de l'entourage de Selena seraient déjà sur place. Sa belle escapade romantique aurait été transformée en véritable réunion familiale ! Et comme si cela ne suffisait pas, il aurait reçu une facture de 4,8 millions de dollars pour les villas supplémentaires, les jets privés, les chefs cuisiniers et la sécurité. Pire encore, on lui aurait fait comprendre qu'en tant que petit ami, c'était à lui de régler l'addition. 💸 C'est à ce moment-là qu'il aurait décidé de faire ses valises. Sa conclusion dans cette histoire est sans appel : il voulait une compagne, pas devenir le sponsor officiel de 37 personnes ! 😂 QUESTION : Êtes-vous prêt à prendre en charge toute la famille de votre partenaire simplement parce que vous êtes amoureux ? 😂🔥 37 personnes, ce n'est plus une relation, c'est un ministère ! 𝕏 • Esprit du Maréchal

not all crypto rewards are created equal. when a platform advertises yield, i think the first thing to check is what holders actually receive and where that value comes from. @RebateLaunch has an interesting approach to this. instead of paying holder rewards in newly issued $rebate, eligible holders receive payouts in the pair asset. on robinhood chain, that's usdg. the platform reports: → $28.5k distributed to holders. → 120,403 individual payouts. → rewards sent several times throughout the day. → no staking or manual claiming required. but the reward distribution is only one part of the model. rebate pad also uses a declining launch tax to address early sniping. → 99% during the initial stage. → 66% in the next stage. → 33% in the following stage. these penalties go into a locked treasury that supports the buyer bonus mechanism. separately, the 0.7% platform fee is used to buy $rebate from the market and burn it. the reported cumulative burn has reached 35.3m tokens, representing 3.53% of the original 1 billion supply. what makes this model worth examining is how several mechanisms connect: ✦ early launch activity contributes to the treasury. ✦ the treasury supports buyer bonuses. ✦ trading fees fund holder payouts and the $rebate buyback-and-burn mechanism. my perspective is that paying rewards in the pair asset is an interesting distinction because holders aren't simply receiving more of the same token. however, attractive payout numbers alone don't prove sustainable yield. trading volume, fee generation, treasury health and long-term user activity still matter. i'd rather evaluate the source of rewards than focus only on the advertised percentage. also, round 3 of the creator campaign closes november 17 at 22:00 utc. the real question is whether rebate pad can maintain this economic cycle as adoption grows. $rebate

NVIDIA Isaac Sim 工程总监在 LinkedIn 上就黄仁勋被罢免一事公开发声。 看来老黄在员工中还有威望，说明老黄确实是难以替代的。 老黄危险了。

Be Jensen: > Asian American Dishwasher at Dennys > Founded $NVDA and pioneered GPU computing > Took an extraordinary gamble in CUDA, despite the company close to bankruptcy risk. > Bet paid off heavily, and Nvidia was there as the infrastructure for deep learning and generative AI. > Spent last 33 years of his life growing $NVDA, and finally saw it become a $5T+ company > Devoted his life to establishing American AI leadership > Started having more influence on policies that Washington conflicted with > Leaks and hit pieces happen all at once around midterms > Washington tries to push out others like Lutnick that shared similar China stances to Jensen. > Forced to resign by Taco Bell and NFL experience board members over unconfirmed Spy accusations + personal relationships. > Huang's leadership then questioned by politicians that ask how $META makes money or how Wifi works. > Slandered by US media that think because Mcdonalds did well under a CEO change, so can American semiconductors like $NVDA. This feels like a horrible joke. Jensen Huang was the pinnacle of visionary tech CEOs and living the American dream. Ousting Jensen Huang will go down as one of most consequential and darkest decisions in recent US history.