与「Slow_Life_Challenge」相关的搜索结果

우리 <느려도 좋아> 정상영업합니다 4회 만에 완전체로 원희 박사를 찾아온 멤버들 💡느리게 생각하기의 효능⬇️ ( #ILLIT# #아일릿# #Slow_Life_Challenge# #느려도좋아#

느리게 심장이 뛰어도 좋아❤️‍🔥 윤아 도령과 원희 도령의 서예 체험기💪 (feat. 어마어마한 벌칙) ( #ILLIT# #아일릿# #Slow_Life_Challenge# #느려도좋아#

😍Foreign tourists enchanted by the Chinese-Style slow life of water towns in the south of the Yangtze River‌. @salahzhang @consulat_de @zhang_heqing @pan_xuesong @xuejianosaka @YDunhai @CG_WangBaodong #ChinaTravel# #tourist# #lifestyle# #WatercolorArt# #reels#

今夜も21時からレギュラーラジオドラマ『野村宏伸のSLOW LIFE』が レインボータウンFMにて放送です📻良かったら是非聴いてくださいね😌

レインボータウンFMでやらせて頂いているレギュラーラジオドラマ「野村宏伸のSLOW LIFE」のアーカイブです🤭✨ こちらから過去の物語を全て聴けますのでオンタイムで聴けなかった方、是非こちらからドラマをお楽しみ下さいね📻🥰

レインボータウンFMでレギュラー出演させて頂いているラジオドラマ「野村宏伸のSLOW LIFE」の収録でした。 今日は全5話分の収録でかなりの長丁場だったのでヘトヘトですが、今回もとても面白い物語になっています🤭 楽しみにしていてねー📻💕

Airwallex founder Jack Zhang on why he turned down Stripe's $1.2 billion offer to buy his company: In October 2018, Stripe reached out. Patrick Collison wanted to catch up, and the two founders ended up spending a whole day together. The proposal was direct: they should either work together, or Stripe should buy Airwallex. Jack's instinct was to slow things down. "Let's just spend more time together," he said. What followed was an unusual courtship. Patrick built out a 10-to-20-page document in a Google Sheet laying out his thinking and asked @awxjack to comment on it. As they worked through it together, Jack had a realisation: "I was like, wow! The vision of the company in the next decade is kind of very much the same. We all wanted to build AWS for financial services." Stripe was far ahead of them. At the time, before Covid it was around a $9 billion company, which Jack notes is similar to the scale of Airwallex today. He was also struck by Patrick himself: "This guy is so smart. The Collisons are always held as geniuses. He's just so intellectually honest about everything, and also able to go deep in multiple dimensions." Then came the offer. Jack breaks down the structure: around $800 million on the cap table, $350 million to him and his co-founders, and roughly $25 million to core employees, close to $1.2 billion in total. Jack met with the whole team, came away impressed, and verbally told them: "I think we're going to do it." But the decision wouldn't settle: "On the back of your mind, are you really going to do it? I flew back and I was walking around San Francisco for two weeks trying to figure it out. I couldn't figure it out." What finally tipped him came from a question he'd asked Patrick about the long term whether he planned to be at Stripe forever: "Patrick said he's going to build Stripe for the next 20, 30, 40 years. I've just never heard a founder tell me that people would dedicate their entire life to building a business. That was so inspiring to me. I'm like that's what I want to do."

Yann LeCun sat across from Lex Fridman and quietly proved that intelligence has nothing to do with thinking. He did it with two sentences about a trophy. “The trophy doesn’t fit in the suitcase because it’s too big.” “The trophy doesn’t fit in the suitcase because it’s too small.” Same words. One swap at the end. In the first, “it” is the trophy. In the second, “it” is the suitcase. You solved both before you finished reading. Nobody taught you that. There is no rule for it. No logic chain. No formula. You knew because you’ve held things. Packed things. Felt the resistance of something too large for the space it was meant to fill. LeCun calls this grounding. “A big object doesn’t fit in a small object.” The machine has read that line a billion times. It has never once picked anything up. It knows the word “big.” It has never been small enough to be lifted, or large enough to be the problem. So when the sentence turns, it has nothing to turn on. You didn’t solve that riddle by thinking. You solved it by having lived. Every object your hands ever closed around. Every door you misjudged. Every suitcase you overpacked and forced shut. Decades of physics written into your nervous system so deep you can’t even find it. That is what answered the question. Not your mind. Your life. LeCun: “You have this knowledge of how the world works, of geometry, and things like that.” Now point that at yourself. Most of what you understand, you could never explain. You cannot describe how you catch a ball. How you judge the weight of a bag before you lift it. How you know a staircase is wrong before your foot confirms it. Your deepest intelligence has no language in it at all. We spent centuries convinced that thinking was the highest act of the mind. LeCun is pointing at something underneath it. Something older. Something the body learned long before the mouth could speak. Intelligence was never computation. It was accumulation. The slow, silent record of a life spent touching the world. The machine holds every word ever written about it. It has never once been in it. We keep asking whether it thinks. It cannot even tell us which “it” we mean.

Elon Musk: "I think if we operate with extreme urgency, then we have a chance of making life multi-planetary. It’s still just a chance, not for sure. If we don’t act with extreme urgency, that chance is probably zero The rate of innovation is not going to be constant; it’s either going to increase or it’s going to slow down. If you look at American access to space with a crew, we were able to go to the moon in ’69. Then with the Space Shuttle, we could only go to low Earth orbit. Then the Space Shuttle retired, and for almost a decade, America had no access to space with people So this is a pretty bad trend, it's trending to zero. We need a very strong trend in the other direction in order to have any chance whatsoever of making life multiplanetary. So that's the reason for the extreme sense of urgency."

Pope Leo XIV has released a new encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, warning of the growing risks of artificial intelligence if developed without strong ethical limits and human control. The Pope said AI should be “disarmed” from military and competitive systems that could allow it to dominate human life. He warned that AI could escalate warfare, replace jobs too quickly and create autonomous weapons that may operate beyond human oversight. At the same time, he made clear that the Church is not against technology or innovation. Instead, he called for AI to be developed in ways that protect human dignity and serve the common good. He urged governments and tech companies to slow deployment in high-risk areas and establish stronger rules